Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: War in the East Q&A

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: War in the East Q&A Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 1:39:13 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

hmmmmm, gamey, don't know, never tried it, yet


Yup, that would indeed be gamey. As said before: I'd rather discuss as many gamey actions as possible now, so that something might still be implented to prevent them if possible, than to wait until after release, which would result in something similar to the truckload of "this is broken/gamey" discussions on the WitP:AE forums.

quote:

well, the Fin's can't attack across, that don't mean they can't defend, you slap them, they will slap you back, and Fins don't like to be slapped !


Sure, the Soviets are not likely to kick the Finns out of the hex, but losses should be a lot lower than when attacking German formations because an actual counterattack isn't possible. As it stands now, the Finnish front could provide easy experience/training for Soviet units, as the Finns can't attack them across the no attack line, so the Soviet units can rebuild after an attack, or simply be swapped with other units so the Finns will suffer from serious attrition.

quote:

you gain some, by sitting still or by week, but combat is the better trainer


I'd say it's also more risky. Given the choice as the Soviets between a certain gain in experience without suffering losses, or trying to gain experience in combat which might all be nullified by the amount of losses suffered (or by the division being destroyed), parking some divisions somewhere so they can train for a while might not be a bad idea, provided you can spare them from frontline duties.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 691
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 4:01:13 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline

Sure, the Soviets are not likely to kick the Finns out of the hex, but losses should be a lot lower than when attacking German formations because an actual counterattack isn't possible. As it stands now, the Finnish front could provide easy experience/training for Soviet units, as the Finns can't attack them across the no attack line, so the Soviet units can rebuild after an attack, or simply be swapped with other units so the Finns will suffer from serious attrition.

yea but, most times, it is not the best idea to try to do a battle of attrition, vs a dug in hex, even more, vs a hex that should be stronger, and with better troops

plus, it would depend on how much you gain, vs how much you lose, you may get 1000 men in replacement, but lose 4000-6000 men on the attack, and those 1000 men, are going to be very low morale/exp, so the odds are you are going to be losing better troops then you are gain, and will lower the skill you gained during the attack




_____________________________


(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 692
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 6:21:04 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		Any non-isolated, non-frozen combat unit on the map may be placed in static mode if that unit has not moved during the turn.

Once isolated, cannot go static.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 693
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 6:26:02 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		Morale goes up for the following reasons:

The morale of a unit will increase when it is successful in combat (holds on defense or retreats the defender when attacking). The morale of a unit may also increase during the friendly logistics phase due to any and all of the following circumstances:

1) The unit's morale is below 50, and it is in refit mode.
2) The unit's morale is below 50, and it is more than 10 hexes away from the nearest enemy unit.
3) The unit’s morale is below its national morale. In this case it can recover as much as 10% of the national morale but not more than the country's national morale (Example: German national morale is 70 in 1942 so a unit could recover 7 per turn, not to exceed 70 for a non-elite unit).
4) The unit is in a very good supply and support situation and its morale is less than 75. If die(75) is greater than the unit's morale than a gain for this situation is possible.


As long as experience is higher than morale, than the unit will train and gain experience. Not sure what modifiers impact the experience gain, but ususally at the low end units gain 1-2 experience points per turn. When a typical Soviet unit is mobilized in 41, it comes in with a 40 morale and 20 experience. Leaving it out of combat for a few months can raise it's morale to 50 or a little higher and give the unit a chance to train. There's a big difference between a 50/35 unit and a 40/20 unit. Of course, that first summer, it's hard not to throw most of those 40/20s into the line which can be very painful.

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 694
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 9:12:41 PM   
Rotherman

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 1/11/2009
From: Rotherham England
Status: offline 		Will there be any rules which allow the Fuhrer to intervene in any of the scenarios?

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 695
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/8/2010 9:19:06 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rotherman

Will there be any rules which allow the Fuhrer to intervene in any of the scenarios?


None so far and AFAIK there will be none. Units come and go along historical timetables so you could look at that as Hitler meddling.

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to Rotherman)
Post #: 696
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/9/2010 8:31:07 PM   
wurger54

 

Posts: 152
Joined: 7/28/2007
From: Texas
Status: offline 		Once more...

Question: Is there a way to simulate the intentional retreat/panic (depending on the interpretation) of Soviet units that resulted in the Germans 'kesseling' little more than air during '42?



(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 697
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 12:50:56 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wurger54

Once more...

Question: Is there a way to simulate the intentional retreat/panic (depending on the interpretation) of Soviet units that resulted in the Germans 'kesseling' little more than air during '42?



That is not a correct intrepretation of what occurred. Please read David Glantz's TO THE GATES OF STALINGRAD, it contains the most accurate explanation of the '42 campaign I've ever read.

(in reply to wurger54)
Post #: 698
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 3:01:39 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline 		The Germans present the battle for Kursk as the first major operation where the Soviet HQ's didn't more or less panic in the initial stages. In all other operations before that, the Germans say they intercepted lots of panicky "what should we do?" radio transmissions. The troops themselves might not have panicked at the start of the summer 1942 campaign, but their HQ's were still shaky if the Germans are to be believed.

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 699
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 6:22:59 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

The Germans present the battle for Kursk as the first major operation where the Soviet HQ's didn't more or less panic in the initial stages. In all other operations before that, the Germans say they intercepted lots of panicky "what should we do?" radio transmissions. The troops themselves might not have panicked at the start of the summer 1942 campaign, but their HQ's were still shaky if the Germans are to be believed.


Read Glantz, not self-serving German accounts.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 700
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 7:02:28 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline 		So in Glantz opinion, Soviet HQ's were not suffering from command and control problems in mid to late 1942? That seems very difficult to believe, especially considering the lack of initiative lower HQ's were supposed to show according to Soviet military doctrine.

If Glantz says so, and can prove it, that would basically declare every other historical analysis about the summer/autumn 1942 campaign null and void.

< Message edited by ComradeP -- 5/10/2010 7:03:26 PM >

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 701
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 9:37:21 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

So in Glantz opinion, Soviet HQ's were not suffering from command and control problems in mid to late 1942? That seems very difficult to believe, especially considering the lack of initiative lower HQ's were supposed to show according to Soviet military doctrine.

If Glantz says so, and can prove it, that would basically declare every other historical analysis about the summer/autumn 1942 campaign null and void.


The truth is more complex than that and not something easily summarized in a few lines of text here. I recommend you read TO THE GATES OF STALINGRAD and then if you are still un-convinced we can continue this conversation in private emails. I honestly think you'll find the book an eye opener. I know it was for me.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 702
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/10/2010 10:10:46 PM   
british exil


Posts: 1686
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Lower Saxony Germany
Status: offline
quote:

The truth is more complex than that and not something easily summarized in a few lines of text here.


Well said, if that were possible why need to publish the thick, sometimes expensive books?

It is also hard to find out what really happened, victors and loser always have different angles of viewpoints. Plus some "facts" remain so for years only to be revealed as false years later. See Shattered Sword the battle of Midway as an example.

I enjoy reading history books but am no expert of most of the facts, I try to read the books as a recreational side to my computer gaming. Esp when having to have my summer holidays on the beach. Gf does not want a laptop near me, so I can read the books and we are both happy.

But always glad to hear of a book title that is worth reading.


Mat

_____________________________

"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 703
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 3:28:01 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		How does intelligence work in this game? Just wondering how much fog of war affects what you can see and what a player can do to reduce it. I've noticed from the 1942 AAR Pyledriver is doing that the German intel is very incomplete. (This is a good thing, not a criticism, mind you.) Or, vice versa, what a player can do to hide his forces from an opponent. (Although I understand the AI is not affected by fog of war rules.)


(in reply to british exil)
Post #: 704
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 10:03:58 AM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Or, vice versa, what a player can do to hide his forces from an opponent.


Stay out of the clear terrain. Place your units further from enemy units. Intercept enemy recon flights.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 705
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 4:17:23 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Does urban terrain increase the fog of war? (This is of some interest to me with regards to the 1942 AAR.)

Also, is intel gathered only through explicit air recon, or can any air mission reveal hidden units as they fly over enemy terrain?

(in reply to Helpless)
Post #: 706
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 7:19:56 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		Air missions will report back info on things they bombed, but not what they fly over. Best way to increase detection level is to have combat units adjacent to the enemy with good ground recon assets. Attacking them will also increase their DL, but that could be very painful.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 707
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 7:28:56 PM   
The SNAFU


Posts: 48
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

So in Glantz opinion, Soviet HQ's were not suffering from command and control problems in mid to late 1942? That seems very difficult to believe, especially considering the lack of initiative lower HQ's were supposed to show according to Soviet military doctrine.

If Glantz says so, and can prove it, that would basically declare every other historical analysis about the summer/autumn 1942 campaign null and void.



There is much discussion by Glantz in To the Gates of Stalingrad about the lack of C&C on the Soviet side. While he disputes many of the long held views on the overall Russian strategy and performance he most certainly identifies C&C issues within the partiicpating armies. This is particularly so with respect to Soviet counterstrokes and their use of armored formations.

_____________________________

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 708
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 8:16:54 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The SNAFU


quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

So in Glantz opinion, Soviet HQ's were not suffering from command and control problems in mid to late 1942? That seems very difficult to believe, especially considering the lack of initiative lower HQ's were supposed to show according to Soviet military doctrine.

If Glantz says so, and can prove it, that would basically declare every other historical analysis about the summer/autumn 1942 campaign null and void.



There is much discussion by Glantz in To the Gates of Stalingrad about the lack of C&C on the Soviet side. While he disputes many of the long held views on the overall Russian strategy and performance he most certainly identifies C&C issues within the partiicpating armies. This is particularly so with respect to Soviet counterstrokes and their use of armored formations.


You're quoting a conclusion that ComradeP jumped to which was never attributed to Glantz by me. Based on TO THE GATES OF STALINGRAD, I was taking issue only with the notion that the Soviets retreated in the summer of '42 either intentionally or in panic. Glantz presents a convincing case that this "strategic" retreat never in fact took place.


< Message edited by jaw -- 5/11/2010 8:17:14 PM >

(in reply to The SNAFU)
Post #: 709
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 8:26:03 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline 		I might add that what really took place could better be described as a reluctant fighting withdrawal which still understates the determination of Soviet resistance.

Perhaps the best analogy is a "beaten" boxer who keeps coming back for more and occasionally getting in a punch or two.

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 710
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/11/2010 8:47:44 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

Perhaps the best analogy is a "beaten" boxer who keeps coming back for more and occasionally getting in a punch or two.


Very nice way to put jaw.



forgot to put a smiley in there, it's hard to see tone and facial expressions...

< Message edited by dlazov66 -- 5/11/2010 8:48:49 PM >

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 711
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 11:22:46 AM   
gingerbread


Posts: 2994
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		In the GE '42 AAR, there is a ss about artillery losses.
At the very bottom of the ss, there are lines for two kinds of dumps.

What are these and how are they used, how do they function, etc?

/g







Attachment (1)

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 712
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 1:28:14 PM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline 		These are supplies and fuel stored at HQs.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to gingerbread)
Post #: 713
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 4:48:31 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Based on TO THE GATES OF STALINGRAD, I was taking issue only with the notion that the Soviets retreated in the summer of '42 either intentionally or in panic.


No, you clearly took issue with the command and control issues I mentioned too, as you said the accounts of German radio interception units and other intelligence assets, who noted that the battle for Kursk was the first larger operation where the Soviet HQ's were not more or less panicking at the start, were self serving. I never commented on the Soviets as a whole, only their HQ's.

(in reply to Helpless)
Post #: 714
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 5:47:33 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

quote:

Based on TO THE GATES OF STALINGRAD, I was taking issue only with the notion that the Soviets retreated in the summer of '42 either intentionally or in panic.


No, you clearly took issue with the command and control issues I mentioned too, as you said the accounts of German radio interception units and other intelligence assets, who noted that the battle for Kursk was the first larger operation where the Soviet HQ's were not more or less panicking at the start, were self serving. I never commented on the Soviets as a whole, only their HQ's.


German sources are self-serving. Compare PANZER LEADER to any objective account of the battles around Smolensk. I'm not disputing that the Russians had command and control problems, just the "conventional wisdow" (German account) of what happened in the summer of 1942.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 715
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 6:22:07 PM   
vinnie71

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline 		The truth on 42 will never be known precisely for various reasons.

a) there is always bias in any account, even if unintentional. The more 'professional' histories are, the more on guard one must be
b) As much as they hate to admit it, those participating on the Axis side of the offensive were bewildered by Sovier reactions.
c) the Soviets rolled with the punches especially since they were wrongfooted at the begining of the offensive in the south
d) most of the German accounts were at division/corps/army level-very hard to get the full picture unless you see it all
e) Soviet history writing leaves much to be desired. It is rewritten over and over again depending on who was in power (vide Kruschev)

In practice stories became longer in the telling on both sides.

(in reply to jaw)
Post #: 716
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 7:06:32 PM   
The SNAFU


Posts: 48
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline 		Self serving, biased? Yes of course to some extent. But on many levels the various accounts by the participants are much more about their limited perspectives than they are about being self serving or biased. Panzer Leader was written by the man while in prison and only a few years after the war. What real knowledge did he have with respect to the Soviet side of the conflict.

I think it is quite possible today, particularly in the wake of the first two installments of the Glantz trilogy, to write an accurate account of events on the Eastern Front in 1942 or any period of the war for that matter. Using battle reports and other accounts from units of both sides, much of which just recently made available from the Russians, an accurate analysis can and has been written.

Of course that is just my opinion and you know what they say about opinions!

_____________________________

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill

(in reply to vinnie71)
Post #: 717
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/12/2010 9:42:34 PM   
Beetle

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 5/10/2010
Status: offline 		I hope everyone is well. Based on the various forums, it looks like there is lots of great work going on. I have a question about the production/replacement concept associated with the game. My understanding is that the production/replacement concept is based on historical #s. Is that correct? If so, how is the game influenced by events that occur within the game (i.e. the taking of a city that adds additional production/replacement capability)? Is there going to be a way to influence the units that are produced/replaced (i.e. there are more armor losses vs. infantry losses)?

Thanks

Keep up the great work!

(in reply to The SNAFU)
Post #: 718
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/13/2010 11:04:23 AM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

German sources are self-serving. Compare PANZER LEADER to any objective account of the battles around Smolensk.


There's a flaw in your thought process regarding this issue: no account of a battle is objective. The archives Glantz read were written by the Soviets and may or may not have actually been written during the battle. Is there any way to verify precisely what happened at Smolensk or elsewhere?

Not really, as historians automatically end up with two (or more) versions of what happened, depending how many sides took part in the battle/conflict. I am a historian myself, so I'm painfully aware of the problem. Ask a few people how the accident they just witnessed happened and see how many different replies you get, whilst they were all there and should in theory all give the same reply.

There's also no way you can accurately determine whether a part of an account about a battle where Guderian was on average mostly kept up to date with detailed information about events in his own sector, written/completed about 9 years after the battle is "self serving" or if Guderian might not remember all the details correctly. Sure, everyone is "self serving" in a way, but (having the description of the Smolensk battles in Panzer Leader on the table in front of me currently) I don't really see how Guderian accounts differs too greatly from what we know now when it comes to the important details:

-German casualties were fairly heavy at various stages.
-There were a lot of Soviet counterattacks.
-Counterattacks by cavalry severely disrupted parts of the German supply train.
-Logistics were a nightmare in general.
-Soviet units could in many cases make an orderly withdrawal and were generally not destroyed in large encirclements (Guderian mentions how troops escaping from encirclements wreaked havoc on the German supply train which had already passed them).
-Due to a mixture of Hitler's poor strategic decisions, German losses, the failure to destroy most of the Soviet troops in the area and logistical difficulties, the German offensive halted a short distance to the East of Smolensk.

< Message edited by ComradeP -- 5/13/2010 11:05:06 AM >

(in reply to Beetle)
Post #: 719
RE: War in the East Q&A - 5/13/2010 11:41:21 AM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline 		Dude, is this a question? Please help us out if you post stuff like this...We have to keep some order...Start a new thread....Jim works his ass off, as the rest of us, post a new thread...Please...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 720
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: War in the East Q&A Page: <<   < prev  22 23 [24] 25 26   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.172