Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> After Action Reports >> joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 5:52:17 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
VS and I will try to play through the short version of the NJ1 scenario.
VS will play the Axis - he is one of the most knowledgeable Axis gamers!
and I will play the Allied this time.

This is the first of three night scenarios and starts on the 21st of August 1941.
This scenario plays during the time of the destruction of Hamburg.

The Allied score triple for each terror target and normal for every other targets.




_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:07:15 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
Because this will be a joint AAR, I will not discuss any future plans, but I will try to give a glimpse into the Allied side.
I will try to discuss past missions, and explain, why the Allied C in C is such an incompetent fool


In the NJ1 scenario BC is quite weak - there are still many Sterling and Wellington bombers used. There are not as many NIs as in the full campaign, because only BC is used.
Sterling bombers can carry a nice load, but lack altitude and are therefore any easy target for large AA concentrations.
The Wellington is a good and sturdy aircraft, but it is past its prime.
The Halifax II and Lancaster I will have to carry the main tasks, but I have to be careful. I do not have an unlimited stock of those.
Mosquito bombers have a nice aid -Oboe -, and can mark targets as pathfinders close to the homeland ( Oboe has a limited range from the closest Allied A/F).

There are even a few Lancaster IIIs, all of them pathfindercapable.....maybe I will use them for pinpoint attacks.

The helping force are 2 Wellington and one Mosquito RCM units as well as a few nightfighter units ( MosquitoII and Beaufighters)

here a look at the campaign information at the game start:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 2
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:10:02 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
The main strength of BC during this time will be the use of windows - and the Germans will have to adapt to the failure of their radar.

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 3
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:35:03 PM   
von Shagmeister


Posts: 1273
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Dromahane, Ireland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: swift

VS will play the Axis - he is one of the most knowledgeable Axis gamers!



Duh, but he still manages to send Werner the wrong file!

22Aug43 Axis

Bomber Command sends out multiple raids against area/rail targets. Since the introduction of their Duppel (Window) during the Hamburg raid last month most of the Nachtjäger force has been rendered impotent. All together we only manage to bring down 15 British bombers and of these only 7 are claimed by fighters. FuG 202 equipped a/c fail to get any sensor detections due to interference caused by window. FuG 212 a/c get two contacts but neither leads to an interception. It appears our a/c must rely on search lights and the fires of our burning cities to pick out enemy a/c. We can only hope that sensors in development allow us to overcome the severe restrictions imposed by window. Himmelbett is obsolete, we must chase the bombers to their targets and rely on our eyes!


_____________________________

Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 4
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:48:04 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline

for turn 1 I used all A/C for a maximum effort turn.
I attack several different targets and used many NIs in streams and as patrols.

here is the raid list ( sorted for bomb raids)




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to von Shagmeister)
Post #: 5
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:50:28 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
here are the fly paths of Northern Germany




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 6
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:51:27 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and central Germany




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 7
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:52:47 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
the campaign information after turn 1




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 8
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:53:47 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and the AAR of the raids:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 9
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:55:49 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
you can see that my losses were in the raids against coastal towns ( Cuxhaven and Bremerhaven), which are not only protected by the typical Luftwaffe Flak units, but also by German Navy AA guns.

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 10
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:56:56 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and here my A/C losses:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 11
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 6:58:25 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
for turn 2 there will be less action,
I forgot to move some units before the first turn.
Also several units are low on morale and others are tired.

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 12
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 8:03:34 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
turn 2 only sees one weak raid to Lingen, and a few NIs to known NF bases




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 13
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 8:05:49 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
here the flypaths.
you can see that the additional waypoints can help creating a better path through enemy territory, or to confuse the opponent




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 14
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 8:07:44 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
VS keeps his forces still grounded
he is probably waiting for an deep inland strike.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 15
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 8:09:09 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
it looks like the raid against the small town of Lingen did some damage




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 16
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/5/2008 8:11:38 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
planning for turn 3.

NO MISSIONS, all A/C are grounded because of the amount of low clouds.



I would attack the enemy, as long only Germany is clouded, but I am not risking a bunch of landing accidents in this foggy weather.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 17
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 12:32:23 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Bite em Shaggy, Bite em

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 18
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 1:31:01 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: swift

The main strength of BC during this time will be the use of windows - and the Germans will have to adapt to the failure of their radar.


I know you mean Window, obviously, but still... That BC should have an advantage by using Windows...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 19
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 1:34:22 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
Term, you not seen Swift play, he means Windows, even Vista

I would like to see the house rules he came up with, I feel sorry for Shaggy (except, I know Shaggy is pretty swift himself :)




_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 20
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 1:43:33 PM   
von Shagmeister


Posts: 1273
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Dromahane, Ireland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

Bite em Shaggy, Bite em


I'd love to, but I appear to have had my dentures stolen. I'm having to use my gums whilst I grown new teeth.


_____________________________

Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 21
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 1:48:57 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
ahhhhh, keep forgetting I not the only old one here :P

okay

Kick em Shaggy, Kick em


_____________________________


(in reply to von Shagmeister)
Post #: 22
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 8:39:07 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

Term, you not seen Swift play, he means Windows, even Vista

I would like to see the house rules he came up with, I feel sorry for Shaggy (except, I know Shaggy is pretty swift himself :)





I somewhat like Vista
but the computer I am playing at the moment is with Linux

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 23
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/6/2008 8:40:00 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
turn 4 sent to Shaggy.

This time more action

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 24
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 3:57:36 PM   
von Shagmeister


Posts: 1273
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Dromahane, Ireland
Status: offline
25Aug43

Extensive radio activity detected by Y-Dienst. Large scale raid predicted.

Large stream approaches the northern Ruhr, controllers begin assembling fighters in the area using the new Wilde Sau and Zahme Sau techniques. Atmospheric conditions are good, searchlights illuminate the clouds and allow for numerous interceptions. To the surprise of the controllers the stream passes the Ruhr onwards deeper into the Reich. Target is in the Leipzig area, fighters directed accordingly and more interceptions are made in the vacinity of the target.

A second large stream is detected over the North Sea heading across the Jutland peninsular, suspect one of the Baltic ports will be targetted. Fighters start to be assembled, looks like it isn't Kiel. Target is Stettin, fighters to assemble in area. Searchlights and flak barrage illuminate many RAF bombers, Pauke, Pauke heard many times (helped now by the moon).

Many Allied a/c are bought down (133 (90 by fighters, 43 by flak)) but still many targets are left as blackened ruins. The enemy has had to pay for his success with the blood of his bomber crews. Most of the a/c bought down are Lancasters and Halifaxs but examination of wreckage also reveals three Wellington Elint a/c (codes identified as 192 Sqn) which Stab XII.Fl.Kps. is particularly pleased about.

Analysis: The RAF planners made serious errors by having two diverse streams allowing us to fight two seperate battles using units from different areas. The first stream in particular (Leipzig raid) was poorly routed over a heavy flak concentration (northern Ruhr) allowing a large number of interceptions to be made (resulting in an estimated 50-60% of the losses on this one raid). Whether this was intentional to throw off controllers as to the real target (which succeeded until stream passed the Ruhr) or if it was poor planning (doubtful) is not known but RAF losses were undoubtedly higher because of this.

Our crews have been quick to adapt to the threat of window and our new control techniques. FuG 212 offers a degree of immunity from interference (13 detections leading to 8 interceptions) whilst FuG 202 is rendered practically useless (1 detection, 1 interception) except in the hands of the most experienced crews. Enemy losses were extremely heavy but even so we couldn't stop the destruction of the targets.

< Message edited by von Shagmeister -- 11/7/2008 4:00:16 PM >


_____________________________

Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 25
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 4:07:50 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
It was indeed bloody.
I thought I was well away from the Flak concentration with my raid.....but the units thought of shortening their way ( they did not use all waypoints....duuuh )

and my major mistake.....I forgot to check the moon rising and setting times and I paid dearly for it

here the planed raids for turn 4

The Leipzig raids targeted the big ALUM site with the hope of creepback bombing over the city




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to von Shagmeister)
Post #: 26
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 4:09:35 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
just to show how I use the waypoints ( at least sometimes):
here is the Soest raid




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 27
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 4:11:17 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
and here is the campaign info after the bloody turn 4:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 28
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 4:12:13 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
here is the after mission report:





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 29
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift - 11/7/2008 4:14:14 PM   
wernerpruckner


Posts: 4148
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline

and now one of the little positive things of that turn.....
creepback did work at Leipzig
and something is still burning ( red dot.......black dots are totally destroyed areas )




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to wernerpruckner)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> After Action Reports >> joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.016