Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: September 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: September 1942 Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: September 1942 - 12/15/2009 9:46:48 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
I decieded to post few more maps regarding potential future operations.

There has been already the initial plans for possible invasion of Marshall Islands layed out earlier.

Here are two more. The common factor is that all of these operations will most likely see KB in action with full force.

Another common factor is the scale of these invasions. We need to go in with substantial force with adequate supporting elements.

Every assault in the Pacific needs to be supported by SEAC forces. Once we commit to operations allied needs to launch overwhelming assaults in Burma and if possible in 3rd theatre too.

Here are the maps with some thoughts. Keep in mind that all of these are just sketches are by no means given green light.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1111
RE: September 1942 - 12/15/2009 9:49:08 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
...and the 3rd potential assault plan.

There are few more of these brewing in my mind but more about them later on. We are in no rush to commit into large scale offensive actions.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by aztez -- 12/15/2009 9:50:37 PM >

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1112
RE: September 1942 - 12/15/2009 10:42:59 PM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4776
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline
Hm...the Kuriles.

I think this could be an interesting operation because of several facors.

- you could (though it probably takes a bit time) force the Japanese AF into a war of attrition because there are some airbases
capable of supporting heavy bombers to the home islands and as a Japanese player id like to avoid this at all costs, more so thsi early in the war.

- exactly because of this youd probably force a heavy naval reaction including CV´s to counter the invasion. Well planned this could turn the war.

- you relieve the attention from northern Australia and India and stage a slower counter there.
Can you bring intel up there? At least sub to not make it too obvious?



- If points 2 and 3 do not happen, even better. Id get every SeaBee in range and any other guy with at least a shovel up there and build your bomber
bases. Its a high supply cost operation though if you want to make something out of it. How safe are the Aleuthians? Can you build them up so you
can ship in supplies in two step ops from the Wcoast?

Good idea, risky but with good results a real turner.

I wonder if its worth to include Urrupu-Jima in your plans. Maybe in excange to the dot base SW of Onnekotan. Closer and a potential lvl 3.
Fighters so close to japan and a few light bombers would be bad news to Hokkaido...

< Message edited by LoBaron -- 12/15/2009 10:45:00 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1113
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 1:17:25 AM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline
Kuriles .. humm

I've perused the map and while a lot of those islands (and 1 good dot base) have potential level 3-4 airfields (i.e 6-7 maxed) the ports stink. not one is bigger than a size 1 !
Most of the airfields will be starting at 0 too unless japans building them (unlikely bar parumashiro). and apart from the 2 northern most and the next dot base all are in easy sweep range of Hokkaido which starts with airfields built upto level 4 and closest can be pushed to an 8 so you will be facing serious japanese landbased air too. Its also very likely that KB will be in japan unless you see it elsewhere too so quick reaction range as well. On top of that i would put good money hes got or will soon have long range patrol planes covering the seas approaching so you may well be spotted early. I would avoid this untill your carriers can face both KB and land based air ( given leaky CAP the betties/nells while taking horrific losses could cause some serious harm while he has good pilots). Not to mention its withing 15 hexes of the mainland i.e Kamikazi activation. Is there a date limit like in WitP ?? not sure.

However not to pour doom and gloom over everything . Operation bulldozer has a lot more going for it. He doesnt have that many large air fields in range either (suva being the exception and its still too far for zero sweeps or escorted bombers) and if KBs in Japan thats several days delay and he'll have to refuel along the way too adding more time.Also recon flights are possible, cats might reach and wouldnt be that out of the ordinary to trigger an immediate response. Cats over the Kuriles would set alarm bells off in Rangoon . esp if you spend a few days over canton/baker etc.

With a rough head count of defenders you will have at least some recon here (vs nil in the aleutians) and maybe most importantly NZ to run to if it all goes down the toilet.
get enough men/eng/everything and head for a non atoll .. flatten it ! while small regimental units tried atoll asaults (he cant be strong on every island). and then reinforce what you got easily. retire to regounp/run away. then either he bases KB here for the rest of the war or you go back in a month and mop up the rest. start prepping now for a possible nov/dec 42 attack. maybe even build up the aleutians as a diversion.

As a strategic plan ,, take this stepping stone(pago) then drive north Phoenix/gilbers/marshalls then West .. and all of a sudden noumea/rabaul(poss) and Fiji are left hanging wide open and sompletely unsupplied. If he hasnt evacuated them then leave them alone for 6 months if he does then follow closely up behind him taking bases easily. Apart from the initial land grab you'll also have LBA support (even if only LR bombers in some cases) all the way.

Additionally by late 42 you should have better pools if nothing else(at least US stuff) while the RAF battle it out over india/burma.

<sing>

Oh Aztez has been fighting hard
Of that we all argee
But will he get to Tokyo
Before 1963 ?

<i will never sing again , i promise>

anyway that just my advice , feel free to shred/delete/use as toilet paper anything you disagree with.

PS .. 1'st disgreement with LoBaron here
quote:


I wonder if its worth to include Urrupu-Jima in your plans. Maybe in excange to the dot base SW of Onnekotan. Closer and a potential lvl 3.


suicide , utter madnees , lunacy (cough) .. made my point
quote:


Well planned this could turn the war.


For either side ! its way too risky imo. Aztez loses in the kuriles and he's not going anywhere in the pacific untill 44. Granted if it worked perfectly then 'maybe' just 'maybe' it might stay alive long enough to hurt japan, but you cant unload many supplies on a level 1 port and whats to cover all the endless convoyes needed going to and fro up here .. not to mention WINTER ! ..

the only way this could imo work is if Aztez somehow manages to sink KB and the japanese surface fleet. Look at the supply chain , those ports cant rearm a fishing boat let alone a destroyer. so back to dutch harbour for 4 inch shells ? (ok an AKE would sort this but whos supplying the AKE with supplies? ). everything would have to be taken along as amphibious cargo and allied AK's esp xAK's take forever unloading supply on that mission type.

ok ,, end PS rant ..and no singing

< Message edited by Rob Brennan UK -- 12/16/2009 1:32:04 AM >


_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 1114
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 5:41:32 AM   
offenseman


Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Not to mention its withing 15 hexes of the mainland i.e Kamikazi activation. Is there a date limit like in WitP ?? not sure.



In a game vs. Allied AI, the AI took Erotufu in May-42 which is a handful of hexes from Hokkaido and while I did not check to see if any of my units were now kamikaze capable, I cannot imagine the AI would do anything to enable kamikazes that early. I wish I had taken a look at that...

Good points regarding the rest of Rob's commentary- even the singing.


_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1115
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 7:25:04 AM   
LoBaron


Posts: 4776
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

Kuriles .. humm

I've perused the map and while a lot of those islands (and 1 good dot base) have potential level 3-4 airfields (i.e 6-7 maxed) the ports stink. not one is bigger than a size 1 !
Most of the airfields will be starting at 0 too unless japans building them (unlikely bar parumashiro). and apart from the 2 northern most and the next dot base all are in easy sweep range of Hokkaido which starts with airfields built upto level 4 and closest can be pushed to an 8 so you will be facing serious japanese landbased air too. Its also very likely that KB will be in japan unless you see it elsewhere too so quick reaction range as well. On top of that i would put good money hes got or will soon have long range patrol planes covering the seas approaching so you may well be spotted early. I would avoid this untill your carriers can face both KB and land based air ( given leaky CAP the betties/nells while taking horrific losses could cause some serious harm while he has good pilots). Not to mention its withing 15 hexes of the mainland i.e Kamikazi activation. Is there a date limit like in WitP ?? not sure.

However not to pour doom and gloom over everything . Operation bulldozer has a lot more going for it. He doesnt have that many large air fields in range either (suva being the exception and its still too far for zero sweeps or escorted bombers) and if KBs in Japan thats several days delay and he'll have to refuel along the way too adding more time.Also recon flights are possible, cats might reach and wouldnt be that out of the ordinary to trigger an immediate response. Cats over the Kuriles would set alarm bells off in Rangoon . esp if you spend a few days over canton/baker etc.

With a rough head count of defenders you will have at least some recon here (vs nil in the aleutians) and maybe most importantly NZ to run to if it all goes down the toilet.
get enough men/eng/everything and head for a non atoll .. flatten it ! while small regimental units tried atoll asaults (he cant be strong on every island). and then reinforce what you got easily. retire to regounp/run away. then either he bases KB here for the rest of the war or you go back in a month and mop up the rest. start prepping now for a possible nov/dec 42 attack. maybe even build up the aleutians as a diversion.

As a strategic plan ,, take this stepping stone(pago) then drive north Phoenix/gilbers/marshalls then West .. and all of a sudden noumea/rabaul(poss) and Fiji are left hanging wide open and sompletely unsupplied. If he hasnt evacuated them then leave them alone for 6 months if he does then follow closely up behind him taking bases easily. Apart from the initial land grab you'll also have LBA support (even if only LR bombers in some cases) all the way.

Additionally by late 42 you should have better pools if nothing else(at least US stuff) while the RAF battle it out over india/burma.

<sing>

Oh Aztez has been fighting hard
Of that we all argee
But will he get to Tokyo
Before 1963 ?

<i will never sing again , i promise>

anyway that just my advice , feel free to shred/delete/use as toilet paper anything you disagree with.

PS .. 1'st disgreement with LoBaron here
quote:


I wonder if its worth to include Urrupu-Jima in your plans. Maybe in excange to the dot base SW of Onnekotan. Closer and a potential lvl 3.


suicide , utter madnees , lunacy (cough) .. made my point
quote:


Well planned this could turn the war.


For either side ! its way too risky imo. Aztez loses in the kuriles and he's not going anywhere in the pacific untill 44. Granted if it worked perfectly then 'maybe' just 'maybe' it might stay alive long enough to hurt japan, but you cant unload many supplies on a level 1 port and whats to cover all the endless convoyes needed going to and fro up here .. not to mention WINTER ! ..

the only way this could imo work is if Aztez somehow manages to sink KB and the japanese surface fleet. Look at the supply chain , those ports cant rearm a fishing boat let alone a destroyer. so back to dutch harbour for 4 inch shells ? (ok an AKE would sort this but whos supplying the AKE with supplies? ). everything would have to be taken along as amphibious cargo and allied AK's esp xAK's take forever unloading supply on that mission type.

ok ,, end PS rant ..and no singing


Damn Rob you outthought me on this.
Good points there, and I admit I didn´t look at harbour size.
Must-stop-posting-on-complex-issues-after-beer-before-going-to-bed. *sigh*

Might still be an interesting option for a diversion for other operations though?

_____________________________


(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1116
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 10:38:16 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
One thing with Kuriles-invasion is that it releases the Kamikaze-option to Japanese in 1/1/1944, by owning base within 20 hexes from Tokyo. Not sure if that is necessarily a good idea.

< Message edited by Sardaukar -- 12/16/2009 10:44:31 AM >


_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 1117
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 11:14:44 AM   
ADB123

 

Posts: 1559
Joined: 8/18/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

One thing with Kuriles-invasion is that it releases the Kamikaze-option to Japanese in 1/1/1944, by owning base within 20 hexes from Tokyo. Not sure if that is necessarily a good idea.


As long as Kamikazes are affected by winter weather that might not be a bad trade-off.

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 1118
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 11:30:25 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
I think after that Japan can convert Kamikazes everywhere..which may make other naval operations in other areas painful. Especially if kamikazes still remain as overpowered as before Patch 2. I don't know if anyone tested them after patch 2.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to ADB123)
Post #: 1119
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 6:58:30 PM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline
quote:

Must-stop-posting-on-complex-issues-after-beer-before-going-to-bed. *sigh*


Best time to post ! .. its why i rant

Sardukars point on Kamis , yes they will be active everywhere from 1/44 (unless they trigger early ?? ) I'm yet to be convinced Kamis are overpowered in AE, but they arent the sham that you could ignore in WitP either.

_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 1120
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 6:58:51 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
I'm not a fan of either of those plans.


  • Moose/Kuriles - I don't think this has great strategic value in the long run. It is closer to his home islands than your nearest ports. The best you can do is build up Adak to a level 8 port. It also isn't going to make him overcommit to anything as he has interior lines and this is very close to his home base.
  • Bulldog/Samoa - This is exactly what he is expecting and waiting for you to do. Taking is going to cause to expend a lot of effort for something you already owned. Its only strategic value is as a shorter journey for your convoys to the SW pacific. But it is clear this isn't going to be the decisive theatre any longer as you've already lost the Solomons and surrounding areas.


I think your best bet at this point is to attack directly into the central pacific. I think the Marshalls are your best bet. You have a number of atols you can take, there is no way he has strong garrisons everywhere there. You can bring a lot more troops to bear than he can I think. Taking the Marshalls gives you local interior lines. From there you can threaten the carolines, marianas, gilberts, solomons and back down to the south pacific to fiji and the samoas. Taking those forces a response there or a pullback and strengthening of the marianas at least and probably also the carolines. He can't afford to waste time and effort in the South Pacific after that. Then you can, at your leisure, take back Pago Pago, Suva and Noumea.

I would really concentrate your US forces for it, all your carriers, all your best divisions, your best surfaces TFs, etc.

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 1121
RE: September 1942 - 12/16/2009 7:04:52 PM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline
Greymane speaks truthfully imo too. now i've thought about it.

Other options might be to ignore the Pacific entirely and reinforce/retake australia and then go for the DEI (his beating heart) .. way too early to plan this in any detail though.One other benefit of a DEI approach is that the commonwealth can help from the north by nabbing northern sumatra to add extra pressure to his defence. think of all that OIL in range of heavy bomber ?? <drool>

_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 1122
RE: September 1942 - 12/17/2009 11:31:16 AM   
veji1

 

Posts: 1019
Joined: 7/9/2005
Status: offline
I haven't played AE yet and haven't had time to play much WITP in a while, but for me part of the pleasure was behaving in a historical way. As the allies you would want to take the initiative, show your strength, but also not go straightaway for a game finisher, ie part of the pleasure is chocking japan progressively.. this is why I am not a big fan of 1943 attacks in the DEI : you can finish the game right there fairly quickly with all the intersupporting bases in AE from northern australia.. There will be massive battles and losses, but by end 1943 japan is starved and done...

While going for the central pacific feels both historical and methodically slow enough.. with the new rules on stacking, you won't be facing 5 divisions on a atoll so with carefull planning and a KB accounted for somewhere, you can do it... And as a reader I would be really interested in seeing a proper island chain invasion in AE to see how it gets handled... from there you can than go for the mariannas and pincer attack your way to the DEI by going for Palau, New guinea, or Truk...


_____________________________

Adieu Ô Dieu odieux... signé Adam

(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1123
RE: September 1942 - 12/17/2009 9:12:17 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
A lot of good views/opinions and most importantly debate. These will help any allied player thinking through forthcoming months. Personally, as always appreciated.

Another very quiet turn. Just airstrikes againts my ground forces in china.

There really has not been much talk about the amount of transports needed to pull through an large scale invasions. The off loading is so diffrent from classic witp.

Any ideas / knowledge regarding this? I'am thinking maybe around 20 AP's + few AK's per divisional size unit. The off loading should be done within turn or two. At least when talking about the actual ground troops.

Also what about the composition of the forces on the landings? Haven't seen much discussions on this subject either when it comes to allied side.

LoBaron: I like the Kuriles route too but as many commented the ports might become an problem. Otherwise it would be the most direct route towards Japan and even if kamikaze are activated a bit earlier it would not be an disaster.

Are you refering to the intel regarding northern australia and burma? I'am flying missions but nothing significant has been spotted.

The Urrupu-Jima would be an obvious target once the other bases are secured.

Even if we could get couple of airbases here it might be worth an shot but his naval forces needs to be dealt with before this campaign though.

Rob: Yeah, the ports will become an issue if we go through that route. I like the airfield sizes though very much.

Dave has not deployed many Betty bombers. Actually haven't seen any for months so I would assume he is training them. Same can be said about Nells. This might become an issue because these must be around 60 exp once we get rolling.

As pointed the operation Bulldozers problem is that it is somewhat obvious. He doesn't seem to have much in these islands though at the moment though. I think this is the least risky operation along with Marshalls but I don't know. It would open the road towards Suva and Noumea and once these are seized than I could link up more allied troops.

I completely agree that too aggressive and brutal assault can be very devastating for BOTH sides. That is why everything needs to calculated as good as it can. Even 1:1 losses are unacceptable in longrun.

Hmmm, you are talking about OFF map movement and than jumping through into DEI? That would be an bold move and also risky. This could be done though via Cape Town but the travelling times are long and it would be one hell of an invasion fleet send through Panama canal. Intresting... need to think this too.

offenseman: Intresting. I think that AI move was way too early and if it activated the kamikazes than very bad move indeed. Allthough AI still has an life of its own.

Sardaukar: Yeah, if manual is to be believed than kamikazes will become active. Allthough they if succesfull invasion is made than the trade off might not be as bad as expected.

A lot of variants available thus leading to numerous possible setbacks.

I guess the key issue is how "powered" the kamikazes are in this AE version. I bet they can be used everywhere but it will also dry out his pilots pools much faster if active.

ABD123: The weather is definately an issue and I think it will affect all the operations in the north. Including kamikazes.

Graymane: Point taken into consideration. The biggest strategic benefit would be those nice airfields near home islands. With that range even the shorter legged bombers could become quite useful. That is the main benefit for the allied side.

The Bulldozer would most definately/ likely get the KB out into open which is not an bad idea once we are ready to deal with it. We want to deal the deathblow to his naval assets as soon as practical.

The risk with Marshalls is not the actual strenght or garrisons. It is the amount of bases he has there which if developed can provide a lot of airpower againts any invasion TF's coming towards the islands.

It might be costly depending on his strenghts in this region. Than again the atoll chain would provide a lot of good airfields for the allies too. It is kind of an trade off as all the operations usually are.

The central pacific route is definately another options. The knife through butter effect into Iwo Jima could be very devastating for him. (It was in the previous encounter).

I completely agree that we need enough carriers plus lba cover if and when possible.

Good points and views.

veji1: Nice to see you here too. I concur that the most fun is retain somewhat logical historical feel of the game. We have so far managed to do this.

It is an two way sword though since by being too obvious you only bring more harms and nasty suprises so I would like to think out of the box too.

Good thing though that we are not ready yet to go forward so we can still think this through and finalize the possible future operations.

The point taken about the island chain invasions. We shall see what the future holds... there are those plans againts Marshalls plus Samoa allready sketched. Just a bit too early to deciede on these. Keep in mind also that these are initial plans which can be changed in very fast time frame.

...appreciated the comments. A lot of things to think through.

(in reply to veji1)
Post #: 1124
RE: September 1942 - 12/18/2009 2:16:39 AM   
cfulbright

 

Posts: 2778
Joined: 5/7/2003
Status: offline
"Any ideas / knowledge regarding this? I'am thinking maybe around 20 AP's + few AK's per divisional size unit. The off loading should be done within turn or two. At least when talking about the actual ground troops."

Aztez - If it's a port 0 or 1 island, you are going to get your infantry squads landed very quickly, and then it will take weeks to unload all the Motorized Support and things like radars, 105mm guns, etc. You may need to do a Frank Jack Fletcher and scoot your transports away before they're done unloading. One size 0 islands they will NEVER finish unloading the bigger devices

< Message edited by cfulbright -- 12/18/2009 2:18:07 AM >

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1125
RE: September 1942 - 12/18/2009 2:35:23 AM   
Yamato_Blitzer

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 8/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

We are in no rush to commit into large scale offensive actions.
Forget that.

Oh, and Kurilles looks awesome, won't bad weather work in your favor if he's trying to intervene and stop you? your ships get more damaged but what about invading during the worst months on purpose? Worse weather means far less chance (and in some cases a total void) of all-out carrier clashes, you can neutralize that risk for the time being, therefor securing a crucial foot hold and at the same time giving yourself even more time for the advantage of allied CV build up

Furthermore, I demand the moral operation of sending significant American ground and air forces into China, A non-stop dagger blitz from the Southern coast to Peking! Totally annihilating the CEF (or rather the CEF and the Manchuko Garrison, that cheap bastard)

< Message edited by Yamato_Blitzer -- 12/18/2009 2:43:24 AM >

(in reply to cfulbright)
Post #: 1126
RE: September 1942 - 12/18/2009 2:56:32 AM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato_Blitzer

quote:

We are in no rush to commit into large scale offensive actions.
Forget that.

Oh, and Kurilles looks awesome, won't bad weather work in your favor if he's trying to intervene and stop you? your ships get more damaged but what about invading during the worst months on purpose? Worse weather means far less chance (and in some cases a total void) of all-out carrier clashes, you can neutralize that risk for the time being, therefor securing a crucial foot hold and at the same time giving yourself even more time for the advantage of allied CV build up

Furthermore, I demand the moral operation of sending significant American ground and air forces into China, A non-stop dagger blitz from the Southern coast to Peking! Totally annihilating the CEF (or rather the CEF and the Manchuko Garrison, that cheap bastard)


Invading in winter (unless the rules have been drastically changed) makes any invasion iirc 75% less effective and unloading nigh well impossible aka cfulbright's comments.

not seeing nellys eh ? well hes still got his main core flyers then (80+) and as you say training up a good cadre too.
quote:


Hmmm, you are talking about OFF map movement and than jumping through into DEI? That would be an bold move and also risky. This could be done though via Cape Town but the travelling times are long and it would be one hell of an invasion fleet send through Panama canal. Intresting... need to think this too.


nothing off map at all. your CV's in the pacific can lurk in the SW and cover important troops shipments to australia to fight a land war vs japan. being in SW pac means its 'relatively' easy to move up to india to cover a CW invasion (in the far future tho.) I mean you use the CW troops in the north DEI and US/Oz/NZ to initially fight in australia and be available when you finish up there.

you have had a couple of recent comments that kuriles is a good idea .. its NOT at least till spring 43 , invading in winter in the north ?? nuts.

Well you did want discussions ?

_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to Yamato_Blitzer)
Post #: 1127
RE: September 1942 - 12/18/2009 3:30:28 AM   
Yamato_Blitzer

 

Posts: 67
Joined: 8/8/2009
Status: offline
Usually the Jap player has a whole lot of nothing stationed in that region, nothing to significant, and aztez can concentrate a ton of ****. It can be done, worth it if he can gain that region without any naval risk due to the weather

< Message edited by Yamato_Blitzer -- 12/18/2009 3:32:51 AM >

(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1128
RE: September 1942 - 12/18/2009 6:45:18 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
To invade the Marshalls (I'll also add the Gilberts into this as it might be easier there instead), I'd focus on 3 atols that are close together, both the Marshalls and the Gilberts have that on the map. At least one with a functioning level 1 AF and maybe one with a good port. The Marshalls have that in the SE corner of the chain including a white island I believe. The Gilberts are less developed but maybe safer.

The invasion composition would be such that you would land at least 1 RGT of INF + armor + one of those small DET with naval support in the first wave. Basically, work on 3 x the AV of the atol max size. The 2nd wave would include arty + eng assets (a lot of ENG assets to get sizes up quickly). The 3rd wave would include AKVs/AKs loaded with fighters to land when the fields are up as well as a BF with ENG + Air Support + Naval Support.

Preceed the invasion with a number of bombard missions on all the atols/islands where you suspect big concentrations of bombers. Make sure to include a couple of BBs in a few of the groups and keep the sizes under 10 or so. I think TF size has something to do with spotting. BBs can absorb shots better than anything else.

The invasion TF should have some heavies in it as well to absorb shots and provide AA. I might even add some BBs to the carrier TFs while they are providing LRCAP (maybe the ones returning after the bombardment). Get your CVEs and put them in the invasion hexes for CAP. Get every CVL and CV you have and load them with carrier capable fighters, offload bombers if you need to. LRCAP the invasion TF and CAP your own TF. Put them all in the same hex. Make sure you have surface TFs between you and the expected air avenue so it hits them instead of your carriers.

You need to get in and get out, so make sure you have lots of naval support (all those small DET forces and anything else you got to help with loading) and a lot of supplies. You then start running supplies with APDs at night. It is important to try to take at least one 60,000 or unlimited size island. Use your best divisions for that. Make sure you are using all your AP and AK that you have.

(in reply to Yamato_Blitzer)
Post #: 1129
RE: September 1942 - 12/20/2009 4:10:35 AM   
bklooste

 

Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/10/2006
Status: offline
Problem with the Kuriles is you wont hold it he will throw everything at you .. If this is what you want ( and it could be its a good thing) . He will have nothing there in terms of land forces ( Naval could be a bit esp ships damaged or after refits ) and air would be significant and i think speed is more important than the size of force comitted. Its worth noting most Jap players gut their home defences and replace the air unit pilots with green training ones for obvious reasons allied players are not brave enough .

The question is what you do about the counter attack .

1) He can land a Division supported by his LBA using local AK
2) He can wait till KB comes around .

The good news is if you are quick he will hit you in winter meaning with minimum forces you can extract significant losses. How much LBA do you have that can sink ships ?

Anyway while he is busy here take Pago Pago :-) You dont want to leave over stacks anyway.

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 1130
RE: September 1942 - 12/20/2009 2:52:41 PM   
Swenslim

 

Posts: 437
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Odessa, Ukraine
Status: offline
Better to invade Mili, Makin and Ponape, they can have 30 000 troops each and there you can build 2 lvl ports and 2-4 airfields.

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 1131
RE: September 1942 - 12/20/2009 7:27:36 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
cfulbright: Yeah, the off loading of heavier equpment is slow. I have experienced this all around the smaller bases.

The 0 size ports take forever to build up but even level 1 ports seem to build up in decent pace.

Yamato_Blitzer: It should work both ways. There actually enemy invasions ongoing in Aleutians so he must have calculated that those islands in Kuriles are worth of defending.

Yeah, I would love to answer the demand immediately but there are high risk if everything goes bad. Damn, I wish he would not have sunken those 2 US carriers early on.

I still do like the Kuriles as you do too.

Rob: Is that 75% figure written in stone? I mean he is unloading in 3 separate bases as we speak. The weather forecast shows severe storms all around them.

True. No Nellies anywhere after the first few months. That +80 experience level has an bad things written to it. Good to know that he has these kind of pilots hidden somewhere.

Ok. I thought you were referring to off map movement which is possible to do. By going through into DEI would mean going through Samoa, Fiji and New Caledonia. Otherwise the routes are way too long but than again even that is doable.

I still think Kuriles are good because of two things...

1. Airfield sizes near home islands.
2. If needed we can force his navy out into open... and we want to deal with these forces soon as possible.

Graymane: We do seem to think in similar fashion in terms that if Marshalls are the target several bases need to be overrun very quickly.

I had sketched that atolls would requiere an RCT unit + Armour units + Combat Engineers so that is almost identical too.

The bombardment missions are tricky IF we haven't dealt with his naval assets before. We cannot hang around for long unless we gain airsuperiority quickly.

I will be putting up the best AA destroyers with the carriers once we head for offense. These ships seem to have high variables in their ratings.

I have actually though about replacing some bombers with fighters on the carriers. That really would even the odds. We just need high enough experience pilots to go with it and kaboom his forces are in trouble.

At the moment we could put up around 3500av worth of troops into action but not yet satisfied.

One thing I'am not certain is on how to effectively put the MSW tf to go along with it. I think the best way would be to set an MSW TF and order it to follow the invasion taskforces. That way we should have dealt with potential mines also.

bklooste: In a way yes, That is what I want but only when I'am ready for it. At the moment the odds are around 50/50% which I don't find to be good enough.

I see you are also a fan of multiple offensives simultaneously. I prefer that too since it maximes the pressure. You can even fail one offensive if all the other prevail.

There are a lot options to go around though.

Swenslim: That would the "conventional" way to go through things. This would naturally mean that Marianas would be included in this package.

Btw, those bases seem mildly garrisoned if the allied signit is to be believed.

(in reply to Swenslim)
Post #: 1132
RE: September 1942 - 12/20/2009 7:32:24 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
Aleutians (september 5th - 14th 1942)


Firstly, we have now upgraded into 2nd official patch + hotfix. Thus meaning that our ceasefire arrangements are off the table.

We have progressed steadily so the current game is mid september 1942. The last few weeks have been quiet in terms of action.

However last turn saw the japanese fleet in Aleutians. Dave have seized 3 empty bases in this region thus giving him an potentially large airfields for his operations.

On the 13th of semtember the following bases were invaded: Attu Island, Kiska Island and Amchitka Island.

These reports are vague at the moment. I have no intel whether KB is involved but I doubt it unless he trying to force an encounter with US carriers.

The landings were made after the Kurile invasion sketch but I see no harm done to that potential offensive. Actually vice versa.. let him build up these bases for me and than we can come knocking if we choose to.

I'am sending some reinforcements into northern pacific as we speak. Mostly aircraft from the west coast.

Here is the actual map from the Aleutians...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1133
RE: September 1942 - 12/20/2009 8:00:02 PM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline
quote:

Is that 75% figure written in stone? I mean he is unloading in 3 separate bases as we speak. The weather forecast shows severe storms all around them.


only for winter months , nov-march iirc. actual 'weather' doesnt matter its the hard coded stuff for winter

Re taking the aleutions would be a good cover for a kurile attack if your set on that approach and like you say get some free base upgrades along the way too. watch out for lvl 2 airfields and Nellies though (air hq and he has torps even on a 2)

anyway , me being so negative over the kuriles might just be a cover so a certain reader thinks i dont go that way . But as Dave has forced your hand up there, and with the aleutians beconing for an allied counter invasion its a viable strategy once the aleutians are built up.

_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1134
RE: September 1942 - 12/21/2009 3:16:30 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
It is unfortunate that Adak has nothing on it. It is the only base in the chain worth holding. Dutch Harbor can't hold an AF very well, so you'd have to use Umnak. If you don't want to invest the forces, you'll have to fall back to Kodiak really, which is probably what I'd do unless you decide the Kuriles are your focus.

(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1135
RE: September 1942 - 12/21/2009 3:27:47 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
There is nothing wrong with the Aleutians/Kuriles, per se. The problem is force and focus. Look at his map of the Aleutian chain. There is nothing there except Dutch Harbor. It is going to takes months to build up any significant forces there including fuel and supplies. In my game, I have a level 8 harbor at Adak with backups at Kodiak, Anchorage and all the way back to Prince Rupert. All the canadian troops that can be bought are in various islands in the chain. I have tons of oil and supply, a couple of bomber groups and a fight group. I have something to build an invasion or a defense upon. I also have roughly 2 combat divisions worth of AV located in various places.

In this game, the opponent clearly still has the initiative throughout. It is time to take that away and start dictating the pace and focus of this game. It is important to develop an overall strategy and then a focus for future operations, whatever aztez decides those are, rather than respond to what his opponent is doing. His opponent cannot be strong everywhere and in a situation such as this where he has interior lines, it is like a balloon getting bigger and bigger. One way to pop this balloon is equal pressure from multiple directions. This forces his hand with the KB to respond to one place or another, but it also requires a CREDIBLE threat from each of those directions, i.e. something that is both going to hurt and be long-lasting (raids do not meet this requirement and that is all the Kuriles and Marianas plans are at this point). The other way is to bring everything to bear on a single campaign with overwhelming force.

This is the main reason I advocate a Marshalls/Gilberts attack. It is close to his base of operations at Pearl where he has all of his troops and supplies and fuel and support.

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 1136
RE: September 1942 - 12/21/2009 7:28:38 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
Rob: Ok.. that pretty much explained it. I had forgotten about that hard coded issue so thanks.

Kind of explains why he is so eager to assault the Aleutians now and not later. The weather there remains bad though.

I didn't know you started an PBEM vs LoBaron? I assume you are the "good" guys!

Don't worry if we all would think the same than what is the point of playing. The content is also top notch so feel free to continue.

Graymane: True. Adak is most valuable in terms of base but we simply did not have enough troops at our disposal. However we gaining strenght day by day so the time will come...

I don't think that Kuriles operation is washed down into tubes even if we lose bases in Aleutians. That just means few bases we need to take care of before the jump IF we head out to Kuriles.

The setup you described seems very solid so that kind of puts Aleutians out of harms way for you. The northern route is somewhat intresting since many japanese player seem to neglect the route and it is the most direct route if you calculate via hexes into japan.

I couldn't agree more we need to stop momentum very soon. It is kind of like any sport / game which only accounts into snowball effects.

Point taken about Marshalls and Gillberts! I do agree once we head out with troops we need to be staying there for good no need for anykind suicide missions or harashments.

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 1137
RE: September 1942 - 12/21/2009 7:29:33 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
Aleutians (september 15th - 16th 1942)


There were more action in past turn. The bases at Amchitka, Adak and Kiska. The initial strenght is just single infantry unit landed so it will take time for him to develop these bases.

KB (or part of it) showed up near Dutch Harbour where it launched couple of raids againts our ASW TF and the base itself.

The net results was few smallers vessels sunk and damaged port at Dutch Harbour.

Allied AA managed to down some +20 Vals though which good news unless this FOW ofcourse.

There is also an larger invasion fleet sailing with KB and yet unconfirmed where these troops will unload.

Allied HQ has been reported to give green light into Operation Tango.

The details are yet to be confirmed though.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by aztez -- 12/21/2009 7:30:54 PM >

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1138
RE: September 1942 - 12/21/2009 8:17:22 PM   
Rob Brennan UK


Posts: 3685
Joined: 8/24/2002
From: London UK
Status: offline
quote:

I didn't know you started an PBEM vs LoBaron? I assume you are the "good" guys!


If you mean by 'good guys' the liberators of the evil european nations .. yes . we are just playing the 1000 mile scenario .. no spoilers pls all as we havnt looked at each others setup or reinforcements .. its good fun.



_____________________________

sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 1139
RE: September 1942 - 12/22/2009 6:11:55 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK

quote:

I didn't know you started an PBEM vs LoBaron? I assume you are the "good" guys!


If you mean by 'good guys' the liberators of the evil european nations .. yes . we are just playing the 1000 mile scenario .. no spoilers pls all as we havnt looked at each others setup or reinforcements .. its good fun.




Oh my... you are playing as Japan! What is happening in this world!

Not to worry about spoilers though!

(in reply to Rob Brennan UK)
Post #: 1140
Page:   <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: September 1942 Page: <<   < prev  36 37 [38] 39 40   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.219