Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Name This!...(60)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Name This!...(60) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Name This!...(60) - 4/15/2010 11:27:33 PM   
John Lansford

 

Posts: 2662
Joined: 4/29/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: che200

IIRC in Hammels Guadalcanal the sea battles the San Francisco's Armoured Conning tower was penetrated only once and it wiped out most of the officers on the bridge. The XO was heavily wounded the day beforeb by a kamikaze Betty which wiped out the secondry bridge. After the hit on the bridge the ship finished conned by an officer who had just been promoted.  Does anybody know what kind of shells the japanese where firing in first Gudalcanal AP or HE ? 


The BB's were planning on another bombardment of Henderson Field, and had the guns and shell hoists full of HE ammo when they detected the USN cruisers. Rather than take the time to unload them back into the magazines, the commander ordered them fired instead. In the confused fighting after the initial contact, with small ships mixing with the bigger BB's and cruisers, it wouldn't surprise me if the BB's decided to fire HE throughout the fight at least for their secondary armament.

(in reply to chesmart)
Post #: 31
RE: Name This!...(60) - 4/15/2010 11:45:13 PM   
chesmart


Posts: 908
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Malta
Status: offline
So thats why the armored conning tower was only penetrated once during the fight so it confirms Hammels version vs Hara's.

(in reply to John Lansford)
Post #: 32
RE: Name This!...(60) - 4/16/2010 1:33:38 AM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
From what I've read (I think in Frank's Guadalcanal book) the Kongos on bombardment missions had most of their AP offloaded and replaced with HE for bombarding.  I would expect they fired off the HE in the ready rack first, used up the AP, then switched back to whatever was left in the magazine.  It's possible they were planning on using the Shen-Seiki rounds for bombardment, or they got loaded on the hoist by accident, or by the end of the fight they were firing whatever was left in the magazine.

I have read of a few naval battles where ships were firing star shells and practice shells by the end of the fight.

Bill


_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to chesmart)
Post #: 33
RE: Name This!...(60) - 4/16/2010 3:25:02 AM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Local Yokel


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

quote:

ORIGINAL: RevRick

The first thing I thought was "What did it sound like inside that barbette?" Then, "WHAT???" A 14" anything hitting the barbette of a CA and then bouncing off amazes me.


You aren't the only one who wondered about that.

From the report (barbette had 5 in armor):

63. The nature of the fourteen inch projectiles which struck the SAN FRANCISCO is of interest in connection with the fires. Reference (c) reports that fragments recovered from hits five and six indicated projectiles slightly larger than fourteen inches. They were of incendiary type with a heavy base and thin (3/8") walls. The cavity was apparently filled with an explosive charge and a large number of small (3" x 1") safety-fused incendiary cylinders filled with powdered aluminum and magnesium. Apparently the explosive charge detonates, sets safety fuses afire, and scatters incendiary cylinders over a wide area. This started fires in many inaccessible places. There was no evidence of a base plug, and tt is probable that the projectile had a nose fuse with a fuse adapter for nose loading. The 5" S.T.S. barbette armor defeated them easily. It was fortunate for SAN FRANCISCO that neither of these shells was armor piercing.


It's my understanding that these were the san-shiki (Type 3) incendiary rounds developed by the Japanese for all their main battery weapons from 18 inch down to 8 inch calibre. There seems to be some doubt as to whether they were intended primarily for bombardment or for anti-aircraft use.

What is interesting is that evidence from the damage to San Francisco that she was hit by these rounds directly contradicts Hara Tameichi's account of First Guadalcanal. In this he states that the Japanese, surprised by the appearance of Callaghan's ships, made frantic but ultimately successful efforts to strike all this bombardment ammunition below. It appears that in reality the Kongos were left with no option but to rid themselves of some at least of these vulnerable rounds by firing them at the American ships.


I think the technical term for that is "unloading through the barrel." A lot less time consuming than trying to unload and strike below the powder and shell. Fortunately, that was a hit that did not blow the San Francisco to smithereens.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 34
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Name This!...(60) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.578