Bing
Posts: 1366
Joined: 5/20/2000 From: Gaylord, MI, USA Status: offline
|
If y'all should run into the PC Magazine review of the Kapersky AVP, don't pay least bit of attention to it. They don't have the foggiest idea of what they are writing about. Kapersky is as good or better than anything out there and that includes detection of Trojan viruses. I got the usual prompt reply from Switzerland and a URL to a German website that shows tests of Kapersky as #1 in this area. Who do I believe? Not Ziff Davis, that's fir sure, they've done this kind of thing too many times. Thank the guys on the old SP mailing list for us knowing about Kapersky - the list was all we had before big time message forums: Due to the nature of the list a virus can spread very fast. Kapersky was 24 to 48 hours ahead of Norton and MacAfee. Both of them may have imporved in this area, seriously for the sake of their customers, I hope this is so. I don't know who else besides Kapersky provides daily updates - but if they don't, they are not giving their customers the protection they need. These days viruses are a fast moving world. Bing
_____________________________
"For Those That Fought For It, Freedom Has a Taste And A Meaning The Protected Will Never Know. " - From the 101st Airborne Division Association Website
|