Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 6/30/2010 8:33:59 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline
LOL. On turn 2 of my new GC mod test.....the AI just hit Enterprise at max range using 111 x B5N's. (and bombs) Ent is badly damaged and burning out of control. May lose her. Thought i'd waypointed her out of the way enough but apparantly i was wrong. That dastardly AI is an AWESOME opponent. Acomplished what a dozen PBEM opponents could'nt achieve

I DEMAND A RESTART!

_____________________________


(in reply to xj900uk)
Post #: 271
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 6/30/2010 9:35:07 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bklooste

FatR expereinces are iMHO more normal esp with dud torps, i dont understand how you can get so many hits in the DEI as these shoudl be well escorted troop convoys ( and he should have some naval search up unless he is suicidal) though you can get lucky with some war ships.  Supply and resources convoys dont really move through there till later.

If you go by the 1 ship in 11 days  you get 100 or so ships in the war .  As this is reduced by the fact these subs will be attritioned  and not all subs are from Manilla i think 100 or so ships is right.



I have to disagree to an extent....at least in terms of it depends on the deployment of those Manila subs and the reaction of the Japanese opponent. Not blowing my trumpet here but I'm generally pretty good with subs IMO and as an example from my current PBEM here's the ships totals due to subs so far to give you the other end of the spectrum view. Of course this is with the SRA sub force as a whole. This is by the end of April 1942:

Sub kills:

Dutch Boats:

AK - 16
CM - 2
PB - 1
DMS - 3
TB - 1
APD - 1
DD - 2
TK - 2

----------------------------------

British Boats:

DD - 1 (mine)
SC - 1
TK - 1

----------------------------------

Fleet Boats:

AP - 1
AK - 24
CM - 1
DD - 2
E - 1

----------------------------------

S-Boats:

AK - 5
CM - 1


_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to bklooste)
Post #: 272
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 7/1/2010 7:26:36 AM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

LOL. On turn 2 of my new GC mod test.....the AI just hit Enterprise at max range using 111 x B5N's. (and bombs) Ent is badly damaged and burning out of control. May lose her. Thought i'd waypointed her out of the way enough but apparantly i was wrong. That dastardly AI is an AWESOME opponent. Acomplished what a dozen PBEM opponents could'nt achieve

I DEMAND A RESTART!


Based at Truk or Rabaul?

The Japanese did do that early in the real campaign. Attrition eventually saw them off.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 273
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 7/1/2010 9:05:44 AM   
bklooste

 

Posts: 1104
Joined: 4/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy


quote:

ORIGINAL: bklooste

FatR expereinces are iMHO more normal esp with dud torps, i dont understand how you can get so many hits in the DEI as these shoudl be well escorted troop convoys ( and he should have some naval search up unless he is suicidal) though you can get lucky with some war ships.  Supply and resources convoys dont really move through there till later.

If you go by the 1 ship in 11 days  you get 100 or so ships in the war .  As this is reduced by the fact these subs will be attritioned  and not all subs are from Manilla i think 100 or so ships is right.



I have to disagree to an extent....at least in terms of it depends on the deployment of those Manila subs and the reaction of the Japanese opponent. Not blowing my trumpet here but I'm generally pretty good with subs IMO and as an example from my current PBEM here's the ships totals due to subs so far to give you the other end of the spectrum view. Of course this is with the SRA sub force as a whole. This is by the end of April 1942:

Sub kills:

Dutch Boats:

AK - 16
CM - 2
PB - 1
DMS - 3
TB - 1
APD - 1
DD - 2
TK - 2

----------------------------------

British Boats:

DD - 1 (mine)
SC - 1
TK - 1

----------------------------------

Fleet Boats:

AP - 1
AK - 24
CM - 1
DD - 2
E - 1

----------------------------------

S-Boats:

AK - 5
CM - 1



Do you have a break down of what the fleet subs at Manilla did though .. were not taliing about the rest . They have crappy torpedos the whole war.


_____________________________

Underdog Fanboy

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 274
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 7/1/2010 1:20:31 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
I can't be 100% precise but I know that Fleet Boats have only been active and successful from either Manila or some from the Aleutians. Aleutian boats have sunk about 7 x AK's. The rest of the ships have been sunk by Manila based Fleet Boats. Also all of the S-Boats kills have been in the SRA from Manila based boats.

I am fairly sure though that my results could be near the other end of the bell curve. Maybe the average is somewhere in the middle between my results and the lower/less successful results.

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to bklooste)
Post #: 275
RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? - 7/1/2010 3:15:49 PM   
Nikademus


Posts: 25684
Joined: 5/27/2000
From: Alien spacecraft
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: herwin


Based at Truk or Rabaul?

The Japanese did do that early in the real campaign. Attrition eventually saw them off.


Based at Kido Butai.

_____________________________


(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 276
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Manila or Pearl-new paradigm? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984