Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/8/2009 12:24:36 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

Does freeezing happen that far south?


I believe it does, when it gets cold enough. The Kerch straits would freeze, therefore any shallow hexes north of there would also freeze.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 121
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/8/2009 12:40:28 PM   
fogger

 

Posts: 1446
Joined: 9/17/2006
Status: offline 		I am on turn 79. I captured Leningrad on turn 42 and destroyed all the Russian naval units. Since then one naval unit has reconstructed. Also HQ for 35th Div has reconstructed twice at Narvik (70, 14) and will not be transported by air. May need to make a port there so that units can be transported by sea.

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 122
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/8/2009 8:58:23 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Ok, I guess I should withdraw the Baltic/Red Banner fleet when Leningrad falls, unless someone can think of a situation where they might have operated from another base. I still don't know why some units gravitate all the way to Narvik for reconstruction, but a HQ unit should be able to 'fly' back to civilization. Why do you say it will not be transported by air? A port in Narvik wouldn't do any good as the area is land locked, but it may be possible to open up a route so that these types of units could be shipped back to Konigsberg.

(in reply to fogger)
Post #: 123
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/8/2009 11:02:13 PM   
fogger

 

Posts: 1446
Joined: 9/17/2006
Status: offline 		I am not complaining just giving feed back. I think what you have done to date is great.  As far as the HQ unit goes I do not know why it would not board aircraft. I left it sitting on the airfield marker for a couple of turns but it would just not board. I suppose that they where having a good time and had one hell of a hangover from what ever they drink in that neck of the woods.  However as punishment they are on a slow walk home.   That is what happens when you join the infantry. I also had one rail repair unit reform in the middle of nowhere. Maybe you should give them a movement allowance of one hex per turn?

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 124
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 2:28:58 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		I've just had the Baltic fleet regenerate again at Leningrad, so yeah - looks like an event is required to withdraw them.

I can't see them fighting on - perhaps making a suicidal sortie to attack a German port or something....but more likely blown up and the crews given rifles and told they've been "retasked"....

(in reply to fogger)
Post #: 125
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 3:36:31 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

I am not complaining just giving feed back.


Understood and appreciated, we're all trying to iron out the little annoyances that will make this huge scenario more enjoyable. Keep on feeding back!

I don't know why the HQ won't airlift, it's weight is around 225, and the Axis have an 1,100 capacity. Maybe it has something to do with being eliminated and losing it's airborne capability, but I'm not sure about that. You can always send me a save file and I can take a look to see what's going on.

The rail repair units reconstituting off rail has been looked into, so in the final file this may not happen. The bigger issue here is that they really don't need to be getting involved in combat, they only have to be 'near' the areas that you would like repaired. From my experience, 2-3 hexes back from the front line is close enough. Any closer and it's a good idea to stack them with some protection.

(in reply to fogger)
Post #: 126
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 6:39:50 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		And if rail units do appear somewhere particularly useless I guess you can always disband them and hope they appear somewhere better next time! :)

Mostly my dead units have been appearing nearby where they were killed - not that there's been that many!! :)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 127
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 7:02:04 AM   
Silvanski


Posts: 2506
Joined: 1/23/2005
From: Belgium, residing in TX-USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

I've just had the Baltic fleet regenerate again at Leningrad, so yeah - looks like an event is required to withdraw them.

I can't see them fighting on - perhaps making a suicidal sortie to attack a German port or something....but more likely blown up and the crews given rifles and told they've been "retasked"....


Or you can set reconstitution to "no"


< Message edited by Silvanski -- 1/11/2009 7:10:11 PM >

_____________________________

The TOAW Redux Dude

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 128
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 11:15:33 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SMK-at-work

And if rail units do appear somewhere particularly useless I guess you can always disband them and hope they appear somewhere better next time! :)

Mostly my dead units have been appearing nearby where they were killed - not that there's been that many!! :)



I've got a rail unit dude that keeps appearing at the same spot no matter how many times I disband him. And the spot doesn't happen to be on a rail so I can't use him when he does appear. I guess I'll just have to live with him instead of disbanding him all the time. Sigh......

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 129
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/9/2009 11:46:57 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

I've got a rail unit dude that keeps appearing at the same spot no matter how many times I disband him.


Just for giggles, if you want to, try and stack 9 units in that hex after you disband him next time. Not that you have 9 useless units, but maybe corps or army HQ's. Then we can see if that changes his idea on where to reconstruct.

As I said in an earlier post, we have since set them to 'fixed' at Berlin, so maybe in your next game you won't have to deal with this situation. Of course, in your next game you will probably then never have one of thos units get eliminated or retreated. It has something to do with Murphy, I think.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 130
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 9:46:25 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		I'm just about finished the game I think - T46 and I have units adjacent to Moscow from the East & Stalingrad from north and south so it won't be long now......

A couple of points about Elmer's priority settings - not sure how much is changeable but it might be of use....

During hte mud turns Elmer heavily reinforced the Arctic and Leningrad areas to the extent of maybe a couple of dozen divisions - but put them in really bad positions - invading the Karelian Isthmus over Lake Lagoda with about 8 divisions/brigades, and a dozen more further north - these were pretty much suicide missions - the bridge by Belomorsk highlighted in this shot is broken and Elmer never seems to have even tried to fix it, and the Leningrad attack made it to the outskirts, but a massive stack was blown to pieces by naval artillery - losing up to 25% of 800+ rifle squads in one combat alone.

Meanwhile the approaches to stalingrad only had a handful of isolated units along the road/rail lines that were no problem at all.

The forces west of Moscow also got themselves isolated pretty easy - they kept trying to move forwards into contact with the Axis troops there, allowing them to be easily surrounded.

I don't know what can be done about setting offensive/defensive priorities for Elmer, but it was a bit too agressive in the wrong places in this game IMO.

Anyway - some shots from north to south....

The arctic - the highlighted bridge is blown & no effort made to repair it.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 131
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 9:49:09 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		Leningrad - only the remnants of the counter attack are shown...along with a reconstituted battleship of course! :)






Attachment (1)

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 132
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 9:52:11 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		Moscow - the defensive unit in Moscow is pretty large & I don't have much artillery there, but I'm confident 3-4 Pz & Pz-Gren divisions will be enough to take it anyway....




Attachment (1)

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 133
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 10:00:59 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		And Stalingrad - the paratroopers landed just last turn to cut off the northern and southern rail lines, and SS Wiking hasn't moved yet this turn.

The Soviet units seen in these screen shots comprise about90% of all soviet units I can see at the moment - there is only a light scattering of occasional brigades & divisions visible across the entire remainder of the map - there is essentially nothing visible between Moscow & Stalingrad.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 134
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 2:56:55 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Thanks for the great info SMK, you hit on a lot of good points.

Turns 103-113. With units becoming available from the Leningrad area, I moved off to the east where about 40 hexes from Leningrad there is a line of lakes and rivers that can provide some sort of stop line. Case Blau is over so I'm back to normal supply and shock.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 135
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 3:12:07 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Turns 113-120. Leningrad has some strong artillery units supporting its' defense so I took some heavy casualties clearing the city. But now that is done with my lines have shortened up and some Finn divisions are looking for some place to go. Off to the east of Leningrad I've closed up on my stop line and Vologda and Yaraslavl (two production cities about 20 and 45 hexes north of Moscow) are close by, so I will go after them. It is August '42 and I know there is some mud coming in about 16 turns, so for now I am going to busy myself with reorganising my lines so I can get as many divisions free as possible. I have to start preparing for operations in the southern part of the map. Elmer has been left alone down there for a long time, and I'm curious to see what he's got.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 136
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 3:27:25 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		South and south-east of Moscow. At one point I was several hexes forward of these postions, but while I've been busy up north, Elmer has been pushing me back. When you see stacks like the one in the inset, it gets a little scary, but Elmer is overall too weak at this point of the scenario to really be any threat. A one hex defensive line is usually good enough, but it's a good idea to have a few units hanging about behind the front. If Elmer does punch a hole he loves to send tank and cavalry brigades shooting thru.

Around turn 110 I noticed that Elmer was blowing bridges right near the front, and he has repaired ones that I have blown and left behind.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 137
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 3:43:27 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline 		Would you happen to have any saves available? It's just that playing the first dozen turns are always so time consuming...

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 138
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 6:16:02 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		I've got each of my turns from this current game saved. You are welcome to have any of those if you like. However, I started this game on October 13, and there have been tons of changes since then. Some of the others have gotten later files, so maybe one of those has made it thru the opening phase.

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 139
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 7:01:12 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline 		I was hoping something before Moscow or Leningrad fell. I wanted to test if the Computer can push me away from the historical conquests.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 140
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 7:22:11 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		I think it's too early in the scenario at that point to expect Elmer to have that kind of success. We can argue that the historical Soviet '41 winter offensive pushed the Axis back, but when we play the Axis side in this scenario we don't end up in the same position as the Axis historically put themselves in in front of Leningrad and Moscow.

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 141
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/11/2009 7:36:29 PM   
Silvanski


Posts: 2506
Joined: 1/23/2005
From: Belgium, residing in TX-USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

quote:

Does freeezing happen that far south?


I believe it does, when it gets cold enough. The Kerch straits would freeze, therefore any shallow hexes north of there would also freeze.


The Kerch Strait does freeze indeed..
Check out this passage in Soviet Documents on the Use of War Experience By Harold Steven Orenstein

http://books.google.com/books?id=gDvct4XI3MkC&pg=PA125&lpg=PA125&dq=kerch+strait+freezing&source=web&ots=jijwoyhWTn&sig=_0c4DXApfgPe-0MWlBXDGFMbOJQ&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result


_____________________________

The TOAW Redux Dude

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 142
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/12/2009 9:36:09 AM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

I think it's too early in the scenario at that point to expect Elmer to have that kind of success. We can argue that the historical Soviet '41 winter offensive pushed the Axis back, but when we play the Axis side in this scenario we don't end up in the same position as the Axis historically put themselves in in front of Leningrad and Moscow.


Let me clarify: I wouldn't advance beyond the historical lines.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 143
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/12/2009 12:11:58 PM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		But I'm still not clear as to what you are saying. Is it that you want to see if Elmer can reproduce the Soviet success in the winter '41 offensive? If that's it, what I'm saying is, to be fair to Elmer, the Axis would have to be in the same position they were historically, low supply, low replacements, in unprepared positions and unable to move. No human would play in a way to put the Axis in that position. This isn't a Barbarossa simulation, this is a 'what could you have done different if you were in charge of the Axis' simulation. On the other hand, maybe I am completely missing what you are saying.

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 144
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/12/2009 9:16:44 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sPzAbt653

But I'm still not clear as to what you are saying. Is it that you want to see if Elmer can reproduce the Soviet success in the winter '41 offensive? If that's it, what I'm saying is, to be fair to Elmer, the Axis would have to be in the same position they were historically, low supply, low replacements, in unprepared positions and unable to move. No human would play in a way to put the Axis in that position. This isn't a Barbarossa simulation, this is a 'what could you have done different if you were in charge of the Axis' simulation. On the other hand, maybe I am completely missing what you are saying.


Well, not quite in those positions(low supply&replacements, unable to move). But I wouldn't caputre the important cities(Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, or anythign beyond historical advance) and leave the AI with plenty of production and units and see if it can use them to good effect(ie to any succees).

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 145
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/13/2009 12:54:56 AM   
fogger

 

Posts: 1446
Joined: 9/17/2006
Status: offline 		I am currently on turn 83 which is a “Thaw turns roads to mud and hinders all operations”. I have found that when I move some air units they will not move directly to the new airfield if there is a hex which has reverted to soviet control in their path. The air units hit the soviet hex and stops. For example if I want to move from point A to D the unit will not directly go there. I have to go to B, C, D, H, J etc. This appears to be mainly in my deep rear areas where I have few or no units or where I do not have a solid front line.

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 146
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/13/2009 4:42:35 AM   
SMK-at-work

 

Posts: 3396
Joined: 8/28/2000
From: New Zealand
Status: offline 		Yeah I had the same in the 1st 10 turn mud-break - there's no offensive ops allowed, so air units are not allowed to transit over hexes you do not own such as river hexes you haven't converted, or sea hexes.

Another small point - I haven't seen any Soviet partisans at all in the 1st 46 turns.....I'm pretty sure htere were a couple of units already in FITE?

(in reply to fogger)
Post #: 147
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/13/2009 5:40:26 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Air unit movement during cease-fire/mud turns.

During these turns no friendly unit can move thru enemy controlled hexes, so air units will not cross any major river or water hexes in enemy control. The major river hexes are easy to identify and convert, but the water hexes are not, as it's not readily apparent as to who 'owns' them. For anyone who wants to know, here's the short version of how the ownership of water hexes takes place. When a map is created, all hexes are owned by player 1 by default. Once the map is complete and units are placed, an 'auto-ownership' feature can be run in the editor, allowing the computer to convert hex ownership based on unit deployment. However, this does not affect water hexes, so they all remained 'Soviet owned'. We manually converted all the water hexes on the 'Axis side' of the map in order to reduce the effect on air units during cease turns, but there are still cases where the player will run into this. A friendly naval unit moving thru a water hex will convert it, but there are many areas on the map where this is not possible.

(in reply to fogger)
Post #: 148
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/13/2009 5:56:38 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Soviet partisans.

In FitE, the way that I played the partisan game was to use security and mp units to surround them. Then I could leave them be and concentrate on the game. Occasionally one would attack and break out, and I'd have to spend the time moving my little units to chase around his little units until they were surrounded again. Destroying them does nothing as they only came back later.To me this was all a big waste of time. The only effect that partisans have is to tie up my security and mp units, while wasting my time. I think that every player has noticed that as the scenario progressed, you have to devote more and more of your units to 'fighting' partisans as more of them appeared. So for the original v653 I came up with a schedule for removing German security and mp units as the scenario progressed, while taking the Soviet partisan units out of the oob. To me, this had the same overall effect, but greatly increased the playability. This feature carried over to D21. I know some players are fans of the partisans and don't like this, but most players have been in agreement with the change. Also of importance was the fact that removing the partisans created several unit slots for the Soviet side, and these are definately needed whenever they can be found.

The partisans that arrive for the Soviet summer '44 offensive are still in, so if anybody makes it that far, watch your rear!

(in reply to SMK-at-work)
Post #: 149
RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread - 1/13/2009 6:18:17 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline 		Cease fire turns.

I just remembered that the original files that were sent out didn't contain the manually converted water/sea hexes. This occurred on 11-15-08, so files dated prior to that will experience more of the 'air units not crossing water hexes' during the cease turns. If you are playing with one of the early files, a friendly naval unit can convert those sea hexes, although you can't visibly tell when they are converted.

Not just because of this issue, but under consideration is the elimination of the cease fire turns, replacing them with negative shock. I'm no fan of negative shock, but after my recent experience with 11 turns of 80% shock after the Typhoon offensive, I am leaning towards shock being a better model of the mud turns than the cease fires. I plan to take the Citadel TO, which comes up around turn 190, in order to experience prolonged negative shock again. The main consideration would be that during mud/cease fire turns, there is no chance of the enemy interfering with you, while you can move unrestricted thru friendly territory. During mud/negative shock turns, supply goes down, unit strengths are reduced, movement and combat are greatly restricted (but still possible in a limited capacity).

If anybody else has experience with or thoughts on extended (10 turns) heavy negative shock and its' effect on the scenario, we'd like to hear.

Thanks.

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> RE: Directive 21 playtesters thread Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.563