Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Leaders

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Leaders Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Leaders - 11/24/2009 6:10:22 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
And thats the reason I will never be involved in doing leaders for a european theatre game

Monty/Patton/Bradley/Alexander/Rommel

Urrrrghhh no thanks thats one fight I can do without

(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 61
RE: Leaders - 11/24/2009 6:16:44 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

And thats the reason I will never be involved in doing leaders for a european theatre game

Monty/Patton/Bradley/Alexander/Rommel

Urrrrghhh no thanks thats one fight I can do without

or Manstein vs Zhukov?

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 62
RE: Leaders - 11/24/2009 6:17:58 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Exactly why bother with the grief

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 63
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 12:40:59 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EUBanana

quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishbed


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace


quote:

ORIGINAL: Fishbed

And I'll add that Crutchley deserves a pretty big aggressiveness rating too, if it's not already the case - he's the one who threw his battleship into a fjord against destroyers, sounds pretty reckless in my book 

I seem to recall the German destoyers being out (or nearly out) of fuel and thus trapped in Narvik. I remember someone describing the action as shooting fish in a barrel.


Some of them were, indeed. But then you must be pretty good at satellite vision in 1940 to be damn sure about what was waiting for him in the fjord - especially with U-booten in the vicinity. If it hadn't been for the Warspite swordfish seaplane, HMS Warspite could have been the fish of the said barrel instead...


Indeed. I doubt Crutchley was privy to the Kriegsmarine's logistical issues when he was pondering charging in. I would have thought a battleship in a fjord would be a torpedo magnet. If Warspite had been torpedoed he'd have gone down in history as a hyperaggressive idiot probably.

He may well not be all that competent as admiral, he didn't seem all that suited to high command. But he was not cautious.


Worth noting that at 2nd Narvik Crutchley occupied a relatively lowly post as Captain of Warspite. V Adm Whitworth was flying his flag in Warspite and was OTC for that action. But even he was following orders from the Admiralty. I don't have much quarrel with those orders: the situation at Narvik was such that the risks involved in sending in a battleship were acceptable, and if you've decided to whack 'em, best to do it with the biggest stick available. OTOH the Admiralty's orders to Whitworth contain the apparently hilarious instruction that he was to lob a single depth charge into any inlet/fjord suspected of harbouring a U-boat!

To get a better feel for Crutchley you could do worse than look at his WW1 record. He fought at Jutland, and evidently made such a strong impression on Sir Roger Keyes as to be handpicked by him for a role in the 1918 Zeebrugge-Ostend raids. Crutchley was, I think, no more than a lieutenant at that stage, but had to take over command of cruiser Vindictive at Ostend 2 after her captain and 1st Lieutenant became casualties, and was awarded the Victoria Cross for the part he played. That is not a decoration that is lightly awarded.

I don't know enough of the details of Savo to be sure, but suspect that Crutchley is open to criticism for a failure to ensure that someone stepped into his shoes as acting commander of the southern cruiser force whilst he was absent at the conference aboard HMAS Australia. Yet the Savo debacle apparently did not do terminal damage to his career, as I understand he retained a seagoing command for much of the rest of the war. In game terms I think he might warrant high aggression, medium-high naval and medium-low skill ratings.

_____________________________




(in reply to EUBanana)
Post #: 64
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 3:19:02 PM   
Arnhem44


Posts: 578
Joined: 11/23/2004
From: Singapore
Status: offline
With reference to the tin cans of Taffy 3 and all who served on them, forgive me if they're already in there, I trawled Tracker a couple of times.

LCDR Ernest E. Evans commanding DD-557 USS Johnston, conferred MoH for his actions, can't find him in the database or as CO of Johnston, he was her first and only captain
LCDR Robert W. Copeland commanding DE-413 USS Copeland, can't find him in the database either
CDR Leon S Kintberger commanding DD-533 USS Hoel (ID:22467), given what's known of the his and Hoel's actions during the battle should his stats be given a relook? Anyone who charges down 3 squadrons worth of heavies in a DD has got to rate better than Naval 53 among other things.
a

< Message edited by Arnhem -- 11/25/2009 3:21:52 PM >

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 65
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 5:10:08 PM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
I hope any leader database changes will be in the new patch.

I would hate to start a new game without them.

(in reply to Arnhem44)
Post #: 66
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 6:48:41 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
As I said this is a patch 3 issue if then no promises

(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 67
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 7:44:14 PM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
What would happen if a game started with patch 2, gets leader changes from a third patch?

Will this cause problems with the game started after patch 2?

Will I have to restart after patch 3?

Also, how long does it take to change a few values on a handfull of leaders in the database?
Cant you release a mini patch soon after patch 2?

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 68
RE: Leaders - 11/25/2009 8:58:53 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Not sure to be honest I suspect leader changes won't take effect.

But there is no need to restart for something as minor as a few leader changes

Not doing a mini patch and I said up fornt this will be a patch 3 item as I need to get agreement from other team members I dont unilaterally control the leader file

Sorry

Andy

(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 69
RE: Leaders - 11/26/2009 1:41:38 AM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
Before the official patch 2 comes out, cant you make a quick few database changes to the leaders in question?

They cant cause any new bugs, correct?

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 70
RE: Leaders - 11/26/2009 7:52:33 AM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Admiral sorry I have been pretty consistent in saying this is a patch 3 item sorry

(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 71
RE: Leaders - 11/26/2009 9:42:33 AM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
When is patch 3 scheduled to be released, or likely to be done by?

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 72
RE: Leaders - 11/26/2009 2:09:04 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Not got a clue Admiral Scott sorry

Just to refer to the comment I made on post 1 of this thread

"OK guys I tell you what a few threads have commented that some leaders looks wrong.

For Patch 3 maybe and I am not promising if there is a leader you disagree with the ratings on write him down with his database number and a short reason why he has is to low or high and I will promise to look at the thread.

I cannot guarantee that we will take any changes proposed but I promise I Will look at the list.

So tell me Leader Number/Name/Current ratings and why you think they are wrong with any proposd changes and we will see "


(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 73
RE: Leaders - 11/26/2009 5:15:39 PM   
mariandavid

 

Posts: 297
Joined: 5/22/2008
Status: offline
Back to an earlier thread. Buckmaster it seems was questionable: am reading the latest book by Peter C Smith on Midway and he cites for example that Thatch complained that Buckmaster kept too many fighters back to protect his ship instead of detailing them to the strike. A strange incident took place after the Yorktown sank -when Buckmaster kept insisting that the destroyer he was in sail again and again through the wreckage!

On Stillwell - I think his inspiration number should be minimal - he is one of the US Army commanders whose men seemed to positively hate him with an utter passion. There is a wonderful story about one of the Marauder officers deliberately walking with him into the known arc of a Japanese post in the hope that Stilwell would be hit, regardless of what happened to him!  The only other general I heard comparable attitudes of was Patton (off topic). 

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 74
RE: Leaders - 11/28/2009 3:53:42 PM   
bush

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 10/30/2007
From: san jose, ca
Status: offline
Andy,

Have you used/seen United States Marine Corp Generals of World War II by George B. Clark? Nice little reference, but very expensive. As I looked up several leaders they sure do not seem to correlate well between AE and this book.

Mike

(in reply to mariandavid)
Post #: 75
RE: Leaders - 11/28/2009 3:58:06 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
I didnt do the USMC Leaders

For tha avoidance of doubt we took the stock leader and then I added a few RN/RAF/British/Aus and NZ HQ level leqaders that were missing and did a review of their stats

but others did japan and US

We did not do a comrehensive scrub so most leaders will be the same as stock

(in reply to bush)
Post #: 76
RE: Leaders - 11/28/2009 7:59:58 PM   
Blackhorse


Posts: 1983
Joined: 8/20/2000
From: Eastern US
Status: offline
I'm to blame for USMC and US Army leader ratings.*

I put some time and effort into fixing (what I perceived) as the most egregious errors in stock. In the interests of time I focused primarily on the Division and HQs commanders, although a few other noteworthy individuals (e.g. "Chesty" Puller; Marine Raider and Presidential son LTC James Roosevelt) were added or tweaked as well.

Several US Army divison commanders (including, most controversially, Ralph Smith) were relieved of command. I lowered most of their ratings from stock.

In general, most US Army leaders will have low aggression compared to Marine leaders. That reflects doctrinal differences -- and is primarily what led to Ralph Smith being relieved by the Marine's 'Howling Mad' Smith. MacArthur has value as one of the few senior US Army commanders with a high aggression rating. For all his faults, few other senior Army generals would have had the gumption or the ability to conduct his 1943-44 offensives on what was - for Americans - a logistical shoestring.

I am a big Stilwell fan. I think he was a great combat commander, and, like MacArthur, one of the few naturally aggressive US Army senior leaders in the Pacific. But Stilwell was miscast in a quasi-diplomatic role. He managed to alienate Chiang, Chennault and most of the British hierarchy in CBI. Lacking US forces of his own to command, to be effective Stilwell had to secure cooperation from the Chinese and the Brits -- and he failed to do so. To cite just one example, had Stilwell been more skilled in personally diplomacy Chiang might have given him authority to directly command the Chinese troops in Burma, which in turn would have made Stilwell more effective. One British General called him, "the best three-star company commander in the theatre". I reflected all this by reducing Stilwell's 'Admin' rating -- if you think there is a better way to reflect this shortcoming of "Vinegar Joe" I'm open to it.

Buckner's ratings went up from his Percival-esque level in stock -- IMHO, he was competent, but with low aggression.

While I have opinions on the qualities of several Generals, and reasons for the ratings, I also have a thick skin, and I'm not emotionally invested in promoting the reputation of any of them. I welcome questions and suggestions on how to improve the ratings.




* = and for adding the fictional Quinton McHale to the database. "McHale's Navy" was a 1960s US television comedy starring Ernest Borgnine as a PT-boat commander in the Solomons in WWII.

< Message edited by Blackhorse -- 11/29/2009 5:17:50 PM >


_____________________________

WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 77
RE: Leaders - 11/29/2009 5:20:10 PM   
Blackhorse


Posts: 1983
Joined: 8/20/2000
From: Eastern US
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bushpsu

Andy,

Have you used/seen United States Marine Corp Generals of World War II by George B. Clark? Nice little reference, but very expensive. As I looked up several leaders they sure do not seem to correlate well between AE and this book.

Mike


I'd be especially interested to know where you think Clark's assessment of USMC generals ought to lead to different ratings in AE. Feel free to PM me, or to post here. Thanks.


_____________________________

WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!

(in reply to bush)
Post #: 78
RE: Leaders - 11/30/2009 9:52:49 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
Any more for any more not quite closing it down but if you want your best worst or inbetweeney reviewed now is the time to get them on the list even if its just a leader thats currently in as a default set of stats you want randomised

(in reply to Blackhorse)
Post #: 79
RE: Leaders - 12/10/2009 7:11:19 AM   
Cerion

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 9/16/2009
From: Europe
Status: offline

A spelling error: I think that 3705 "Kurita, Takao" should be "Kurita, TAKEO".

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 80
RE: Leaders - 12/10/2009 7:14:48 AM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
ndy, a group of game designers, nameless but they sell here at MAtrix, made the error of saying something not too flatering about Monty, WHAT A SH##$ORM that caused... lets agreee the leaders have a special place!
Perhaps there could be a way to randomize the various ratings, keeping the overall ratings of a group for a side, but allowing some gaminess to satisfy all.. another toggle! lol
Thanks again guys for all the work

(in reply to Cerion)
Post #: 81
RE: Leaders - 12/15/2009 6:24:22 PM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
Any chance we could see some leader database changes in the next hotfix patch?

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 82
RE: Leaders - 12/15/2009 6:39:17 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
No its going to be an exe only patch to avoid folks having data issues.

Joel aka Blackhorse is going to lead on the leader review and he is in China for a few days I think so when he gets back he will start work on it.

(Its nice to be evil and delegate....)

(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 83
RE: Leaders - 12/15/2009 6:52:16 PM   
Admiral Scott


Posts: 625
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Syracuse, NY USA
Status: offline
Ok thanks Andy

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 84
RE: Leaders - 1/8/2010 10:57:33 PM   
Cerion

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 9/16/2009
From: Europe
Status: offline

And now (after the patch) with the leaders, please. The thread, I think, should be stidkeyed for a discussion in depth.

(in reply to Admiral Scott)
Post #: 85
RE: Leaders - 1/9/2010 3:58:26 AM   
Blackhorse


Posts: 1983
Joined: 8/20/2000
From: Eastern US
Status: offline
Please stand by . . .

I'm am Andy's delagatee, but RL commitments are delaying my ability to post some "comps" (comparisons of significant Japanese and Allied leaders) for forumites to review.

_____________________________

WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!

(in reply to Cerion)
Post #: 86
RE: Leaders - 1/9/2010 5:23:49 AM   
Cerion

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 9/16/2009
From: Europe
Status: offline

Ok, thank you.

(in reply to Blackhorse)
Post #: 87
RE: Leaders - 1/9/2010 6:51:37 AM   
wwengr


Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ckammp


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kereguelen


quote:

ORIGINAL: ckammp

If possible, could the devs look at Joseph Stilwill(16131).
In particular, his admin(44) seems a little low. Given what he had to deal with (Chiang, Chennault, lack of supplies), IMHO he accomplished a lot.



Ahem, what exactly did Stilwell accomplish?




Just off the top of my head:

Stilwill was considered one of the top troop trainers in the US Army;
Stilwill built the Ledo Road;
Stilwill organized and ran the Ramgarh Training center;
Stilwill led his re-trained and re-organized X-Force to victory at Myitkyina;
Stilwill's five Chinese divisions(NCAC) were the best trained in the Chinese Army;
Stilwill established training centers for Y-Force and Z-force.

Seems more than enough to justify a better than 44 admin rating. I do recognize that Stilwill had many flaws, I just feel those flaws should be reflected in other attributes rather than admin.


In the game, Admin Skill influences the HQ units use of support to reduce fatigue and disruption. It has not influence on training.

_____________________________

I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!

(in reply to ckammp)
Post #: 88
RE: Leaders - 1/9/2010 8:46:56 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
Stillwell was famous for his non-diplomatic approach and way of speaking. Nickname "Vinegar Joe" didn't come from nowhere...so, I think admin rating is justified. 

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to wwengr)
Post #: 89
RE: Leaders - 8/30/2010 12:42:00 PM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline
This might be a good place to ask this- in my current game of WITPAE 1.04.1106 there's a Captain Jeffries V. with ratings in excess of 100! Surely an error?

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Leaders Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.719