RE: Dec 8 Mod questions

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Dec 8 Mod questions

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/3/2011 7:23:22 AM

CaptBeefheart

Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline

That's a feature, not a bug. I like having all those Corsairs on board. Seriously, squadron sizes on carriers seems a bit buggy in general in Downfall as I ended up with 18 in VF, 18 in VBF, 15 in VB and 15 in VT on most of my CVs.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to NAVMAN)

Post #: 211

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/4/2011 9:47:28 PM

JeffroK

Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline

Ditto

The Carrier airgroups are the hardest thing to manage in Downfall.

Re Midway, it takes so long to get the unit up to full strength as you can only draw 12 aircraft and then wait for a few days. A way around this is to change the aircraft type which thenfills out the squadron.

Other option is to land the squadron and put some of the land base VF on board.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)

Post #: 212

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/19/2011 1:21:51 PM

Hortlund

Posts: 2884
Joined: 10/13/2000
Status: offline

There are loads of allied ships who have not done all their upgrades in Downfall. Some have not even done their 42 upgrades

_____________________________

The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)

Post #: 213

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 12:53:28 AM

Andy Mac

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline

There is an update around somewhere to correct that I was sure i posted it I will see if I can find it again

(in reply to Hortlund)

Post #: 214

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 3:36:42 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

There is an update around somewhere to correct that I was sure i posted it I will see if I can find it again

Andy, do you recall if the Downfall which was included as a scenario in that official patch (last one I think, before the OOB/data official patch) includes the changes? IOW, the verison you just bumped in the other thread? In which case we can play the version in the patch safely?

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Andy Mac)

Post #: 215

RE: Dec 8 Mod questions - 2/23/2011 9:59:56 PM

mikkey

Posts: 3142
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

IIRC "WITP Admiral's Edition v1.01.06i Official Update" contains Downfall scenario v1.0 (without some ship upgrade, fuel...) and this thread Official Downfall Scenario Erratta contains Downfall scenario v2.0.

_____________________________

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 216

RE: Downfall, Buccaneer and Marianas and Ironman Allied - 3/5/2011 5:27:20 PM

gradenko2k

Posts: 935
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline

Sorry if this has already been answered elsewhere, but the original post doesn't really say anything: Does "Ironman Allied" mean a game where the Allies are boosted to ahistorically stronger levels? As a counterpoint to the latest patch's scenario 010, which is a game where the Japanese are boosted to ahistorically stronger levels.

If yes, are the attachments in post 4 and 5 of this thread still the latest version? I find the idea intriguing.

(in reply to sprior)

Post #: 217

RE: Downfall, Buccaneer and Marianas and Ironman Allied - 3/19/2011 11:38:29 PM

Andy Mac

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline

Yes it does no I dont think those are the latest versions I will try to dig them out later

(in reply to gradenko2k)

Post #: 218