river crossing and schock attack

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

river crossing and schock attack

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> river crossing and schock attack

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

river crossing and schock attack - 11/22/2009 10:54:06 PM

loricas

Posts: 217
Joined: 3/29/2008
From: Scandiano(RE), Italy
Status: offline

in the save attached a shock combat occured in loyang

the 86000 men yet in hex have deliberate attack order.

at turn resolution this attack is defined as shock attack.

the only reason i found for this is that a tank unit cross the river from 88,43 causing the shock.

it seem that as this is the first unit the cross from this hexide, the engine don't keep in account the units yet in hex.

is this intended?

and again: this is a two turn game: but even the second day combat is defined as shock attack: as only when cross the river a unit have shock mandatory, the unit order i think must divert to deliberate even if the first shock is succesfull in a no 1 day game

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Se la germania perde siamo perdenti. Se la germania vince siamo perduti.
If germany lose we are loser. if germany won we are lost.
G.Ciano Mussolini's foreign minister
Ciao Paolo

Post #: 1

RE: river crossing and schock attack - 11/22/2009 11:55:15 PM

treespider

Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

If your tank unit crossed an unfriendly river hexside to enter the hex then it will shock attack.

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to loricas)

Post #: 2