Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wipe out the LW?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wipe out the LW? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 10/24/2011 5:04:09 PM   
PizzaDeOveja


Posts: 52
Joined: 10/20/2011
Status: offline 		Haha all this talk about how unfair it is for fighter sweeps to be so damaging...funny

IMHO the thing is that being anglosaxons, having air superiority in all the wars made you not take into account how sh*%ty it is to have to operate without it! But it surely is. Of course airports got shredded by bombing and strafing runs and the Germans pilots had as much chance as the thousand of civilians the Americans and especially the brits in their terror circus.

Well... playing this game on the German side really puts you in place and tells the full story and specially how miraculously it was that the Germans managed to withstand so much time (granted it helped to be a totalitarian socialist state that machine gunned defeatist but anyways...).

It was the same for Spain in the old days, with the Brits financing every fanatic that wanted to wage war against us it was amazing we managed to last for so long against such odds. But we did, and for a lot more time than the Germans managed and against many more enemies. Even the pope was against us! and we was defending Catholicism! Talk about fighting against all odds!

The French and brits didn't last a month without air superiority in 1940, the Germans lasted years without it and fighting a 3 front war. And as for the glorious Spaniards, oh boy how did they manage to keep the godless communists at bay for months with no air support whatsoever in total inferiority in material but with total superiority in everything else.

AIR Superiority RULES and I doubt any brit/american army will ever get into a battle without it, in fact last time I checked it is military doctrine since very long ago, and boy there is a reason for that!

So no more bitchin' about it in the forum ok???

< Message edited by PizzaDeOveja -- 10/24/2011 5:09:44 PM >

_____________________________


The Rules of War? I'll give you a lesson, sir, about the Rules of War...

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 61
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 10/25/2011 8:28:36 PM   
kaybayray

 

Posts: 424
Joined: 6/1/2007
Status: offline 		Hey Pizza <S>

I think you are missing the point of the thread started by Nick. IMHO the points are that the game mechanics as they work in BTR produce very unrealsitic and Ahistoric results with respect to the Allied Fighter "Patrols", their engagement with Luftwaffe assets and the reaction of the Luftwaffe assets to the Allied patrols.

I suggest you read from the very beginning with Nick's original posts. I agree with his views and for those reasons I dont use the Patrol feature in many ways because it is unrealistic. As enjoyable is it may be for some to sit and watch their patrol nail Luftwaffe AC after AC as they attempt to land at an Airfield near your patrol without making any effort to engage or find another field to land at, I belive it is so far removed from a historical or even realistic event in the overall theme of this game that I do not use it in that way. IMHO that is what we refer to as "Gaming the Game" or in wider circles "MetaGaming". I dont see it as at all enjoyable so for me it is not an option. I believe Nick also thinks this way as do many others. However each of us can choose to run their campaign as they see fit. So I am not telling you what you can or can not do. Just trying to enlighten you as to what this thread was actually started about long ago.

Later,

KayBay

_____________________________

It's all Mind Over Matter....
If you dont mind... It dont matter

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 62
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 10/26/2011 11:15:10 AM   
npsergio

 

Posts: 185
Joined: 1/23/2010
Status: offline 		A noob here...
I have sent FS with very good results in enmy killed planes on the ground, but to a very high cost in morale and damaged and killed allied planes because of AA and reaction attacks... My question is: the problem (ahistoric killing of landing palnesa) here is when after the AF straffing the FS planes patrol over the AF, isn't it? Do you use house rules not allowing patrols over the enemy AF?

Thanks

(in reply to kaybayray)
Post #: 63
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 10/26/2011 3:43:16 PM   
7th Somersets

 

Posts: 282
Joined: 5/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

My question is: the problem (ahistoric killing of landing palnesa) here is when after the AF straffing the FS planes patrol over the AF, isn't it? Do you use house rules not allowing patrols over the enemy AF?


That is right - the problem arises where the allied player launches a fighter sweep that has a target point near the enemy airfield and then sets a patrol over it... the result is that you get no/very few losses and seem to hit a large numberof landing enemy aircraft.

The real problem here imo is the ai not reacting to this by diverting - since such patrols did occur historically and when they caught enemy ac in landing patterns they did cause havoc - however - the AI does not seem to respond to this tactic - sending the rest of the returning squadron to its doom one after another.

The other problem is that with message levels set to 3 - you can see where enemy aircraft come from very easily (and also by looking at the map). This means that you can readily identify the airfields that are regularly used and set patrols over them very easily.

I personally see nothing wrong with an allied player trying to set up patrols that catch landing aircraft - since that is what happened - and because it can be a significant drain on fighter resources. I agree though that without the 'fixes' set out above that the results become a-historical.

(in reply to npsergio)
Post #: 64
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/2/2011 10:59:55 AM   
PizzaDeOveja


Posts: 52
Joined: 10/20/2011
Status: offline 		Oh boy-oh boy-oh boy...x100000000

yesterday I planed I raid on the coastal radars that the Germans cunningly have constructed, and naturally, a whole bunch of bf-109 AS went on to intercept my glorious raid.

Well first it must be said that from the wiki you just cant get much about submodels of a particular aircraft...some entries are more helpful than the others...but I think that AS designation in a model was the German way of saying that that particular sub model would produce a ton o' widows in brit/america...anyways...

They made a single pass on my bombers and returned to base. On this point I must say that I had already identified their home base so I conducted an earlier FS that did some damage before they took off (oddly enough your fighters don't get to shoot enemies taking off only landing, but it must be a balance thing or somethin) but...as my thunderbolt FS had a single mustang unit on it, it was still hovering over their base when they came to land...and...

OH BOY was that awesome...suffice to say...I wont be seeing those AS guys any time soon...

Hooooooo! ho ho ho ho ho ho ho ho...

I'm already examining the map to plan false raids in order to catch the Luftwaffe landing!

::EDit::
according to this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109_variants#Late-production_G-6.2C_G-14.2C_G-14.2FAS
AS means that the plane has been fitted with an engine designed specifically to operate at high altitude ...A good thing to target those as soon as U identify them, if you like me, always send the raids at 25000+ feet.

< Message edited by PizzaDeOveja -- 11/2/2011 11:12:49 AM >

_____________________________


The Rules of War? I'll give you a lesson, sir, about the Rules of War...

(in reply to 7th Somersets)
Post #: 65
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/3/2011 9:07:18 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Naive realism at its peak.

Seriously, the landing units must be able to divert when they are notified of enemy fighters over their airfield. No pilot in his right mind would try to land on a airfield patrolled by enemy fighters. The penalty could mean a delay of 1 day before the unit is assembled and ready for action again. However that is a more realistic outcome (statistically speaking) than losing all planes and many pilots in one or several units trying to land at that particular airfield.


_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 66
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/3/2011 10:11:31 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline 		::EDit::
according to this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109_variants#Late-production_G-6.2C_G-14.2C_G-14.2FAS
AS means that the plane has been fitted with an engine designed specifically to operate at high altitude ...A good thing to target those as soon as U identify them, if you like me, always send the raids at 25000+ feet.
[/quote]

More precisely, AS means that the DB605 engine got the charger of the DB603 engine (a higher cylinder volume engine). This increased the full pressure ceiling considerably. The advantage exists solely above the normal DB605's full pressure ceiling which was historically a bit under 6 km (20k ft).
As a result these Bf109G models excelled at altitudes exactly above the good altitude range of almost all Fw 190A/F/G models (Fw 190 was good up to 20k ft).

The Bf109 is still a deathtrap even in the Bf109G-5/AS version, though. Too fragile, not enough firepower to yield good kill ratios against tough targets. It's furthermore still not capable enough to interdict photo reconnaissance aircraft reliably (Ta 152C can do this very well).

The real killers are early on the best Fw190A-5/-6 units. Some of them rack up very high kill counts, especially if they've been located just outside of escort fighter range till early 1944.
This game produces a lot of experts (high aces) if pilots reach 100+ sorties with enemy contact. The secret ingredient for mass destruction by interceptors is thus to keep their pilots alive. The Bf 109G isn't good at this.

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 67
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/4/2011 11:07:27 AM   
PizzaDeOveja


Posts: 52
Joined: 10/20/2011
Status: offline
Excelent info lastdingo.
Personally I have an Xpecial notebook at hand in which I take note of the landing airports of any fw190 I see, I dont see it as a cheat as Im sure the info about the kinds of planes and where they were based was infinitely superior for the allies than the one we have in game so...

Oddly enough jets seem to be next to useless in the game, at least it has been in my campaign so far. There is an m163 unit, you know those rocket aircraft that killed more german pilots than anglos, that keeps taking off but so far its range hasn't allowed it to reach any single time any of my glorious planes. And then there's also an m262 unit whose glorious contribution to the national socialist cause so far has been 1 damaged b17 in exchange of one of their own upon landing. We wont be seeing many more of them as meser factory got a 99% hit last week...Hoooo ho ho ho ho ho

But a wolfpack of fw190 yesterday got around 5 bombers damaged and 3 or 4 destroyed in a single pass...ouch! (and that with close and high friendlies!)

In my side, so far, the best are the mustang IV, oh how I love those guys...and the spitfires XIV (If I got that model correctly..its a model that has a range that is not ridiculous like all the other british fighters..) I don't have enough production of them so I have only like 6 flying but they always manage to come home with victories. Awesome planes awesome.



< Message edited by PizzaDeOveja -- 11/4/2011 11:08:03 AM >

_____________________________


The Rules of War? I'll give you a lesson, sir, about the Rules of War...

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 68
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/4/2011 7:47:10 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline 		Actually, Germany didn't have enough AAA to protect all airfields. It was much-preferred to use camouflage and concealment instead.

Some fighter airfields (not on Northern Germany's plains) were small fields that were 99% of the time full of cows or sheep. The aircraft were hidden in the woods nearby. The Allies didn't always know about these airfields.

Think of this when you read the next time that Me 262 couldn't be used on grass airfields (because the turbo engines burnt the grass) and were thus restricted to the few paved airfields (mostly civilian ones without any areas for hiding aircraft).


Btw, the Ta 152C is a beast. It slaughters the Allies (and can be had in April '44 while still putting up a good fight till that month). Nothing can stop it, for the few comparable Allied fighters are invariably overpowered by the superior experience of the German pilots who can survive on average about 200 missions in their Ta152Cs.
Performance and combat strength suffices to slaughter PR aircraft and B-17s alike.

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 69
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/5/2011 1:39:49 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lastdingo

Btw, the Ta 152C is a beast. It slaughters the Allies (and can be had in April '44 while still putting up a good fight till that month). Nothing can stop it, for the few comparable Allied fighters are invariably overpowered by the superior experience of the German pilots who can survive on average about 200 missions in their Ta152Cs.
Performance and combat strength suffices to slaughter PR aircraft and B-17s alike.


This is historically accurate. The Ta152A/B versions were to enter production in january '44. The type was production ready in late '43 but was turned down in favor of the Me209 project which was still in development. The Ta152A/B versions would have had the same armament as the C, with provisions for 2 more cannons (Mk108 or MG151/20) in the outboard wing mounts. Granted with the early Jumo 213A it would not have had the same performance as the later C powered by the DB603, but it would have made a very potent bomber killer nevertheless and engine development would have seen performance get better by the month.

Historically, the Me209 project ran into problems and never materialized. It was perhaps the biggest blunder of the RLM concerning daytime fighter defense, to not go ahead with full production of the Ta152A/B versions.

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 70
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/5/2011 3:18:51 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline 		Jumo 222 A/B production was planned for 1942. The Jumo 222 A/B was as large as the BMW 801 and equipped with a ring cooler it could have been in service in 1942, with a quite lightweight 2,500 hp engine. That fighter would have reigned supreme below 20-25k ft even more than the BMW-equipped 190 ever did.


One of the great in-game strengths of the Ta 152C is its range and endurance, though. It allows much more intercepts and regular flights on defensive CAP against PR aircraft.
That's like having twice that number of Fw 190A-6s. On top of that it has a "good" high altitude rating, and has thus simply no weak spot.

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 71
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/5/2011 3:30:27 PM   
lastdingo

 

Posts: 110
Joined: 7/31/2006
Status: offline 		double post

< Message edited by lastdingo -- 11/5/2011 4:27:11 PM >

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 72
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/5/2011 5:11:25 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Never read of the Jumo 222 before so, thanks! Engine production was of such central importance to Germany. It is a recurring feature in Luftwaffe history that key production plants were bombed. Like how the Ta154 production was effectively eliminated when the glue factory was bombed out.


_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lastdingo)
Post #: 73
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/7/2011 9:11:08 AM   
PizzaDeOveja


Posts: 52
Joined: 10/20/2011
Status: offline 		Woh! I suppose you all guys already know but I didn't so just in case....

Yesterday I was performing a glorious a double airfield strike to catch those hellish 190 landing and it turns out that when you see a lot of AA black clouds around your planes it aint that the huns are missing yet again...if you turn messages to level 3...you will be informed that your planes are taking a lot of damage...and I mean a lot...I think once I got 15 planes damaged in a single puff-puff! So anytime you see some puffs here and there expect a lot of planes to immediately return to base (that must be what happened to my glorious LANC III unit that turned home in the middle of the strike! It a good thing I'm the overcomandant and don't own anyone an apology after my 2 hour rant about their cowardice...well except to my poor neighbor that is)

_____________________________


The Rules of War? I'll give you a lesson, sir, about the Rules of War...

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 74
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 11/7/2011 1:34:24 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ktJlY6FeNw

Go to 720p and fullscreen and you'll see what a Ta152H is capable of.

The first engagement is a good example of mismanagement of speed in a dive. Once you hit compression it can be difficult to recover and in this case it resulted in a P47 slipping away. It's very true what they say, altitude is life and speed is your saviour.


_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to PizzaDeOveja)
Post #: 75
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/9/2011 5:30:58 PM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		The Ta 154 had nothing to do with a glue factory. Tank found an adhesive he liked in '42 and built the first two 154's with this adhesive. The RLM did not like this adhesive company for political reasons (and possibly money changing hands with the new company) so the RLM vetoed Tank's choice and forced him to use another companies adhesive.
Which then promptly ate through the wood it was bonded to causing the 154's to crash in flight.

The 154 should be an optional rule in the game; "you can use them/you can not use them" as there was no chance the way things historically went that they would ever be used.

But we cannot do this as the 154 takes 4 engines, signifying that there was an engine problem with this aircraft. There was no engine problem, it should probably require 2 or 3 parts per 154 to build them. But 2 engines. With a need for 4 engines the German player can never build them.

Michael

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 76
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/11/2011 12:52:55 AM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		It had nothing to do with a glue factory? What's the difference between glue and adhesive then? The factory was bombed out in '44 ending Ta154 production, that was the issue. Yes NSDAP politics and RLM bureaucracy often hampered development and efficiency, sometimes even counterproductive.

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 77
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/11/2011 4:21:15 AM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		The factory manufacturing the glue that worked was not bombed.
The factory that was bombed was making a sub par glue, and the TA 154 kept disintegrating in the air because of this glue.

The plane would have never gone operational with that glue.

Mike

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 78
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/11/2011 10:42:59 AM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Ok I won't argue the point with you it's not my personal opinion just what my source say. So I have no personal conviction or prestige vested in it.

Do you know which the specific companies involved were?

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 79
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/11/2011 9:32:59 PM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		Okay, there were 3 glues.
The first i do not know the name of; it was listed in the Focke-Wulf interrogations documents. Tank said he wanted that one.

The second was Goldamund in Wuppertal, this glue did not eat wood but it was of limited strength. This glue is blamed for the crashes of V4,5,8,9 and 12 if i remember correctly.

Goldamund was destroyed in may or June of '44, so Tank switched to Dynamit AG from Leverkusen. Many sources seem to have this incorrect. Dynamit was NOT half as strong as Goldamund, Goldamund was half as strong as Tank's first choice. Dynamit's problem was that it ate the wood it was bonded to.

The first two A0's that flew with Dynamit glue disintegrated in the air, Tank checked the fuselages of the other A0's and found the glue eating the wood. So he cancelled the program.

I wish i could remember the first glue that was mentioned. I copied as much as i could at the Library of Congress but i certainly never had the time to copy all of the data. I am looking through my pile of notes and if i find the company's name and location i will post it.

Mike

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 80
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/11/2011 9:37:10 PM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		Another issue with the game is that with the Jumo 213E (actually the F) the plane armed and radared only reached 354mph. In June '44 with the correct engine the all weather day fighter (armament but no radar) reached 404mph.
The Night fighter, even with the correct engine only reached 385mph.

Mike

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 81
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/12/2011 2:24:04 AM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Thanks for the info, much appreciated.

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 82
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/12/2011 9:19:45 PM   
otisabuser2


Posts: 1097
Joined: 8/13/2004
Status: offline 		To be fair, most sources that I have read, both online and in print, give the 2 glues and the delay being due to glue factory bombed. Many places just copy, or rather, "source" from one another, which causes the myths to become stone.

There is a common thread out there that those prototypes listed above crashed due to undercarriage failure ? No mention of glue. Inferences given that this was down to visibility issues and the tricycle undercart ?

What's the score there ?

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 83
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/12/2011 11:52:08 PM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		Focke-Wulf stated in the post war interviews that the undercarriage failure was due to weak glue connecting wooden struts except on the first where there was some arrangement problem on the tricycle gear.

One of my favorite set in stone is the performance of the N1K Japanese fighter. It is listed as a top speed of 360mph or so.
I read reports from both American and Japanese pilots that stated that the N1K was faster than any American fighter up to 20,000 feet.

How to reconcile that??

I went to the LoC and found the error. Japanese Army fighters tracked their speed in KPH. The Navy tracked in knots. It stated right there in the PTHINT's that the N1K's speed was 360knots. It was just a slight error, but it is now stone. I try to tell people about this and most disbelieve me.

Mike

(in reply to otisabuser2)
Post #: 84
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/13/2011 2:53:50 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		LoC is that Library of Congress?

Would it be possible to provide a copy of that information? Regarding the N1K that is.

< Message edited by Turner -- 12/13/2011 2:55:53 PM >

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 85
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/13/2011 5:40:28 PM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		Sorry, just my notes. There was a French man, name started with an 'L', he lived in Japan before the war. In '45 he was brought in by the USA as a translator for the PTHINT's, he was the one who started this error.

I spotted it because he correctly listed the A6M2 as 302 kts and the N1K1-J he listed at 363kts. Later in his appendices he adjusted these speeds to mph, presumably because the Americans asked him to, and he listed the A6M2 at 332mph and the N1K1-j at 363mph.

I think it was a simple error by an overworked man but no questioned it for 20 years and by then it was set in stone.

One of the easiest things to do is read up about the N1K1-j, it was regarded by everyone as a very clean, aerodynamic design. It was quite light by American standards, and was powered by a 1990hp engine. Then compare it's power to weight to any American or British fighter.
Then think about the speeds these compared aircraft reach. You will see the discrepancy.

You cannot get this info from the Library of Congress anymore because everything has been re-classified by my insane, paranoid government which thinks the flow of information is bad. If i had known we were going to reclassify this stuff i would have bought a hand scanner but i just took notes.

Mike

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 86
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/13/2011 11:37:56 PM   
Turner


Posts: 299
Joined: 9/14/2010
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		I can confirm your insane paranoid govt, the rest I do not know about that's why I asked. Interesting stuff, I might do a proper aerodynamic analysis of the N1KJ later to see if I can get results in line with what you propose.

I brought it up with the Aces High team at HitechCreations, they run a really serious online combat sim of WW2 era. They do thorough research of all planes they put in the game and their admin said he'd never heard of it. Wanted to know if you could give a relevant reference, file # or anything of the sort. Thanks anyway.

_____________________________

"There are no desperate situations, only desperate people." - Heinz Guderian

Trippin' with Jagdgeschwader 11

(in reply to lycortas)
Post #: 87
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 12/14/2011 3:17:54 AM   
lycortas

 

Posts: 74
Joined: 9/26/2008
Status: offline 		Sorry about that i am just a person interested in military history for gaming. I went to learn what i could for my mods and to help others with their mods, not to write a book.

If i had been doing proper research i would have kept better notes.

I did this in the mid to late 90's when i was much younger. My mother was a librarian so i knew the woman who worked with her who handled inter-library loans. I took much advantage of that to find obscure history books while i was in college.
One book i received said 'Library of Congress' so i asked this woman if we could request books from them. She said we could so i took lots of advantage of that.

Then, what, late 90's? The LoC stopped lending but you could still go there and view stacks and microfiche. So i took several trips to DC and availed myself of their research materials to help JCL with BTR research. I also went to Suitland to the Paul Garber facility and saw many beautiful aircraft from the war. I got some good pictures of a Do335 that an Australian man seems to own. I did not see it, just got pictures from a pilot.

Mike

(in reply to Turner)
Post #: 88
RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wip... - 1/17/2012 5:37:49 AM   
Rusty1961

 

Posts: 1219
Joined: 2/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hard Sarge

WAD


Yes, it is, but not as it would happen in real life.

The LW would divert planes to fields not under siege.

WAD in this case is an exploit.

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 89
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> RE: Fighter Sweep - Program Exploit or Great Way to Wipe out the LW? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.000