rickklahorst
Posts: 16
Joined: 6/9/2002 From: Brookfield, WI Status: offline
|
I had a recommendation for Matrix and SSG regarding the scheduled sequel to Ardennes which is Korsun Pocket. I told them that I think that instead of doing the game on the Korsun Pocket, it would be better to choose a campaign which has yet to be done. There are many campaigns that would be much more interesting to do. The Korsun campaign is neat but it kind of one sided with regard to strength of forces. One side is pretty much on the defensive trying to stave off disaster while the other is trying to demolish his opponent with overwelming tank, infantry, and air/artillery support. Besides this, Mr Tiller at HPS Simulations just published a game on this very subject. Would it not be better to make the game on a campaign like Anzio for example. You WWII buffs out there probably already know that the Anzio campaign in Italy was by no means a cakewalk for the Allies. Both sides had armoured units, relatively equal amounts of men and artillery, as well as air support. So both sides could go on the offensive, as did really happen, with not one side always defending himself. Also all sides had unique special units. For example, the US had several Ranger battalions, and the Brits had their Commando units. This would be a much more intense and fun scenario to play that has never been done before. Also the idea of having up to three players could be done. One having the Americans, one having the British, and the other having the Germans. At least thats what I think. I am really interested to find out if anyone else out there shares my views?
_____________________________
Rick
|