TIMJOT
Posts: 1822
Joined: 4/30/2001 Status: offline
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jeremy Pritchard [B] If you REALLY look at a great military leader you will find plausible deniability, the main difference is that they were never caught, or their military won. These 'great military leaders' were not perfect, and in fact were great by their ability to plausibly deny any act of wrong doing. Montgomery was one, so was Patton, MacArthur, the same with Rommel. They were willing to accept responsibility for victory, but never in defeat or costly victory. The reason that they remained 'great' in the public eye was that they WERE ABLE to shift responsibility lower down the ranks. If you look closely at these, and other, great generals, you will see complacency with autrocity, inability to accept responsibility, as well as willingness to let someone else take the blame (and them the credit). Name me one institution that ever, on their own (without outside or media pressure) who have ever fixed responsibility on those responsible. Scapegoats exist all over, and in every military. [/B][/QUOTE] I have to diagree in regards to Rommel. There is documented evidence that proves he repeatedly ingnored directives regarding the treatment of Jewish prisoners. He aslo quite parodoxically for the times refused SA officers demand to be seperated from their black soldiers. I can say I have never read any accounts were troops under Rommels command committed atrocities. Unless of course you consider the atrocities committed at Normandy by certain SS troops, but the SS were only nominally under his command and besides I think they actually occured after he was wounded and no longer in command. Not sure though.
|