RGIJN
Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006 From: far away from battlefield :-( Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xj900uk IMHO Yamamoto was a strategic genius, there was nothing wrong with his idea to engage the USN in a 'decisive battle', although I grant you his complex plans and strategy were often too much that - ie too complex and inflexible. Also they assumed to a high degree the US doing exactly as predicted (which they usually didn't) and the IJN commanders on teh ground (which wasn't actually Yamamoto's fault but rather the prodcut of poor training at IJN staff college which tended to mould officers in a particular way & rigid line of thinking and discouraged 'thinking off the cuff') being able to carry them out exactly as planned. and Nagumo, on the other hand, was a wiley opponent, but he characterised many of the Japanese admirals (in interesting contest to the foot-soldiers and actual pilots, who were full of the Banzai spirit) by being overtly cautious, almost timid. He was over-cautious at Pearl Harbour by not sending out the 3rd strike (either to hit the shore installations, docks or search for the US carriers one of which he could have found and sunk, having virtually no defensive CAP), and at Midway (admittedly aided by faulty reconissance) he dithered and dallied too long at the wrong time before deciding not to send out any strikes against the Yorktown (which had finaly been spotted) but rather waiting for his initial Midway strikes to return & turn around. Thus the IJN were always off-balance (and genuinely unlucky) in a battle they should have walked As for the overall strategy, I agree that the japanese were doomed to force the US into a decisive clash ASAP. And yes, Yamamoto was well aware of that fact. Even before the war broke out he was rather against one and he was quite aware of the overwhelming power the US had to their avail. And very often the japanese war was an issue of zero synergy between IJN & IJA. Both branches even were at enmity, impossible to grasp for me today. I think Yamamoto fought as best as he could against such "inbuilt" troubles, but did not succeed very well in this. But his genius failed extraordinary in the design stage of the MI operation. Aside from the countless ifs and expectations (as said before), he was just too overconfident to see the perils of that move. When the plan was exercised in a battle game in early April, the results were shocking. Even with a lot of the optimistic assumptions of the Americans applied, the IJN either lost badly or it came to a close call at the most. Though Y.I. sept aside any doubts, from that point on the commanding officer (Nagumo) lost any poise and spirit. The "decisive" battle was almost doomed at that time already. And after Coral Sea things worsened when KB was cut short of CarDiv 5 (SHOKAKU & ZUIKAKU) plus that they were certain to have sunk two US fleet carriers. But though a bold battle in a "decisive" manner actually demands bold perfomance (even more so considering the exercise games in April) the battle wasn´t postponed or the layout changed. Yamamoto even granted his fleet the luxury not to sail with ZUIKAKU. Though she was stripped of some A/C and pilots, spare AirGroups would have been available to substitute them at ZUIKAKU (at least temporarily). But no, they got to sail into desaster undaunted. "Shattered Sword" is one of the greatest books ever on this topic. It´s thoroughly researched and makes a clean sweep with many rumors and wrong "facts" around the Battle of Midway. quote:
ORIGINAL: xj900uk HOwever, Yamamoto made one serious error during his career, and that was to get the IJN sucked into a war of attrition over Guadacanal. THe Japs should have either gone in in strength at the very beginning, or else cut their losses & pulled out. The IJN (partly through faulty intelligence) at first committed troops piece-meal and failed to fully inform (as usual) the Army of what was going on. After that both sides took horrendous losses in the campaign, but the US could afford & replace them (with difficulty) and the IJN couldn't. Also after Santa Cruz he stripped the carriers of their remaining air-groups, virtually every last experienced pilot off them, and sent them to Rabaul in c. late November to reinforce air operations SE down the Solomons slot. They accomplished little and lost heavily, mainly through non-combat operational losses (the weather at that time of year was bad, with loads of storms). Thus the depleted carriers were forced to start training new air groups basically from scratch, with only a handful of experienced pilots (mainly those returning from injury) to assist with the advanced training (which the Japs always carried out near the front lines). The results, by the time of hte Marianas Turkey shoot in mid-'44, were obvious for all to see, with the new IJN pilots not being a patch on the old and thus the USN could shoot them down in droves (which they did). I honestly believe this strategic error can be firmly laid at Yamamoto's door. You´re right. They truly suffered tremendously... The valve for the lethal loss of blood later on was set in 1942 already.
|