Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: next Allied move?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> RE: next Allied move? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: next Allied move? - 2/9/2009 10:20:03 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
not much action today, aside from some flopped night bombing by Betties and Helens and the daily recon ops. Not even my petty barges came under fire last turn. And the day before six or seven of them sunk from these damn patrol bombers...

The transport bug continues to upset me. Really annoying thing to give orders to load "Unit XYZ" but some doofus at the pier (or wherever this moron resides) determines "Unit 123" to get onboard instead. Or no one at all.
One of the key tactics in my defensive system is to be as flexible and as quick as possible under the given circumstances. But this is getting out of the window yet...

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 361
RE: next Allied move? - 2/10/2009 2:34:58 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
Sep 9th, 1943

another IJ barge sunk after hits from patrol bombers.
Allied shipping traffic in the Western Coral Sea undaunted.
No Air Action (at day).
DDs trying to resume FT operations. Very curious if it works now.

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 362
barge war - 2/10/2009 3:39:12 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
have not counted the killed barges so far yet, but I guess the losses must be about 50...80. Wondering if I am going to run out of these moderately helpful vessels when all from the database (about 100 or so) are lost then or if they will revive after some time?!?

these sort of losses are no wonder to me, considering how exposed these tiny nutshells operate most of the time...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 363
RE: barge war - 2/10/2009 3:42:34 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
So may be I should keep them sheltered in tunnels (as historcal) and they won´t sink down to the bottom. Instead, they will just rust away after some decades...






(actual picture taken at Rabaul...)

Attachment (1)

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 364
110 days short of the End - 2/10/2009 7:44:13 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
Hey folks - turn 500 is done by now!

Only a few more than hundred days and we´re at the end of this truly great game we both germans having here in the Pacific!

But unfortunately, there is no much reason to celebrate. Not so because of the real war happenings but because of the strange "surprises" built into this game...!
Will post some details of the bugs we´re encountering lately in the forums "Tech Support" section.

Aside from this, MY own (IJA) patrol bombers finally hit some target... the first US barge was sunk!






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by RGIJN -- 2/10/2009 7:45:43 PM >

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 365
RE: 110 days short of the End - 2/11/2009 4:12:55 AM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
my personal favorite is waiting on the last two Nell sqd's to arrive at Truk, and they are empty instead of having 18 bombers each. So much for late game reinforcements. 

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 366
RE: 110 days short of the End - 2/11/2009 10:50:53 AM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: borner

my personal favorite is waiting on the last two Nell sqd's to arrive at Truk, and they are empty instead of having 18 bombers each. So much for late game reinforcements. 


Which G3M squads do you mean in particular? I never got an empty Nell unit (originally), but I agree their supply is ridicoulous. Same as for many other Types. So it happens that if you disband say a Nell unit of course they will return empty and it takes a long time to "fill up" even up to 6 A/C (two months at least!). Actually, I never had a full strength G3M Daitai with all it´s 27 planes. I think it´s impossible to gain.

Though it´s very hard for the japanese player to get along with such reinforcement rates, IMHO it´s pretty historical. After the 1942 hightide (especially in autumn 42 the japanese pumped a lot of A/C into the Solomons theathre) there came a steep fall down into the agony of late 1943. Had the four airdromes at Rabaul always up to 250...400 A/C from late 42 to Oct. 43, the Imperial High Command had to abandon this great airbase in steps from Nov. 1943 to mid-February 1944 when the last servicable wrecks were withdrawn to Truk (after the disaster there). Countless numbers of planes and -above all- the last surviving pilot cracks were lost to nothing achieved with this sacrifice. They even sent to the slaughter the CV Airgroups, which returned quite depleted, if at all.


(in reply to borner)
Post #: 367
RE: 110 days short of the End - 2/11/2009 10:57:39 AM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
another recon mission by paratroops at Vila, which is beeing reconnoitered some time by now.
Otherwise, some LBA tried to bomb transport convoys in the Tulagi area but failed to succeed.




AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/11/43

Weather: Clear

Sub attack at 35,38

Japanese Ships
AG 119, Shell hits 12, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Sargo


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on Hoskins , at 16,31


Allied aircraft
SBD Dauntless x 55
TBF Avenger x 9
P-40E Kittyhawk x 18
P-40E Warhawk x 18


no losses

Runway hits 3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on Nevea , at 50,43


Allied aircraft
SBD Dauntless x 45
P-39D Airacobra x 15
P-40E Kittyhawk x 24
F-5A Lightning x 2


no losses

Japanese ground losses:
Men lost 12

Port hits 3
Port supply hits 1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on TF, near Sepi at 38,38


Allied aircraft
Hudson x 6


no losses

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 24
AP Kinugasa Maru

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air attack on TF, near Sepi at 38,38


Allied aircraft
PB4Y Liberator x 3


no losses

Japanese Ships
PC Ch 24


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Vila

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 15 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 2927 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 3)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 368
RE: 110 days short of the End - 2/11/2009 10:58:52 AM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
Oh, they have armor??? Now that´s new...


Anyway, not enogh to withstand the deadly projectiles of a 20mm Oerlikon!

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by RGIJN -- 2/11/2009 10:59:03 AM >

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 369
Armoured barges - 2/11/2009 11:10:22 AM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Didn't you know? They used to hang empty saki bottles along the side in the hope that allied shells might bounce off them

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 370
RE: Armoured barges - 2/11/2009 12:51:42 PM   
borner


Posts: 1485
Joined: 3/20/2005
From: Houston TX
Status: offline
The sooner you hang them on the side after you drink them empty, the better the crews thought they would work! 

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 371
RE: Armoured barges - 2/11/2009 2:19:11 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Funnily enough, there was a lack of feedback from barges who had been attacked & shot up, whether good or bad. In fact, I don't think there were any barges left to make feedback...

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 372
RE: Armoured barges - 2/11/2009 5:58:36 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Funnily enough, there was a lack of feedback from barges who had been attacked & shot up, whether good or bad. In fact, I don't think there were any barges left to make feedback...


Oh no, I still have plenty left. But these crews in particular turned from drunken to drowned, so no other feedback available than gurgling and some little blebs that rise up from the bottom... Not to forget the countless bottles scattered in the Solomons now. And there are no letters within...


(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 373
RE: Armoured barges - 2/11/2009 6:38:42 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: borner

The sooner you hang them on the side after you drink them empty, the better the crews thought they would work! 


the stuff might also ease the impact of the hits... making them to belive its just bad weather once more...

(in reply to borner)
Post #: 374
failed experiment - 2/11/2009 10:00:03 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
Last night I sent two DDs (separately) out into Woodlark Isl. anchorage. Large allied transport fleets are reported there. And I know that Fuelli has based (at least part of) his battle fleet at GG. The plan was to land some fishes into the bellies of any ship. I assumed he would come out since he saw my forces in the area.
You´ll think "wow, what a silly suicidal move".


I agree it certainly looks like that, but more than once it worked and sometimes I even got out without a scratch. Nomad can tell you the tale... But not so this time, unfortunately... Both DDs sacrified in vain.



AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 09/13/43

Weather: Rain

Night Time Surface Combat at 0,0

Japanese Ships
DD Shimotsuki, Shell hits 32, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Pensacola
CA Quincy
CL Santa Fe
DD Fletcher
DD Converse
DD Foote
DD Spence
DD Thatcher
DD Claxton
DD Aulick
DD Calahan
DD Flusser
DD Farragut


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat at 0,0

Japanese Ships
DD Susuzuki, Shell hits 17, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Pensacola
CA Quincy, Shell hits 1
CL Santa Fe
DD Fletcher
DD Converse
DD Foote
DD Spence
DD Thatcher
DD Claxton
DD Aulick
DD Calahan
DD Flusser
DD Farragut


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by RGIJN -- 2/11/2009 10:07:00 PM >

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 375
RE: failed experiment - 2/11/2009 10:17:38 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
This time I got surprised and shot into pieces.

The "surprise" mechanism is quite strange built into UV anyway. The concept in general is fine, but the way it works I cannot grasp. As stated earlier from the allied POV, it lacks some reality. (A transport fleet which got heavy shooting already can´t be surprised if they face their foe for another round...)
But OK OK OK, I know - such PC games are "just" computer programmes which work straight digital supported by some dicees...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 376
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 9:41:34 AM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 377
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 10:16:44 AM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found


good idea, but I don´t think so. At least I never experienced any "miss" when two opponent fleets met at one certain spot...

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 378
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 10:45:03 AM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
I have on a few occassions. Also, i f the captain/force commander is savy enough, he can move his force out of the way of a bigger/larger/more powerful force which has certainly happened to me (unloading transport force had enough presence of mind to undock and leg it just before the Yamato & Mutsu came around the headland)

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 379
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 12:19:00 PM   
Kingfisher

 

Posts: 234
Joined: 6/16/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Is there the chance/possibility built into the encouter tables that the fleets will miss one another? Particularly if one fleet, eg here the Japanese, is one small solitary and fast ship trying to do some 'blockade running' and doesnt' particularly want to be found


At first glance one would think not if the side that is blockading has a picket of radar equipped ships.

Then again, there was the battle of Savo Island...

_____________________________

"splendid was their tactic of diving upon our force from the direction of the sun, taking advantage of intermittent clouds"

-Captain Takahisa Amagai, KAGA, June 4th 1942

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 380
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 12:26:25 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Tokyo Express in the last qtr of 1942 managed a few unchallenged runs to Guadacanal at night. The bigger the flotilla though, the more likely of being spotted/challenged by the US pickets
Even with the advange of radar, the US had great difficulty in distinguishing small fast Jap destroyers from the clutter of Slot islands

(in reply to Kingfisher)
Post #: 381
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 5:56:50 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
I agree it could a bit depend on the Commanders and their aggressiveness. And maybe the setup: if both TFs have orders "do not react" maybe its possible that they will exchange just flag or light signals instead of shells and torpedoes...

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 382
RE: failed experiment - 2/12/2009 8:02:21 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
The Japanese were certainly masters of stealth & infiltration.  Running the Tokyo Express, their orders were always not to engage if possible even though Admiral 'Tiger' Tanaka, the architect behind them, was one of the most agressive leaders on the IJN staff.  They wanted the supplies to get through to their troops on Guadacanal,  not engage the USN in a shooting match.
Just been looking a few things up, at one point in October-November the supplies were coming in virtually daily,  individual fast DD's were almost impossible to detect (although they couldn't carry much, just a few oil drums filled with rice & ammo which they used to heave over the side & hope they drifted onto the Japanese-held beach) but when they sent through bigger fast convoys the US invariably got lucky and found them

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 383
IJ leaders - 2/12/2009 8:57:54 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
Strange enough Tanaka Raizo was edged out by the Imperial High Command after the Guadalcanal campaign... Aside from his naval abilities he always put his mind straight out, but criticism certainly ruined your career in the closeminded Japanese system of hierarchy...

So dumbs like Kondo or Nagumo ruled over the fleets and brought them to the bottom. Command was assigned by seniority instead of skill. Quite foolish...
IMHO, even the "great" Yamamoto Isoroku wasn´t the genius he is claimed to be often. His complex & troublesome battleplans mostly depended on too much IFs and lacked some sense for the (expected) enemy strength, fitness and determination. He and Nagumo Chuichi along with some bad luck lost the battle of Midway. And bad luck was the scrawniest factor in this equation!

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 384
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 7:51:15 AM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
IMHO Yamamoto was a strategic genius,  there was nothing wrong with his idea to engage the USN in a 'decisive battle', although I grant you his complex plans and strategy were often too much that - ie too complex and inflexible.  Also they assumed to a high degree the US doing exactly as predicted (which they usually didn't) and the IJN commanders on teh ground (which wasn't actually Yamamoto's fault but rather the prodcut of poor training at IJN staff college which tended to mould officers in a particular way & rigid line of thinking and discouraged 'thinking off the cuff') being able to carry them out exactly as planned.
HOwever,  Yamamoto made one serious error during his career, and that was to get the IJN sucked into a war of attrition over Guadacanal.  THe Japs should have either gone in in strength at the very beginning, or else cut their losses & pulled out. The IJN (partly through faulty intelligence) at first committed troops piece-meal and failed to fully inform (as usual) the Army of what was going on. After that both sides took horrendous losses in the campaign,  but the US could afford & replace them (with difficulty) and the IJN couldn't.  Also after Santa Cruz he stripped the carriers of their remaining air-groups, virtually every last experienced pilot off them, and sent them to Rabaul in c. late November to reinforce air operations SE down the Solomons slot.  They accomplished little and lost heavily, mainly through non-combat operational losses (the weather at that time of year was bad, with loads of storms).  Thus the depleted carriers were forced to start training new air groups basically from scratch, with only a handful of experienced pilots (mainly those returning from injury) to assist with the advanced training (which the Japs always carried out near the front lines).
The results,  by the time of hte Marianas Turkey shoot in mid-'44,  were obvious for all to see, with the new IJN pilots not being a patch on the old and thus the USN could shoot them down in droves (which they did).  I honestly believe this strategic error can be firmly laid at Yamamoto's door.

Nagumo, on the other hand, was a wiley opponent,  but he characterised many of the Japanese admirals (in interesting contest to the foot-soldiers and actual pilots, who were full of the Banzai spirit) by being overtly cautious, almost timid.  He was over-cautious at Pearl Harbour by not sending out the 3rd strike (either to hit the shore installations, docks or search for the US carriers one of which he could have found and sunk, having virtually no defensive CAP), and at Midway (admittedly aided by faulty reconissance) he dithered and dallied too long at the wrong time before deciding not to send out any strikes against the Yorktown (which had finaly been spotted) but rather waiting for his initial Midway strikes to return & turn around.  Thus the IJN were always off-balance (and genuinely unlucky) in a battle they should have walked

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 385
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 10:11:58 AM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk
IMHO Yamamoto was a strategic genius, there was nothing wrong with his idea to engage the USN in a 'decisive battle', although I grant you his complex plans and strategy were often too much that - ie too complex and inflexible. Also they assumed to a high degree the US doing exactly as predicted (which they usually didn't) and the IJN commanders on teh ground (which wasn't actually Yamamoto's fault but rather the prodcut of poor training at IJN staff college which tended to mould officers in a particular way & rigid line of thinking and discouraged 'thinking off the cuff') being able to carry them out exactly as planned.

and

Nagumo, on the other hand, was a wiley opponent, but he characterised many of the Japanese admirals (in interesting contest to the foot-soldiers and actual pilots, who were full of the Banzai spirit) by being overtly cautious, almost timid. He was over-cautious at Pearl Harbour by not sending out the 3rd strike (either to hit the shore installations, docks or search for the US carriers one of which he could have found and sunk, having virtually no defensive CAP), and at Midway (admittedly aided by faulty reconissance) he dithered and dallied too long at the wrong time before deciding not to send out any strikes against the Yorktown (which had finaly been spotted) but rather waiting for his initial Midway strikes to return & turn around. Thus the IJN were always off-balance (and genuinely unlucky) in a battle they should have walked




As for the overall strategy, I agree that the japanese were doomed to force the US into a decisive clash ASAP. And yes, Yamamoto was well aware of that fact. Even before the war broke out he was rather against one and he was quite aware of the overwhelming power the US had to their avail.
And very often the japanese war was an issue of zero synergy between IJN & IJA. Both branches even were at enmity, impossible to grasp for me today. I think Yamamoto fought as best as he could against such "inbuilt" troubles, but did not succeed very well in this.

But his genius failed extraordinary in the design stage of the MI operation. Aside from the countless ifs and expectations (as said before), he was just too overconfident to see the perils of that move. When the plan was exercised in a battle game in early April, the results were shocking. Even with a lot of the optimistic assumptions of the Americans applied, the IJN either lost badly or it came to a close call at the most. Though Y.I. sept aside any doubts, from that point on the commanding officer (Nagumo) lost any poise and spirit. The "decisive" battle was almost doomed at that time already. And after Coral Sea things worsened when KB was cut short of CarDiv 5 (SHOKAKU & ZUIKAKU) plus that they were certain to have sunk two US fleet carriers. But though a bold battle in a "decisive" manner actually demands bold perfomance (even more so considering the exercise games in April) the battle wasn´t postponed or the layout changed. Yamamoto even granted his fleet the luxury not to sail with ZUIKAKU. Though she was stripped of some A/C and pilots, spare AirGroups would have been available to substitute them at ZUIKAKU (at least temporarily).
But no, they got to sail into desaster undaunted.

"Shattered Sword" is one of the greatest books ever on this topic. It´s thoroughly researched and makes a clean sweep with many rumors and wrong "facts" around the Battle of Midway.


quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk


HOwever,  Yamamoto made one serious error during his career, and that was to get the IJN sucked into a war of attrition over Guadacanal.  THe Japs should have either gone in in strength at the very beginning, or else cut their losses & pulled out. The IJN (partly through faulty intelligence) at first committed troops piece-meal and failed to fully inform (as usual) the Army of what was going on. After that both sides took horrendous losses in the campaign,  but the US could afford & replace them (with difficulty) and the IJN couldn't.  Also after Santa Cruz he stripped the carriers of their remaining air-groups, virtually every last experienced pilot off them, and sent them to Rabaul in c. late November to reinforce air operations SE down the Solomons slot.  They accomplished little and lost heavily, mainly through non-combat operational losses (the weather at that time of year was bad, with loads of storms).  Thus the depleted carriers were forced to start training new air groups basically from scratch, with only a handful of experienced pilots (mainly those returning from injury) to assist with the advanced training (which the Japs always carried out near the front lines).
The results,  by the time of hte Marianas Turkey shoot in mid-'44,  were obvious for all to see, with the new IJN pilots not being a patch on the old and thus the USN could shoot them down in droves (which they did).  I honestly believe this strategic error can be firmly laid at Yamamoto's door.



You´re right. They truly suffered tremendously... The valve for the lethal loss of blood later on was set in 1942 already.

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 386
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 12:26:56 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
In the run-up to the battle of Midway, the Japanese were suffering with what Yamamoto himself described as 'The Victory Disease' and were woefully overconfident. True they coudl have had the Zuikaku manned with scratch airgroups made up of the survivors of the Coral Sea, which may have tipped the balance but on the other hand could have made a disaster even worse if that too had been lost. Overall though the Japanese could have got her ready for the fleet to sail but decided they wouldn't need her - a sure sign of overconfidence.
It is true also that Yamamoto and Nagumo didn't get on. Both were pragmatic realists who knew the overall strength of the US would eventually crush the Japanese if not checked, however they went about it in vastly different ways. Yamamoto knew their ownly realistic hope was to knock the US carriers out ASAP then try to negotiate a peace (which the US would proably never have accepted anyway!) whilst Nagumo was so concerned about the building US strenght he was loath to commit any Japanese assets or forces in case they were lost. He wrote in his diaries a fascinating quote which sums up his whole attitude to the conflict : "It is my duty to protect the fleet for His Majesty, it will be invaluable in the long battles that lie ahead so it should not be thrown away in any kind of reckless gamble".
Nagumo both privately and publically saw Midway as just that - a reckless gamble - and the outcomes of the war-game/simulations experimented with in April which saw most of his ships lying on the bottom or else seriously damaged did little to improve his feelings about the outcome of the whole enterprise. Yamamoto was actually advised to relieve him of command (possibly to be replaced by the commander of the Hiryu who went down pointlessly with his ship at Midway, can't remember his name at the moment but he was certainly less cautious and served as Nagumo's 2nd-in-command during the battle) and after toying with the idea decided against it, as it would almost certainly dent the fleets morale somewhat

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 387
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 2:08:38 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Yamamoto was actually advised to relieve him of command (possibly to be replaced by the commander of the Hiryu who went down pointlessly with his ship at Midway, can't remember his name at the moment but he was certainly less cautious and served as Nagumo's 2nd-in-command during the battle) and after toying with the idea decided against it, as it would almost certainly dent the fleets morale somewhat



Yamaguchi Tamon was the man. To be honest, I am not entirely sure what would have happen with him in command. But worse than with Nagumo certainly not. He was a guy full of fighting spirit and he was admired in the navy due to his capabilities. I think this fellow would have attacked with any plane available (no matter if bomb or torp armed) instead to sit and wait. But he could not even out the flaws of the general battle design either. Maybe he would have received some pounding too. Most probably I guess. But had he lost the entire KB?
Would be interesting though!





Attachment (1)

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 388
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 4:12:12 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Thanks, I'd 4gotten his name.
There's an interesting note to the battle which has been largely overlooked, and Yamaguchi oddly enough could actually have rescued it for the Japanese before they'd thrown it away. The moment the third signal from the Jap spotter plane circling above TF 17 reached the bridge which caused so much consternation and confusion "Unidentified force appears to be accompanied by an aircraft carrier, bringing up the rear", it was also flashed across to Yamaguchi in the Hiryu (being 2nd in command, he also got all the important signals after they'd been received in the Akagi).
He immediately flashed back to Nagumo 'Permission to launch strike against unidentified target immediately' and was refused. At that time the Hiryu still had it's second strike of about 18 Vals and a dozen or so Kates sitting on the deck waiting to go and armed with torpedo's and anti-shipping bombs (they'd been unable to strike down because of landing/rotating CAP planes, which is why they'd been slow to obey Nagumo's order half an hour before to send down the 2nd strike to the hanger & re-arm with GP bombs to hit Midway again). Also Kaga still had a good number of planes equipped with torpedo's and anti-ship bombs on deck as it too had had to delay because of rotating CAP.
If Nagumo had said 'yes, go' at that time, Hiryu could have launched 30 strike planes and Kaga at least 20 for the Yorktown. At that time the US were still in the process of launching their strike at maximum range, but the Japs could have got something away to hit them just after 8.15, and if the Hiryu and Kaga had had empty decks then in theory the returning Midway strike could have been turned around quicker at least on those two carriers.
But Nagumo said 'no', because there were very few escorts that could be spared to accompany it. Also the Japs had just beaten off several heavy attacks from Midway island and inflicted heavy losses on the undescorted US bombers & torpedo planes, so Nagumo felt he was justifying in refusing Yamaguchi's request to launch a strike until escorts could be available to accompany it. This feelign of justification was probably compounded less than an hour later when the three US TBD squadrons hoved into view and were decimated, in fact at that time until the SBD's winged down from overhead the Japs were probably quite justified in thinking they had won the battle of Midway.

Still, makes a fascinating question - what if Nagumo had agreed to Yamaguchi's request to launch early the moment a carrier was identified. As always though the cagey Nagumo played safe.
Incidentally, Yamaguchi did not survive the battle of Midway, he chose to go down with teh Hiryu despite the pleas of his officers and a huge sumo-wrestling champion petty officer threatening to bodily lift him up and carry him off the bridge, so popular he was with his men. He was last seen alone at the bow of the Hiryu just after it had been torpedo/scuttled by a Jap destroyer in the process of lashing himself to the anchor.

(in reply to RGIJN)
Post #: 389
RE: IJ leaders - 2/13/2009 5:45:51 PM   
RGIJN


Posts: 1057
Joined: 11/24/2006
From: far away from battlefield :-(
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xj900uk

Thanks, I'd 4gotten his name.
There's an interesting note to the battle which has been largely overlooked, and Yamaguchi oddly enough could actually have rescued it for the Japanese before they'd thrown it away. The moment the third signal from the Jap spotter plane circling above TF 17 reached the bridge which caused so much consternation and confusion "Unidentified force appears to be accompanied by an aircraft carrier, bringing up the rear", it was also flashed across to Yamaguchi in the Hiryu (being 2nd in command, he also got all the important signals after they'd been received in the Akagi).

He immediately flashed back to Nagumo 'Permission to launch strike against unidentified target immediately' and was refused. At that time the Hiryu still had it's second strike of about 18 Vals and a dozen or so Kates sitting on the deck waiting to go and armed with torpedo's and anti-shipping bombs (they'd been unable to strike down because of landing/rotating CAP planes, which is why they'd been slow to obey Nagumo's order half an hour before to send down the 2nd strike to the hanger & re-arm with GP bombs to hit Midway again). Also Kaga still had a good number of planes equipped with torpedo's and anti-ship bombs on deck as it too had had to delay because of rotating CAP.
If Nagumo had said 'yes, go' at that time, Hiryu could have launched 30 strike planes and Kaga at least 20 for the Yorktown. At that time the US were still in the process of launching their strike at maximum range, but the Japs could have got something away to hit them just after 8.15, and if the Hiryu and Kaga had had empty decks then in theory the returning Midway strike could have been turned around quicker at least on those two carriers.

But Nagumo said 'no', because there were very few escorts that could be spared to accompany it. Also the Japs had just beaten off several heavy attacks from Midway island and inflicted heavy losses on the undescorted US bombers & torpedo planes, so Nagumo felt he was justifying in refusing Yamaguchi's request to launch a strike until escorts could be available to accompany it. This feelign of justification was probably compounded less than an hour later when the three US TBD squadrons hoved into view and were decimated, in fact at that time until the SBD's winged down from overhead the Japs were probably quite justified in thinking they had won the battle of Midway.

Still, makes a fascinating question - what if Nagumo had agreed to Yamaguchi's request to launch early the moment a carrier was identified. As always though the cagey Nagumo played safe.
Incidentally, Yamaguchi did not survive the battle of Midway, he chose to go down with teh Hiryu despite the pleas of his officers and a huge sumo-wrestling champion petty officer threatening to bodily lift him up and carry him off the bridge, so popular he was with his men. He was last seen alone at the bow of the Hiryu just after it had been torpedo/scuttled by a Jap destroyer in the process of lashing himself to the anchor.


Did I forgot to accent some? As always, the damn "what if" thing. Most exciting & interesting anyway.

Unfortunately, there is no Battle of Midway scenario available in UV to try out some concepts...!

(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> RE: next Allied move? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.188