JWE
Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Terminus I can't help but wonder if I'd have liked The Pacific better if I hadn't seen Band of Brothers first. Don't get me wrong, I didn't DISLIKE The Pacific, but Band of Brothers was better, in my opinion. I do agree Termy. BoB was a look at a unit, through its formation, its deployment, and its use through the entire continuum of the European Theater. Those guys were in almost every action that was important to US Arms. There is a continuity there that resonates. Winters is the commander (that we all wish we had), and Guarnere, Talbert, Toye, are the NCOs (that we all wish we had), that made it happen. The Pacific is disjoint, because it has to be. Nobody was in every action. If you followed any unit, almost 2/3 of the war would be lost, so the producers went for abstraction. Can't fault them, because they are not talking to you or me, but to the lumpen proletariat (who really needs to know this stuff). I'm pretty comfy with what they did and how they did it. A bitch of a job that they did pretty well. Occasionally, God puts a maggot in the brains of people like Tom Hanks, or Clint Eastwood, and something wonderful happens; a look at a real personal slice of duty and death. That's what these mini-series are all about, really - people - and what they do in the face of 'duty'.
|