Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/23/2009 10:23:37 PM

roy2008

Posts: 42
Joined: 10/8/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

The Shokaku has to begin 18 Zeros / 27 Val / 27 Kates, in Witp the Shokaku has 24 Zeros / 24 Vals / 24 Kates
All Japanese carriers of the KB has 18 Zeros per Wing

The Ami Carrier has 27 Fighteraircrafts in his Wings.

This is a clear Handicap for Japan

WHY ????

< Message edited by roy2008 -- 8/23/2009 10:24:31 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/23/2009 11:13:25 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

18 Zeros / 27 Vals / 27 Kates was real deckload of Shokaku and Zuikaku at start of the war.

_____________________________

(in reply to roy2008)

Post #: 2

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/24/2009 12:34:39 AM

khyberbill

Posts: 1941
Joined: 9/11/2007
From: new milford, ct
Status: offline

quote:

The Ami Carrier has 27 Fighteraircrafts in his Wings.

Yes, and sometimes they are Buffaloes... a clear handicap for the Ami!

_____________________________

"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.

(in reply to roy2008)

Post #: 3

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/24/2009 12:44:05 AM

JuanG

Posts: 906
Joined: 12/28/2008
Status: offline

Its that way because as said, thats what was loaded on Dec 7th. You can easily modify it with the new resize options, which take effect next time the ship disbands into port I believe. This was you can bring the carriers to their maximum capacity.

_____________________________

Coral Sea HDM
AltWNT Scenarios

(in reply to roy2008)

Post #: 4

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/24/2009 8:28:24 AM

roy2008

Posts: 42
Joined: 10/8/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

when you say this was historical, why have the american Carrier ( Enterprise / Lexington / Saratoga ) not the historical Size by his Airgroups?

Enterprise / Lexington

18 Fighter / 36 Dautless / 18 Devastator

(in reply to JuanG)

Post #: 5

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/24/2009 10:13:43 AM

Djordje

Posts: 537
Joined: 9/12/2004
Status: offline

Just set air group to "fit to ship" and when you disband CV in port it will change to 24. Note that both Val and Kate air groups will switch from 27 down to 24 as well, so you might want to go against history here and only increase zero squadron while leaving other two at higher number than they were historically.

(in reply to roy2008)

Post #: 6

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/24/2009 12:18:55 PM

roy2008

Posts: 42
Joined: 10/8/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

I can not resize the Airgroups in Turn 1, or is it still possible ?

(in reply to Djordje)

Post #: 7

RE: Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups - 8/29/2009 4:09:33 AM

Djordje

Posts: 537
Joined: 9/12/2004
Status: offline

I don't really know, I resize them when they get back from PH attack.
Ship has to be disbanded in port, and I think you need to resolve the turn for change to happen. So if you really want to change size on turn one feel free to remove them from KB and leave them disbanded in port...

If you wish to increase number of planes to get better PH strike that won't work, and should not work. The point is in historical accuracy.

And ofc you can always use the editor and change squadrons there to get what you want.

(in reply to roy2008)

Post #: 8

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Question to Jap. Carrier Aircraftgroups

Page: [1]