Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
- 4/12/2002 10:39:15 PM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		Hmmm... I'm not wild about waiting for them to return from a refit in Tokyo for a number of reasons

1. The US will just get stronger
2. There is no guarantee that they will come back
3. From an entertainment value perspective, it would be pretty boring to wait that long.

If I was playing against a human opponent in a "real" game I think I would agree with you. This campaign has kind of taken on a life of it's own and I figure we might as well roll the dice and see what comes up.

So, assuming we're not sending them back I thought a usefule role for them would be as close air support for the landing group because:
1. Their slower speed will not be a problem since they will be keeping pace with the transports
2. Some air support is better than none at all
3. If nothing else they will provide decoys for the allied air attacks which will seem select even seaplane tenders over big fat transports. There's no way they will ignore a carrier - especially a damaged one
4. Using the logic above, they are basically expendable since returning them to Japan is equivalent to losing them altogether if we want to act in the next 3 months (and I think we should).

I agree that the airflleets should go preferentially to the undamaged carriers. Bear in mind that the carrier airfleets are coming back to full strength faster than anything else as more carrier a/c replacements seem to be available.

I'll get a detailed status on that tonight.

Also note that I was planning to use some zeros currently based at land bases to increase the fighter complement of the close support group (even disembarking bombers if necessary).

I want the close support group to concentrate on defense. If the US carriers come out I will use the fast group (undamaged carriers) to attack them (and hopefully draw them into range of LBA).

Well, that's the plan anyways :rolleyes:

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 151
Holy molely - 4/12/2002 11:06:17 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		Gadzooks!!!! They are 300 plus VP each. 45% damage to start with I don't think they will do much good. Kept the airwings but send the birdfarms home. Then when the good CV's get in a fight they can swap airgroups and go right back out. (we are not going to lose any CV- hope hope). ( I can hear you now "Soldier where do you think your going" "To the hospital one of my arms has been shot off" "Get back in your hole and get ready to charge you still have one arm to fight with you coward" )
It's sad they are damaged but we have enough to cover their absence. I will have nightmares if you send a 45% damaged ship in harms way. (1 tiny hit and they will lose flight ops and then the air groups will be stuck onboard unable to transfer) I do not think they will help enough to justify it. Prehaps send the smallest back right now to see what kind of report you get from Japan as to how long it takes to repair and if/when it will come back. (Have you sent anyship back to Japan this game yet?)

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 152
- 4/12/2002 11:21:30 PM   
ratster

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: PA
Status: offline 		Victory points are irrelevant when your going for the automatic victory. So losing them is of no consequence in game terms, especially if they can help before they go down. Hehe, given the amount of LBA thats no doubt going to be waiting for you as you approach Luganville, your gonna need anything that floats.

_____________________________

" If it be now, tis not to come: if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all"

Clan [GOAT]

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 153
No No No (and might I add NO!!!) - 4/12/2002 11:26:42 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		Sending wounded men into combat does not increase your chances. They stop bullets sure but that does not protect your healthy men. Instead you will provide targets for the allies to train their airgroups and then they will use this new skill to hurt our good ships. If you don't want to send them back to Japan ok but hold them as a reserve up in Truk. Then as a last (LAST) resort you could use them but remember it you could lose good aircraft along with the carrier. How much damage prevents flight ops?

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 154
- 4/12/2002 11:29:20 PM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		I concur with ratster... this is a hail-mary attempt for auto victory - send the kitchen sink.

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 155
The Kitchen Sink - 4/12/2002 11:31:33 PM   
Jason629

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: Charlotte NC
Status: offline 		Send the kitchen sink! Even if it is leaking abit :D

Although, Mogami does have a good point with regards to the loss of Flight ops....I am not worried so much for the carriers as I am the planes.....The "Emperors Sea Eagles" must not be lost!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 156
All out effort - 4/12/2002 11:35:00 PM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		In this all out effort supply and fuel and pilots and aircraft are important. Don't waste any of them on futile gestures. Carrier planes are not really that good for attacking land targets and in a Carrier battle a ship that starts with one hand tied behind it's back is not a gamble it's throwing good after bad. Save the material to support the healthy combat worthy efforts. The escorts etc should be used to protect our healthy stuff. 1 lucky torpedo from a sub.....Hold these ships in reserve.

20% is leaking a bit 45% is **** near sinking (1 bomb or torpedo from it)

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 157
Air units who lose their "base" - 4/13/2002 12:15:07 AM   
Toro


Posts: 578
Joined: 4/9/2002
From: 16 miles southeast of Hell (Michigan, i.e.), US
Status: offline 		Iain,

Thanks for the amazing information and tactical report. I'm nearly wetting myself here waiting for this game.

I've a question concerning air units that lose their base of ops, such as the float recons and their AV tenders, or units attached to CVs or air stations. In many games, when the CV is sunk or damaged, but the units are in the air, the squadron is likewise considered "lost." How is this handled in UV? Also, you mentioned that it appears float recons can be forward staged where support may not be available, conduct a mission, then return to a supported base. Does this mean that there are not necessarily allocated support units specific to squadrons? IOW, if a squadron is based at Truk but shifts to Rabaul (where, let's say, a support unit is located), then maintenance support continues unabated? I recall the older game Carrier War in which support units were dedicated to squadrons, and if you changed bases for that squadron, no maintenance would ever occur again.

Thanks for the info!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 158
- 4/13/2002 12:25:44 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		[B]Don't forget this is system damage not flotation damage[/B]

[U]I would agree entirely with you if it were flotation.[/U] 45% would make them incapable of operating a/c at all (anything more than about 10% seems to make it impossible for flight ops).

I am assuming that system damage in this case means that radars, gun mounts, engines, flight deck elevators (maybe catapults) are not working.

My understanding is that system damage does not impair seaworthiness at all but is more a measure of reduced combat effectiveness.

I have already sent Zuikaku and Shokaku into a fight with over 40% system damage each. They still did pretty well against the Saratoga in July.

So, the appropriate analogy would be telling soldiers to carry on up the hill even though they are out of ammuntion (FIXXXXXX Bayonettts!) and are missing various pieces of equipment. Which would be acceptable if ultimate victory seemed close.

I think as floating CAP platforms they will function acceptably. What I really want is for them to fend off the LBA while the undamaged carriers tangle with the US carriers if they show up.

AFAIK ships sent home are lost for at least 90 days if they come back at all. I'll check on some of the ones I already send back. Sending another one might be a useful test as well. I'll try it.

Also, I would certainly consider sending them home as soon as the invasion is over so that they might become available if the AI starts getting desperate at 1 Jan approaches.

This is a good discussion, though. Made me think through the rationale more thoroughly

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 159
How much time to process a turn? - 4/13/2002 12:34:12 AM   
Toro


Posts: 578
Joined: 4/9/2002
From: 16 miles southeast of Hell (Michigan, i.e.), US
Status: offline 		Iain, and other betas,

With all the detail we've seen in your reports, how long does it take to process a turn?

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 160
- 4/13/2002 12:34:40 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]In many games, when the CV is sunk or damaged, but the units are in the air, the squadron is likewise considered "lost." How is this handled in UV? [/QUOTE]

a/c seem to be able to transfer to bases or other CV's within range. Not sure if this is only a/c in the air or whether there is a provision for emergency ops to get them off the carrier. Most of the time this has happened to me (like the Coral sea battle in June) I have been in the process of exchanging strikes with the AI so it is entirely possible that the a/c were still in the air and were diverted en-route.

Near as I can tell, flotation damage seems to be the critical factor. As soon as any flotation damage is sustained air ops become impossible. This would seem to be realistic.

[QUOTE]? Also, you mentioned that it appears float recons can be forward staged where support may not be available, conduct a mission, then return to a supported base. Does this mean that there are not necessarily allocated support units specific to squadrons? [/QUOTE]

Support is allocated to base force units that stay at a particular base. Any a/c at that base can make use of it. This makes a/c quite mobile as they can operate in the same turn they transfer so when a juicy target shows up you can concentrate air groups quickly to take it on. I don't know if they suffer reduced effective ness because of the transfer.

You can operate from bases without any support (or without adequate support) the main impact is non-operational losses. If you operate without any support then no repairs will occur. This means the the number of available a/c drops quickly, but more perniciously, the damaged ones cannot be recovered until they are repaired. If you operate with poor support they rate at which a/c are repaired just drops.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 161
- 4/13/2002 12:37:33 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]With all the detail we've seen in your reports, how long does it take to process a turn?[/QUOTE]

I have typically been managing about to play about 7 to 10 turns in approximately 2 to 3 hours. That includes time to stop and take notes for the AAR's of course.

I checked the first post - it was 8 days ago and I have played almost 3 months - playing between 2 and 4 hours a night.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 162
Using the damaged carriers - 4/13/2002 12:48:42 AM   
IanLister

 

Posts: 158
Joined: 4/7/2002
From: Pennine Hills, Northern England, UK
Status: offline 		Reading the discussion reminds me of the Japanese plan for Leyte Gulf involving Ozawa's TF as a decoy. Even if using the damaged carriers doesn't help that much (and it seems to me, Iain, your plan to use them in the way you suggest is a good one) it might be realistic in terms of what the Japanese high command would do. Just remember the effect on TF34 of Ozawa's carriers.......you might get some similar kind of benefit that allows the ultimate goal to be reached. If it doesn't work, die with the great satisfaction of knowing you did it the Imperial way!

Bear in mind however, I could just be spouting the trash of one who is sitting in his study thousands of miles away getting more impatient by the minute. I can't even get off the forum cos people keep posting new items to read!!!!!!

_____________________________

Battleaxe Rules!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 163
- 4/13/2002 12:51:05 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]Bear in mind however, I could just be spouting the trash of one who is sitting in his study thousands of miles away getting more impatient by the minute[/QUOTE]

And how would that make me any different than any other field commander reporting to the high command :D

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 164
- 4/13/2002 12:51:12 AM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		Raverdave -
I'm still at work, but here's some prelim info on subs:
The modern US subs (Gatos, etc.) had a combat patrol time of about 45 days. This includes transit time, so more like 30 days in the combat zone for most patrols. That number should be higher in UV because the distances aren't so great.
The S class and older subs have a patrol time of about 30 days, more like 20 with transit... They're old, leaky, slow, and can't dive very deep - not too effective, although the S-39 did put the Kako (Jap CA) down off Kavieng following the Savo Island debacle. The funny thing is the S's used the mk. 10 torp which, although older, was not plagued by the same probs as the new-fangled Mk. 14s. If the S could get in position, it often had a better shot of putting a ship down...

Japanese subs were not as standardized - many more flavors, from giant float plane carrying subs like the I-25, which had a 14,000 mile radius and logged at least one mission I know of that lasted around 2 months. The other end of the spectrum (ignoring midgets) is the RO types. These were coastal subs, similar in size to the S class - mostly more modern though. They had ranges about the same as well - 20-30 days at sea.

I'll get more specific data when I get home, but this should help for now.
Also, I came across an interesting site today which is still being completed. It doesn't have a lot of info, but some of the tidbits are interesting, if only in an anecdotal way.
http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/japsubs/japsubs.htm

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 165
- 4/13/2002 12:53:35 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]The funny thing is the S's used the mk. 10 torp which, although older, was not plagued by the same probs as the new-fangled Mk. 14s. If the S could get in position, it often had a better shot of putting a ship down..[/QUOTE]

I'm pretty sure that almost all of my losses to US Subs have been to S class boats

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 166
- 4/13/2002 1:26:01 AM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		Iain,
Any sense as to how many of those S boats were sunk in return by your escorts? I'd wager a good number. They were basically antiques by the time WW2 kicked off, so their odds of escaping most concerted anti-sub efforts were slim...

Out of curiosity, do you see the AI's subs making any meaningful efforts against you, or are they more of a nuisance? In Pacwar I remember the AI was pretty laughable in its placement and utilization of subs.

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 167
- 4/13/2002 1:31:11 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		A significant number of the S-Class subs did not survive their encounters.

It's hard to tell about the AI's sub warfare since I usually don't see them unless they attack something - In which case the AI looks quite smart!'

The US subs have probably been averaging about one successful attack a week or so - not bad really.

In one case a sub torpedoed the Zuiho and then followed the TF trading shots with the escorts for 3 nights until it was finally sunk of Shortland I.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 168
- 4/13/2002 1:41:22 AM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		That attack you describe is persistance to the point of stupidity... Doesn't sound too historical though - Most times subs had one shot at major fleet units because they simply did not have the speed to keep up with them. Either sink them or hurt them badly enough to finish them off, otherwise no chance...

In other news: A matrix chat would be a great idea for this campaign of yours! We could really brainstorm then...

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 169
- 4/13/2002 2:00:22 AM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		Maybe the Zuiho was going 5 knots (then again, maybe the game isn't perfect). :) Just checked the database, you guys are good. The S class carries MK10's which we have rated with a 10% dud rate. Other US subs at that time carry the Mk14 with an 80% dud rate. The game does model the weaker defensive abilities of the S class, so they do tend to take their lumps.


As for the issues of carrier aircraft, here are the rules:

(18.5) planes on a ship may not fly if the ship’s combined system damage and floatation damage are greater than 50%. They may transfer off the ship if docked or at anchor at a base with an airfield with a size of at least 1 (they are assumed to have been manually unloaded and taken to the airfield).

11.17 Emergency Landings

Planes attempting to return to a carrier that has been damaged sufficiently to prevent aircraft operations, will instead attempt to land at another carrier or airfield that is within its remaining range. Planes won’t make an emergency landing on another carrier in such a way as to cause it to exceed 110% of the carrier’s aircraft capacity.

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 170
- 4/13/2002 2:43:24 AM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		Joel -
I wasn't implying a problem with the game when I mentioned the persistant attack - I don't know the specifics of the attack and the CV may very well have been limping home. I certainly can't critcize until I have played the sucker...

I'm glad to see the torpedoes modeled in such a manner, even though that severely handicaps the US subs - as was 100% historical.

Oh, I've got another random question for any tester/programmer/etc. -
What is a barge hub and what does it do in the game? I saw on some screenshots a mention of this ability at a base (Pt. Moresby?)

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 171
- 4/13/2002 5:14:15 AM   
byron13


Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]Originally posted by IChristie
[B]

And how would that make me any different than any other field commander reporting to the high command :D [/B][/QUOTE]

Good to see you know your place. What, you thought this was YOUR game? HA!

I appreciate Mogomi's comments, but I think at his point we (the whole gaming world) have pretty much taken the attitude of "forget the minor victory" conditions and are willing to throw it all away to see if we . . . er, Iaian . . . can get Lugansville and get the auto victory. Looks like we're just having fun now.

I am all in favor of using the damaged carriers as CAP escort for convoys. However, after Joel's last post, you may have to reconsider Mogomi's advice. You'd get at least one good CAP mission out of the carriers, but it looks like any damage at all would take you over the 50% mark and end flight operations. Ah, what the heck! Go for it!

Iain keeps asking the same question, but gets no answer. Matrix Staff: how soon could Iain expect to get ships back from Tokyo? What are the repair rates? Can he summon them back before repairs are completed if he wants?

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 172
- 4/13/2002 6:11:19 AM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		I can't remember the repair rates for sure, but my guess is that near 50% damaged large carriers would take 6 months before they'd be back, maybe more. I could be wrong on this, but I don't think so. If they go back to Japan, they won't be back in time for an attempt at an auto-victory.

Joel

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 173
- 4/13/2002 6:18:03 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		That's OK, Joel. I had pretty much figured they would be gone for the duration . It's probably going to take them at least a couple weeks to get home. Sigh....

I had tried to post earlier but the network was down at work. Looks like another tip of the hat to Admiral Mogami in his secret garden. I think I will have to take a very long hard look at the carrier force and decide how many I need to carry the planes that I do have.

The other thing I'm wondering is whether sending one home will free up either the Junyo or Soryu which are sitting in Japan with no release date for the South Pacific set. That might be worth a try.

One question I did have - the CS class ships have a space for "carrier planes" but they usually only have "Float Planes" on board. Are there carrier a/c that they can actually carry - or is just for taxi service (i.e. launch but no land).

ic

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 174
- 4/13/2002 6:40:18 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		Well that didn't take long to figure out.

Here are the numbers

Total carrier a/c of all types
zeros (M2 and M3) - 209 (including those at airbases)
Kates- 52
Vals - 43

Total - 304

CV Capacity from "undamaged" carriers (in round numbers): Kaga (75), Hiryu (75), Zuiho (30), Shoho (30), Ryujo (30), Unyo (25)

Total capacity - 265

So, it certainly doesn't make sense to keep the three big damaged carriers around. I so Akagi and Hiryu go back to Japan (once their a/c are off loaded). I just can't bring myself to get rid of all the birds in the hand so Shokaku stays at Truk.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 175
Now Your Up to date - 4/13/2002 7:37:14 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		More despatches from the front. I actually have an evening where my daughter is in bed and my wife is out so I'm actually playing this game while awake.... I wonder how that will work out ;)

I'll keep posting every so often...

23 August - The Kaga and Shokaku are sent back to japan after disembarking their air fleets in Truk.

In the afternoon, I notice that the US Surface force is on it's way North to Lunga again and then - glory be! The Betty's and Nells from Lunga have at them and put a torpedo into the North Carolina (sorry BoomBoom) and three more into a luckless DD. OK boys, all is forgiven. Sake on me tonight!

I move all unneccessary shipping out of Lunga (across the channel to Tulagi) and sortie one of the CL TF's from Shortland

24 August - The surface TF turns around and is back in Luganville by morning. The bombing raids agains Gili Gili are getting quite intense. B-17's are now getting into the act. In one raid alone I counted over 40 bombers.

27 August - After several uneventful days (unless your living in Gili Gili, that is) I suddenly realize something: Nevea has a level 1 airstrip and it is in fighter range of Lugan ville - Praise the Lord and Pass the ammunition boys! I move some A6M3's there and set all the level bombers at Lunga for a Port Attack on Luganville.

28 August - It works like a charm! The Zeros join the sortie from Neve and With them holding off the CAP the bombers manage to lay some 250kg eggs on a CL, CA, DD and the North Carolina. Pillars of smoke tower skyward as they skim the waves back to Guadalcanal. The price - 1 plane lost and 2 damaged! Once again the Sake flows freely at "bird of Paradise" airbase on Lunga.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 176
Nevea our unsinkable CV - 4/13/2002 8:07:11 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline 		Greetings, Now can you build Nevea pior to the invasion? Station a horde of fighters there to escort the bomber from Lunga. This is a nice replacment for CAP over the landings. (They can hurt it but not sink it.) But it will require a defensive LCU. Can we bomb supplies at Luganville at night? Does being bombed at night subtract from the effectivness of the LCU there (put a few 'Washing Machine Charlies' at Nevea to keep the Marines awake at night. Use Sept and Oct to build up and then start the operation in Nov.

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 177
- 4/13/2002 8:39:06 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		I'm bringing more AV support in as we speak. There is a ground unit and an engineer already present.

LRP from that range is an option, but it's not very effective so I will probably include some carrier air as well (I still have a the Ryujo and Unyo that can't keep up with the fast carriers anyway). Yes, night raids are allowed and they do have an effect on Morale.

You are right, sir. Time to get them started I think. Have to keep on eye on aircrew morale to make sure the long range flying is not wearing them out.

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 178
Operation Total Victory Begins! - 4/13/2002 9:42:38 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		29 August - Intent on getting some of their own back, I guess a CA force is seen headed North the next day. Because the bombers are set to port attack as their primary mission, they don't attack it. I move the CL's down form Shortland again and set the bombers back to Naval attack in case there are stragglers to be picked off tomorrow.

In a minor disaster I find that I now have 50 fighters marooned at Gili Gili because the airfield has sustained so much damage they can't fly out - ****! I waited one turn too long to pull them out.

30 August - The battle of Guadalcanal UV style. Two evenly matched CA (IJN - 1CA, 2CL, 5DD vs. US 2CA, 1CL, 5 DD) forces trade blows in a swirling night time duel. By morning both US CA's are burning fiercely with the astoria having taken 15 hits. In return the Suzuya suffers moderate damage and the Natori is badly mauled. Both sides have a DD that is badly damaged as well.

The carnage starts again in the morning when the birds of paradise (as I call the Lunga airforce) get airborne. The Astoria is caught off Tulagi and attacked by no fewer than 28 bombers. She is torpedoed repeatedly and sunk. The New Orleans gets farther but fares no better, caught off San Cristobal she is torpedoed 5 times and reported sunk.

The birds, feeling pretty good about themselves, just can't resist the temptation to have a go a shipping in Luganville again. They are swarmed by 35 fighters (Nevea was closed by weather and so no escorts were available). Despite the heavy CAP, they just can't seem to miss and they put fish into a DD and a TK in Luganville Roads.

In another piece of good news, weahter socks Port Moresby in and the respite lets me repair the runway long enough to pull out two of the three groups of zeros.

31 August - Looks like it's getting to be about that time. I have managed to get 35 AP's in Truk with another batch headed to Rabaul to pick up a reg't there. I am still going to go ahead with the raid on Koumac. It only costs me 1000 troops and it's potential to sow havoc in the rear areas is too good to pass up. Time to start thinking about apportioning the carrier air as well.

OK here are the TF dispositions
Truk
- TF 6 - 38th Division
- TF 11 - 35th Brigade
- TF 13 - Close air support with Ryujo and Unyo
- TF -19 - Bombardment group with Yamato, Mutsu and Nagato
In addition a TF with second line infantry, base force and Eng support is formed
Another convoy loads with Fuel to drop at Shortland then load followup supplies

Rabaul
TF 21 - Covering force - with Kaga, Hiryu, Shoho, Hiei and Kirishima
TF 22 - Forward air cover - for the raid at Koumac - will RV with TF 21 - Zuiho and DD's

Shortland
2 Fast TPT TF's to carry the 2nd recon regt and other elements to Koumac
One of the CL TF's will cover at long range in case US surface units sortie

.... And Away we go!

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 179
Koumac Secure, Sir - 4/13/2002 11:09:15 AM   
IChristie

 

Posts: 673
Joined: 3/26/2002
From: Ottawa, Canada
Status: offline 		Well, in the end I decided to go with the majority opinion and send the invasion fleet agains Luganville. I have saved the game so we can always go back and explore any of the other options later.

[I]Alors, Allons y[/I]

3 Sept - the invasion fleet sails from Truk. I intend to route them far to the east and then south to avoid detection as long as possible. The raider force leaves Shortlands. I decide that they will probably need a fuel top up before the run to Koumac so I form a replenishment TF as well. Likewise, in Truk I form a replenishment TF to accompany the bombardment force. Those BB's really drink the stuff. I'm still using all available capacity to ferry fuel south. Lunga has around 30 000 tons and Shortland 20 000 with more on the way. Rabaul still has over 80 000.

Night time raids on Luganville net little in real terms - I do get one lucky hit on the North Carolina - still in port and nursing wounds.

I need to be careful about the timing of the air offensive, because it will chew up my bombers pretty quick. 2 to 3 days before the assault should be plenty.

Also note, I have moved the rest of the Kavieng base force down to Nevea by flying boat. I think I will also drop one the base forces from Truk there on the way by. That should let me fly 50 fighters out of Nevea which should be enough.

9 Sept - Progress is slow and my nails are getting shorted by the minute. I finally get the APD's headed for Koumac. These TF's are slippery. If you don't give them final destinations they seem to like to turn around and head home.

I release the BB's from Truk with instructions to follow the invasion force. The replenishment convoy also sails. I load another replenishment convoy and send it on to Lunga.

The Zuiho is standing SW of Rennell to provide some amount of long range cover for them. Once they start the final run they'll be on their own.

Another CA force sorties from Luganville. They appear to be headed for Lunga but then veer off suddenly -looking like they are going to bombard Nevea instead (something I could not prevent) - but then they just go home. I beef up the birds of paradise and let them have it in port - the results are highly satisfactory with two more hits on the NC and three other warships left burning.

In other good news, more a/c replacements have started to arrive including a daitai of Oscars. I start moving air assets forward from Truk.

I load up the fast carriers in Rabaul and move them on the Shortland to get closer to the action.

11 Sept - The raid on Koumac goes off without a shot fired at the APD's. They scamper away to pick up supplies in LUnga and return. The main invasion fleet nears the concentration area a days sailing N of Nevea.

An AP carrying an extra base force is despatched to Nevea so I can add even more fighters there.

12 Sept - Koumac falls with hardly a struggle. Now we own a size 9 (yes that's a nine) airbase in the auto victory zone. Time to get busy with the flying boat shuttle and get some support and supplies down there. I'll move some fighters down right away to give some cover.

I'm so pumped, I'm not sure I'll sleep tonight.

Is anybody out there...

_____________________________

Iain Christie
-----------------
"If patience is a virtue then persistence is it's part.
It's better to light a candle than stand and curse the dark"

- James Keelaghan

(in reply to IChristie)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> After Action Reports >> Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.641