Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: English is Easy?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: English is Easy? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 2:09:42 AM   
Mac67

 

Posts: 496
Joined: 3/7/2006
From: Essex, England
Status: offline

quote:

Get back to us when somebody from Argentina accomplishes something besides mass murder, atrocities, and invansions of defenseless islands in the south atlantic.


You left out cheating at football:



Hand of God my arse


_____________________________

"If you are going through hell, keep going" - Winston Churchill

The Rose and Crown, a forum for British Gentlemen

(in reply to Doggie)
Post #: 121
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 2:11:18 AM   
BoredStiff

 

Posts: 237
Joined: 6/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: andym

Just thought i would say that the Russians fired an ICBM from a Nuclear Sub in the Barents Sea this week.Scary or what?

Why should this be any scarier than the US, France, Britain or China testing their nukes?

_____________________________

BoredStiff

[Link and Avatar removed by Moderator]

(in reply to andym)
Post #: 122
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 2:14:27 AM   
Doggie


Posts: 3244
Joined: 9/19/2001
From: Under the porch
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lützow
However, we didn't need to beat the Sovjets, which were predominant in conventional forces anyway, but rather stop them from further advance toward the West and this again could have been achieved through nuclear armament. To paraphrase it: with German missiles targeting Moscow the presence of american forces would have been obsolete.


A nuclear armed Germany would have been all the excuse the Soviets would have needed to roll all the way to the ardennes. And who besides the Anglo Americans would have stopped them? Your pals in France? Their strategy was to nuke the Soviets in Frankfurt. The 300,000 "obsolete" Americans were there to insure the only way a Soviet occupation of West Germany would happen would have been over our dead bodies.

Even the most left leaning politician in the United States would have been unable to argue against an intervention against an invasion of Germany in which 300,000 Americans and their wives and children were on the front lines.

We, and that includes me personally, were there to insure that people like you are able to thumb your nose at the people who selflessly defended your country for more than sixty years against the very same people who raped virtually every female in the eastern sector of Germany after the end of the second world war. As an American soldier traveling through some of towns whose names you see on hypothetical war game scenarios, like Hosenfeld, Huestrue, and Bad Neustadt, I couldn't buy my own beer, thanks to people who had witnessed Soviet generousity first hand.

Those people were born during the war or shortly thereafter, and they knew who their friends were, and more important, who their enemies were. I will always remember the German people who treated me so kindly while I was freezing my ass off on some mountaintop in the Rhoene, or flying through some black valley in the days before night vision goggles. I consider my self fortunate that I left a decade before the Berlin Wall came down, and was not subjected to the contempt of arrogant little Piefkes with no knowledge of their own history and the people who saw to it that they did not have to smuggle turnips out of some collective farms in their pompous, left leaning asses.,


_____________________________


(in reply to Lützow)
Post #: 123
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 3:30:34 AM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Maybe this a bit off topic but does anyone know of any good recent pictures of ARA General Belgrano. I can't find any.

(in reply to Mac67)
Post #: 124
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 3:38:28 AM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Maybe this a bit off topic but does anyone know of any good recent pictures of ARA General Belgrano. I can't find any.



LOL, tis a little sad for some, but I have a "liberal" sense of humor.

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 125
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 3:46:58 AM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline
This is really an interesting thread, but it seems to be drifting a bit. So, in an effort to get it back on track, and up and running;

UP YOURS!

English is really a versatile language, but it does have a huge amount of oddities. In time, it is possible to get used to it.

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 126
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:09:36 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
If English is so easy, why can't anyone tell the difference between lose and loose?  (They're not even pronounced the same!  ...you can lose a game if you have one too many screws loose!)

(sorry, with all the ranting going on in here, thought I'd try one closer to the topic *grin*)

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 127
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:42:21 AM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

If English is so easy, why can't anyone tell the difference between lose and loose?  (They're not even pronounced the same!  ...you can lose a game if you have one too many screws loose!)

(sorry, with all the ranting going on in here, thought I'd try one closer to the topic *grin*)


Asa matter forr you? Of course there is a difference; subtle, yes, but a difference. One is pronounced "luze", the other would be "luuuse".

I am here for you Big E.

(in reply to E)
Post #: 128
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 5:00:05 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 06 Maestro


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

If English is so easy, why can't anyone tell the difference between lose and loose? (They're not even pronounced the same! ...you can lose a game if you have one too many screws loose!)

(sorry, with all the ranting going on in here, thought I'd try one closer to the topic *grin*)


Asa matter forr you? Of course there is a difference; subtle, yes, but a difference. One is pronounced "luze", the other would be "luuuse".

I am here for you Big E.


Now what are the odds of someone from Nevada knowing how to lose correctly? *grin*

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 129
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 5:28:38 AM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

Now what are the odds of someone from Nevada knowing how to lose correctly? *grin*


If you are gunna be loose, you're gunna lose. For me, it is only a recreation which I very rarely engaged in.

(in reply to E)
Post #: 130
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 5:41:29 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
I went to Reno once and lost all the money I brought to bet... $0.25 (a WHOLE quarter!) I was such a loser. *sigh/grin*

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 131
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 6:04:10 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline
The casinos are losing big time in the current climate. I feel sorry for the people who will lose their jobs but not the usually dodgy bastards who run them.

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to E)
Post #: 132
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 7:26:54 AM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster

The casinos are losing big time in the current climate. I feel sorry for the people who will lose their jobs but not the usually dodgy bastards who run them.

Cheers, Neilster



Some of them are taking a beating. There is one particular one, the Venetian Hotel (stock "LVS"-the old Sands property) has gone from over 140.00 a share to 14.05 as of yesterday. Roughly, about 40 dollars of that drop was in the last month. The CEO of LVS built a hotel in Macao which opened over a year ago. He is a real champ; managed to alienate everyone in town (here).
I used to joke about owning his shares, if I did well-good, if I lost-then that SOB was losing millions. It was a win/win situation for me. I sold out over a year ago at a tidy profit.

The money that built Las Vegas mostly came from the "nickle and dime" tourists from California. Most of those people used their cars to drive here. Los Angeles is only about a 4 hour drive ( I made the trip in 3 hours once) The cost of fuel had a real impact on that particular group. The airlines have lost much business also due to higher costs, less service, and the fact that many people are sick of the absurd security procedures caused by the refusal to engage in "profiling". People are just not traveling like they used to-even those that can afford it.

All of the hotels are offering major discounts now. They even have specials for the locals. It's a good time to check the place out-just stick to single deck black jack and craps-after you studied the rules. Of course, staying sober helps also. The hotels don't gamble, they are engaged in "gaming"-big difference.

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 133
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 7:46:59 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 06 Maestro

-just stick to single deck black jack and craps-after you studied the rules. Of course, staying sober helps also. The hotels don't gamble, they are engaged in "gaming"-big difference.


I went to Vegas last year (long after my losing streak in Reno). But that time I came prepared. I devised a System(tm). I took my hotel provided free chip and played one spin of roulette (which even I could understand enough to bet on red) and turned the complimentary no cash value chip into $20.00 US currency. I then pocketed and subsequently used that $20.00 to pay for the taxi to the airport when I left. *grin* (I went again this year, but was too tired/busy to even try out my no-lose system.)

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 134
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 8:13:24 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

quote:

ORIGINAL: 06 Maestro

-just stick to single deck black jack and craps-after you studied the rules. Of course, staying sober helps also. The hotels don't gamble, they are engaged in "gaming"-big difference.


I went to Vegas last year (long after my losing streak in Reno). But that time I came prepared. I devised a System(tm). I took my hotel provided free chip and played one spin of roulette (which even I could understand enough to bet on red) and turned the complimentary no cash value chip into $20.00 US currency. I then pocketed and subsequently used that $20.00 to pay for the taxi to the airport when I left. *grin* (I went again this year, but was too tired/busy to even try out my no-lose system.)

I'm a mathematician who specialises in probability. There is no such thing as a no-lose system. There is stuff you can do if you have an infinite pool to play with. Got one of those?

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to E)
Post #: 135
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 8:22:08 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

(I went again this year, but was too tired/busy to even try out my no-lose system.)

I'm a mathematician who specialises in probability. There is no such thing as a no-lose system. There is stuff you can do if you have an infinite pool to play with. Got one of those?



I'm not a mathematician, but I can assure you that if I only play with complimentary chips, I cannot lose any of my own money. That is a no-lose system! Granted, it's not necessarily a winning system either, but I suffer no monetary losses from gambling using it. *grin*

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 136
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 9:47:35 AM   
Lützow


Posts: 1517
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Doggie

A nuclear armed Germany would have been all the excuse the Soviets would have needed to roll all the way to the ardennes. And who besides the Anglo Americans would have stopped them? Your pals in France? Their strategy was to nuke the Soviets in Frankfurt. The 300,000 "obsolete" Americans were there to insure the only way a Soviet occupation of West Germany would happen would have been over our dead bodies.

Even the most left leaning politician in the United States would have been unable to argue against an intervention against an invasion of Germany in which 300,000 Americans and their wives and children were on the front lines.

We, and that includes me personally, were there to insure that people like you are able to thumb your nose at the people who selflessly defended your country for more than sixty years against the very same people who raped virtually every female in the eastern sector of Germany after the end of the second world war. As an American soldier traveling through some of towns whose names you see on hypothetical war game scenarios, like Hosenfeld, Huestrue, and Bad Neustadt, I couldn't buy my own beer, thanks to people who had witnessed Soviet generousity first hand.

Those people were born during the war or shortly thereafter, and they knew who their friends were, and more important, who their enemies were. I will always remember the German people who treated me so kindly while I was freezing my ass off on some mountaintop in the Rhoene, or flying through some black valley in the days before night vision goggles. I consider my self fortunate that I left a decade before the Berlin Wall came down, and was not subjected to the contempt of arrogant little Piefkes with no knowledge of their own history and the people who saw to it that they did not have to smuggle turnips out of some collective farms in their pompous, left leaning asses.,



I think you're wrong here. Not tanks or soldiers saved us from another great tragedy, but nuclear deterrence. Regarding conventional warfare the Sovjets had outnumbered NATO forces by far and probably crossed the Rhine before your 300k soldiers even knew what happened. And yes, the Cold War was a phase of prosperity for Western Germany as we didn't need to care for our own safety. I'm thankful that I grew up during this period and considered it as irony of fate that we lost war but won peace - some kind of trade off. My reasoning here was just, that merely allied restrictions in terms of German rearmament made American presence necessary.

Aside of this I respect those GI's serving in Germany during Cold War. It was a retired US army Sergeant who instructed me at shooting range and I'm not biased toward your country at all. However, what made me upset and interfere with this thread is rather your arrogant attitude, conjuring the picture of the obnoxious American. Maybe you should contemplate before insulting people.

(in reply to Doggie)
Post #: 137
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 10:11:45 AM   
Dennistoun


Posts: 233
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Perth, Scotland.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mac67


quote:

Get back to us when somebody from Argentina accomplishes something besides mass murder, atrocities, and invansions of defenseless islands in the south atlantic.


You left out cheating at football:



Hand of God my arse



Bang on, Mac!! That was an absolute disgrace!! That England side may have possibly gone all the way if that wee fella hadn't felt the need to cheat like that. Maybe he thought "how ELSE are we gonna break this superior England team down?"

(in reply to Mac67)
Post #: 138
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 11:32:04 AM   
Neilster


Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

(I went again this year, but was too tired/busy to even try out my no-lose system.)

I'm a mathematician who specialises in probability. There is no such thing as a no-lose system. There is stuff you can do if you have an infinite pool to play with. Got one of those?



I'm not a mathematician, but I can assure you that if I only play with complimentary chips, I cannot lose any of my own money. That is a no-lose system! Granted, it's not necessarily a winning system either, but I suffer no monetary losses from gambling using it. *grin*

OK. It's a no-lose-your-own-money system. It's not a no-lose system. All the best.

Cheers, Neilster

(in reply to E)
Post #: 139
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 1:37:07 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
You know, when he came out and admitted that he handled the ball a few years ago, I was gutted. Everyone apart from the Ref and the Linesmen knew he used his hand...but I got YEARS of fun, winding up the English..."Hand of God my arse....it was a header...a great header and he beat you fair and square"....man...the people I used to reel in with that one!!!

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 140
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 3:35:27 PM   
cdbeck


Posts: 1374
Joined: 8/16/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
So, I don't understand soccor well (or at all). I'm guessing that the scrunched faced guy on the left is the Argentinian and that he cheated by putting his hand on the ball, causing England to lose? What is the "Hand of God" thing? Oh, and that guy on the right looks like he is reaching for the ball too, is that kosher?

SoM


_____________________________

"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!"
(Kill them all. God will know his own.)

-- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 141
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:19:09 PM   
PunkReaper


Posts: 1085
Joined: 8/23/2006
From: England
Status: offline
The one on the left is Maradonna, who was the greatest footballer in the world at the time, but he cheated in the world cup against England handling the ball into the net. The only people in the stadium not to see the foul was the referee and his assisstant. When asked about it he called it the Hand of God.....So much talent but still a cheat.....says so much about sport.

(in reply to cdbeck)
Post #: 142
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:31:39 PM   
BoredStiff

 

Posts: 237
Joined: 6/18/2007
Status: offline
The guy on the left is Argentinian Diego Maradona, at the time (World Cup, 1986) arguably the best soccer player in the world.
In the picture, he can be seen using his hand to punch the ball past the English Goalkeeper (who is allowed to use his hands) into the net to score. That made the score 1:0 and Argentina went on to win 2:1. It was a quarterfinal match.
I didn't see the game, but have seen replays. Apparently many people saw the illegal handball, but unforunately, neither the referee nor the linesman did.

As for England possibly going all the way if this hadn't happened - lol.

Edit: I might add that mistakes of this magnitude by referees in soccer are thankfully very rare. But when they happen, they're talked about forever.

Here's the short video.

< Message edited by BoredStiff -- 10/12/2008 4:44:25 PM >


_____________________________

BoredStiff

[Link and Avatar removed by Moderator]

(in reply to cdbeck)
Post #: 143
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:36:55 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

We, and that includes me personally, were there to insure that people like you are able to thumb your nose at the people who selflessly defended your country for more than sixty years...


If it was ¨selfless¨ as you say then why do you keep talking about it all the time as if they owe you something!! If it was true so ¨selfless¨ you wouldn´t say anything about it at all now would you?



Because you couldn´t ¨buy your own beer¨ and were freezing your ¨ass off on some mountaintop in the Rhoene¨ Well, these are your problems, not theirs.

quote:

I think you're wrong here. Not tanks or soldiers saved us from another great tragedy, but nuclear deterrence. Regarding conventional warfare the Sovjets had outnumbered NATO forces by far and probably crossed the Rhine before your 300k soldiers even knew what happened.


I agree with you. The Russians are a tough people. They would have went through those 300,000 wifes, children and soldiers wishing to ¨buy their own beer¨ with no difficulty. Having Moscow nuked was much more of a concern for them.

(in reply to Doggie)
Post #: 144
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 4:56:55 PM   
andym


Posts: 1117
Joined: 7/12/2006
From: Kings Lynn UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoredStiff


quote:

ORIGINAL: andym

Just thought i would say that the Russians fired an ICBM from a Nuclear Sub in the Barents Sea this week.Scary or what?

Why should this be any scarier than the US, France, Britain or China testing their nukes?



Have you seen the state of thier Nuclear fleet????

_____________________________

Press to Test...............Release to Detonate!

(in reply to BoredStiff)
Post #: 145
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 6:42:25 PM   
Dennistoun


Posts: 233
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Perth, Scotland.
Status: offline
Why not? After England beating Belgium in the S-Final, they would have faced a German side who mostly struggled thru that whole competition. Leading UP to the S-Finals, Germany only scored 4 goals to Gaz Lineker's 5! That Final would have been all to play for.
And with Lineker (World Cup 1986 top scorer) on fire...



quote:

ORIGINAL: BoredStiff




As for England possibly going all the way if this hadn't happened - lol.






< Message edited by teddy -- 10/12/2008 6:51:42 PM >

(in reply to BoredStiff)
Post #: 146
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 6:43:14 PM   
06 Maestro


Posts: 3989
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Nevada, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ike99

[If it was ¨selfless¨ as you say then why do you keep talking about it all the time as if they owe you something!! If it was true so ¨selfless¨ you wouldn´t say anything about it at all now would you?




Well Ike99, the deployment was to a very large degree, a selfless task. Billions of dollars were pumped into the German economy by the US presence there, and not much was asked in return. It is true that we got something in return; being able to counter a threat to the U.S. thousands of miles from home instead of right in our front yard. On the other hand, Germany, and all of Western Europe were able to maintain their freedom. Keep in mind that the U.S. could have easily turned its back on Europe and still had been quite safe-Germany would have been a "workers paradise" long ago. In view of the great success of "free trade", especially the one sided type, I know that the U.S. would have been much better off to become isolationist-except those that play by the same rules.

It could be said we were the the "gravy train" for Germany. Not only were billions pumped into the economy by the normal means, but there were other little benefits. Occasionally, during winter only, the U.S. Army would conduct exercises in local areas instead of the major training bases such as Graffenweer (spell?), Hohenfells, and a couple of others. In every village, the people would come out to right down our convoy numbers so they could cash in on payouts for anything we allegedly damaged (streets, curbs, fencing, etc.) I know that on occasions, the damage was not cause by us-they were simply suckling on Uncle Sam. Farm fields were another great source of income-even without crops, due to our presence. IIRC, it was ten dollars a lineal foot of track rut in a field-and there were a lot of them. These local training areas were necessary to use as we were training to fight, and win being out numbered at least 5 to one-it was for the common cause. There was on uproar when the American public found out about a few 600 dollar toilet seats for the Air Force-good thing they never heard about the farm field ruts. Speaking of farms, a German farmer visiting us in the field told my platoon he was happy to have the U.S. Army using his land because, "Americans bury there crap, the other armies just leave it on the ground.

As for the actual presence of ground units in Germany; they were essential to the Western defensive strategy. I surely hope that no one here believes that the U.S. would have fired a nuke at Moscow as soon as the first Polish mortar round hit FRG's soil. There would have to be a real ground war, a war involving U.S. troops, before anyone would support the use of strategic nukes. The threat of tactical nukes is what made the Russians hold back. In particular, the development of the "neutron bomb", with its low blast yield, brought an end to any Soviet plans (even with their silly anti radiation pills) for a conventional war in Western Europe.

I have to agree with you that U.S. motives are not 100% altruistic, but judging on a curve, the U.S. looks pretty damn good in comparison to the rest of the world. Germans, and others have been gracious in their thanks to Americans; I've witnessed this many times-even from those which lived near major support facilities full of wanna be pimps (rear echelon types).

I don't recall having seen an American soliciting thanks for our real national and personal sacrifice unless someone states (or insinuates) that our efforts were meaningless, or selfish. Such statements are clearly false, and many Americans will feel obliged to respond. Do not misunderstand, I am not saying the U.S. is beyond criticism, but it should be factual-from my point of view, of course.

(in reply to Ike99)
Post #: 147
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 6:46:33 PM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

quote:

ORIGINAL: Neilster


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

(I went again this year, but was too tired/busy to even try out my no-lose system.)

I'm a mathematician who specialises in probability. There is no such thing as a no-lose system. There is stuff you can do if you have an infinite pool to play with. Got one of those?



I'm not a mathematician, but I can assure you that if I only play with complimentary chips, I cannot lose any of my own money. That is a no-lose system! Granted, it's not necessarily a winning system either, but I suffer no monetary losses from gambling using it. *grin*

OK. It's a no-lose-your-own-money system. It's not a no-lose system. All the best.

Cheers, Neilster



Ah, but a no-lose-your-own-money system is a no-lose system in my book**! *grin* (sorry we can't use your book, as it is obviously upside down *grin*) Let's move on to something that is debatable... which side would you like to play? "Your country sucks" or "My country can do no wrong?" *grin*

**See page 4 under the connect the dots illustration 1-2.

(in reply to Neilster)
Post #: 148
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 8:22:10 PM   
NefariousKoel


Posts: 2930
Joined: 7/23/2002
From: Murderous Missouri Scum
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 06 Maestro

I don't recall having seen an American soliciting thanks for our real national and personal sacrifice unless someone states (or insinuates) that our efforts were meaningless, or selfish. Such statements are clearly false, and many Americans will feel obliged to respond.



Nicely summed 'up'.

_____________________________


(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 149
RE: English is Easy? - 10/12/2008 9:58:45 PM   
Ike99


Posts: 1747
Joined: 1/1/2006
From: A Sand Road
Status: offline
quote:

There would have to be a real ground war, a war involving U.S. troops, before anyone would support the use of strategic nukes.

These local training areas were necessary to use as we were training to fight, and win being out numbered at least 5 to one-it was for the common cause.


I don´t agree. I think you would have been dead and in a very short time with much of Europe with you. Just look through Soviet war plans.

Soviet plans to annihilate Europe revealed

Red and blue mushroom clouds are marked on the map, showing Soviet nuclear bombs raining down on cities including Brussels, Antwerp, Munich and Stuttgart...

Soviet plan for WW3 nuclear attack unearthed

Chilling Soviet plans to launch massive nuclear strikes in Europe followed by a ground offensive in Germany and southern France have been unearthed by a Nato historian.

On the ninth day the troops would take Lyon, south eastern France.

(in reply to 06 Maestro)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> RE: English is Easy? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969