Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> SP:WaW Opponents Wanted >> Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
- 7/5/2002 12:28:28 AM   
Knife

 

Posts: 41
Joined: 7/20/2001
Status: offline
Can i join in?

Britain please!!

_____________________________

And when he gets to heaven
To St. Peter he will tell
One more soldier reporting Sir
I've served my time in hell

(in reply to red)
Post #: 61
Sorry for being late - 7/5/2002 12:39:49 AM   
Supervisor

 

Posts: 5166
Joined: 3/2/2004
Status: offline
Sorry I misread the initial thread, so if there is still room I'm in.
I prefer the US but will play as Germany if need be.:cool: :cool:

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 62
- 7/5/2002 1:04:41 AM   
Hades

 

Posts: 565
Joined: 12/3/2001
From: Texas
Status: offline
I'll lead the Italians to victory. I hope.

_____________________________

"History admires the wise, but it elevates the brave."
-Edmund Morris


[img]http://members.hometown.aol.com/guarana861512/myhomepage/russiankatkillers.jpg?mtbrand=AOL_US[/img]
[img]http://publish.hometown.aol.com/kenkbaran/images/spwaw-virtual-b-o-b

(in reply to red)
Post #: 63
- 7/5/2002 1:11:22 AM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline
What ever counrty I get assigned is good with me:cool:

(in reply to red)
Post #: 64
Re: More more - 7/5/2002 2:07:23 AM   
Tankhead

 

Posts: 1352
Joined: 6/21/2000
From: Yukon Territory Canada
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mogami
[B]Hi, the more the merrier. Too many Germans and Americans come on you cowards take those Hungarians, Rumanians Italians etc, I willl take what ever country the majority decide are the worst. (I am not afraid of no ghost) [/B][/QUOTE]

Well since I'm a sucker for minor country :D I will take the Hungarians :D ;)

_____________________________

Tankhead


(in reply to red)
Post #: 65
- 7/5/2002 3:11:32 AM   
Bing

 

Posts: 1366
Joined: 5/20/2000
From: Gaylord, MI, USA
Status: offline
Hi guys - I hate to be accused of going wee-wee on the campfire. But ... the scoring system sucks. We know that. I kill everything in sight, run my opponent clean off the map - and because I lack maybe five points I get a "draw" instead of the solid victory I actually achieved.

Ideas on that?

Then: The way I see it, minor nations are going to have to be handicapped - if it isn't done the first time the minor nation player gets creamed - he certainly will - he will simply drop out. I know I would.

I like the sound of the idea and since really getting going with PBEM I enjoy it tremendously. For larger battles it is a lot better to be able to take your time, rather than being under the time constraint of "live" play. But with "match" play, there is going to have to be a time limit on a player completeing and mailing the turn, otherwise we know what happens.

We are finding there are very few scenarios that play well both solo against AI and PBEM out of the box - just doesn't work that way. We have to tinker with ratings and sometimes equipment - easy enough for two players to come to an agreement on these issues. Not so easy to satisfy 12 or 14 players - who is the authority that says a battle is "balanced"? ( I have always disliked that concept, but since its a game we have to live with the idea - it has justified all kinds of ridiculous tinkering.)

Great idea - depends upon how it is set up.

Shout me out of the place if you feel like it.

Bing

_____________________________

"For Those That Fought For It, Freedom Has a Taste And A Meaning The Protected Will Never Know. " -
From the 101st Airborne Division Association Website

(in reply to red)
Post #: 66
- 7/5/2002 10:12:02 AM   
Fallschirmjager


Posts: 6793
Joined: 3/18/2002
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Status: offline
I will lead the mighty Fins to victory.

Too bad ive only ever played with them twice.

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 67
- 7/6/2002 12:05:25 AM   
Tomanbeg

 

Posts: 4385
Joined: 7/14/2000
From: Memphis, Tn, CSA
Status: offline
Originally posted by Goblin
[B]I disagree, and think it can be done. Same number of points, agreed. Same size map, k. After that, its to varied of a game to try to set limits. One pair might fight Brits/Germans, in the desert, early war, another pair might want late war Pacific. What matters, I think, is that everyone has fun, and plays fair.

It is just impossible to standardize it. Unless we all played the exact same [I]scenarios [/I] ,with the same starting positions, etc. I wouldn't want that.

Goblin- A Goblin says try it anyways;) [/B]

Why not? Far be it for me to promote tradition, but ALL of the well run tournements use the same scenarios to avoid the tournament from morphing into a gamesmanship event. If every one has the same units on the same map, it becomes a test of tactical abilites, not one of who knows the OOB the best. At the unlimited level the game becomes little more then "Rock Paper scissors". Do you buy 6,000 points of arty and a few scouts, FO's and jeeps? Or is your oppnent going to do that so you buy scout killers and engineers. Or throw caution to the winds and go all armor and try to move faster then the arty? Or all infantry like a sea of ants swarming across the map, with more rifle squads then your opponent has arty shells. Is this about having the better tactical skills or being the best at gaming the system? With scenarios, the difference will be skill, because all else is equal. With 16 players, it would take 4 scenarios, with 32 players 5. So it would take a little time to make the scenarios, but It would take time to play them also, so once the first 2 were made, the scenario makers should be able to stay ahead of the players. 6 scenarios would be 64 players and IIRC 7 would make a double elimination tournament possible.
T.(Double Duce used to do this and had it down pat. I have seen him around here, get in touch with him).

_____________________________

"The 15th May, 1948, arrived ... On that day the mufti of Jerusalem appealed to the Arabs of Palestine to leave the country, because the Arab armies were about to enter and fight in their stead."
– The Cairo daily Akhbar el Yom, Oct. 12, 1963.
[IMG]http

(in reply to red)
Post #: 68
I'm in!! - 7/6/2002 3:28:58 AM   
Capt. Pixel

 

Posts: 1219
Joined: 10/15/2001
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Sorry it took so long to reply - took me a half-an-hour just to read the thread. (slow lips ;) )

I'd like to lead the germans to their deserved victory. DUA!! :cool:

BTW, I tried a similar tourney with three friends. We agreed on a standardized tourney map that we all used for all contests. By the end of that, I was so sick and tired of that map, I'll probably never use it again. :p

Random maps of a fixed size sound better to me. Luck of the draw on terrain, eh wot? :cool:

_____________________________

"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson

(in reply to red)
Post #: 69
Best SpWAW player or.... - 7/6/2002 5:09:21 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
World Cup. If we are looking to crown a SPWAW king then the set up should be the same for every battle. If it is to be a World Cup then the important thing is to get as many differant Countries into the contest. Since every country has units prior to WWII that should be the time period not Russians with 1945 stuff against Spain 1936. Is this for fun? Or are a battle of egos?
Small battles on small maps with pre war gear make the most even battles. Certainly some countries have poor troop rating but the points (true troop cost on) should balance that out. And then again a little skill will not hurt. First assign countries by lot/random picks of neutral party. Then make quads of 4 countries. Play a round robin (3 battles) the 2 high scores of each quad advance to next round. the two low scores go home.
This will keep us busy with plenty of small PBEM/on line battles
for some time. This system would allow as many players as there are countries. If more players we can begin assigning countries again (from bottom up. So first we need to list all the countries and rank (seed) them. Countries will be assigned from the bottom up (the bad countries are more evenly matched then the top ones) As soon as we have agreed as to the worst country assign it to me.

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to red)
Post #: 70
- 7/6/2002 5:24:12 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
People. I just want to play, and I want to play the country I choose, in the year that my opponent and I agree on, with terms we agree on.

If I win, I will make new arrangements with my next opponent. I understand some things need to be set, like map size and points, but I am NOT playing some random country in 1938 or so. I am also noy going to fight 12 battles to advance one round. I like the win-advance,lose-out thing.

If I lose, bye bye. If I win, next.

PS-it is quite possible for two players using the same country play eachother.

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 71
- 7/6/2002 6:28:10 AM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
Let's do the final roster. Then randomly match the opponents. Each pair sets their own rules and may the strongest /luckiest palyer win. No custom maps/rules/years/force makeup etc. The players decide what setup they want.

Lets vote on the rules:
Points: 4K/?
Turns: 10/?

The only thing to decide is how to declare a victory. I suggest having the following very simple rule which will also energize the combat and bring a twist to the game: by the end of the tenth turn whoever controls the most vhexes wins. Nice and simple.

This is not DC so it shouldn't take us weeks to figure it out.

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 72
- 7/6/2002 6:38:34 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
10 turns is real short. I agree on the 4k, medium maps. Say 20 or so turns, the winner is the person with the most points?

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 73
- 7/6/2002 6:43:23 AM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
20 turns with 4K? Hmmmm, for the sake of creating a consensus I agree.

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 74
Rumble - 7/6/2002 6:51:08 AM   
mogami


Posts: 12789
Joined: 8/23/2000
From: You can't get here from there
Status: offline
Ok then lets stop calling this a World Cup and rename it "King of the Hill" I'll take Soviets 1945

_____________________________






I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!

(in reply to red)
Post #: 75
- 7/6/2002 6:52:23 AM   
Capt. Pixel

 

Posts: 1219
Joined: 10/15/2001
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
5K? No reduced squads? Or am I jumping the gun? :)

_____________________________

"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson

(in reply to red)
Post #: 76
- 7/6/2002 6:53:45 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
The reduced squads is between you and your opponent. 5k is high if someone takes a 1939 or 40 battle!

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 77
pre-41 - 7/6/2002 7:29:04 AM   
Capt. Pixel

 

Posts: 1219
Joined: 10/15/2001
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
You're right. 5K is really high for pre-WWII.

We're we going to a graduated set of battles throughout the war ('40, '41,' 42, etc.) or pick a specific era?

I personally like the pre-war, early war myself. In that case 3k to 4k is mor than enough points. :)

_____________________________

"Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible. "
- Stonewall Jackson

(in reply to red)
Post #: 78
A suggestion - 7/6/2002 2:13:21 PM   
Spenser

 

Posts: 81
Joined: 7/5/2002
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Since this was Red's idea, why don't we let him work out the details based on the views in this thread ?

Oh, and i would like to join too, and if anybody fancy a friendly warm-up i'm game :D

[EMAIL=spenser2u@yahoo.se]spenser2u@yahoo.se[/EMAIL]

(in reply to red)
Post #: 79
Listing - 7/7/2002 4:00:53 AM   
TimeTanker

 

Posts: 148
Joined: 6/15/2002
From: Chico,CA
Status: offline
As Y'all can see I didn't go on my trip so I am here to continue my current matches.

red (SU)
Goblin (US)
Gary Tatro (US)
Fallschirmjager (Finland)
TimeTanker (Marines)
Brutto-Bob (Germany)
Mogami (Holland?)
BORO (SU)
Scharfschütze (Germany)
Viking2 (Canada)
Capt Pixel (Germany)
Belisarius (Finland)
M4Jess (Professional Troublemaker/TagTeam Artist)
Orzel Bialy (Whoosie....with a sprained wrist... )
Hades (Italy)
Easy8 (Whoosie?)
gmenfan (US)
Tankhead (Hungary)
3/2 ACR (SU)
Ironfist (Germany)
radboy223 (French)
Mojo (Finland)
skryking (Rumanians)
Knife (GB)

Ok the only ones that haven't expressed a desire for a country are Easy8 and Orzel. But, I am sure somewhere soon they will speak up.

_____________________________

"You can run...but, you will only die tired"

(in reply to red)
Post #: 80
- 7/7/2002 4:09:24 AM   
Supervisor

 

Posts: 5166
Joined: 3/2/2004
Status: offline
Hey you don't you have a turn to finish???????

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 81
I finished my turn..... - 7/7/2002 7:28:00 AM   
TimeTanker

 

Posts: 148
Joined: 6/15/2002
From: Chico,CA
Status: offline
I finished my turn. But, I wanted to update the list of players for the "World Whatever Cup" so that all those guys that have asked to be part of it would know that we know that they want to play.......ummmm....was that at all clear?

If I get around to it (and if Goblin hasn't already done this) I was thinking that if no one objects tooo loudly. I may just draw names on a random basis and pair names up. Just to see what kind of pairings we would end up with.

Just thinking about it, however it does seem to me that no matter what time period two players agree upon. If one of them is Germany and the other is say Mexico.....Belgium. :p Then there has to some sort of agreement between the two players to handicap somehow. Sort of how the Assaulter gets a 3:1 ratio in the game to compensate for the defender's ability to entrench.

Or perhaps we put all the minor nations in one hat and all the majors in another and then do the pairing?

_____________________________

"You can run...but, you will only die tired"

(in reply to red)
Post #: 82
- 7/7/2002 9:21:57 AM   
Goblin


Posts: 5547
Joined: 3/29/2002
From: Erie,Pa. USA
Status: offline
You missed Spenser...

_____________________________


(in reply to red)
Post #: 83
- 7/7/2002 11:16:23 AM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
with Spncer the list consist of 25 entries. Do you want to wait for one more entry to make it even or would like to start with one player automatically advancing to the second round?

Also what's the final set of rules we agree on?

4K pts.
20 turns
winner is determined by the number of points
game setup is up to the players

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 84
I will play ! - 7/7/2002 7:18:32 PM   
Rokondo

 

Posts: 362
Joined: 1/2/2002
From: Israel
Status: offline
I will take US.

_____________________________

"If you have Patience you will win !"

(in reply to red)
Post #: 85
final player list - 7/7/2002 8:32:28 PM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
Final list:

1.red (SU)
2.Goblin (US)
3.Gary Tatro (US)
4.Fallschirmjager (Finland)
5.TimeTanker (Marines)
6.Brutto-Bob (Germany)
7.Mogami (Holland?)
8.BORO (SU)
9.Scharfschütze (Germany)
10.Viking2 (Canada)
11.Capt Pixel (Germany)
12.Belisarius (Finland)
13.M4Jess (?)
14.Orzel Bialy (?)
15.Hades (Italy)
16.Easy8 (?)
17.gmenfan (US)
18.Tankhead (Hungary)
19.3/2 ACR (SU)
20.Ironfist (Germany)
21.radboy223 (French)
22.Mojo (Finland)
23.skryking (Rumanians)
24.Knife (GB)
25.Spencer (Sweden)
26. Rokondo (US)

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 86
round 1 - 7/7/2002 8:33:37 PM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
The results were generated at [url]www.random.org[/url]

6.Brutto-Bob - 12.Belisarius
11.Capt Pixel - 20.Ironfist
8.BORO - 14.Orzel
2.Goblin - 10.Viking2
21.radboy223 - 23.skryking
5.TimeTanker - 7.Mogami
22.Mojo - 24.Knife
4.Fallschirmjager - 17.gmenfan
9.Scharfschütze - 13.M4Jess
1.red - 18.Tankhead
15.Hades - 25.Spencer
16.Easy8 – 19.3/2 ACR
3.Gary Tatro – 26. Rokondo

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 87
- 7/7/2002 8:34:37 PM   
red

 

Posts: 555
Joined: 8/21/2000
From: FL,US
Status: offline
Everybody needs to confirm the engagement to each other so if the game is not possible, we can re-match them.

_____________________________

"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I beat people up."
--MUHAMMAD ALI

(in reply to red)
Post #: 88
.....and Rekondo too? Yes, and Rekondo Too1 - 7/7/2002 8:41:29 PM   
TimeTanker

 

Posts: 148
Joined: 6/15/2002
From: Chico,CA
Status: offline
Ok, here we go.

red (SU)
Goblin (US)
Gary Tatro (US)
Fallschirmjager (Finland)
TimeTanker (Marines)
Brutto-Bob (Germany)
Mogami (Holland?)
BORO (SU)
Scharfschütze (Germany)
Viking2 (Canada)
Capt Pixel (Germany)
Belisarius (Finland)
M4Jess (Scenario Scion)
Orzel Bialy (World of Hurt)
Hades (Italy)
Easy8 (Mars)
gmenfan (US)
Tankhead (Hungary)
3/2 ACR (SU)
Ironfist (Germany)
radboy223 (French)
Mojo (Finland)
skryking (Rumanians)
Knife (GB)
Spenser (Lichtenstein, Malta, & Tibet)
Rekondo (US)

Ok with Spenser and Rekondo, we now have 26 players. I say go for the pairing. Perhaps, with a proviso that minor countries play minor countries and major vs. major. And, that if you move on to the second round as a major you must pick a minor country to continue.

Pairings to follow.

Vice Versa, if you advance to the second round from the minors. You get to change to a major.

Which of course will leave 2 players in the end. They can then decide if they want to play major or minor countries for the final showdown.

I agree with 4K pts and 20 turns.

_____________________________

"You can run...but, you will only die tired"

(in reply to red)
Post #: 89
Random Pairings - 7/7/2002 8:52:09 PM   
TimeTanker

 

Posts: 148
Joined: 6/15/2002
From: Chico,CA
Status: offline
These pairings were done under the strictest standards of our time. I drew them out of a hat.

MAJOR COUNTRIES:

3/2 ACR (SU) VS. GOBLIN (US)

REKONDO (US) VS. KNIFE (GB)

RED (SU) VS. GARY TATRO (US)

GMENFAN (US) VS. BRUTTO-BOB (GERMANY)

IRONFIST (GERMANY) VS. BORO (SU)

CAPT PIXEL (GERMANY) VS. SCHARFSCHUTZE (GERMANY)


MINOR COUNTRIES:

M4JESS (CEYLON) VS. RADBOY223 (FRENCH)

MOGAMI (BELGIUM) VS. TANKHEAD (HUNGARY)

SPENSER (TIBET) VS. SKRYKING (RUMANIANS)

MOJO (FINLAND) VS. TIMETANKER (MARINES)

HADES (ITALY) VS. BELISARIUS (FINLAND)

ORZEL BIALY (FIJI) VS. VIKING2 (CANADA)

EASY8 (MARS) VS. FALLSCHIRMJAGER (FINLAND)

As you can see there are some fictional and nonsensical countries in there. :D If your name has one such country/planet beside it would you kindly post what country you want within the category your name appears? Danka!

_____________________________

"You can run...but, you will only die tired"

(in reply to red)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> SP:WaW Opponents Wanted >> Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.766