20-21st August - Midway CV Battle!

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

20-21st August - Midway CV Battle!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle!

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

20-21st August - Midway CV Battle! - 9/4/2010 11:23:17 AM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Hi all,

BBfanboy - LOL......all the experts are in the field

Smeulders - You read my mind. On the 21st we turned the tables on the Japanese at Attu and attacked:

Ground combat at Attu Island (153,49)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 17809 troops, 230 guns, 364 vehicles, Assault Value = 572

Defending force 15497 troops, 231 guns, 36 vehicles, Assault Value = 340

Allied adjusted assault: 276

Japanese adjusted defense: 347

Allied assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
779 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 65 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 91 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
115 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

ckammp - Intel indicates an Infantry Rgt (144th IIRC) is located at Carnarvon. Good question on the 8th IJA Div. It is located to the east of Daly Waters protecting the land route that way. As for Silversides - she only had 4 fish left. She's fired 24 torpedoes in total to sink 5 ships in this patrol.

---------------------------------------

Midway -

This was a little unexpected! 4 days ago a PBY located a potential Japanese TF 460 miles north of Midway heading east. They reported '4 x CA'. I swung into action straight away and ordered Yorktown, Enterprise, Hornet and Wasp to head south from Attu to investigate.......The morning of the 21st brought our 2nd CV Battle of the month - my 4 vs Shokaku, Zuikaku, Ryujo and Shoho:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Kure Island at 155,76

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 35
B5N2 Kate x 64
D3A1 Val x 34

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 46

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 4 destroyed
B5N2 Kate: 9 destroyed, 8 damaged
D3A1 Val: 5 destroyed, 4 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
F4F-4 Wildcat: 6 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CV Yorktown, Bomb hits 2, on fire
CLAA Atlanta, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
CV Enterprise
DD Ellet
DD Fanning
CA Northampton
DD Morris
DD Dunlap

My morning counterstrike:

Morning Air attack on TF, near Kure Island at 152,77

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 120 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 47 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 20

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 44
SBD-3 Dauntless x 112
TBD-1 Devastator x 15
TBF-1 Avenger x 51

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
F4F-4 Wildcat: 2 destroyed
SBD-3 Dauntless: 4 damaged
TBF-1 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Japanese Ships
CVL Ryujo, Bomb hits 8, heavy fires, heavy damage
CV Shokaku, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
CA Haguro, Bomb hits 1
CV Zuikaku, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
CVL Shoho, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
DD Shigure
DD Natsushio
BB Kongo, Bomb hits 8, on fire
DD Kagero
DD Harusame
DD Yudachi, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
CA Chokai

My boys returned, refuelled and rearmed whilst the Japanese CV's could not conduct air ops.......

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Kure Island at 152,77

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 120 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 47 minutes

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 28
SBD-3 Dauntless x 104
TBD-1 Devastator x 16
TBF-1 Avenger x 48

Allied aircraft losses
SBD-3 Dauntless: 2 damaged

Japanese Ships
CV Zuikaku, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires
BB Kongo, Bomb hits 18, heavy fires
CVL Shoho, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
CV Shokaku, Bomb hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
CA Haguro
CA Chokai, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires
DD Harusame
DD Natsushio, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Kagero, Bomb hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Shigure, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damag

Devastating........I feel that Faber has once more picked a short straw since he didn't get a massive strike off and the hit rate of his planes was shocking! My TB's were also shocking but SBD's were incredible. I'm staying on station and heading west to smash whatever remains since I still have 90% of my strike planes ready to go (I have no torps left though).

CLAA Atlanta will probably sink (88 FLT) but Yorktown's fine (12 SYS).

Due to being unable to take on board planes the Japanese lost 150 planes operationally or on board their ships. A2A losses were 32 Japanese for 18 x Allied.

I personally feel sorry for Faber in these CV Battles. I'm beginning to side with Nik that this game is skewed in favour of the Allies as they can counter-attack in more force earlier than history...anyhow. It is what it is and this will be a tough game for Faber from now on.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to ckammp)

Post #: 421

RE: 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle! - 9/4/2010 1:32:13 PM

castor troy

Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

I�ve got the feeling the ol� penguin will soon be back into the same experience of a painful campaign just like he suffered in WITP against you. Losing more or less all carriers in mid 42 as the Japanese is like game over.

The old story, never split your carriers... not the game is the problem here, IMO it�s more what the player is doing with his carriers. If you look at my PBEM, my opponent sent a 505 carrier based aircraft strike (yes, a single strike of 505 aircraft) against an Allied carrier force with over 600 aircraft and whiped the floor with my fleet while the enemy suffered nearly no losses. Japanese carriers are far more deadly than Allied IMO, a Kate is worth two Allied bombers and nothing saves you against a strike of 200+ aircraft, let alone 505.

< Message edited by castor troy -- 9/4/2010 1:35:02 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 422

RE: 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle! - 9/4/2010 1:58:18 PM

ckammp

Posts: 756
Joined: 5/30/2009
From: Rear Area training facility
Status: offline

re: CV battles

WOW!

That's some serious one-sided carnage. Overall, it seems to be incredible, beyond-bad-die-roll results for the Japanese, especially given the EXP levels of his pilots at this time, plus Fabertong is not one to make any rookie mistakes.

I don't believe that the game is skewed towards the Allies due to the ability to counter-attack early (after all the RL Midway was June 42, in your game it's Aug 42), but it does seem to me that Allied CVs are doing a-historically good vs Japanese CVs. I have read several other AARs where early-war CV battles go strongly in favor of the Allies; this IMO can be a serious game-play issue, if KB is destroyed by mid-42, what can Japan do? I expect these kind of results vs AI, but in the hands of a capable opponent, KB should be a much more deadly threat than these combat results indicate.

At any rate, it was an outstanding performance by your CVs; the SBD squadron leaders definitely deserve Distinguished Flying Crosses for this battle. (Your medal-making industry must be happy!)

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 423

RE: 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle! - 9/4/2010 4:57:23 PM

Walloc

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ckammp

I don't believe that the game is skewed towards the Allies due to the ability to counter-attack early (after all the RL Midway was June 42, in your game it's Aug 42), but it does seem to me that Allied CVs are doing a-historically good vs Japanese CVs. I have read several other AARs where early-war CV battles go strongly in favor of the Allies; this IMO can be a serious game-play issue, if KB is destroyed by mid-42, what can Japan do? I expect these kind of results vs AI, but in the hands of a capable opponent, KB should be a much more deadly threat than these combat results indicate.

Hmm, from read AARs ive seen it go both ways. Tactical situasion and luck being the deciding factors.
From reading AARs like CT IJN CV and from Von S experience the IJN wipe the floor with the alled CVs. 3 US lost to no damage on IJN side.
In the first CV batte of this game. Tho Faber is a capable opponent gets him self into a situasion of 4 CV was 6 US CVs and too boot the US CVs carry more planes. Thats some serious tactical disadvantage. US has prolly near twice the number of planes. A 4 CV KB isnt a death star and shouldnt vs 6 US CVs in aug 42 if the USN core pilots have been retained and trained since the begining of the war. They wouldnt be far behind the IJN ones.
Sure the casulties could have been more equal, but then luck plays in.
2nd battle Battle is 4 US CVs vs 2 CV and 2 CVL'ish still a IJN disadvantage in planes. Again could casulties been more equal, sure. Non the less IMO Faber gets him self into tactical situasion of being surprised operationally and "outgunned" twice. If he had instead of splitting his forces up, gone in full strength i suspect the battles would have looked very different. The reasoning behind the 2nd "raid" causing the 2nd battle mystifies me a bit.

As to what should japanease side do if they lose KB mid 42, hmm historically they "played" on to Aug 45. How is that for play balance?
KB isnt unbeatble and if u act like it u gona lose baring luck and so on.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 9/4/2010 5:26:30 PM >

(in reply to ckammp)

Post #: 424

RE: 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle! - 9/4/2010 5:48:26 PM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

Yep, without those carriers he is pooched. Japanese LBA can be quite deadly- (and in scen #2 obscene) but without the carriers you are going to call the shots from now on. He did it to himself. Never any reason for KB to face the Allied carriers when split up. Not in 42 when KB is better. Not ever.....

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Walloc)

Post #: 425

22nd August 1942 - 9/4/2010 6:28:53 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Hi guys,

I agree with Walloc. I expressed similar thoughts to Faber via mail in that main thing that could have gone wrong from a Japanese tactical perspective is that in both CV battles they were outgunned and outnumbered. This is probably the number one thing Faber perhaps could have done differently in these battles. No doubt about it I had the die rolls as well. You put those 2 factors together and you get the massively one-sided results that we have.

As for what This Japanese CV force was doing north of Midway - Faber mentioned they were out huntign for my crippled CV's after the first battle. He was hoping I'd detached them and was sending them directly to San Fran. If I was and he remained hidden he may well have smashed Lex and Sara. However, IMO even if they had found them I would have probably been able to send my 4 remaining CV's to find and has this battle anyway.

I think these 2 battles reinforce more than ever do NOT break up a 6 CV KB and initiate a CV Battle with the US CV's - especially after May 42 when Wasp arrives as do TBF's and lastly coupled with the additional training time the US pilots would have had.

---------------------------

My CV's located the damaged remnants of the CV force (no CV's were found though) and pummeled CA Haguro/Chokai and a Kagero class DD. Very happy to get the 2 x CA's as well. I have ordered my force to sweep for 1 further day to the SSW (towards Wake) and then we'll head back to Pearl Harbour for R&R. These pilots have earned it in August!

Other than that (and a dud attack by S-27 on a PB) it was a regular day with a few Japanese bombing raids in China and on my troops at Daly Waters.

I am now trying to think and plan where to head offensively next in the Pacific. I now have a CV edge (he'll only have Junyo/Hiyo + CVL/CVE) but can't risk attacking an area with interlocking airfields. I'll list the forces I have available in a bit but where do you think guys?

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 426

RE: 22nd August 1942 - 9/4/2010 6:45:44 PM

Walloc

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

As for what This Japanese CV force was doing north of Midway - Faber mentioned they were out huntign for my crippled CV's after the first battle. He was hoping I'd detached them and was sending them directly to San Fran. If I was and he remained hidden he may well have smashed Lex and Sara. However, IMO even if they had found them I would have probably been able to send my 4 remaining CV's to find and has this battle anyway.

I kinda figured. Trying to reverse a bad situasion. Thats when u should be most at a guard concerning ur decision making process. Still, IMHO a very bad decision. He knew there was undamaged US CVs larger than his force in the vincinity. Making it very much a gamble. Could he have "won" the war, no, but he could lose it and did.

Oh well chit happens and then u go on,

Rasmus

< Message edited by Walloc -- 9/4/2010 6:47:29 PM >

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 427

RE: 22nd August 1942 - 9/4/2010 8:20:48 PM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

I am now trying to think and plan where to head offensively next in the Pacific.�I now have a CV edge (he'll only have Junyo/Hiyo + CVL/CVE) but can't risk attacking an area with interlocking airfields. I'll list the forces I have available in a bit but where do you think guys?

I'm not sure how the map looks exactly, too many AAR's that I'm trying to follow, but with the CV advantage you should probably be thinking about moving forward in the Pacific. Retaking Wake and moving on the Southern Gilberts could probably both be done with minimal enemy LBA resistance. A big advantage is that you won't be needing too many LCUs to do this either, of course, you need to have them prepping a couple of months in advance though.

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 428

23rd August 1942 - 9/5/2010 1:20:00 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Hi all,

Hi Smeulders - Aye. Wake or the Gilberts would be logical. I already have units slowly building up Baker and Funafuti. I have the following forces to hand which are ready for action (need to prep for invasion though):

WC:

37th Inf. Div
40th Inf. Div
3rd Mar. Div
6th Mar. Div

PH:

1st Mar. Div
25th Inf. Div

Question - How on earth do you figure out the 'size' of a unit? By that I mean - let's say I'm invading Wake. It has a troop capacity of 6,000. Now how do I know what size a Rgt will be for example?

--------------------------------

Attu -

The Japanese, isolated and unsopported are starting to feel the pressure:

Ground combat at Attu Island (153,49)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 17758 troops, 230 guns, 364 vehicles, Assault Value = 570

Defending force 14647 troops, 231 guns, 35 vehicles, Assault Value = 281

Allied adjusted assault: 196

Japanese adjusted defense: 175

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), disruption(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2313 casualties reported
Squads: 26 destroyed, 100 disabled
Non Combat: 10 destroyed, 87 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
485 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 38 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 42 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

------------------------

Midway -

My CV's spotted a limping DD but decided not to attack. We're now heading back to PH for R & R.

CLAA Atlanta lost her battle today and sank. RIP. My only casualty of the 2nd CV battle. Not bad. That's 1 x CLAA and 1 x DD (so far) for 6 x CV, 2 x CVL, 1 x BB, 2 x CA, 1 x CL + 6 x DD (unconfirmed) in the August battles.

------------------------

Other areas/tidbits -

Norfolk Island is operational and has 6 x Sqn's of LBA there. They've started bombing Noumea's airfields with no interference.

SigInt has identified another Rgt is on it's way to Port Headland. That will make 2 x Rgt's there + a BF. Will be tough to tackle as it will need a seaborne invasion. Anyway. Carnarvon is first.

BB Oklahoma has repaired all damage from PH raid.

BB North Carolina and CA Chester have reached Seattle and will be in port for 2 weeks repairing damage from the Attu CV Battle.

BB South Dakota has reached the Panama Canal.

-----------------------------

Submarine Warfare -

1 missed attack.

SS Cuttlefish heavily damaged AK Tatuha Maru with a torpedo in Shikuka Harbour.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Smeulders)

Post #: 429

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/5/2010 1:56:11 PM

nicwb

Posts: 518
Joined: 4/26/2010
Status: offline

Congratulations - it looks like the strategic iniative has now passed definitely to you.

Fabertong's move was a bit of a gamble - but he had just lost a sizeable chunk of his fleet. If he had been right about your carriers, he would have redressed the balance quite a bit.

You could probably now sort of ignore the Japanese troops in Australia - Fabertong's is probably going to find it a real burden to keep them supplied especially when your sub's fully kick in soon.

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 430

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/5/2010 8:34:01 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Question - How on earth do you figure out the 'size' of a unit? By that I mean - let's say I'm invading Wake. It has a troop capacity of 6,000. Now how do I know what size a Rgt will be for example?

As I found out the hard way that is critical information. If you are say slightly over then the penalty is modest but rises sharply. Summary of some tests I ran:

Stacking-SupplyUsageFactor
080%-01
104%-01
114%-04
120%-09
152%-56
222%-91

Meaning that at 114% stacking units use 4 times normal supply while at rest. Presume under combat they use similar multiplier.

The answer to your question is Tracker. Go to the LCU screen, scroll all the way to the right and see the "Base Load" column. I find it useful to drag and drop that column to the left when I am using it. If you have a unit loaded on ships it will show the individual fragments.

Edit to fix typo.

< Message edited by witpqs -- 9/5/2010 10:38:07 PM >

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 431

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/5/2010 9:47:15 PM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

witpqs already provided the answer for you. I don't think whole divisions against small atolls is the way to go. 2 regiments will probably overstack an atoll already. As I've now seen the map, I'd suggest a move against New Caledonia and the New Hebrides as well. Take them and the supply route to Oz becomes a whole lot shorter. You'll also need them if you want to try a NG route alongside an advance in the Pacific. Of course, if the islands are too well protected, bypass them with a move straight to the Solomons (risky, but might take him by surprise) or take one and use one to neutralize the other with LBA.

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 432

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/5/2010 10:38:02 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smeulders

witpqs already provided the answer for you. I don't think whole divisions against small atolls is the way to go. 2 regiments will probably overstack an atoll already. As I've now seen the map, I'd suggest a move against New Caledonia and the New Hebrides as well. Take them and the supply route to Oz becomes a whole lot shorter. You'll also need them if you want to try a NG route alongside an advance in the Pacific. Of course, if the islands are too well protected, bypass them with a move straight to the Solomons (risky, but might take him by surprise) or take one and use one to neutralize the other with LBA.

I agree that 2 reg or even 1 reg + 1 eng reg to take a small (6,000 limit) atoll/island, although it does depend on what is there. What happens if your PBM opponent throws you a curve ball and all the troops on the island are combat (instead of a mixture of combat, AF, eng, CD)?

And 2 regiments are a large enough base load to kick in a substantial supply penalty on a 6,000 limit island - so bring plenty of supplies and the ability to unload them fast or they will be used up (as a penalty) faster than you can unload them. This last bit is the real danger. It happened to me.

(in reply to Smeulders)

Post #: 433

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/6/2010 4:44:00 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

Speedy,

How to take advantage of crippling enemy CV force?

IMHO, I do not agree with the sentiments expressed that you now have the strategic initiative. The fact that

(a) you are wary of coming within range of enemy LBA
(b) have difficulty in assembling a superior force in northern Australia
(c) the enemy lodgement in the Aleutians still has to be liquidated
(d) the Allied position in China is not yet fully secured
(e) you remain far from acquiring the necessary real estate or fully working weapons (think of dud torpedoes/adequate 4E replacement rates) to significantly pressure the enemy economy

does not indicate you now have the strategic initiative.

What you actually do have is Pacific SLOCs which are for 6-12 months safe from enemy interdiction. IMHO, the best way to take advantage of this situation is to completely bypass the Gilberts, the Mandates, New Hebrides etc and go straight for Wake thence Marcus and thence either Iwo Jima (preferred) or the northern Marianas (say Pagan). This route takes you away from enemy LBA and hits those islands early before their defences have been built up. The 6 divisions you have identified as being available would easily suffice for this rolling offensive. This route takes you directly to the Philippines and makes the enemy garrisons in the Pacific irrelevant. Advancing on this axis also eliminates the need to shorten the SLOC to Australia from the West Coast as no logistical build up in Australia would be necessary.

Alfred

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 434

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/6/2010 5:00:12 PM

Walloc

Posts: 3141
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

does not indicate you now have the strategic initiative.

I would disagree with that, but then its cuz i view strategic initiative differently than u. Its a question of psychology. I make presumtions which ofc could be incorrect.
My bet would be that Faber has made his last offensive less possibly in China/Burma. He cant cover his ships for any seaborne invasion and would on the same time be very weary of crushing allied CV superiority possibly devastating any seaborne invasion. So he is on the defensive thinking now. Where to defend not where to attack, less local counter offensives and only place where it would involve a land campaign and the occationally SAG raid.
On the other hand Speedy is now considering where to take any offensive actions.
Is the percieved difference in psychology between the 2 players, that to me indicates that the initiative has shifted.

What Speedy doesnt have is overwhelming strength allowing him to do any thing. That in my themyology doesnt have any thing to do with which side that has the initiative.

Kind regards,

Rasmus

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 435

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/6/2010 5:39:37 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

Walloc,

I don't necessarily disagree with what you say about what constitutes strategic initiative. I disagree however that the conditions exist to claim that the strategic initiative is now with Speedy.

The Penguin has the capacity, if he so desires, to launch dangerous land offensives in China, Australia and even into India via Assam. None of those operations is dependent on having Japanese carriers present. Even if his opponent does not launch continental offensives, Speedy does not yet have freedom of maneouvre anywhere other than in the wide open spaces of the pacific Ocean between Hawaii/Wake/Marcus and the Aleutians.

More important is the fact that the term "strategic initiative" is just a theoretical concept. It means nothing unless successful action is undertaken which hits at the Penguin's weak spots. As I said in my previous post, Speedy does not yet have either the real estate or working weapons to hit those weak spots.

Alfred

(in reply to Walloc)

Post #: 436

24-27th August 1942 - 9/6/2010 10:14:16 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Hi all,

Interesting discussion!

Hi witpqs - I don't have Tracker. Where do I get that from? So I assume adding up the load values in the bottom left of the screenshot below don't equate to the troop total?

Smeulders - I plan to go nowhere near New Caledonia or the Solomans/New Guinea. That can be one massive POW camp as far as I'm concerned. If I'm honest the effect on the Aus supply route only add's about 2 weeks to the journey total. Not a major effect. Especially with Norfolk Island being built up. With hindsight I think if Faber had taken Norfolk THEN it would have a major effect since convoys coming south of NZ to Sydney could be interdicted by Netties etc.

I kind of guess then that a Rgt for a small Atoll would be 'ideal' with another in reserve in case the first one failed/met a lot of resistance?

Alfred - personally I disagree a little. Not totally but a little. To explain:

I totally 100% agree with you that I don't have total Strategic Initiative and flexibility. I could never have that unless I was willing and able to invade ANYWHERE I wanted despite LBA. I don't have that ability (as you say) so I don't have total control. I do however believe I now have partial initiative. To explain this:

a) I agree in northern Aus. I don't have superiority but I have parity and have a plan - I outnumber Faber 1.5:1 at Daly Waters however it's not enough to take it - primarily since I can't get supply into my base to the south. As such we have parity - except I still have about 2000 AV around eastern Aus in defence there. I am marshalling about 500AV to the south of Daly to swing around to the west of it. This will NOT happen now but will coincide with future invasions of NW Aus.

b) Aleutians - almost done. Heavy fighting has seen the 4th IJA Division annihilated. The 2th is clinging on but takes 1000+ casualties daily and has an AV of 50. Won't be long. Frustratingly though I don't have the mobile strength to invade the Kuriles. Anyhow.

c) China - true. It's not secure. However Faber has not conducted ANY offensives here for over a month now. My men are rested, recovering and forts are growing. I personally feel that unless Faber brings in additional troops he won't now make headway in China.

d) real estate/weapons - 100% agree with this

To summarise I don't feel the Japanese have the initiative anywhere (except in China where they have the ability to conduct an offensive if they wish). I on the other hand do have the initiative - I am conducting an offensive in Western Aus on Carnarvon. Within 2 weeks a force will move from Calcutta to re-take Akyab. I'm now planning offensives in the Pacific - You're right here though they HAVE to be against isolated bases. Wake is perfect.

Alfred - agree with your strategy re: bypassing SoPac garrisons.

Faber could NEVER invade India now. Well he could but it would fail miserably. 2 IJA Divisions are toast at Attu, There's at least 4 Divisions worth in Northern Aus, 2 that I know of in SRA. I have about 12-14 Divisions worth of Troops in India that are virtually all rested and starting to fill out with decent equipment!

----------------------------

Attu -

As mentioned I expect the remaining 17000 reported Japanese to be annihilated within a week. Good riddance.

----------------------------

Submarine Warfare -

4 x Dud/missed attacks.

SS Cuttlefish left AK Yosida Maru 1 heavily listing outside of Shikuka Harbour.

SS Sculpin reportedly sank AKL Kanjo Maru near Wakkanai..

SS Sturgeon sank AK Sugiyama Maru SW of Tokyo.

On the 27th an unkown Jap aircraft put damaged SS Sturgeon with a bomb. Minor damage. Returning to port for repair.

----------------------------------

Other areas/tidbits -

CV Lexington/Saratoga have reached WC. Sara will be in Seattle for 68 days. Lex is heading for San Fran.

BB Washington has reached Balboa. She's leaving with South Dakota in the company of smaller ships heading for San Fran.

Active CV's 2 days out from PH.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 437

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/6/2010 10:30:36 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Hi witpqs - I don't have Tracker. Where do I get that from?

From the thread in the main forum:

quote:

The web site to get it from is here: http://sites.google.com/site/witptracker.

If you have problems and/or suggestions, post them to this thread or send e-mail to witptracker@gmail.com.

quote:

So I assume adding up the load values in the bottom left of the screenshot below don't equate to the troop total?

No, unfortunately. Even if they did with Tracker you can see a bunch of units in one place, and you can export a CSV to set up your own invasion spreadsheet, so Tracker is very convenient.

It's also very convenient for looking at Alerts and Intel each turn. Managing your squad upgrades, and so much more. My every-turn use is limited, but once in a while there are tasks to be done where it is the only source of info or it gives up the info so much more quickly and easily than in-game that it is a great aid. Ask about different stuff as you get started with it. You will like it!

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 438

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/7/2010 5:53:16 AM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Speedy,

How to take advantage of crippling enemy CV force?

IMHO, I do not agree with the sentiments expressed that you now have the strategic initiative. The fact that

(a) you are wary of coming within range of enemy LBA
(b) have difficulty in assembling a superior force in northern Australia
(c) the enemy lodgement in the Aleutians still has to be liquidated
(d) the Allied position in China is not yet fully secured
(e) you remain far from acquiring the necessary real estate or fully working weapons (think of dud torpedoes/adequate 4E replacement rates) to significantly pressure the enemy economy

does not indicate you now have the strategic initiative.

What you actually do have is Pacific SLOCs which are for 6-12 months safe from enemy interdiction. IMHO, the best way to take advantage of this situation is to completely bypass the Gilberts, the Mandates, New Hebrides etc and go straight for Wake thence Marcus and thence either Iwo Jima (preferred) or the northern Marianas (say Pagan). This route takes you away from enemy LBA and hits those islands early before their defences have been built up. The 6 divisions you have identified as being available would easily suffice for this rolling offensive. This route takes you directly to the Philippines and makes the enemy garrisons in the Pacific irrelevant. Advancing on this axis also eliminates the need to shorten the SLOC to Australia from the West Coast as no logistical build up in Australia would be necessary.

Alfred

I thought about suggesting this route as well, but I'm not sure how feasible it is. Sure, it is unlikely that the Marianas have a strong LBA presence to fight off the invasion, but wouldn't it be able to close down Marcus in the absence of Allied carriers ? I might be overestimating the Japanese capabilities though. Going even further will probably put the garrisons completely out of range of any sort of help except for the carriers, so I'm not quite sure if that is feasible just yet.

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 439

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/7/2010 7:09:22 AM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

Smeulders,

The point about my suggested axis of advance is that it maximises Speedy's major advantage (freedom of naval movement in the area to the north of the indicated islands and south of Alaska) and minimises the Penguin's major capabilities (LBA).

(1) Speedy can approach Wake from the north and enemy LBA is largely made irrelevant. Only Netties would represent any threat but they would be very vulnerable to interception from the initial CV covering force, and subsequently from land fighters operating out of Wake itself. The 2 divisions currently at Pearl Harbor would more than suffice to defeat the likely current Wake garrison. Those 2 divisions could then be taken off immediately after the shock attack captures Wake and replaced by a RCT. A small Allied garrison would suffice because for the next few months, the enemy is in no position for a counter seaborne invasion.

(2) Immediately following on from the capture of Wake, Speedy can approach Marcus from EastNorthEast, again minimising enemy interdiction. Again a 2 division assault will almost certainly be enough. Once secured, Marcus can immediately base a figther unit purely for CAP and more when the airfield is built up.

(3) After Marcus, the choice is either Iwo Jima (my preference) or Pagan in the northern Marianas. The choice largely depending on how strongly either site is garrisoned. Iwo Jima has the advantage that only airpower based on the Home Islands will be an issue but that would require the Penguin to either totally interrupt his pilot training program or rebase from elsewhere, which in turn opens up Allied possibilities elsewhere. Again the approach to Iwo Jima (from due east) can avoid enemy air concentrations.

(4) The value of either Iwo Jima or Pagan is that it allows air surveillance of the enemy convoy routes to the South Pacific and allows for the vectoring in of Allied CVs from their safe loitoring positions in the area referred to previously. There is no need to immediately move on the Philippines (or the rest of the Marianas) but after the necessary build up, an early 1943 invasion becomes an option. In any case the advance would have been accomplished on the cheap before the enemy has had an opportunity to garrison the island chains and whilst he lacks the ability to launch any meaningful sea counter invasions.

(5) There is no need for Speedy to totally tether Allied CVs to these locations. He merely has to organise some CVs to escort resupply convoys, and then only until the airfields are built up to accommodate 50 Allied fighters. In between convoys, he can use subs to top up supply.

Alfred

(in reply to Smeulders)

Post #: 440

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 7:29:40 AM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Hi witpqs - I don't have Tracker. Where do I get that from?

From the thread in the main forum:

quote:

The web site to get it from is here: http://sites.google.com/site/witptracker.

If you have problems and/or suggestions, post them to this thread or send e-mail to witptracker@gmail.com.

quote:

So I assume adding up the load values in the bottom left of the screenshot below don't equate to the troop total?

No, unfortunately. Even if they did with Tracker you can see a bunch of units in one place, and you can export a CSV to set up your own invasion spreadsheet, so Tracker is very convenient.

It's also very convenient for looking at Alerts and Intel each turn. Managing your squad upgrades, and so much more. My every-turn use is limited, but once in a while there are tasks to be done where it is the only source of info or it gives up the info so much more quickly and easily than in-game that it is a great aid. Ask about different stuff as you get started with it. You will like it!

Thanks witpqs.

The link doesn't appear to work?

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 441

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 8:01:57 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Ooh - maybe the link I pasted was messed up or there was a hiccup. Here is what I got (edit to add) when I went directly from my bookmark just now:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by witpqs -- 9/7/2010 8:05:58 AM >

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 442

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 8:06:00 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

That's a bold plan, Alfred. Speedy should expect the super-penguin to mount one or more counter-attacks, although not necessarily immediately. It would most definitely be the defining thrust of the game.

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 443

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 12:17:18 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

Having real probs getting Tracker going.....can't even get the latest version of Java installed properly!

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 444

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 12:38:57 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

OK, I'm no Java expert, but...

What version of Windows are you running, meaning is the version of Java you downloaded appropriate?

Second, if you have a 64bit machine and you have 64bit Java loaded, go to the Tracker thread in the main forum and get their assistance with getting 32bit Java installed along side it. Tracker does not (yet) work under 64bit Java. Several folks have gotten it to work with minimal fuss on 64bit hardware (by also loading 32bit Java). I have 32bit hardware so I have not done that myself.

Third, a corrupt .msi? If you did already download the appropriate version for your Windows, then it sounds like the actual download is not working properly. Are you having problems with any other downloads? Or was that one of the downloads that the installer does automatically? Maybe you hit a bad spot and need to just try again. I'm still wondering why you had trouble finding that web site earlier, and if perhaps the two are related.

PS: Try out Google Chrome for a web browser.

< Message edited by witpqs -- 9/7/2010 12:39:05 PM >

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 445

RE: 23rd August 1942 - 9/7/2010 4:28:18 PM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

Smeulders,

The point about my suggested axis of advance is that it maximises Speedy's major advantage (freedom of naval movement in the area to the north of the indicated islands and south of Alaska) and minimises the Penguin's major capabilities (LBA).

(1) Speedy can approach Wake from the north and enemy LBA is largely made irrelevant. Only Netties would represent any threat but they would be very vulnerable to interception from the initial CV covering force, and subsequently from land fighters operating out of Wake itself. The 2 divisions currently at Pearl Harbor would more than suffice to defeat the likely current Wake garrison. Those 2 divisions could then be taken off immediately after the shock attack captures Wake and replaced by a RCT. A small Allied garrison would suffice because for the next few months, the enemy is in no position for a counter seaborne invasion.

(2) Immediately following on from the capture of Wake, Speedy can approach Marcus from EastNorthEast, again minimising enemy interdiction. Again a 2 division assault will almost certainly be enough. Once secured, Marcus can immediately base a figther unit purely for CAP and more when the airfield is built up.

(3) After Marcus, the choice is either Iwo Jima (my preference) or Pagan in the northern Marianas. The choice largely depending on how strongly either site is garrisoned. Iwo Jima has the advantage that only airpower based on the Home Islands will be an issue but that would require the Penguin to either totally interrupt his pilot training program or rebase from elsewhere, which in turn opens up Allied possibilities elsewhere. Again the approach to Iwo Jima (from due east) can avoid enemy air concentrations.

(4) The value of either Iwo Jima or Pagan is that it allows air surveillance of the enemy convoy routes to the South Pacific and allows for the vectoring in of Allied CVs from their safe loitoring positions in the area referred to previously. There is no need to immediately move on the Philippines (or the rest of the Marianas) but after the necessary build up, an early 1943 invasion becomes an option. In any case the advance would have been accomplished on the cheap before the enemy has had an opportunity to garrison the island chains and whilst he lacks the ability to launch any meaningful sea counter invasions.

(5) There is no need for Speedy to totally tether Allied CVs to these locations. He merely has to organise some CVs to escort resupply convoys, and then only until the airfields are built up to accommodate 50 Allied fighters. In between convoys, he can use subs to top up supply.

Alfred

I see your point and it might work, but it's sticking out your neck quite far and counting on the fact that your opponent hasn't got anything more than a table knife to cut it off. Who knows, at the moment that may indeed be the case in which case your plan is very good.

The 2 divisions per atoll does seem a bit much though, it'll be murder due to the overstacking penalty, besides, do the allies even have enough AP and AK to move that ?

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 446

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 5:01:16 PM

Speedysteve

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

OK, I'm no Java expert, but...

What version of Windows are you running, meaning is the version of Java you downloaded appropriate?

Second, if you have a 64bit machine and you have 64bit Java loaded, go to the Tracker thread in the main forum and get their assistance with getting 32bit Java installed along side it. Tracker does not (yet) work under 64bit Java. Several folks have gotten it to work with minimal fuss on 64bit hardware (by also loading 32bit Java). I have 32bit hardware so I have not done that myself.

Third, a corrupt .msi? If you did already download the appropriate version for your Windows, then it sounds like the actual download is not working properly. Are you having problems with any other downloads? Or was that one of the downloads that the installer does automatically? Maybe you hit a bad spot and need to just try again. I'm still wondering why you had trouble finding that web site earlier, and if perhaps the two are related.

PS: Try out Google Chrome for a web browser.

Thanks for your thoughts witpqs. 'Seems' like I've sorted it. After much digging, tweaking and downloading I think I've got it workign and I loaded up my last turn into Tracker and it seems to have found the onfo ok (Intel screen info displayed fine).

Now being a total newbie to Tracker, and having no idea what I'm getting into with it, I have a few Q's if I may?

If so:

1.) How do you best get it to store and track things over time? By that I mean Faber and I use the same save slots every turn - 15 for me and 18 for him. Now am I still able to do this or does Tracker require me to upload a new turn in a different slot every turn? OR Can I keep it in slot 15 and just upload this to tracker every turn before I start my orders?

2.) I can't for the life of me see where I get info on there about unit sizes for Atoll invasions etc?

Thanks

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 447

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 6:31:08 PM

Mynok

Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Always keep it in the same slot. Just do a Read Turn from the menu when you load up Tracker (after saving your turn file to the proper directory of course).

_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 448

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 8:39:12 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

Now being a total newbie to Tracker, and having no idea what I'm getting into with it, I have a few Q's if I may?

If so:

1.) How do you best get it to store and track things over time? By that I mean Faber and I use the same save slots every turn - 15 for me and 18 for him. Now am I still able to do this or does Tracker require me to upload a new turn in a different slot every turn? OR Can I keep it in slot 15 and just upload this to tracker every turn before I start my orders?

2.) I can't for the life of me see where I get info on there about unit sizes for Atoll invasions etc?

Thanks

Like Marvin said, but in just a tad more detail:
- It works on the same save slot so the game must be there every time (you know this if you set up the configuration file where it gets the password, etc.)
- It reads the save game and the Intel file (not sure if it reads the others), so if you get the replay separately run it, but wait until getting the full turn to do the 'Read Turn' in Tracker.

Base Load Stacking: On the pull down menu where you select the screen to look at (i.e. 'Alerts', etc.), select LCU's. Now you can sort by any column you want to by clicking on the header. Scroll all the way to the right, about the last column is 'Base Load' - that's the one! BTW, you can rearrange the colmuns by dragging and dropping the column header. I always drag the Base Load column to the left when I use it so the number is close to the unit name.

(in reply to Speedysteve)

Post #: 449

RE: 24-27th August 1942 - 9/7/2010 8:46:04 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

Smeulders,

In view of the issues raised in your last post, you (and hopefully Speedy too) might find the following comments of value.
Assuming Speedy has lost few transports to date, his sea lift capacity should be of the following order. Note that I have listed only troop transports because they can carry both troops (the critical item) and equipment. Cargo ships, of which there are many more available, are omitted because they can only carry equipment.

(A) Sea Lift Capacity

Pacific Ocean littoral

USN
25 AP with aggregate 96,000 capacity
14 xAP with aggregate 36,000 capacity

RAN
19 xAP with aggregate 59,000 capacity

RNZN
7 xAP with aggregate 17,000 capacity

Indian Ocean littoral

RN � 38 xAP
Commonwealth � 5 xAP
Dutch � 31 xAP amounting to about 85,000 capacity

For the purposes of the suggested offensive, I totally exclude the combined RN and Commonwealth sea lift on the basis it is too far away. Some of the Dutch ships may have been evacuated to Australia or still be in American waters and there it constitutes a reserve which may be available for this offensive.

To be on conservative side, this leaves us with the USN, RAN and RNZN to provide the sea lift. This amounts to approximately:

25 AP = 96,000 capacity
40 xAP = 112,000 capacity

A total capacity of 208,000

(B) Load Requirements

A USA infantry division uses 24,000 sea lift capacity in Transport TF mode and approximately 30,000 in Amphibious TF mode. A USMC infantry division uses 22,000 sea lift capacity in Transport TF mode and approximately 28,000 in Amphibious TF mode. However, these are not the critical figures. The critical calculation is to load the divisions onto Amphibious TF in combat mode so that they are fully unloaded in one turn onto the Wake and Marcus atolls (see section (D) below).

(C) Amphibious Unload Rate Over the Beach

By far the best ships for an Amphibious TF are APA. Unfortunately, Speedy will have none available for this offensive. The daily unload rate for AP is 600 and for xAP it is 250. Accordingly, to complete unload in a single day, a USA infantry division needs 50 AP or 120 xAP. The comparable figures for a USMC infantry division are 47 AP and 112 xAP.
Clearly relying solely upon USN, RAN and RNZN troop transports will not suffice to completely unload in a single day but if we add our reserve fleet (ie the Dutch troop transports) to the equation, then it should be possible to do so. If we then add the much more numerous (but not listed) cargo ships, a 2 division sea lift capacity should be possible.

(D) Appropriate Invasion Force Size

It is unlikely that the Penguin would garrison the atolls with a division due to the over stacking rules. Much more likely is that the garrison AV is mainly provided by at best an army bde but most likely by a Naval Guards unit. The difference in AV is quite significant ranging from about 150 AV for a bde to about 60 for a Naval Guards unit. When the level of fortification is taken into account, Speedy may need to land as much 750 AV to immediately defeat a bde. Against a Naval Guard unit, he would need to land only about 300 AV. The conservative estimate is therefore that a two division invasion would cope with the most likely worst case scenario.

The importance of a quick victory is twofold. Firstly for the invader, it is always a bad situation to have an extended fight for an atoll. Secondly capturing an atoll with the initial assault eliminates the need to factor in the overstocking penalties on supply consumption as the assault troops will subsist on their organic combat rations.

Once the atoll is secured the two divisions are removed and replaced by either a RCT (which will probably result in some overstocking) or an armour bn plus CD unit (plus BF to service the LBA) which should come within the stacking limits.

Alfred

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 450

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> 20-21st August - Midway CV Battle!