Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Additional Chinese cities option

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Additional Chinese cities option Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 6:15:46 PM   
terje439


Posts: 6813
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
I honestly believe that this is a matter that needs playtesting to decide, what seems fine on paper might not work out too well in an actual game...

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 31
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 6:16:47 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: peskpesk
If I get it right, so far these are the solutions in the forum:

1) 4 roll for the first 2 cities taken and 3 for the next 2 and then 2 for the remainder.
2) US entry to only apply to the original Chinese cities
3) Halving the US Entry cost (to 2)

I think all of the proposed fixed for US entry regarding Chinese cities are all good, interesting and solves the problem, all with there own drawbacks and advantages. My vote goes for option 3, since it’s these easiest to program.

In a dream world I would to see there US Entry cost for Chinese cities to be low for cites close to the border/cost and higher the more inland the Japanese gets. And of course higher if its a factory hex. I don’t have any good solution for it, just a basic one.

Type of city: US Entry cost

Normal city: 2
Factory city: 3
Double factory city: 4

I like 1), I like 3), and I like your last proposal, let's call it 4).
I don't like 2).


I think that it is time to ask if there is enough proposals and try to come to an consensus and decide what to recommend to Steve.

Personally I like proposal 4 best.

It can also be written as this in the US entry actions:

Japan occupies Chinese city - 2*
Notes:
* +1 for each factory in the hex


-Orm



What is nice about #4 is that all of the additional cities are then worth 2.

There are 4 proposals here. let's let each person have 4 votes that they can allocate however they like. So if two of them appeal to you, you can cast 2 votes for each of them. But if one is your overwhelming favorite, cast all 4 of your votes for that one.

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.


_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 32
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 7:01:49 PM   
lomyrin


Posts: 3741
Joined: 12/21/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
My vote:   2 for #1   and 2 for #4

Lars

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 33
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 7:23:00 PM   
terje439


Posts: 6813
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
#1 -> 3 votes
#4 -> 1 vote

but as I stated earlier I believe this should be playtested before anything decisive is decided.

(in reply to lomyrin)
Post #: 34
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 7:46:44 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

There are 4 proposals here. let's let each person have 4 votes that they can allocate however they like. So if two of them appeal to you, you can cast 2 votes for each of them. But if one is your overwhelming favorite, cast all 4 of your votes for that one.

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.



#4 -> 4 votes.

I prefer 4 over 1 primarily because you do not have to remember how many cities already captured. And of course playtesting is required but it has to start somewhere. I also doubt there can be enough testing on this before release.

-Orm

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 35
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 7:58:38 PM   
wosung

 

Posts: 692
Joined: 7/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

There are 4 proposals here. let's let each person have 4 votes that they can allocate however they like. So if two of them appeal to you, you can cast 2 votes for each of them. But if one is your overwhelming favorite, cast all 4 of your votes for that one.

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.



#4 -> 4 votes.

I prefer 4 over 1 primarily because you do not have to remember how many cities already captured. And of course playtesting is required but it has to start somewhere. I also doubt there can be enough testing on this before release.

-Orm


I think that, too: 4 votes to No. 4.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 36
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 8:28:04 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
There are 4 proposals here. let's let each person have 4 votes that they can allocate however they like. So if two of them appeal to you, you can cast 2 votes for each of them. But if one is your overwhelming favorite, cast all 4 of your votes for that one.

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.


As I said, I like #2 and #4. #3 disappear before #4 now that you have found it I prefer it.
But the problem for me with #1 is that the player will have to remember if the city he is about to take is the second, the third, or else.

So, for this reason, I cast 4 votes for #4.

But as Terje said, we should be ready to change that if playtest show it is not appropriate.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 37
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 8:47:34 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
4 points for number 2 ...

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 38
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 8:47:35 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline
There are more cities in China now, but there are no additional factory stacks. Thus, I would vote for USE effect per city of +2 with +1 for any printed factory stack. This is important, even if it is very very unlikely that China may build factories.



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 39
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 9:03:07 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sajbalk

There are more cities in China now, but there are no additional factory stacks. Thus, I would vote for USE effect per city of +2 with +1 for any printed factory stack. This is important, even if it is very very unlikely that China may build factories.



There is no need to splt things this fine, is there? You are talking about a 10% increase in the probability of the US drawing a chit when the Japanese capture a city that has a newly built Chinese factory in it. In the grand sweep of things, let's just lift up the corner of the rug and say "all Chinese factories".

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 40
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/26/2008 10:53:29 PM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.


Would be my vote for the starting point of playtesting this.

_____________________________

-------------

C.L.Norman

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 41
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/27/2008 3:41:23 PM   
peskpesk


Posts: 2347
Joined: 7/17/2003
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

There are 4 proposals here. let's let each person have 4 votes that they can allocate however they like. So if two of them appeal to you, you can cast 2 votes for each of them. But if one is your overwhelming favorite, cast all 4 of your votes for that one.

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.



#4 -> 4 votes.

I prefer 4 over 1 primarily because you do not have to remember how many cities already captured. And of course playtesting is required but it has to start somewhere. I also doubt there can be enough testing on this before release.

-Orm


4 votes to No. 4.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 42
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/27/2008 4:47:34 PM   
Zorachus99


Posts: 1066
Joined: 9/15/2000
From: Palo Alto, CA
Status: offline
I prefer option #3. 

Simplicity

_____________________________

Most men can survive adversity, the true test of a man's character is power. -Abraham Lincoln

(in reply to peskpesk)
Post #: 43
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 4:22:52 PM   
composer99


Posts: 2923
Joined: 6/6/2005
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline
2 votes each for #3 and #4.

_____________________________

~ Composer99

(in reply to Zorachus99)
Post #: 44
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 6:48:53 PM   
meisterchow


Posts: 284
Joined: 12/12/2007
Status: offline
1 vote for #3 and 3 votes for #4

_____________________________

'Fear God and dread nought'
Coat of Arms Motto of Baron Fisher, of Kilverstone

(in reply to composer99)
Post #: 45
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 9:46:51 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
I'll leave the voting open for a couple more days.

Right now we have (including my 4 for #4):

#1 - 5 votes
#2 - 4 votes
#3 - 7 votes
#4 - 32 votes

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to meisterchow)
Post #: 46
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 10:28:02 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

I'll leave the voting open for a couple more days.

Right now we have (including my 4 for #4):

#1 - 5 votes
#2 - 4 votes
#3 - 7 votes
#4 - 32 votes

To repeat, the choices for the US Entry roll when Japan occupies a Chinese city are:
1) US Entry roll is 4 for the first 2 cities taken, 3 for the next 2 cities, and then 2 for the remaining cities.
2) US entry rol is 4 but only applies to the original (not additional) Chinese cities.
3) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities.
4) US Entry roll is 2 for all Chinese cities with the addiition of +1 for each factory in the city/hex.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 47
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 10:33:15 PM   
YohanTM2

 

Posts: 1143
Joined: 10/7/2002
From: Toronto
Status: offline
3 votes for #3
1 vote for #4

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 48
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/28/2008 11:50:03 PM   
Mr. Yuck


Posts: 103
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Asheville, NC, USA
Status: offline
Could options 3+4 be combined as an if-then? If not, 2 votes for each.

(in reply to YohanTM2)
Post #: 49
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 12:29:22 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mr. Yuck

Could options 3+4 be combined as an if-then? If not, 2 votes for each.

I prefer to not have optional rules within optional rules. I've done it, but only in a couple of places.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Mr. Yuck)
Post #: 50
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 2:05:05 PM   
BallyJ

 

Posts: 142
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline
My vote is 4 votes for number (2)

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 51
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 5:08:25 PM   
Edfactor


Posts: 106
Joined: 6/13/2008
From: Dallas
Status: offline
My vote is
3 votes for #3
1 vote for #4
and 1 vote for the hanging piece of chad.

(in reply to BallyJ)
Post #: 52
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 6:32:05 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edfactor
and 1 vote for the hanging piece of chad.

What is the hanging piece of chad ?

(in reply to Edfactor)
Post #: 53
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 7:04:31 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edfactor
and 1 vote for the hanging piece of chad.

What is the hanging piece of chad ?

When George W. Bush was awarded the Presidency by the Supreme Court in 2000, it was because of their decision about whether the majority of voters in Florida voted for George or Al (Gore). There is television footage of people in Flroida reviewing some of the individual ballots (holding them up to the light, trying to see through the ballots), which used punched cards. A hanging piece of chad is the part of the ballot that was punched out but did not fall off the card. One of the questions of those days was whether a ballot counted if the chad was not completely detached from the card.

This also lead to several jokes about about a fictional porn star called Chad.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 54
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 7:06:43 PM   
cockney

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 11/15/2006
From: London
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edfactor
and 1 vote for the hanging piece of chad.


What is the hanging piece of chad ?

 
what is Floridian election counting?

_____________________________

never piss off a sgt major

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 55
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 8:11:19 PM   
YohanTM2

 

Posts: 1143
Joined: 10/7/2002
From: Toronto
Status: offline
Please don't go down this road, we all lived it in North America. Or take it OT to the general forum.
quote:

ORIGINAL: cockney

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edfactor
and 1 vote for the hanging piece of chad.


What is the hanging piece of chad ?

 
what is Floridian election counting?


(in reply to cockney)
Post #: 56
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/29/2008 10:48:58 PM   
cockney

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 11/15/2006
From: London
Status: offline
back to topic.

I would say that in regards to the four options

I would vote for No 4

_____________________________

never piss off a sgt major

(in reply to YohanTM2)
Post #: 57
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/30/2008 3:52:42 AM   
Jagdtiger14


Posts: 1686
Joined: 1/22/2008
From: Miami Beach
Status: offline
First of all...I hope you...Mr. OKeets are a better programer than political scientist. I love WiF and hope this computer game comes to fruition...maybe you are doing your programing job very well and dont have time to spend on current events. To set the record straight on the 2000 election...it was Al Gore who tried to steal the election. The vote count was very close...Al Gore tried to cherry pick three heavily Democrat counties here in south Florida to see if he could mine for enough votes to over-turn the Florida election results, get the Florida electoral votes, and make himself president. Those counties (with elected Democrat Supervisor of Elections and their Democrat staff) went through election ballots that were the old computer punch card system type where the voter takes a punch card pen to punch out a perferated rectangular hole...the hole is marked by the voter selecting their choice by putting the pen in the hole besides their candidate. Some of these cards were punched too often, and many still had the perferated rectangle still hanging. it was a spectacle to see the staff and elected officials take the cards, look at each one and try to decide what the voters intent was. Months after this crazy spectacle newspapers (New York Times, St. Pete Times, and just about every liberal media) went through all the votes in these counties on their own time and dime and came to the conclusion that George W Bush won Florida. Period. And that is without looking for more votes in heavily Republican counties. Some leftists still cant get over it. I know Hawaii is a leftist state, but Mr. OKeets...I suggest you stop wasting your precious time on something you either no little about, or cant help yourself but to spew propaganda. Stick to what you know best, and lets get this product out for Christmas or whatever new date you have come up with. Get to work.

_____________________________

Conflict with the unexpected: two qualities are indispensable; first, an intellect which, even in the midst of this obscurity, is not without some traces of inner light which lead to the truth; second, the courage to follow this faint light. KvC

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 58
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/30/2008 4:30:05 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

First of all...I hope you...Mr. OKeets are a better programer than political scientist. I love WiF and hope this computer game comes to fruition...maybe you are doing your programing job very well and dont have time to spend on current events. To set the record straight on the 2000 election...it was Al Gore who tried to steal the election. The vote count was very close...Al Gore tried to cherry pick three heavily Democrat counties here in south Florida to see if he could mine for enough votes to over-turn the Florida election results, get the Florida electoral votes, and make himself president. Those counties (with elected Democrat Supervisor of Elections and their Democrat staff) went through election ballots that were the old computer punch card system type where the voter takes a punch card pen to punch out a perferated rectangular hole...the hole is marked by the voter selecting their choice by putting the pen in the hole besides their candidate. Some of these cards were punched too often, and many still had the perferated rectangle still hanging. it was a spectacle to see the staff and elected officials take the cards, look at each one and try to decide what the voters intent was. Months after this crazy spectacle newspapers (New York Times, St. Pete Times, and just about every liberal media) went through all the votes in these counties on their own time and dime and came to the conclusion that George W Bush won Florida. Period. And that is without looking for more votes in heavily Republican counties. Some leftists still cant get over it. I know Hawaii is a leftist state, but Mr. OKeets...I suggest you stop wasting your precious time on something you either no little about, or cant help yourself but to spew propaganda. Stick to what you know best, and lets get this product out for Christmas or whatever new date you have come up with. Get to work.

No comment.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 59
RE: Additional Chinese cities option - 7/30/2008 5:05:42 AM   
BallyJ

 

Posts: 142
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jagdtiger14

First of all...I hope you...Mr. OKeets are a better programer than political scientist. I love WiF and hope this computer game comes to fruition...maybe you are doing your programing job very well and dont have time to spend on current events. To set the record straight on the 2000 election...it was Al Gore who tried to steal the election. The vote count was very close...Al Gore tried to cherry pick three heavily Democrat counties here in south Florida to see if he could mine for enough votes to over-turn the Florida election results, get the Florida electoral votes, and make himself president. Those counties (with elected Democrat Supervisor of Elections and their Democrat staff) went through election ballots that were the old computer punch card system type where the voter takes a punch card pen to punch out a perferated rectangular hole...the hole is marked by the voter selecting their choice by putting the pen in the hole besides their candidate. Some of these cards were punched too often, and many still had the perferated rectangle still hanging. it was a spectacle to see the staff and elected officials take the cards, look at each one and try to decide what the voters intent was. Months after this crazy spectacle newspapers (New York Times, St. Pete Times, and just about every liberal media) went through all the votes in these counties on their own time and dime and came to the conclusion that George W Bush won Florida. Period. And that is without looking for more votes in heavily Republican counties. Some leftists still cant get over it. I know Hawaii is a leftist state, but Mr. OKeets...I suggest you stop wasting your precious time on something you either no little about, or cant help yourself but to spew propaganda. Stick to what you know best, and lets get this product out for Christmas or whatever new date you have come up with. Get to work.

What an over reaction to a harmless post!!!!Get over it.

(in reply to Jagdtiger14)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: Additional Chinese cities option Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.531