Playin' in the rain

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Playin' in the rain

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Sports] >> Maximum-Football 2.0 >> Graphics Related >> Playin' in the rain

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Playin' in the rain - 10/14/2008 1:17:45 AM

LarryK

Posts: 12
Joined: 9/19/2008
Status: offline

Played a game on an outdoor grass field, in the rain. At the end of the game, only a couple of players on each team had dirty unis; the rest looked like they'd just stepped out of the locker room.

This is not a huge deal; I was just wondering if it's a shortcoming in the game or have I missed something?

Post #: 1

RE: Playin' in the rain - 10/14/2008 1:48:36 AM

garysorrell

Posts: 2176
Joined: 1/29/2005
Status: offline

I am pretty sure at one point in the past, all players eventually got funky. But I think David may have been working on it for some reason and it is how it is now. No idea as to what or why, but I do remember this discussion from the past.

_____________________________

(in reply to LarryK)

Post #: 2

RE: Playin' in the rain - 10/14/2008 2:41:10 PM

DAWUSS

Posts: 248
Joined: 7/5/2008
Status: offline

I think if a ballcarrier gets tackled 4 times he gets dirty.

... at least that's how it was for me

(in reply to garysorrell)

Post #: 3

RE: Playin' in the rain - 10/14/2008 5:00:43 PM

Marauders

Posts: 4428
Joined: 3/17/2005
From: Minnesota
Status: offline

As I recall, only players involved in tackles get dirty. This had something to do with how the graphics engine being used took longer to redraw players than David would have liked.

I did ask for this to be scaled back a bit, because backs looked like the swamp thing while linemen were clean. That didn't look right.

This is an area that I suspect would have been looked at again for 3.0.

(in reply to DAWUSS)

Post #: 4