RE: Probable RHS 7.93

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Probable RHS 7.93

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: Probable RHS 7.93

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Probable RHS 7.93 - 7/10/2008 10:40:25 AM

ChickenOfTheSea

Posts: 579
Joined: 6/7/2008
From: Virginia
Status: offline

As long as you are doing such an extensive review, you might want to look at the supply sink in Mersing. In our EBO 7.91 game it starts as 99% disabled.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 31

RE: Probable RHS 7.93 - 7/10/2008 3:19:53 PM

Buck Beach

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: el cid again

Hmmm - like where?

You can check the MAIO save game I sent to see the levels of supplies at that that particular point in time if it helps. In fact you can review that whole game/file for abnormalities (if your so inclined) that we/I possible wouldn't recognize. It may be well worth your time and you could even test for some of the issues (eg if the ships deplete their DC Ammo, a/c effectiveness against allied subs, Alaska bases supply issues, impregnable Luzon bases, ship repair rate etc, etc) several of us have surfaced.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 32

RE: Probable RHS 7.93 - 7/10/2008 6:52:03 PM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

Matrix Legion of Honor

Posts: 12168
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: online OK - one big problem lies with the Russians in Russian active scenarios - that is half the set: I finally got the fighters to fly - that was AI - it simply does not fly all the time. But both escort and sweep will fly - and enough tests revealed it.

The other big problem is with ASW devices. I constructed a test bed and could not show any working.
I put stock devices into it - and the DC work - while the "special weapons" (Hedgehog, etc) don't seem to work.

I thought maybe it is the accuracy - the minimum stock value is 5 - but that is not it - some of ours are above that -
and even values like 90 don't work either.

I then looked at other fields - and there is something radical: there is a BIG range in stock.
I don't think it is range. Unless it was range in yards for a thrower - and since DC often are not thrown that makes no sense.
I think it is somebody's idea of depth in feet. Hundreds of feet make sense. This needs to be verified.

I am not sure why DC were able to drop from an airplane? But it may be stock does not see DC as different from bombs
when running air attacks. Anyway - the length of the string is not an issue. But it may be there are minimum values
just as with shells. We may have to settle for too large values - or we may be able to adjust effect to compensate.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 33

RE: Probable RHS 7.93 - 7/10/2008 6:52:41 PM

el cid again

Posts: 16922
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

When I get sick of test runs I look for ways to improve production and reduce fast ship repairs - Columbo, Trincolalee, Rangoon,
Sydney. The former got a new form of small sink organic to other units which is support neutral. The latter moved the sink out of the
city to an adjacent city with no repair shipyards. Also - some rural points in Australia and NZ lost their damaged resource centers.
This mechanism to increase production can be forced - but it is easier to force at a port or river port than it is at a non port. It is better when at a point that naturally can accumulate supply points - which is not always the same as where mines are sunk unfortunately.

(in reply to el cid again)

Post #: 34

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Scenario Design >> RE: Probable RHS 7.93

Page: << < prev 1 [2]