Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/20/2008 11:14:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		A little further south of the above shot I came to the realization that even if I took the next 10 turns or so to encircle and destroy a small line of Soviet troops he will just replace them with more.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 241
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:47:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the moves minimovie from turns 16 throu 20:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 242
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:49:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And now a series of close-ups starting at the north sector:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 243
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:50:22 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 244
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:52:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 245
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:52:40 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 246
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:53:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 247
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:53:58 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 248
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:54:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 249
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:55:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 250
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 4:56:57 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I believe I destroyed 14 Soviet units in turn 20: all infantry types. Here's the Axis losses so far:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 251
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 5:02:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the north half of the front lines:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 252
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 5:07:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the south half of the front lines:





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 11/21/2008 5:09:59 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 253
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 - 11/21/2008 5:14:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Nothing changed at Odessa ( again ) and I'm beginning to think it's not going to for a long long time. I need more arty or some tanks or a nuclear bomb or something. Those guys deserve metals for holding out in the face of repeated attacks for weeks now. I've tried using all the combat support ( aircraft ) that's available and all the railroad arty and both together at the same time and nothing is budging those guys. There's only three Soviet arty pieces there and they must be some big guns or something like that. I hate to attack at "ignore losses" settings because of the much much higher losses but I may have to to get some progress out of my guys. I've seen units evaporate when on "limit losses" settings so I've been attacking at "minimum losses" settings. Maybe that's the problemo.

Anyway, I've put together a loss history of the HRS squads and I thought you might find it mildly interesting:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 11/21/2008 12:28:29 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 254
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/22/2008 11:10:24 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		So um.......I'm minding my own business when all of a sudden one of my MP units near Kiev goes into reorg during the last combat round of turn 20. I open the moves from Curt and loe and behold I find ALL my MP units are in reorg, even those near Leningrad and those in the Ukraine.

So, all you scenario designers out there.....maybe you should break your formations down into bite-sized chunks so that 40+ units don't go into reorg when only one of them does.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 255
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 12:47:19 AM   
LLv34_Snefens


Posts: 254
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Aarhus, Denmark
Status: offline 		From the manual

"Formation quality is the average of the formation's proficiency and average assigned unit quality. Formation quality is reduced if many units are divided. The formation passes the quality check if this value is greater than a random number from 1 to 100, or if the number of units that experienced severe combat results in the previous turn is smaller than a random number from 1 to the number of units in the formation. This means that formations are subject to reorganization on turns following heavy combat."

and

"Unit Quality = (2*proficiency+readiness)/3.


This is a weighted average of a unit's proficiency and readiness, expressed as a percentage. Regardless of actual proficiency and readiness, quality can be no lower than 10% and no higher than 100%. This is the chance that the unit will pass a quality check. Quality checks are made at numerous points in the game to determine things like the unit's ability to sustain an attack or hold ground in the face of a strong enemy attack."

I'm seeing a lot of orange readiness status in that screenshot.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 256
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 2:04:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Thanks for the info. I had no idea. Now I understand better.

(in reply to LLv34_Snefens)
Post #: 257
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 4:30:03 AM   
sPzAbt653


Posts: 9511
Joined: 5/3/2007
From: east coast, usa
Status: offline
quote:

if the number of units that experienced severe combat results in the previous turn is smaller than a random number from 1 to the number of units in the formation. This means that formations are subject to reorganization


So if there are 20 units in a formation, and one unit experiences severe combat results, there is a 95% chance that the formation will be subject to reorganization. And if 10 units experience severe combat results, there is a 50% chance of reorganization.

No wonder I can't win in Vegas.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 258
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:29:16 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the moves minimovie from turns 17 to 21:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to sPzAbt653)
Post #: 259
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:30:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And now a series of close-ups starting at the north sector:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 260
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:31:12 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 261
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:32:18 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 262
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:32:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 263
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:33:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 264
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:34:06 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 265
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:34:53 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 266
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:35:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And the next sector to the south:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 267
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:37:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I believe I destroyed 39 Soviet units in turn 21: 31 infantry types, 2 armoured divisions, and 6 guns. Here's the Axis losses so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 268
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:42:25 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the north half of the front lines so far:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 269
RE: FITE Curt vs larry T21 - 11/23/2008 5:49:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the south half of the front lines [ sorry about the bad quality of the view ]:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 270
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: FITE Curt vs larry T20 Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.438