Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/14/2010 3:36:13 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		16 Apr 42

Some excitement today, both good and bad....

Summatra

The Palembang force crawls closer to their goal.

I attacked and took Medan, Bengkalis and Tandjoengbalai, along the NE Summatran coast. I had great results capturing the industry there:

Bengkalis:
Oil 30(10)

Medan:
Manpower 1(1)
Resources 20(0)
Oil 206(4)
Refinery 196(4)

Banzai!

Burma

Remember that ambush I wanted to do on the Allied fighters over Magwe? Well, it didn't quite work out how I had planned.....

Ted sent wave after wave of fighters after me, including the AVG (first time they showed their fithly faces). In the end, it looked worse than it was. I lost 18 Oscars (only 6 pilots killed and 6 more WIA) and 3 Zeros (1 KIA and 1 WIA) to 8 Warhawks and 4 H81-A3s. Ah well, we'll try again tomorrow. I'm in the process of sending more air support up there. Once I do that, I can flood the place with fighters. Maybe that will work. What I really need is a fighter that has the firepower to shoot something down.

Other Stuff

A few days ago I increased vehicles by 20 (to 120). I just increased it today by another 30. They'll be done in 5 days.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 811
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/14/2010 3:34:27 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		I forgot KB!  They rendezvouzed with the replenishment fleet today and headed south.  Currently, about 5-6 hexes east of Brisbane, there are at least 2 TFs hunting one of my subs in the area.  One is DDs and the other is other riff raff.  Off Noumea is at least 1 TF of cargos that was spotted by another sub.  KB will arrive in range on 19 Apr.  I'm going after the warships first and then the cargos.  I will do a port attack on Noumea and possibly Brisbane.  I'll decide later.  Note that on my initial attack, I'm only going to set 1 or 2 Kate daitai to use torpedoes.  I don't want to waste them on DDs or the trash he has floating around there.  I'm saving them in case I find something juicy.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 812
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 2:28:44 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		17 Apr 42

Things started off with a bang. The I-175 found an xAK a few hexes SE of Sydney and launched 4 torps at her. Three hit and down she went.

Summatra

I'm starting to move up the west coast and took Benkolen today. On the east coast, I pulled out one of the infantry regiments and will send them farther north to take the next base. Supply is enroute to repair the oil fields.

Burma

Ted sent his fighters at Magwe again. I was ready for him and did a much better job. At a cost of 1 Tojo and 2 Oscars, I shot down 6 H81-A3s, 2 Hurricanes and a Warhawk. Then, unescorted bombers came in. First, 14 Blenheim IVs came. Nine of them aborted and the remaining 5 were shot down. Then I saw the first Wellington Ics and shot one of them down as well.

Not a bad day at all over Magwe.

Pt. Moresby

Ted sent his daily raid of about a dozen B-17s again. This time the Zeros shot 2 of them down. Banzai!

Australia

The 14 Army is still not all ready to go at Koepang. They're destined for Darwin. The 16 Army is ready and the Broome invasion force launched yesterday. They'll hit tomorrow. I've been reconning all of the northern Australia bases and watched a ground unit leave Broome. I guess nobody will be home for the party tomorrow. I also launched the Wyndham invasion force today. It'll land the day after tomorrow. All looks good so far.

KB

KB is still headed south. Those 2 ASW TFs are still trying to find my sub. They're having a hard time of it. The sub isn't even moving. Anyway, KB will be in strike range on 19 Apr. KB is composed of Soryu, Hiryu, Shokaku and Zuikaku. Only Soryu's Kates are armed with torpedoes. I really don't expect to find much but I'll sink whatever is out there.

Other Stuff

Kumano safely made the port of Soerabaja. It'll take about a month to repair her damage completely.

Oscar production is currently at 64. It's ok, but won't be forever. I bumped it up to 80 for now.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 813
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 4:58:58 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		18 Apr 42

Burma

His fighters came in droves again, and this time I shot down 11 Warhawks and 4 Blenheim IVs for the loss of one Ann that was part of a bombing campaign of the remnants of the 1 Burma Division, the old Rangoon garrison. The guys are doing just great. Magwe's airfield is beat up a bit still, but more engineers are on the way to fill the holes.

Australia

The Broome invasion force landed and will take Broome unopposed. The former garrison of Broome (no clue what it was) was spotted on the coast walking to Port Hedland. I've got an invasion that will head there in a day or two. Those poor guys are going to be stuck on the coast.

The Wyndham invasion force (one day out) was attacked by some Aussie Hudsons. One got lucky and put a bomb into an xAK. She'll survive but she's headed back to Koepang.

Baby KB is going to take up a position between Broome and Wyndham, but closer to Wyndham, in case Ted gets frisky with the couple of ships he has there. The Wyndham invasion fleet has a CA TF (3 CA, 3 DD) escorting it, as well. Wyndham appears to be empty too.

KB

KB will reach the launch point tomorrow. Those two TFs are still hanging around my sub. Hopefully, they'll become artificial reefs.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 814
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 1:46:30 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Something interesting happened that I can't explain.  There are a bunch of air units belonging to restricted commands in the Home Islands.  For the most part they train pilots.  I had 2 IJN air units spontaneously change from a restricted command to independent!  No clue how it happened.  Does anyone have any idea?

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 815
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 4:43:12 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Magic!

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 816
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 4:46:38 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

Magic!


Says the rocket scientist.....



_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 817
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 4:56:20 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Hey You want E=mc(squared)

How about V=IR?

P=I(squared)R?

w=2(pie)/T=2(pie)f

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 818
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 5:02:13 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Ted and I have been talking about the game to date.  Interesting stuff and he gave me a bit of intel too.  He admitted that he shouldn't have pulled out of the Southern SRA so quick.  He also admitted that a big mistake was to not reinforce Timor and Koepang.  I agree with Koepang.  That's where my launch point is for my invasion of Australia.  From that air base, I can recon every base in Northern Australia with Dinahs.  I've gleaned a lot of intel from that.  I currently have 4 Dinah dets/chutai keeping tabs on his whereabouts.  He was surprised at how long it took for Singapore to fall.  That was my fault - lack of supply.  I should have sent supply there from Japan on 7 Dec.  That held up invasions of Northern Summatra and Australia.  25 Army has given up some units for 15 Army and is now preparing for another mission.  I still haven't mentioned that to you guys, but I will soon.

He also wondered where KB is.  Heh, heh..... He'll find out tomorrow.  I don't expect KB to kill a lot of things, but every escort/ASW platform that dies is a good thing for me.  Any merchant ships that sink and carry down all or part of a ground unit is an excellent thing as well.  It's much easier and quicker to kill ground units (and air units) by making them try to swim than on the ground (or in the air).

I made a comment about British fighter quantities.  He admitted that he's already running short of some of them.  Very good.  I can afford the Oscars more than he can afford his.  Right now, plane losses in Burma are running ~3:2 in my favor.  Not good enough, but it's getting there.  The best part is that he's fighting over my bases, so my pilot losses are very low. 

Akyab is a major fighter base.  I've sent a small bombardment force (2 CA, 1 CL) to pay a visit.  I'm going to try the night time float plane recon of that base with ship based float planes idea.  We'll see how that works.  I believe they will arrive in 2 days.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 819
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 5:02:46 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

Hey You want E=mc(squared)

How about V=IR?

P=I(squared)R?

w=2(pie)/T=2(pie)f



I'll take it if that'll explain what happened!

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 820
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 5:08:29 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Go with the last one........

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 821
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 5:13:17 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		25 Army mission:

I'm going to do a recon in force of Ceylon.  The objective is to destroy all of the ground units that are on that island.  I'll probably leave one division equivalent as a garrison.  Maybe not.  I haven't decided yet.  There will be 4 divisions involved in this operation.  The operation will be supported by the 22 Air Flotilla and part of the 3 Air Division.  Baby KB will be available.  I'm toying with moving Akagi/Kaga there as support as well.  If I do, the the rest of KB will remain in the Pacific (probably Kwajalein) to defend against any of Ted's funny ideas there.

I have a large quantity of transports in Singapore right now.  I won't begin this until the following occur:

1. KB returns from it's current Brisbane-Noumea operation and moves to Kwajalein.
2. Akagi/Kaga move from Kwajalein to Singapore.
3. Baby KB is no longer needed off Northern Australia.
4. I gather enough transport for the invasion.
5. Much of the surface elements for the Australian invasion are no longer needed.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 822
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 5:13:55 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BrucePowers

Go with the last one........


Got it! Thanks, Bruce!

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 823
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 9:44:36 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Something interesting happened that I can't explain.  There are a bunch of air units belonging to restricted commands in the Home Islands.  For the most part they train pilots.  I had 2 IJN air units spontaneously change from a restricted command to independent!  No clue how it happened.  Does anyone have any idea?


I've had the opposite happen to me.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 824
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 9:46:29 PM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline
Did they change size too? Perhaps slated for use on a CVE or something arriving soon?


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 825
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/15/2010 10:12:21 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		In my case groups that came off of a ship as Independent picked up the local restricted command.

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 826
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 1:42:27 AM   
Djordje

 

Posts: 537
Joined: 9/12/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

In my case groups that came off of a ship as Independent picked up the local restricted command.


What patch are you using? This is old known problem that michaelm said was fixed.

Anyway the problem can easily be avoided when you know what is causing it - avoid rail transfer of independent squadrons. When squadron goes off-map for one or more turns game engine does not allow HQ to be independent, so when it returns to the map next turn it assigns it HQ of the base it is in.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 827
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 11:10:56 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Djordje


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

In my case groups that came off of a ship as Independent picked up the local restricted command.


What patch are you using? This is old known problem that michaelm said was fixed.

Anyway the problem can easily be avoided when you know what is causing it - avoid rail transfer of independent squadrons. When squadron goes off-map for one or more turns game engine does not allow HQ to be independent, so when it returns to the map next turn it assigns it HQ of the base it is in.


It happened months ago, likely Patch 2 but maybe 3.

(in reply to Djordje)
Post #: 828
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 8:14:31 PM   
Djordje

 

Posts: 537
Joined: 9/12/2004
Status: offline 		Once it happens only thing you can do is change HQ to existing unrestricted one. There is no difference between independent and other HQs as far as I know

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 829
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 8:18:24 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		19 Apr 42

Australia

I took Broome today. The Wyndham invasion force reached Wyndham, but I had it set to do not unload. Figures....

KB

Ah yes, KB, the terror of the Pacific. They couldn't hit 3 DDs, but they only sent 11 Vals to do the job. They did send 23 Kates after 2 AMs and sank both of them. Nothing else in sight. Looks like it'll be a bust.

Magwe

The Oscars decided not to fly today, even though they're stationed at Magwe. Ted sent only fighters, the AVG to be exact. The final score was 3 Zeros (only one pilot fortunately) to 4 H81-A3s.

Overall, a lackluster day.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 830
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 8:19:49 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Djordje

Once it happens only thing you can do is change HQ to existing unrestricted one. There is no difference between independent and other HQs as far as I know


I have no problem with independent units. It's actually nice because they converted from a restricted command to an unrestricted command. They're still remaining as training units though.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Djordje)
Post #: 831
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/16/2010 8:33:15 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		20 Apr 42

Miscellaneous Ship Losses

The xAK that was in the Wyndham invasion force sank today. In addition, I had an xAKL explode today. Oops. Someone was smoking in the wrong place. Fortunately, it was only a Daigen class.

Wyndham

The invasion force decided to land today.

KB

Ah yes, KB. Bad things happen when the supreme commander gives dopey commands. It started out well. I had continued south in the hopes of running into the DDs and doing something useful. Those guys have vanished. I thought, to myself, why not hedge my bets and let KB do something useful even if I don't find the DDs. I set all of the Vals and Kates to Naval attack with a secondary mission of Port Attack (Brisbane). Well, they found a nice juicy cargo ship TF. After two attacks 4 xAKs (big ones!) were confirmed sunk with 12 more damaged. I suspect at least 4-6 of those will go down. Great! KB did something sort of useful with no losses. Well, Nagumo read my order and sent a third strike at the port of Brisbane, 41 Vals escorted by 8 (yeah 8) Zeros. They ran into a buzzsaw of ~40 Allied fighters. The Zeros were overwhelmed losing 1 to a few Allied fighters. Then they tore into the Vals. Final results were 24 shot down with more lost as op losses. Overall Shokaku lost 14 Val pilots KIA/MIA and 2 more wounded. Zuikaku lost a Zero pilot MIA and 15 Val pilots KIA/MIA. The only consolation is that I have a lot of pilots in the reserve to replace them. Doesn't make that swift idea any less stupid though. There still are a lot of ships in that TF out there, many damaged. I'm heading south one more day (and away from Brisbane) to try to catch them again. After that, I'm going to swing past Noumea to see if there's anything hiding around there. I also have 2 subs in the area headed for that beat up TF. Oh yeah, I sank an AMc in Brisbane.

Edit: The I-3 sank an xAK off San Franciso. It had been a while since I place any subs out there. Now I have 8 dedicated to the US West Coast. Four at a time. They'll swap out every couple of weeks. I'm also placing sub divisions (3-4 subs each) around various important Allied ports. I'm trying to force Ted to escort everything. That makes fewer escorts for his warships.

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 10/16/2010 8:39:11 PM >

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 832
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 3:34:21 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		21 Apr 42

Another quiet day. Ted decided not to send fighters over Magwe. I think I depleted his fighter reserves. Heh, heh. Maybe he's just resting. He has taken serious losses for no appreciable result there. The CA TF will bombard Akyab the day after tomorrow.

KB ran into 2 xAKs, litterally. In the morning they sank them. KB will now head toward Noumea to see if there's anything around there.

I took Wyndham. Next on the agenda is Darwin. I'm concerned about invading there though. Intel says there's 14 units and 40k troops. What do you guys think?

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 833
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 7:01:29 AM   
bilbow


Posts: 741
Joined: 8/22/2002
From: Concord NH
Status: offline 		Do you know where the Aussies of the 6th and 7th divs are located? They could be in Darwin, and would be if I were him.

_____________________________

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile- hoping it will eat him last
- Winston Churchill

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 834
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 12:28:59 PM   
TheLoneGunman_MatrixForum


Posts: 312
Joined: 1/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I took Wyndham. Next on the agenda is Darwin. I'm concerned about invading there though. Intel says there's 14 units and 40k troops. What do you guys think?


If he's got that many troops at Darwin, he's keeping them supplied by sea. I'd recommend doing some major sea lane interdiction in the area while you continue with your recon to make sure your intel is correct.

Such a large concentration of troops in one spot could be disastrous for him if you can manage to figure out a way to kill them off.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 835
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 3:25:22 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheLoneGunman


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I took Wyndham. Next on the agenda is Darwin. I'm concerned about invading there though. Intel says there's 14 units and 40k troops. What do you guys think?


If he's got that many troops at Darwin, he's keeping them supplied by sea. I'd recommend doing some major sea lane interdiction in the area while you continue with your recon to make sure your intel is correct.

Such a large concentration of troops in one spot could be disastrous for him if you can manage to figure out a way to kill them off.


I've been able to supply by land quite a large force in Darwin. However, you may have HR's against the push/pull supply. However, I would agree that it is likely that sea supply is at least a partial component to keep 14 large units supplied in Darwin.

_____________________________

Pax
Post #: 836
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 4:19:46 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline 		Facing 14 units I would at a minimum reconsider the plan to directly amphib assault the place. I'd interdict by sea and launch a few ground attack bombing raids just to get a list of units present. Then decide how to take Darwin, perhaps by the overland route you originally planned.

_____________________________


(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 837
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 9:21:17 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		I don't know where the 6th & 7th Aussie Divisions are. Good idea of the ground bombing raid. I'll try that next turn to get some intel. That's a great idea. I'm leaning toward landing the force at Wyndham and taking the road. 14 Army will turn north toward Darwin and 16 Army will form a defensive line to the south.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 838
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 9:27:53 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		22 Apr 42

Australia

That damn Boise showed up and sank a small invasion TF headed for Pt. Hedland, composed of 2 PBs and 2 xAKs. It was carrying a Naval Guard unit, one of the ones that teams with a port unit to create a Special Base Force. The intent was to take Pt. Hedland and then withdraw it back to Koepang to form the SBF. Well, now that it's gone, I can upgrade without it. I can rebuild all of the infantry that was destroyed. It was a loss, but not a bad one. I suspect Boise came from the west. I never saw her and I don't have anything in that area. That has been rectified. I also sent the 4 BBs to hang out in that area in case she returns.

Sub War

The I-15 put down an xAK east of Hawaii with 3 torpedoes.

KB

KB headed to an area west of Noumea looking for some more meat. They didn't find anything. I sent KB on a route to the south of Noumea heading east. I'll check out that area and then head for home.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 839
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 10/17/2010 9:52:16 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		23 Apr 42

Burma

We keep taking turns battering each other. This time he won. I lost a dozen Oscars and 6 pilots for about half a dozen Allied losses. Unfortunately, he closed the airfield at Magwe. I pulled out the beat up Oscar Sentai and didn't replace it this time. I have more air support units arriving in theater. Soon, I'll have airfields with fighters all over the area. I think that's the key.

The CA TF bombarded Akyab in a night bombardment. I used the suggestion to have floatplanes recon and I am convinced they made the bombardment a great one. The CL hit the 18 Br Div and the 2 CAs hit the town. Overall, there were 316 casualties and at least 1 Warhawk was destroyed on the ground. Best of all was that fires were started. The bombardment said 316 fires, but when I put the cursor on Akyab, it showed 44 fires. Is that a lot? What will it do to the base?

Summatra

I took Sabang. Now I own all of the bases along the NW coast of Summatra.

I have a strong force in Palembang. I could take it now but I'm waiting for the 3 engineer regiments to arrive to reduce the possibility of trashing the joint.

I also took Djambi with a Tank regiment. I captured the oil field there at 245(5)!

US West Coast

The I-2 obliterated the PC Jackson.

Australia

There are small TFs (1-2 ships each) arriving at Darwin constantly. They're coming from the east. I'm putting surface forces there and will station subs in the area as well. Not sure where they're coming from though. Baby KB caught an xAKL and sank her in Darwin.

KB

Well, KB hit the convoy route mother lode! They found 3 cargo convoys heading toward Australia, so they were full! In 3 attacks they hit a total of 13 xAKs and 6 xAKLs. Five xAKs and 3 xAKLs were confirmed sunk and all of the rest had multiple 250kg bomb hits and heavy fires and heavy damage. I lost count of the number of times I heard the sinking ship sounds during the turn. KB will head east next turn looking for fresh game then will turn north on the east side of Noumea to head for the replenishment fleet rendezvous and then for Truk. Still a couple of turns left before they are out of danger, but there's been no inkling of Allied carriers. So far they have sunk 12 cargo ships and badly damaged/sunk another 24 cargo ships. I know that in the long run, it's meaningless, but for the short term, it'll slow down the build-up in Australia.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 840
Page:   <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  26 27 [28] 29 30   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.047