leastonh1
Posts: 879
Joined: 2/12/2005 From: West Yorkshire, England Status: offline
|
sabre1 - For what it's worth...When I'm looking for new software these days, I always go open source first, then shareware, then commercial last. Unless I have a very good reason to alter that sequence, I don't. Obviously, I can only go on my own experience, but I find that open source application software (once it's out of alpha and early beta, and not always then!) is usually so well supported and regularly developed, that bugs are few and generally minor and squashed extremely quickly. Shareware is similar, but costs me money which I'd rather not spend if I don't have to hehe! But, even shareware authors usually respond very quickly and very personally to support issues. It's their bread and butter, so they provide that rare thing, the personal service. Some commercial software is better because the development has been well funded, but in my book. Bigger and more expensive definitely doesn't equal better. I have always used commercial anti-virus software (BitDefender 2009) because I've always found it more reliable. However, I only ever use freeware firewalls (Comodo or Online Armor (not v3 though!)) these days. Just my 2p worth
_____________________________
2nd Lt. George Rice: Looks like you guys are going to be surrounded. Richard Winters: We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded.
|