Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Yikes!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Yikes! Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 7:59:22 PM   
pat.casey

 

Posts: 393
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline 		I have to agree with the consensus here that using single ship task forces like this isn't inherently gamey. IMHO, something is only gamey if there's no practical counter to it, so things like pre-path nuclear artillery is gamey b/c there's not much you can do, but there are reasonable counters to single ship raiding and/or scounting.

Likewise I'm not a big fan of "you shouldn't do that in the game because the allies wouldn't have done that in real life" as a line of logic, largely because it seems like the Japanese are not constrained by that same rule. The kind of careful strategic defense that your opponent is playing here is diametrically opposed to both IJN doctrine and observable behavior. Historically, most any allied advance resulted in the local japanese air and sea forces immolating themselves in immediate counterattacks, not fading back slowly to keep a fleet in being and fight another day.

If you're going to be constrained not to put destroyers on "suicide" missions, then the japanese ought to be restained from using their ships in "dishonorable" missions, like avoiding combat with your carriers or sitting at anchor while your forces advance.

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1681
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 8:05:56 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/4/44 and 7/5/44
 
Allied Carriers:  A sub put a torpedo into Saratoga.  Damage is light, but that's the second she's taken in the past month.  I'll likely send her to Capetown (or do you guys think ARD ships at Sydney could handle her?).  Saratoga will join Constellation in the yards - a subtraction of 180 aircraft in two weeks.  The KB lost CV Taiho and her 72 aircraft, an IJN CVL was torpedoed and is probably in the yards, and the Allies have added about five CVEs in the past two weeks - but overall this makes me less willing to seek a carrier engagement.  For now, I think the Allied carriers will continue to operate in waters where LBA can fly LRCAP.  That's okay short term because the next Allied operation (invasion of Samarinda) is in acceptable waters.

Japanese Subs:  The Allies did sink the offending sub plus another (but CLAA Atlanta ate two torpedoes).  Miller has lost well over 100 subs in the game, but IJN subs are still pesky.

Celebes:  The Allies have nearly wiped out the remaining IJA troops at Makassar. Up between Pare Pare and Madjene, a New Zealand brigade routed a demoralized and battle-weary IJA contingent.  On Celebes, the Japanese are down to Madjene (which they won't hold long) and Leowek (which I've bypassed and will probably ignore).

Samarinda Invasion Force: Loading at Manado may be complete in time for the ships to get underway next turn; if not, then the turn after.

Thailand:  The Allies have blown a gaping hole in the Japanese MLR - the road to the east is open to Udon and the Allies just seized the base behind it by paratroop assault (50th Indian).   The Allied force moving on Udon is overwhelming and should be able to blast through and continue east into Cambodia and Vietnam.  The road to the northeast is open to Udon Thnai.  The Allied force heading that way isnt't much larger than the garrison, but I hope applying pressure along several vectors complicates Miller's life.  Also, I'm in open terrain now and two armored units are moving fast.  They have proven useful in cutting roads and supply lines. 

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 5/13/2010 8:10:46 PM >

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1682
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 8:27:14 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		Canoerebel.

At this point in the game, how many P38s are you producing a month? B25?

Thanks.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1683
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 8:31:20 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I'll look next time I get a turn, but both P-38 and B-25 production is meager at this point in the war.  Nearly all Allied fighter production is P-47 and P-40N (the former, of course, are excellent).  Nearly all bomber production is B-24 (which is also excellent).

I only have a few P-38 squadrons left on the map.

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 1684
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 9:20:49 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Things are about to get very, very interesting.  I've issued orders, I've "girded up my loins," and one or the other of us will be toasting this turn:

1)  Miller had two units garrisoning Samarinda - a total of 12,000 men.  He pulled the bigger of the two out to reinforce Balikpan (I find that move odd because I haven't even tried an attack there yet and can't until I bring reinforcements).  So Samarinda is suddenly open...at the same time I have just completed loading an invasion force prepped for Samarinda.  This force weighs anchor at Manado tonight and should arrive at Samarinda the day after tomorrow.  The force includes two division equivalents, so if it gets ashore Samarinda will fall.
2)  But Miller has 400 aircraft at Balikpan, 200 at Tarakan, and the KB is lurking.  My invasion fleet will be covered by LRCAP from Donggala and Gorontolo, plus the Allied carriers will take the chance and move north into the Makassar Strait, taking station just east of Balikpan.  I'm willing to take on LBA, but if the KB chooses this moment to sally forth, I will be in trouble.
3)  B-24 bombers will try to suppress the Tarakan airfield.
4)  The South Borneo invasion transports are pulling back to near Kendari while all this happens.
5)  The base taken by 50th Indian 'chutes last turn is in Indochina - not Vietnam proper, but I *think* within the boundaries needed to trigger activation of the Indochina defenses.  That's fine, as I'm going to have to face them sooner or later.  They begin the game weak, though, and a major Allied army is bearing down on Vietnam from the West.
6)  The Chinese army that lately retired from the unsuccessul seige of Nanning is moving cross country towards the Vietnam border.  I intend to move on Hanoi.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1685
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 9:29:26 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline 		Question: Is this the first time Miller has complained about your moves etc or is there a history here? I find it difficult to fathom why he is holding on so strongly to this viewpoint unless there's a previous history...

I give you odds that if the IJNAF and IJAAF combine in a co-ordinated strike Miller won't complain that's gamey. *sigh*

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1686
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 9:42:15 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		There have been a few instances where gaminess has been discussed in the game; not many, considering how far we've played into the game, but a few.

I made the strongest protest when Miller stripped Manchuria of artillery and blasted a hole through my MLR in China.  (He used 18 artillery units to obliterate a strongly fortified base that until then hadn't been seriously threatened.  As a result of the fall of that city, the entire MLR in northern China became untenable and the Chinese were routed).

I also pointed out that strategic bombing had wiped out 75% of Chinese industry, making supply impossible.  I wasn't asking that Miller halt it, just pointing out that it had crippled me.  He took umbrage at that and pointed out that the Allies had knocked out a few oil points at Miri and another base or two early in the war.

On the other hand, I have tried to avoid things that might be gamey.  I self-imposed a rule requiring payment of political points to move restricted Allied units into Burma; I did not abandon cities with garrison requirements (Rangoon, for instance) in hopes that partisans would destroy industry.  And I have carried over the old WitP 4EB at a minumum of 10k when on naval strike (not sure it's necessary, but didn't want to take the chance).

Miller's strongest protest came when I resumed offensive operations in China after he had declared a ceasfire.  I hadn't asked for a ceasefire, and I told him that I would attack when possible, but he apparently felt that a ceasefire was in effect.  He requested three days to get his troops ready, but I gave him either two or three weeks to avoid him feeling like I had taken advantage of the situation.

That's been about it in the game.

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1687
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 9:44:20 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline 		Ah, yes, I remember now... Well as you know I disagreed with your view on some of those issues but on this I think there's no gameyness at all and you should reserve the right to keep doing these raids. It is his job to stop you.

By the same token though when he shoots down shedloads of your improperly trained pilots or destroys many of your ships with correctly employed subs that's not gamey or a sign of poor game design either. Fairness cuts both ways.

Anyways, I wish you the best with the game as it continues.

< Message edited by Nemo121 -- 5/13/2010 10:14:40 PM >

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1688
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 10:05:27 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/6/44 and 7/7/44
 
A quiet turn, much to my delight, but I think the quiet is about to end:

Samarinda:  The invasion force neared the island - one transport TF even began landing troops.  The defenses are so weak that there wasn't an enemy artillery attack (those are automatic when any ground troops are present).  This confirms that the garrison is weak, but alot is going to happen now.  The main Allied transports will arrive next turn.  If they have even one day to unload, the invasion should succeed. But I think Miller will commit the KB - the only question I have is from which direction?  South from the Java Sea or north from the Sulu Sea?   I plan to keep my carriers on station unless, when I get the actual turn file, something really looks bad.

Tarakan:  B-24s hammered the airfield so that it should be inoperational for a few days.

Thailand:  The rapid Allied advance to the east and northeast continues.  Miller is hitting my troops with LBA.  I know he's scrambling to pull together some kind of defense.  The problem for him is that his closest troop concentrations (Bangkok and Saigon) are much further from the scene than are my troops.  I don't know yet whether the Allies can make it all the way to the coast

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1689
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 11:15:24 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

quote:

it's not realistic to argue that detection is, or ought to be, equal regardless of the size or value of an asset.


Agreed, I didn't argue that and that's not how the game model works. A single BB will be more easily spotted than a single DD.


And, despite my incredibly tortured wording, that is what I meant as well.

One coastwatcher with a radio can detect a battlegroup with twenty ships. The battlegroup is exposed, the coastwatcher is essentially immune. A PT boat with a radio. A sub. All detections are not equal two-way streets.

We agree.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1690
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 11:30:55 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline 		Bullwinkle, Indeed we do

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 1691
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 11:41:42 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Since the issue of having a single DD act as recon/bait is still an issue (AI doesn't give them much respect), I would suggest that you use 2 DDs as the AI treats them differently.

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 1692
RE: Yikes! - 5/13/2010 11:59:02 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Since the issue of having a single DD act as recon/bait is still an issue (AI doesn't give them much respect), I would suggest that you use 2 DDs as the AI treats them differently.


IF the 1-ship AI code issue is true, that would swing my vote over to 2-ships as well. IF it is a thing. I have not seen 1-ship forces, commonly merchants in my case, ignored by air attack. But my sample size when the attacker was planes and not a sub is small.

Two-ship TFs can also tear the guts out of most late-war Japanese small convoys, with "E"s and "PB"s escorting. Run twenty or thirty of them up into the Sulu Sea from Balikpapan (Real Soon Now) and see how he likes it.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 1693
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 7:22:52 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
quote:

A sub put a torpedo into Saratoga. Damage is light, but that's the second she's taken in the past month. I'll likely send her to Capetown (or do you guys think ARD ships at Sydney could handle her?).


Those ARDs are great for flotation damage, but that's it. So, if you have any major engine damage you'll need to send it to a bigger port to take care of.

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 1694
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 7:40:26 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline 		I think your tactic is different, not gamey. Would anyone complain about an AMC doing laps of Borneo?

At least it isnt a CA/CL with aircraft doing spotting.

Its probably similar to the IJN putting a CVS in a Carrier force to take up the burden of search duties, dont think it ever happened, doesnt mean it cant.

As for CR's style, I never seen anyone do so much to keep his opponent happy, replaying turns, allowing time for a Chinese defence to set up etc and reasonably calmly, deal with opponents who strip Manchuria of artillery or try to load KB with 100% fighters, even those that are not carrier capable.

Keep going Dan, I'm glad you studied Grant's Richmond campaign, or is it Haig on the Somme?


_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 1695
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 1:54:14 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Big turn tomorrow - if the game permits invasion ships to unload at Samarinda (see my query thread in the main AE area).  I checked Q-Ball's AAR and confirmed that he invaded Samarinda, so I think I'm good.  Orders for the day:

1)  Invasion TFs are just one hex east of Samarinda, which is not garrisoned (except for a non-combat unit).  No matter what happens in the way of carriers and combat ships, enough troops should get ashore on the morning of the first day to take this base no matter what happens (unless Miller somehow moves a unit from Balikpan in one day despite bad roads).

2)  I am risking some combat ships and transports with this invasion, but it is worth it.  If Samarinda falls, Balikpan's fate is sealed.

3)  Allied carriers will move south and take station about four hexes southeast of Balikpan (and not that far from friendly waters around Makassar).

4)  Allied LBA from Donggala, Gorontalo, Polapo, and Watampone will offer as much LRCAP assistance as possible.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 1696
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 2:06:01 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Good luck! You can land at Samarinda. I might be the only other one who knows exactly where Donngla, Garontalo, Palopo, and Watampone are.

What next after taking Balikpapan? If memory serves, you are clear up to Talaud Island. Balikpapan is not quite close enough to bomb or close Palembang. You're getting to the point where I was: Either moving into the Phillipines, or moving toward the Oil. Phillipines is more important, but the other way will encounter less resistance.

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1697
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 5:14:03 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		The move would be irritating but I agree with the rest in just fixing it to pick-off those lone ships. Perhaps--if there is a code issue--go to the 2 DD TF but it is up to your opponent to sink them. How hard would it be to simply put a Chutai of Vals along the route and plaster the offending ship? He just needs to adjust his tactics there.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 1698
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 6:12:03 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/8/44 and 7/9/44
 
Samarinda:  The invasion is going remarkably well.  All ships - much to my relief - were able to make their way up "river" to the hex and got their troops unloaded in good shape.  There was no appearance by the KB of IJN combat ships (I'm pretty surprised).  LBA managed to damage or sink three our four low-value transports.  The Allies have 800 AV ashore - some of it 100% prepped and the rest about 40%.  I think the base will fall even if Miller manages to get a unit across the river from Balikpan (which would result in a shock attack on his part, too).

Effect:  If Samarinda falls, that seals the fate of Balikpan.  I'll have a ready source of reinforcements that I can shift to the latter.  Once the Allies get ahold of both bases, that makes moves to the next bases up the coast (Tarakan) or down the coast (Banjermasin) much easier.

Allied Carriers:  There was no action this turn, but a sub did put two TT into CV Intrepid, doing moderate damage.  She made Makassar where I'll keep her under cover for awhile.  I've temporarily lost three carriers in three weeks.  Another five or ten CVE are on the way.  Hancock and Ticonderoga should make it to theater in about three months.  Until then, though, there's no getting frisky with my carriers.

Speaking of Which:  I just sent the turn to Miller and he replied:  "Are you carriers staying on station?  If so, this will be a big turn."  Well, they aren't.  They are retiring to a point near Makassar from a point SE of Balikpan.  I don't know if that will be close enough to allow engagement, but possibly so.  No matter what happens, though, I will be very pleased (and relieved) that the Allies were able to put together the Samarinda operation so quickly (and apparently successfully).

Thailand:  Allied troops are nearing the hexes adjancent to the IJA garrisons east (Udon) and northeast (Udon Thani).  I feel pretty sure the Allies will plow through Udon, the more important of the two, and then continue on to Vietnam.  Udon Thani is a little more iffy.  The Chinese army that will move on Hanoi from the north should near the border in about a week.  I have no idea if Miller has stripped the region and sent troops south or if he anticipates a move like this.  It'll be fun to see. 

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 1699
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 7:51:01 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/10/44 and 7/11/44
 
A very good two-day turn for the Allies:

Samarinda:  This base falls without any real opposition.  The Allies can move most of these troops over to Balikpan, have an operational airfield, and can land future Balik-bound troops at a friendly port.

Carriers:  No clash between the two forces.  The KB approached the scene from the south (Java Sea).  Allied ASW hammered several Japanese subs, none of which scored any hits.  The Allied carriers finished the turn a few hexes south of Makassar.  I don't think Miller dares venture any further east due to Allied LBA - too, the Allied carriers put up a CAP of about 500 Hellcats and 200+ other fighters, so it's still a potent force despite the damage incurred by Intrepid, Saratoga, and Constellation (speaking of which, Constellation is ten days away from Capetown, Saratoga is about a week from Perth, and Intrepid is disbanded at Makassar waiting for the area to quiet down a bit).

LBA:  Alot of Japanese LBA sortied.  Raids targeting Allied shipping around Manado and Makassar got chewed up by overwhelming CAP.  Raids targeting lightly protected "low-value" transports at Donggala scored and probably sank a dozen ships.  Overall, the Japanese probably lost more points on aircraft than the Allies did on ships.

Strategic Situation:  The past month has seen rather marked progress for the Allies in the DEI as Kendari, Makassar, and Samarinda have fallen and stout armies have been landed at Balikpan and Sampit.  These were accomplished at very acceptable cost.  

The Allies have suffered enough carrier attrition that they won't chance any "forward thrusts" in the near future, but will be content to work on Balikpan along with considering further action against Sampit, Banjermasin and possibly the Java bases east of Soerabaja if the KB isn't lurking.

In SEAC, the Allies will continue to press their advantages in Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam until they run up against bases to strong to take.  I think the Allies will be threatening some of the "middle" Vietnam cities in the next month or so.
 

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1700
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 8:00:46 PM   
AcePylut


Posts: 1494
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline 		When you assign your LBA to cap, to you specify which target you want to CAP, or do you just leave it up to commanders decision?

_____________________________


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1701
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 8:30:12 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		I also set a target for my LRCAP.  That has risks, because if the TF gets destroyed or retires out of range, the computer may choose a new LRCAP for that squadron that you wouldn't have chosen yourself.

_____________________________

"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.

(in reply to AcePylut)
Post #: 1702
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 10:03:05 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/13/44 and 7/14/44
 
A very frustrating day for the Japanese and therefore a very nice day for the Allies:

KB:  Moves north into the Straits of Makassar, lauching a number of raids against various shipping targets of little consequence, sinking a modest number of "low value transports" while losing a fair number of aircraft.  Also, the Allies have three subs waiting in the narrows - they score a hit on a DD and one on CVL Mizuho.

Combat Ships: Miller sends a stout CA/CL/DD TF to raid the area around Makassar.  It savages a small ASW TF but then encounters a well-led Allied CL/DD TF.  The combat results in the following serious damage (reports like "heavy fires" or the like):  IJN: 5 DD and 2 CL; Allies:  3 DD.  Later, Allied land- and carrier based air sorties against the surviving Japanese ships, setting two more CL afire and putting two TT into CA Kako.  Given Miller's serous shortage in combat ships, the sinking or heavy damage inflicted on at least six DD, four CL, and one CA is a significant Allied victory.

LBA:  I don't have the totals for this turn, yet, but last turn Miller lost 150+ aircraft to ops alone (in addition to 200 to a-2-a).  The ops losses mystify me, but I hope it's an indication that Japanese pilot quailty is seriously declining.

SEAC:  The interesting situation in Thailand/Vietnam is described in the map in the following post.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1703
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 10:03:52 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		The situation in SEAC on July 11, 1944




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1704
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 10:28:55 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		How many times have your carriers been hit by subs in the game? Even in closed waters this does not seem right. Carriers on patrol are much faster than subs. They should get an occasional hit but you are taking them at a phenomenal rate. Certainly a bit of bad luch as you are not hitting his nearly so often.

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1705
RE: Yikes! - 5/14/2010 10:43:23 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		Hmmm, let me see if I can remember what's transpired.

I don't think I've had any fleet carriers torpedoed outside of the DEI (although I've had scads of BBs torpedoed everywhere from Bay of Bengal to San Francisco).  I expected serious sub problems in the DEI and, until recently, have felt fairly fortunate in that regard.  But I've taken a few licks that have dampened my enthusiasm.

Back at the very beginning of the Great Carrier Battle at Morotai in November '43, a sub put a torpedo into CV Constitution.  This ended up playing havoc, because my carriers were just about to react (against orders) and split up into several groups.  Constitution ended up getting destroyed by carrier-based air.  So that was a particularly nasty sub encounter.

I've had many other fleet carriers torpedoed since then, but thus far none have gone under:  Hornet (one; light damage); Saratoga (two; moderate damage); Intrepid (two; moderate damage).  A few CVE and CVL have also been hit (and I recall a CVE taking a torpedo near Attu Island back in '43).

Allied subs have exacted an equal or greater toll on Japanese carriers in the DEI.  I believe three fleet carriers have been sunk and there have five or ten scores against CVE and CVL.

I've chalked this up to doing business in the confined waters of the DEI, so I really don't have any complaints about what's happened with respect to carriers.  If you want to hear me gripe about sub warfare, though, just ask me about their success against merchant shipping and ASW ships earlier in the game.  Sheesh!

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 5/14/2010 10:58:21 PM >

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 1706
RE: Yikes! - 5/15/2010 7:51:43 AM   
Cuttlefish

 

Posts: 2454
Joined: 1/24/2007
From: Oregon, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

How many times have your carriers been hit by subs in the game? Even in closed waters this does not seem right. Carriers on patrol are much faster than subs. They should get an occasional hit but you are taking them at a phenomenal rate. Certainly a bit of bad luch as you are not hitting his nearly so often.


Q-Ball, operating carriers in the same waters, has had the same experience in our game. The narrow passages in the DEI make carrier operations there very hazardous.

This is how it works in the game. By this time in the war in real life, of course, Japanese sub drivers were notoriously gun-shy, and for good reason. But even though Miller's sub captains have seen over 100 of their brethren lost they will still attack fearlessly, without regard for their virtual hides. Good samurai!

US carriers usually steamed at around 23 - 27 knots, I think, depending on conditions. The fastest I-Boats made 23 knots surfaced and a mere 8 knots submerged. But if a sub is waiting in a narrow strait and and a carrier comes through, it doesn't matter if the carrier is doing 35 knots - the sub is still going to get a good firing solution.


(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 1707
RE: Yikes! - 5/15/2010 8:58:33 AM   
Smeulders

 

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline 		Canoerebel, I'm not quite sure how well you've got Bangkok cut off. He can still pull supplies into the base South of Bangkok on the coast (only 1 jungle hex, if you see how easy you can get supplies from India to Burma) and from then on to Bankok.

How much resistance are you still expecting before the Vietnamese coast ? It seems like it will still take some time to built up significant bases with enough protection on the coast.

(in reply to Cuttlefish)
Post #: 1708
RE: Yikes! - 5/15/2010 8:02:19 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline 		7/15/44 and 7/16/44
 
Powerful carrier forces are maneuvering in close proximity, tempting fate and drawing some "collateral blood," but thus far the forces haven't quite engaged in battle.

Carriers:  Two turns ago, the carrier forces ended up just eleven hexes apart, with the KB close to Soerabaja and the Allied TFs south of Makassar.  Both were under stout LRCAP, no doubt, and it was probably good for both sides that neither launched long-range attacks.  This past turn the KB moved north into the Makassar Strait and Miller assigned his carrier aircraft to port strike in an effort to hit CV Intrepid, which was disbanded in port after taking two TT from a sub.  The Allied carriers had moved closer to Makassar, however, and the resulting air battles were pretty much a turkey shoot - the Japanese losing 355 in a-2-a and the Allies losing 100.  Intrepid did take two bombs, but they didn't do much damage.  Now, the Allied carriers will move back to a point just west of Makassar.  If the Japanese remain in place or move south there will be a great carrier battle.  If the Japanese move north then Allied transports may proceed to Sampit under cover of the Allied carriers.  I am willing to accept battle because the Japanese have suffered nearly 1,000 aircraft losses in the past week.

Combat Ships:  Allied combat ships finished off a Japanese CL and a sub sank an Allied CL.

Future Borneo Ops:  Since the Allies probably can't risk taking on both KB and LBA, the Japanese can use the KB to block any Allied advance.  So the Allies will be prepared to move in either direction - west through the Java Sea (troops prepped for Sampit and Ketapang are aboard transports while others are prepping for Singkawang) or north up the coast of Borneo (the troops that just took Makassar are prepping for Tarakan).  Wherever Miller posts the KB the Allies can go the other way.

Indochina:  5223 Provisional Tanks just entered Vietnam proper.  To the west, 500 Allied AV will attack at Udon Thani tomorrow.  To the southwest, a very large Allied army is bearing down on the islolated enemy garrison at Udon.  To the north, a Chinese army is making good progress on the road to the Vietnam border - ETA may be a week or ten days.

(in reply to Smeulders)
Post #: 1709
RE: Yikes! - 5/15/2010 8:19:49 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		Good show. You might want to pursue aggressively here. It will take him at least 2 weeks to replace 1,000 pilots!

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 1710
Page:   <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Yikes! Page: <<   < prev  55 56 [57] 58 59   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.359