RE: Jan. 18-19/43

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Jan. 18-19/43

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Jan. 18-19/43

Page: << < prev 25 26 [27] 28 29 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 6:59:37 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Hi Chickenboy,

All good points/suggestions.

My plan is to mass submarines in waters I expect Allied amphibious operations to take place. Both for recon and to hunt damaged ships.

Bart doesn't cut corners. He's so averse to losses he escorts everything. I think the routes have loosened somewhat and he's taking a more direct path to his destinations, however these are covered by air and naval ASW. My subs simply can't penetrate the defences, and as mentioned, even when I do find something an attack is usually prevented/suppressed by naval ASW, or my torpedoes just plain miss.

I check SigInt every turn. The last TF information I received was "radio transmissions at xx,xx" which turned out to be three hexes away from San Diego, and included no information as to type of vessels.

This is one of the aspects of the game I really enjoy, submarine operations, and have put a lot of time and effort into it. Unfortunately, as I mentioned, I just go through the motions now. I've done everything I can, but the results are just not happening for me.

Even now, I'm positive the Allies are making another move in the Southeast Pacific. I'm picking up a heck of a lot of small ASW TF's and just know the bigger fish are out there. I've positioned my submarines to cover as much Ocean as possible in likely invasion routes. All I can do now is wait and hope I get a sniff of something before the Allies arrive at their next target.

I'm not hopeful. When the Allies invaded Tabiteuea, I had 5-6 submarines in the area. I vectored them to positions where they could interdict any number of Allied TF's. I didn't get an attack in, not one.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 2/3/2012 7:06:07 PM >

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 781

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 8:03:05 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

My bar is a lot lower ... I don't expect them to attack. In fact, I position them so they won't.

When they trip something up, I either send kamikaze assets to confirm what's there (typically single PB TF's), or go in with "party" forces (KB, or a SurfTF). Particularly my Glen subs, I don't put in harm's way. I want recon from them.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 782

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 9:03:37 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

My bar is a lot lower ... I don't expect them to attack. In fact, I position them so they won't.

When they trip something up, I either send kamikaze assets to confirm what's there (typically single PB TF's), or go in with "party" forces (KB, or a SurfTF). Particularly my Glen subs, I don't put in harm's way. I want recon from them.

That's just it Pax, I don't get the intel to be able to make those kind of defensive decisions. I don't want KB having to react to every sighting and placed at risk of taking a fish from an Allied sub to only learn it was nothing. My Glen subs are on the periphery, the RO's and non-equipped Glen subs are the ones expected to strike at enemy TF's.

Anyway, one thing that definitely is a problem is Allied air search from Ndeni and Tabiteuea. They are picking up all my movements and make it hard to position SCTF's outside of DB range without being spotted first. Any SCTF that could be used to confirm any sightings or act as early interdiction forces are compromised. Tabiteuea and Ndeni may turn out to be more of a problem than I originally thought. I'm not sure what to do about them.

I'm learning intel is everything in this game. Next time I will grab all these outlying bases if for nothing else early warning of enemy movements. I'm blind while the enemy is seeing all my movements. Bugger it!

So I sit and wait. KB is primed at Truk and it's up to the Allies' next move to determine whether I can set it loose. I get a lot of ships back from refits in the coming weeks that will allow more options for countering anything the Allies may do.

Let me ask a general question for everyone out there. What is more worrisome in your opinion for Japan, losing the Marshall's or the Solomon's?

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 783

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 10:04:38 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

My thought: depending upon when. You are Jan '43. Losing anything at this stage is worrisome for me. I'm still hoping to be above parity yet, so anything they take I hope to be able to take back with punishment. 9/43 things change rapidly with the Essex showing up.

I forget your IJN losses so far ... can you summarize for us?

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 784

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 10:11:44 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

My thought: depending upon when. You are Jan '43. Losing anything at this stage is worrisome for me. I'm still hoping to be above parity yet, so anything they take I hope to be able to take back with punishment. 9/43 things change rapidly with the Essex showing up.

I forget your IJN losses so far ... can you summarize for us?

I've lost the CV Hiryu and a handfull of DD's. That's it. Any potential clash between the Allies and Combined Fleet is most likely to be all in. The invasion of Tabiteuea was conducted by practically the entire U.S. Pacific Fleet.

I have 3 CVL's, 1 CVE, 2 BB's, 4 CA's, 6 CL's and 14 DD's at Singapore. The remainder of my forces are at Truk or the Home Islands refitting. Refits are all CL's and DD's. I have 7 CV's, 1 CVL, 8 BB's, 13 CA's, 6 CL's and 33 DD's at Truk. I also have a CA, CL and 6 DD's at Kwajalein. Give or take a few CL's and DD's off here and there, I'm just spouting these numbers from memory.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 2/3/2012 10:20:20 PM >

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 785

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 11:14:16 PM

jrcar

Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Seymour, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

Let me ask a general question for everyone out there. What is more worrisome in your opinion for Japan, losing the Marshall's or the Solomon's?

Solomon's... just.

The Allied real advantage in 1943 is the 4E bomber, taking the Marshalls doesn't help that much due to the small island sizes and they are easy to interdict... also ties down his troops.

In the Solomon's the allies can apply their airpower, mass their ground forces and do smaller hops, with risking their ships. And not much the Japanese player can do safely.

If you loose the Marshalls there is still plenty of sea room to bring stuff into and out of the SWPAC... but loosing Truk is a no no. Ponope and Kusaie make good outposts to protect Truk.

Loose Truk and you had better evacuate the SWPAC... back to Hollianda.

cheers

Rob

_____________________________

AE BETA Breaker

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 786

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 11:28:38 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jrcar

quote:

Let me ask a general question for everyone out there. What is more worrisome in your opinion for Japan, losing the Marshall's or the Solomon's?

Solomon's... just.

The Allied real advantage in 1943 is the 4E bomber, taking the Marshalls doesn't help that much due to the small island sizes and they are easy to interdict... also ties down his troops.

In the Solomon's the allies can apply their airpower, mass their ground forces and do smaller hops, with risking their ships. And not much the Japanese player can do safely.

If you loose the Marshalls there is still plenty of sea room to bring stuff into and out of the SWPAC... but loosing Truk is a no no. Ponope and Kusaie make good outposts to protect Truk.

Loose Truk and you had better evacuate the SWPAC... back to Hollianda.

cheers

Rob

Thanks for posting Rob. I've mentioned about how I'm learning a lot from your AAR and I'm glad you've begun posting advice/suggestions here.

I'm thinking along the same lines about the Marshall's. They certainly can be used as a future springboard into the Central Pacific, but they are limited in what they can due locally. I've been fortifying both Ponape and Kusaie, so perhaps that will be where I make my stand.

With Combined Fleet intact, minus Hiryu, do you see any merit in taking on the Allied Fleet if they choose to advance further in the Gilberts and Marshall's, or would I be better served holding back and countering any moves into the Solomons. I see two benefits to fighting in the Solomons, My logistics are better, and I can bring substantial LBA to bear in support of the fleet.

I want a crack at the Allies here soon, it's just a question of do I do it in the Gilberts/Marshalls or wait for a move on the Solomons.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to jrcar)

Post #: 787

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/3/2012 11:42:20 PM

jrcar

Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Seymour, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

Thanks for posting Rob. I've mentioned about how I'm learning a lot from your AAR and I'm glad you've begun posting advice/suggestions here.

I'm thinking along the same lines about the Marshall's. They certainly can be used as a future springboard into the Central Pacific, but they are limited in what they can due locally. I've been fortifying both Ponape and Kusaie, so perhaps that will be where I make my stand.

With Combined Fleet intact, minus Hiryu, do you see any merit in taking on the Allied Fleet if they choose to advance further in the Gilberts and Marshall's, or would I be better served holding back and countering any moves into the Solomons. I see two benefits to fighting in the Solomons, My logistics are better, and I can bring substantial LBA to bear in support of the fleet.

I want a crack at the Allies here soon, it's just a question of do I do it in the Gilberts/Marshalls or wait for a move on the Solomons.

You need to hold Ponape and Kusaie... otherwise Truk becomes untenable...

There are a couple of windows of opportunity. When Judy comes, when Jill comes, but before the Allied strength really mounts in mid-late 1943...

You don't NEED to defeat the Allied fleet though...

If you loose your fleet a lot of your options are taken away from you...

Defeating the Allied fleet is a nice bonus, but only if your fleet remains basically intact. You can do so if you can syncronise land and naval power... I think that is a bit easier to achieve in the Solomons, or when the allies go deeper into the Marshalls.

Remember the purpose, to defend the resource/fuel and their convoys as long as possible. Ground only matters for the advantage that it provides for that pupose. In the Pacific that means anything forward of the Mariana's is there to provide delay. Having an intact fleet will slow him down the most.

You are now playing for time... throw sand in his face... breaking his nose is also nice... but you can't knock him out.

Cheers

Rob

_____________________________

AE BETA Breaker

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 788

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:00:48 AM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Great way to put it Rob!

I'm so tempted to break away from my plan, but you've reinforced that I need to stick to it. KB as a deterrent is the way to go at the moment. Nothing on the map the Allies are threatening is worth possibly losing it over. I'll be posting more over the weekend on my defensive dispositions. A lot more early next week if the Patriots end up losing the Super Bowl. I'll be so depressed I'll need something to take my mind off football.

I like the throw sand in his face analogy. I'll try to be as much of a pest as possible to slow any advance in the Gilberts/Marshalls with as little as possible. In the meantime, fortify and garrison the main line Truk/Ponape/Kusaie/Rabaul/Lae quickly. With my current reorganization going on, I'll be able to set an actual timetable of PP expenditure needed to get as much AF support and extra ground troops into the Pacific as quickly as possible.

The amount of combat LCU's I get over the course of 1943 are mainly in China. I do get a lot of support units and those are what is most needed at the moment to get the forts and base expansions up into fortress type levels.

I just need to stay the course, and look for opportunities to delay.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to jrcar)

Post #: 789

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:01:21 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

At this point for you, the allies should only be getting about 75 4E's/mo. All Flavors.

He's got Tabiteuea ... to me that means he's pointing to Marshall's as at lvl6 he should be able to support b-24's there. 17/21 range ... Kwaj is in jeopardy. You can't let that happen this early. Bad things for you ... he's too close too early.

Tabiteuea though is out on it own ... meaning there isn't another 5/6 air base within 21 so he can't support it with 4E coverage. Can you take it back? It's Jan '43 ... I would think it through. atoll size 60,000 ... prep 3 div take you 60 days... land 4/1/43 ... before he starts getting his CV's. If you still have Tarawa ... that's within Tojo distance .... When you're ready, move +200 Tojo's there and sweep and LRCAP your amphib force adn the island. Set your KB within protect distance. Get Emily coverage from Kwaj/Solomons.

He'll have to use CV's to stop you cause he is out of 4E support range. If he does, commit. Bring the whole tamale (Combined Fleet) ... it's early '43, still your time to win.

Or he will try to just make you pay and flood the area with subs. Bring fleets of patrol craft with you ... counter flood with your ASW forces and Jakes from island AV's.

He will know you're coming ... allied intel is just too good. Either way, there is a reaction. If you're ready, you can still pull this off.

He took this early ... so he isn't timid. I think he will react.

Hopefully some other will chime in .... this is just me. I hate to give up the offensive too early. BANZAI!!!

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 790

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:10:04 AM

njp72

Posts: 1372
Joined: 9/20/2008
Status: offline

Good comments there Pax

I have only come to understand how tough it is to assault atolls in my current PBEM against Dennishe. If he has enough troops and supply on one of them with fortfications they are very hard to take. I failed with a 3 Div assault with prep and substantial bombardment.

I now let him penetrate into a position and then seal off the breach using surrounding islands. I then use subs, destroyers and air to attrit him.

Won't work forever but it is fun.

Cheers

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 791

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:21:45 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njp72

Good comments there Pax

I have only come to understand how tough it is to assault atolls in my current PBEM against Dennishe. If he has enough troops and supply on one of them with fortfications they are very hard to take. I failed with a 3 Div assault with prep and substantial bombardment.

I now let him penetrate into a position and then seal off the breach using surrounding islands. I then use subs, destroyers and air to attrit him.

Won't work forever but it is fun.

Cheers

Good point, so maybe have to prep 6 divs ... 3 for first assault, and 3 for backup if needed. It IS hard to take these things ... but if he gets 4E's on this one ... you will have to commit so many assets to keep the Marshall's secure ... more than taking them back in my mind. Maybe not though .... needs to be thought through ...

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to njp72)

Post #: 792

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:22:03 AM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Pax,

I'm tempted to strike back at Tabiteuea as well, it is too early to allow this foothold. The timetable fits in terms of me being able to strike back, I have three divisions available for a counterstrike. I agree, he has stuck his neck out without an adequate support structure. Tabiteuea is on it's own.

I have nine days to come up with a course of action. I can either stick to the plan to defend farther back, or strike in an effort to give me more time. I'll weigh the suggestions and come up with something. The nice thing is, I can do either option. I am prepared to launch an attack or sit back and wait.

At some point, I have to take a risk. I just have to determine if this is the best one to try.

As I've mentioned earlier, SigInt/Allied ASW moves and my gut feeling point to another Allied operation happening soon in the S.E. Pacific. I just don't know where yet. I may have on opportunity to strike when I learn more, or the next Allied move forces my hand.

On a reality check Pax...200 Tojo's? I'm PDU off remember! I have a grand total of 85 until the IIb is available. One unit is in Burma, the other Lae. 200 Tojo's...I wish!

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 793

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:31:42 AM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

On a reality check Pax...200 Tojo's? I'm PDU off remember! I have a grand total of 85 until the IIb is available. One unit is in Burma, the other Lae. 200 Tojo's...I wish!

Ahh, that's right. Whew, good news for you! Means very tough for him to get 4E's here. He can't move his planes around either.

So, Tojo/Zero/Oscar mix is what you will need. Depending upon what he has there, Nates might even work at max DT range. They get 6 hex right?

Still, Rob had some points as well. Hopefully you can get some others to chime in.

It's just Tabiteuea can get AB to 6 and its about the only one in the area ... that's a problem. Means little to IJ as don't have any 4E's, but to the allies, this is key ... moreso than Tarawa which can only get AB to 5. 4E's established there, with supply and a div and high forts ... very hard to dislodge and they can control everything within 21 hexes in '43 .... nasty. Not saying he will be able to put B-24's there ... but he could.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 794

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:33:33 AM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: njp72

Good comments there Pax

I have only come to understand how tough it is to assault atolls in my current PBEM against Dennishe. If he has enough troops and supply on one of them with fortfications they are very hard to take. I failed with a 3 Div assault with prep and substantial bombardment.

I now let him penetrate into a position and then seal off the breach using surrounding islands. I then use subs, destroyers and air to attrit him.

Won't work forever but it is fun.

Cheers

Hey njp72, glad to see you following along and posting. I don't think Tabiteuea is an atoll though, it has a 30k or 60k troop limit...too large for an atoll I think? I thought of isolating Tabiteuea early as well by invading Baker Island and the Ellice Island chain, but I figured I'd never be able to build the bases up quickly enough to support my air or naval units and seal the trap.

However, Tabiteuea and area is still very isolated for the Allies. There is still a chance to do something.

Lots for me to think about.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to njp72)

Post #: 795

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 12:59:16 AM

jrcar

Posts: 3613
Joined: 4/19/2002
From: Seymour, Australia
Status: offline

TB is an Atoll with 60,000 troop capacity.

At long range over time 4E will fall from the sky, if you have to use your CV forces to LRCAP a base from a hex on two out... do that once or twice and he won't come back.

Kusaie I think is the key, rather than Kwaj/Roi as they are too small.

PDU off I think is slightly better for the Japanese at this time of the war...

Counter invading is the Japanese doctrinal thing to do.. preferably with inadequate forces as you have underestimated the enemy... not sure repeating history's mistakes is the best way to play WITP...

He probably has a div on the place... attacking with 3 won't be enough to guarantee victory. If he has more than one... say plus a regt, or a couiple of those big defence units... and he'd be mad not to, you will not take it.

Use subs. Threaten with raiding forces (they don't even need to commit). Try to tie him down to defending the place... you don't need to take it back. If you get a couple of "lucky" sub hits though then you may start to create a tactical advantage that you can turn into an operational one. 50-50 odds is a loosing proposition.

Cheers

Rob

_____________________________

AE BETA Breaker

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 796

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 1:41:24 AM

njp72

Posts: 1372
Joined: 9/20/2008
Status: offline

Yep that is what I try to do. Fully agree with jrcar's comments.

If you get lucky and take out a carrier or two with your subs it will guarantee to dampen an Allied player's enthusiasm.

One tactic that I try to use and occassionally works is feinting with a large surface force and then deploy in depth sub picket lines where he is likely to deploy his carriers if he takes the bait.

By late 42 early 43 you have to be devious......

(in reply to jrcar)

Post #: 797

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 2:18:14 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

Rob and njp72 bring up really good points. I don't know how long they've been on Tab and what your recon shows. You certainly cannot fail in your attempt to re-take it. You may want to review Pzb's successful operations of re-taking islands in his AAR. He's done a couple IIRC ...

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to njp72)

Post #: 798

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 5:33:22 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Thanks everyone,

I stick to the plan. I wait for a chance to strike a blow on better terms another time.

Tabiteuea being an atoll closes the deal. There is at least a Marine Division and a CD gun unit on the island and they've been there for months. The initial idea was to isolate and starve the island and then assault it. I will not launch a direct assault against the island without having first cut if off from supply and reinforcement. The troop strength needed just doesn't warrant the risk. If I failed...I'd never recover.

Nope, I continue to dig in and re-deploy for the defence of my MLR as per the original plan. I have many more pressing needs than the defence of these island chains. If I do decide to move against the Gilbert's, it won't be a direct assault. It will be by isolation. I have some ideas how to effectively defend the Marshall's.

I'm going to try and get some recon on Ndeni and the Ellice Islands. I still think the way to defeat Allied forces on Tabiteuea is to strike behind them. More Allied troops committed to the Gilbert's without first building up the supporting islands may be an opportunity for me. No new CV's arrive until the Essex, and I believe that is still 5 months away or so. If I can get a lucky, a torpedo hit on a CV or two, that could open the door as jrcar and njp72 have suggested.

A lot can happen in 5 months.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 799

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/4/2012 6:20:08 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
...There is at least a Marine Division and a CD gun unit on the island and they've been there for months. The initial idea was to isolate and starve the island and then assault it. I will not launch a direct assault against the island without having first cut if off from supply and reinforcement. The troop strength needed just doesn't warrant the risk. If I failed...I'd never recover.

+1

months = lvl6 forts. Rob is correct, I doubt you could take it. Would take 3 or maybe 4 waves of 3 div's each, and then still not 100%. I'd have to set up a test bed to see. Way too much resource.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 800

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 4:57:38 AM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Sigh. Patriots choke against the Giants once again. What is it about playing the Giants that brings out the worst in the Patriots? Anyway, I'm grumpy and will need a day or two to recover. I can't believe they gave that game away, too many mistakes and dropped passes.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 801

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 10:01:00 AM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

Sorry Man. That was a bummer, even though I'm not a huge Patriots fan, for some reason I was rooting for them last night. I like that the strengths for them are some of the unsung guys stepping up. If Welker had caught that one we'd be having a different conversation though. That was really it.

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 802

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 1:19:21 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

I hear y'all.

I repeatedly root for the Redskins plane to go down. Well, not literally, I would feel a bit guilty about that-but you get the gist. As a lifelong Cowboys fan, my feelings for the Giants (and Eagles) are similar.

Alas, the supermodel's husband will have to be satisfied with his OTHER three Superbowl rings.

Belicheck's expression as the game clock ended? What a sour puss!

_____________________________

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 803

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 3:24:03 PM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

One thing to consider, and that is to take a very close look at the Gilberts in terms of airbases. Sure Tabiteuea can be built up to level 6, but there are no less than 9 bases begining with Tarawa that are all 0(2), and they can be built to level 5. 10 bases if including Aorae. Granted it is the minmum size given "....a B17-E requires a minimum size 5 base" (p. 163).

Given stacking one over the airfield rating ..8 X 6 = 48 + Tabiteuea at 7 means 55 potential air groups stationed in the Gilberts. More than enough potential for all of the 7th USAAF

In my game I have started planning the fighter advance up Makin and Milli keeping the 4E's pounding away on the Atoll's. I find that it is not so much disablement and destroyed squads as much as disruption and morale effect that is not reported in the combat reporter,but I see it as an effective tool in taking these Atolls.

From an Allied point of view I see the Gilberts as a huge thorn in the side of the IJ because of all the deep water narrow passages to conduct submarine warfare and the difficulty of the IJ to supply and operate out of the Marshalls (I own the Glberts in Aug '42).

Just a thought from a AFB ...

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 804

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 5:11:52 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Thanks for the post Crackaces.

I agree that the Allied lodgement in the Gilbert's and an advance into the Marshall's will put them into a good position. However, it's also on the fringe of the Empire. I don't want to invest large amounts of aircraft or troops defending these islands. The main bases are too spread out to be mutually supporting and they'll require a large influx of supply and troops to defend adequately. I should have done something when they initially landed, but wasn't really in a position to do so.

Anyway, hindsight is 20/20, but I see reacting to the current situation with a knee jerk invasion as reinforcing failure. I'll have to look at other creative ways of striking back.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Crackaces)

Post #: 805

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 5:18:46 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Today sucks. I've been a Patriot fan for 30 years. This loss is a heartbreaker. I take nothing away from the Giant's, but this game meant something to the Patriot's organization bigger than football. It was a feel good story that deserved a happy ending. Ugh, here I sit at work and just replay the game over and over again in my head.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 806

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 10:59:02 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Anyway, hindsight is 20/20, but I see reacting to the current situation with a knee jerk invasion as reinforcing failure. I'll have to look at other creative ways of striking back.

He has to supply those bases, and it has to be by ship. Subs can be a real nuisance. Find the route he takes and start nibbling away.

_____________________________

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 807

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/6/2012 11:56:13 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

I agree Mike. I'll be using subs in the area. The only problem is the Allied ASW is getting very good, and has been suppressing my submarines in the area consistently. I know Tabiteuea is getting stronger daily, but I've used the time to better my logistics in the entire theatre for a more sustained effort over the long term. In two weeks the majority of my fleet refits will be complete, then I will look at causing problems for the Allies.

My reorganization is going well and I'm formulating concrete measures to employ in defence of the entire region. I do have some ideas. My first priority is preventing any lodgement in the Solomons or New Guinea. I'm willing to sacrifice the Gilbert's and Marshall's, but that doesn't rule out making life difficult for the Allies on occasion.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 808

Jan. 20/43 - 2/12/2012 6:12:12 PM

SqzMyLemon

Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline

Well, Bart is back from partying with the snow bunnies and we've completed another turn.

An interesting development today, which adds another piece to the puzzle concerning whether the Allies are commencing another operation in the Pacific soon. A screenshot will follow showing the particulars.

Jan. 20/43:

Sub Ops:

SS I-8 is spotted and attacked by carrier borne TBD's and DB's today. The submarine is positioned between Luganville and Suva.

Burma:

Allied B-24D Liberator's (74) in a total of three raids, hit the Japanese 33rd Division guarding against any Allied move south from Akyab. Losses were reported at one non-combat squad disabled. However, Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (4) were lost in A2A against the bombers. One Liberator was recorded as an Ops loss.

China:

Kweiyang's airbase damaged with 5 AB, 3 ABS and 31 Runway hits. The 15th Chinese Corps at Kweiyang suffered 6(5) infantry and 1(5) non-combat squad losses totalling 67 casualties.

Northwest of Ankang the 33rd Chinese Corps was bombed by Ann and Sonia bombers based from Sian. Casualties were light at 0(2) infantry and 0(2) non-combat squad disablements.

Chinese troops east of Chihkiang were bombed, losses were minimal.

Miscellaneous:

Japan:

Liuchow expands airfield to size 2

Allied:

Darwin expands airfield to size 8
Port Hedland expands airfield to size 4 (If I'm going to do something here, I better get started)

Thoughts:

Allied CV's are active. Two TBD's and one SBD were recorded as Ops losses today. The ASW attacks against the SS I-8 confirms to me that the Allied CV's are on the move and an operation is forthcoming. At least I have intelligence on their general location, if nothing concrete about numbers or course. This gives me advance notice and I can choose to sortie the Combined Fleet or not.

One quick question! Does the aggression level of the pilot have any bearing on whether a submarine's Glen floatplane will perform a naval search mission. I looked at the SS I-8 Glen's pilot and he sports a whopping aggression of 23! I then decided to look at many of the pilots on my Glen equipped submarines and noted simliar poor ratings. I wonder if this could explain the horrendous performance of my submarines to gather intelligence on enemy naval movements?

So, what to do about this current development? My first order is to increase search capabilities as much as possible, to spot any Allied move against the Solomon's or the Gilbert's as soon as possible. I'm going to err on the side of being right, that the Allies are indeed moving, and sortie the Combined Fleet from Truk to take up a position that allows for a counter against either possiblity. I will then decide whether to commit the fleet upon learning more of the enemy intentions, but I want to at least be in a position to react if a favourable opportunity presents itself. I will need two to three days to get into position. I'm also going to deploy more LBA units forward and put them on alert for action.

The next few days will be crucial in trying to figure out and spot what the Allies may be up to. Things may get very interesting...or not!

Here's the screenshot:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 2/12/2012 6:14:05 PM >

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)

Post #: 809

RE: Jan. 18-19/43 - 2/12/2012 6:34:33 PM

Crackaces

Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Anyway, hindsight is 20/20, but I see reacting to the current situation with a knee jerk invasion as reinforcing failure. I'll have to look at other creative ways of striking back.

He has to supply those bases, and it has to be by ship. Subs can be a real nuisance. Find the route he takes and start nibbling away.

What I have found from my side is that the submarine threat forces me to escort with at least 2 sometimes 4 DD's. Plus Tabitueua is in line with Sydney to WC and I have forgotten to reroute my TF's South .. the same boys looking for my cargo going to the Gilberts ...have sunk my returning convoys from Sydney ..

I would think that Tabiteua right now contians more than one CD unit. Although in itself is very non-threating .. it comsumes a BB maybe 2 per to supress fire less your AP's and AK's will take a beating. I would aslo assume Tabiteuea us mined .. that will suck up some DD's ..

My orginal post to this discussion was not so much about striking back .. but that the whole Gilberts can be devleoped into 4E bastions ..with Tabiteueua simply a level 6 base. But every one can be level 5 and that is enough to base 4E's. Then it is a simple matter of advancing up the chain[given teh horrendious casulties attacking atolls

] to move fighter support forward.

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 810