Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: P-40E v P-39D

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: P-40E v P-39D Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: P-40E v P-39D - 12/15/2009 10:12:06 PM   
tigercub


Posts: 2004
Joined: 2/3/2003
From: brisbane oz
Status: offline
True it was not needed a lot of the time because the ME109 could out dive and out climb the spit.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: tigercub

The ME109F could be turned so tight you could tear the wing off and some ACES did do this killing them self's.

Tiger!




Most people would say that proves they COULDN'T be turned that tightly...




109 could not outturn Hurricane/Spit or P40 (low/med alt) under normal circumstances. 109 experten quickly learned that attempts to match these planes in turning fights were non-habit forming. Some of the best Experten could briefly get away with it, such as Marssialles but these were exceptions vs. the rule. Another experten got away with it from time to time vs. I-16's, a plane which could turn on a dime and was way more nimble in this way vs. the 109.

109 was a nimble design (less so as you progress from E to G) but it's primary strength lay in vertical maneuvers vs. these planes. The Russians made similar note regarding P40 as with Commonwealth exp in the desert. UK veteran pilots, being used to having the edge in turning fights was part of the reason why they preformed poorly initially when facing the JNAF and JAAF for the first time in Asia. Situaiton was reversed there.




_____________________________


You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life

(in reply to Nikademus)
Post #: 91
RE: P-40E v P-39D - 12/16/2009 1:34:00 PM   
xj900uk

 

Posts: 1340
Joined: 3/22/2007
Status: offline
Certainly until the mid-year Spits (like the Mark VIII & IX) started getting fuel-injection carb systems and better turbo-chargers on their Merlins which negated a lot of the advantages the Me's were enjoying

(in reply to tigercub)
Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: P-40E v P-39D Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.703