Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted >> RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/10/2008 9:23:49 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		Someone know where the game is at?

(in reply to all5n)
Post #: 151
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/14/2008 3:08:00 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Where is the turn now ?
Please read again the first page.
8-12 hours to answer not 8-12 days.

It is really annoying now and i already think about to leave the game.
It´s simply not my game speed
And btw not the speed that was asked for at the start......

(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 152
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/14/2008 6:01:28 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		My last turn played and sent is still t28 that i played and sent to Vic on the 5th of september. That was the turn that made Vic say that he was thinking about surrendering.

Could the turn have ended up in someones spammail?

I agree on the whole Seille. But dont give up on a excellent game yet. There will always be some issues. Patience is a virtue :)

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 153
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/15/2008 7:40:07 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		The problem is that Vic resent the turn Daniel did not receive on Friday.
Now it´s monday and i still wait for the damn turn.
Daniel should have done his turn friday but if he did where is it yet ?
To be honest with all the long breaks i run out of patience...

Guys please do the turns the same day you receive them and make
sure you forwarded them to the next player. Is it that hard ?


(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 154
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/15/2008 6:49:49 PM   
all5n


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Republic of Texas
Status: offline 		I sent vic's turn to daniel as well.  I sent a separate e-mail asking for confirmation but have not received anything.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 155
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/15/2008 6:53:43 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		Well, on the good side. At least we seem to know where the turn is.

When these "who has the turn-controversies" come up i am always nervous that it will turn out to be me who forgotten to send my turn :) But lets give people the benefit of the doubt before we chomp them up. Maybe he is in the hospital with broken fingers desperatly trying to post a message here but not succeding :)

(in reply to all5n)
Post #: 156
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/15/2008 9:40:14 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		You´re right Grymme, but the delay doesn´t happen the first time.
After a good start in this game we have delays now for nearly every turn.
I hope Daniel is ok and will answer soon. If he had no accident he should
at least be able to tell us he can´t play for some days.
Or he can let play you his turns for a while

(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 157
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/16/2008 11:40:24 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Sent turn 29 to Grymme this morning.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 158
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/16/2008 5:12:10 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		Turn sent on to Vic

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 159
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/19/2008 8:54:28 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Same question as always.
Where is the turn ?

Should be here again....

(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 160
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/19/2008 6:48:23 PM   
all5n


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Republic of Texas
Status: offline 		I got vic's turn to daniel, and i forwarded it to daniel.

Have not heard back yet.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 161
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/21/2008 9:10:11 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		Always the same

(in reply to all5n)
Post #: 162
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 9/24/2008 3:22:01 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		In case Daniel is MIA we should probably end this game, or ?
Can´t see any reason to continue.
What do you guy´s think ?

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 163
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/1/2008 4:44:33 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		Hi

I got email from Danel Yesterday. So atleast he is communicato. He says that Roys surrendered and he gave me option of continuing to play with his empire or to surrender it. So the game is potentioally on again. It would only be 4 players left, with me playing Daniel.

I am in Greece till sunday so you can think about it.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 164
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/1/2008 5:13:15 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		I´m confused. Roy surrendered ?
Why he did not tell us this and why you have to play Daniels turns now ?
He surrendered, too ?

I would continue if you want to play Daniels turns.

(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 165
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/1/2008 6:33:00 PM   
Tac2i


Posts: 2001
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: WV USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: seille

I´m confused. Roy surrendered ?
Why he did not tell us this and why you have to play Daniels turns now ?
He surrendered, too ?

I would continue if you want to play Daniels turns.


I didn't surrender but was thinking about doing so. Daniel convinced me and Vic to let him play our turns instead, so that is what we did. Not sure why Daniel is quitting unless he thinks the situation is hopeless.

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 166
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/1/2008 7:45:26 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		I don´t like the situation and Daniels behavior, but i would continue if one of his
allies will take command over his territory.

@Vic
In case you read this.
Maybe you can implement a option to give allies command over own troops.
So if one of the allied players surrender the other can simply overtake his terrain and troops.
In the actualt case Daniel could use such a function to convert his troops and Terrain to
Grymme´s colors. Would be helpful and his probbaly to do by the actual event engine.

(in reply to Tac2i)
Post #: 167
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/7/2008 9:46:56 AM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline 		What is the actual status of this game ??
Do we continue or not ?

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 168
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/7/2008 5:07:56 PM   
Grymme

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 12/16/2007
Status: offline 		Hi Seille

The Situation. As i understand it is the following.

Vic has surrendered or given his password to daníel.
Roy has surrendered or given his password to daniel. Prob the later.

I got an email from Daniel with a turn and Old Armys password. I dont know if that is his password or who it is. He said in password that Roy was surrendering.

When i opened the turn it was old armys turn. It also said that the Deep Confederation & Muslim Imperium has surrendered.

This leads me to the conclusion that the game currently has 4 players. I didnt play the turn but closed it down instead.

Roy - That i have password to.
Seille -
Allin -
Grymme -(me)


Since i was pretty much allied with daniel & Vic that surrendered my possibilites in the game are slim. I have 26 cities & Roy 18 (44 cities) against your 83 cities. I could ask you to not ally against me, but it hardly seems fair. 

I probably open to continue the game in some form, but it doesnt seem much fun if you are gonna gang up on me. Cant really ask you not to eather though. 

(in reply to seille)
Post #: 169
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/7/2008 7:43:20 PM   
all5n


Posts: 371
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Republic of Texas
Status: offline 		This game is officially dead.  Daniel had the largest empire, and he quit.  The Seille/Allan axis seemed to be on the upswing at the time, but we may never know.  I did have a lot of fun playing this game while it was running.

People that dissapear and just stop playing suck.

(in reply to Grymme)
Post #: 170
RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED - 10/7/2008 9:44:02 PM   
seille

 

Posts: 2134
Joined: 6/19/2007
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: all5n

This game is officially dead.  Daniel had the largest empire, and he quit.  The Seille/Allan axis seemed to be on the upswing at the time, but we may never know.  I did have a lot of fun playing this game while it was running.

People that dissapear and just stop playing suck.


I agree and can understand Grymme that he don´t want to continue.
If it would be possible to merge his own empire with the ones of his surrendered former allies it would be
possible to continue.
But as it is now Allan would pick a lot of Daniels cities.

I think it was a fair game and after i noticed that Daniel and Grymme are allied i was very happy to build a alliance
with Allan. Playing alone was a mistake i made in Iron Age II....

Too sad Daniel left the game this way, very bad manner.
Such guy´s i won´t play a second time. Fortunately there are many very reliable AT players available.

I´m open for a new game.

(in reply to all5n)
Post #: 171
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Opponents Wanted >> RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703