Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly Pillager)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly Pillager) Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/7/2011 1:20:11 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/05/42

Japanese Home Islands: US fleet sub Shark reports contact with probable Jap surface ASW TF in a night action S of Kobe. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Torishima at 108,66 (NW of Torishima)

Japanese Ships
DD Amagiri
CL Yubari
DD Akizuki
DD Akebono

Allied Ships
SS Shark

SS Shark launches 4 torpedoes at DD Amagiri
Shark diving deep ....
DD Akebono fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


South Pacific: No contact reported with KB task forces this game turn. I’m less than convinced Pillager turned the KB back and returned to Truk unless the sub contacts completely ruined the surprise factor of its (the KB’s) planned mission.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/04 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: 10 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay


New Guinea: Japanese capture Biak. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Biak (87,110)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 755 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 6
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0
Japanese adjusted assault: 4
Allied adjusted defense: 1
Japanese assault odds: 4 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Biak !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
18th JAAF AF Bn (previously reported on Formosa)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Philippines: Entries in the 7/04 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 80,82 at Sibuyan, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,91 at Davao, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 5 Japanese ships at 79,91 at Davao, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 4 Japanese ships at 79,91 at Davao, Speed unknown

Sigint report entry for 7/04 indicates elements of Japanese 24th Infantry Division have embarked from Sibuyan and are moving to Roxas (Panay). This report indicates a Japanese amphibious landing is already or soon to be underway to take Panay.


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – three Jap TF’s in port, no ships at anchor, 74 aircraft (32 fighters, 21 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s. Light industry, resource production and oil refinery facilities in Rangoon appear to be fully operational. Known Japanese LCU in Rangoon include HQ’s 15th Army and 2nd Fleet, 7 JAAF Base Force, 47 Field AA Bn, 55 Mountain Gun Rgt, 112 Infantry Rgt. This report shows two other Jap LCU’s detected in Rangoon but not identified.


China: Japanese capture Lanchow. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lanchow (81,34)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30218 troops, 291 guns, 111 vehicles, Assault Value = 1062
Defending force 7488 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 215
Japanese adjusted assault: 516
Allied adjusted defense: 147
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Lanchow !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
934 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 92 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 37 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
3184 casualties reported
Squads: 116 destroyed, 19 disabled
Non Combat: 146 destroyed, 35 disabled
Engineers: 20 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 5

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
13th Ind.Mixed Brigade
17th Division
37th Division
1st Mortar Battalion

Defending units:
259th Brigade
303rd Brigade
9th Separate Brigade
8th War Area
8th Chinese Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Japanese resume ground bombardment attack near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2324 troops, 192 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 864
Defending force 18178 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 495

Japanese ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
43 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
104th Division
13th Tank Regiment
38th Division
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
93rd Chinese Division
16th Group Army
4th War Area
10th Group Army
9th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 391
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/8/2011 9:40:40 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/06/42

Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/05 reports intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Baker Is. Detected status of Baker Is shows no visible Japanese forces or activity.

US fleet sub Sealion reports contact with large Japanese AP off Tinian. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Tinian at 109,96 (SE of Tinian)

Japanese Ships
xAP Yoshino Maru (one hit, dud torpedo)

Allied Ships
SS Sealion

xAP Yoshino Maru is sighted by SS Sealion
SS Sealion launches 4 torpedoes at xAP Yoshino Maru

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


South Pacific: US fleet subs Pike and Searaven operating in the sea area SW of Ponape (SE of Truk) reporting multiple contacts with B5N2 Kate air patrols. Whether or not the KB aborted its mission and returned to Truk remains an open question, though two probable if not certain conclusions can be drawn at this point – (1) KB has moved some distance to the N of its previous sighting on 7/03, and (2) Pillager is now aware that US submarines are prowling the sea areas S of Truk. Situation map follows.




Expansion of port facilities at Tahiti completed to the base’s maximum port size = 5, airfield expansion is being started.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/05 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: CM Tsugaru reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Ndeni
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: AK Noto Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher sighting: 3 Japanese ships at 102,132 near Fergusson Island, Speed 8, Moving West


Philippines: Entries in the 7/05 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 8 Japanese ships at 79,83 near Roxas, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 4 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao, Speed unknown

One or more Jap Amphibious and/or Transport TF(s) detected in Roxas base hex (Panay), these TF likely to be disembarking 24th Jap Infantry Division mentioned in the 7/04 Sigint report. 24 Division had captured Sibuyan on 6/29.


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – three Jap TF’s in harbor, no ships at anchor, 69 aircraft (23 fighters, 21 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


India: HQ China Air Task Force command was transferred out of China to Southeast Asia command, then airlifted from Kunming to Ledo last game turn. A leader change on this HQ was made to remove MGen Chennault and transfer him into the leader pool. Plans are for MGen Chennault to be eventually employed with a front-line USAAF Air HQ, likely a combat air command in a Pacific theatre.

No definite plans at this time for future employment of China Air Task Force HQ, though the HQ does have torpedo ordnance which makes it potentially useful outside of China.


China: Japanese continue ground bombardment attack near Kweiyang. Latest AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2332 troops, 192 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 878
Defending force 18217 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 501

Allied ground losses:
88 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
21st Mortar Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
16th Group Army
10th Group Army
9th Group Army
4th War Area
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/8/2011 9:43:35 PM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 392
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/10/2011 12:36:06 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/07/42

Eastern US: Transport convoy EC-1 (3 ships) departing Eastern US for Capetown with three fighter squadrons (75 planes total) for eventual deployment with US Tenth AF in the Southeast Asia theatre plus 4300 fuel.


Central Pacific: US fleet sub Pompano near the Marianas spots and attacks several small Japanese transport TF’s moving together, all heading southbound. AAR’s follow.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Saipan at 115,95 (E of Saipan)

Japanese Ships
AD Nichiran Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Pompano

AD Nichiran Maru is sighted by SS Pompano
SS Pompano launches 4 torpedoes at AD Nichiran Maru

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Saipan at 115,95

Japanese Ships
xAK Somedono Maru
PB Jokuja Maru

Allied Ships
SS Pompano

SS Pompano launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Somedono Maru
PB Jokuja Maru fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


South Pacific: No further contact reported with KB. 7/06 Operations report entries state that US fleet subs Pike and Searaven on patrol S of Truk were spotted by unspecified Japanese forces, no indication on whether these contacts are or could be the KB. SS Pike and Searaven were the two subs attacked last game turn by B5N2 Kate air patrols. Both subs remain in the same general area where the B5N2 Kate contacts occurred last game turn.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/06 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: AMC Aikoku Maru reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 5 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: AK Kirishima Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 4 Japanese ships at 98,130 in Port Moresby, Speed 0, Moving Northeast


Australia: Unidentified Jap submarine detected off Perth.


Philippines: Japanese LCU (probably 5th Infantry Division) detected this game turn adjacent to Cagayan base hex.


Entries in the 7/06 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,83 near Roxas, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 4 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao, Speed unknown


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – two small Jap TF’s in harbor (both appear to be surface ASW), undetermined number of ships at anchor, 70 aircraft (34 fighters, 14 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese continue ground bombardment attack near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2345 troops, 192 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 881
Defending force 18196 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 498

Allied ground losses:
27 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
2nd RF Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
93rd Chinese Division
16th Group Army
10th Group Army
4th War Area
9th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 393
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/11/2011 1:13:25 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
The Big Picture #10a – The World as we know it six months (or so) after 12/08/41

Central Pacific:

Dec 1941 estimate (quote from original post) – Hold Wake as long as possible. Hold Midway period. Otherwise, not much else to do for now.


July 1942 actual – Wake repelled several Japanese landings and managed to hold out until 1/42. I have no explanation to offer as to how it held out through multiple Japanese attacks before its fall, my original estimate being that it would fall almost immediately in 12/42. Nonetheless it was expected to fall and it did.

Midway is garrisoned and remains in US control. Pillager did not attempt an attack on Midway, this also being the case in our previous CHS game. Some construction activity is underway to gradually expand airfield and port facilities on Midway. For the moment, Midway is a relative backwater in the big picture as there is virtually no naval or air activity in the Central Pacific.

One activity that Pillager engaged in on several occasions during 1942 in our last CHS game was sending the KB on sorties into US-controlled areas of the Eastern Pacific, primarily in sea areas near the Line Islands, Johnston Is and south of Hawaii. The intent of these KB sorties appeared to have been mainly probing attacks with a secondary objective to destroy or disrupt US shipping movements between Hawaii and the South/SW Pacific theatres. The KB sorties in CHS had limited success and did not result in any significant naval actions. Up to this point, Pillager has not sortied KB into the Eastern Pacific in AE since the initial Pearl Harbor attack.

Until recently (6/42) the level of Japanese submarine activity in the Central Pacific in our AE game this time has been considerably less than in our previous CHS match. One possible theory as to why was the heavy toll taken during our CHS game by US surface ASW forces on Japanese subs Pillager sent into US controlled sea areas of the Eastern Pacific, this to the extent where Japanese subs detected in these sea areas had at or near 100% probability of attack if not destruction in the later stages of our CHS game (Pillager perhaps not having a short memory on this matter). In our current AE game, I’ve been largely content to note the presence of and otherwise ignore most Japanese subs as (1) Jap subs so far have minimal or no effect on my transport convoy system, (2) surface ASW warfare at least during the early war period is less effective in AE than in CHS, and (3) I’ve had several actions in AE between Japanese subs and US surface ASW where US ASW ships have been torpedoed and sunk.

My current general position on Allied surface ASW warfare in our AE game is to defer aggressively going after Jap submarines with surface ASW TF’s until later in the campaign when more effective Allied ASW weapons and systems become available, and I have larger numbers of Allied surface ASW ships that can be dedicated exclusively to “search and destroy” missions on Jap subs. Once those two conditions are true, plans are to become considerably more aggressive with employing Allied surface ASW. For now the benefits are limited and most Allied surface ASW activity is largely unnecessary (as Pillager’s subs have minimal impact or damage on my operations).

Up to this point in our AE game, both the Marshall and Gilbert island chains have been quiet with neither Pillager nor I putting a lot of emphasis on operations from these locations. That may change but attention on both sides has focused to the south.


South Pacific:

Dec 1941 estimate (quote from original post) – Pillager got me here last time. A Japanese outer perimeter in the South Pacific area including Noumea, Suva, Samoa and Canton Is is very hard to crack. My early-game objective here is to prevent history from repeating itself.

There is very little question that Pillager will set up Japanese expansion in the Pacific to reach this outer perimeter line again, it proved to be very worthwhile in CHS and is equally so in AE. And every bit as hard for the Allied command to defend all these points in 1941 and early 42.

The opening Allied strategy in this theatre boils down to three questions… (1) How much time do the Allies have before the Japanese reach this line? (2) How many and what forces can the Allies bring into this area before the Japanese arrive? (3) How many and which of these bases can be effectively defended against a Japanese assault?

(A) In our last match in CHS, Canton Is fell to the Japanese on 1/5/42, Pago Pago was taken around 2/20/42. It would be a reasonable estimate to say events are likely to move at or close to the same pace this time as well.

(B) Even with Allied reinforcements immediately departing for the South Pacific, it’s going be a close race against Pillager.

The closest source for ground forces to reinforce South Pacific bases is New Zealand, however, NZ ground forces start the game in miserable condition with most New Zealand LCU’s having large numbers of disabled elements.

Australia is a possible source with several fully operational ground units that can be immediately dispatched (with PP expenditures) to the South Pacific area. One Australian infantry unit is now under orders for dispatch to the South Pacific and scheduled to depart in the next 1-2 days. Also, an attempt is being made to evacuate Lark Bn from Rabaul before the Japanese reach that location. A South Pacific base will very well be Lark Bn’s new home if I get it out of Rabaul.

Dispatching US forces from either Hawaii or the mainland US to the South Pacific will have to take into account the KB’s location and movement over the next few game turns. Until I can get a handle on the KB’s location and direction of movement, sending anything from here could run into a delay.

Somehow, from somewhere, we’re going to get something down there… How much and what we get down there determines the answer to question (3).

(C) It’s apparent that the Allies will not be able to defend everything, but may be able to defend at least one or possibly more of the major South Pacific bases.

The basis of my overall defensive plan in the South Pacific is to hold a sufficient portion of the Noumea-Suva-Pago Pago-Canton Is line so as to maintain a viable “bridgehead” in any Japanese outer perimeter line Pillager may attempt to form along this axis.

From an administrative standpoint, defense of the South Pacific theatre will be divided roughly into two areas: a Western Area (using mainly ANZAC forces) centered on Suva, and an Eastern Area (with mainly US forces) centered on Pago Pago. Thus, the planned “bridgehead” is projected to center on Suva and Pago Pago. After these two locations, Canton Is will be held so as to maintain an relatively unobstructed line of communications between the US and the South Pacific/New Zealand/Australia. Noumea is the most difficult of the four to defend and also the closest to major Japanese bases at Truk and Rabaul (once this is captured). Noumea will receive the lowest priority and estimates are that it is likely to fall into Japanese control.

Both the Lexington and Enterprise CV task forces are being dispatched into the South Pacific. Along with locally available Allied surface TF’s, these naval forces will be employed to disrupt Japanese invasion forces moving southward as much as possible at least until Pillager gets his ducks lined together and sends the KB south to end the party. Available PT boats at Pearl Harbor are being dispatched to (yet to be determined) bases in the South Pacific to assist in local defense against Japanese surface naval or invasion TF’s.

In short… we’re going to do what we can with what we can get down there without losing most or all of it (though expecting to lose some of it).


July 1942 actual – In the South Pacific, Pillager’s Japanese advance is running behind the schedule he followed in our last CHS game. In our current AE game to date, the Japanese have rather gradually taken Canton Is, the Solomons, Ndeni, Luganville and Noumea with no or token opposition. With KB hanging about nearby, there is so far little point to raising any effective Allied opposition. For the Japanese in this AE match, easy conquests in the South Pacific may be over.
Allied reinforcements from New Zealand and the mainland US have steadily accumulated in both Suva and Samoa with more on the way. The main island positions on Fiji and Pago Pago are already occupied in strength (one US division plus other LCU’s in each location), well supplied and with ample fortifications. Supporting positions on surrounding islands (Savaii, Tongatapu, Niue and others) are already in place or in the process of being set up. Another feature of the Samoa-Suva position is development of Auckland and Tahiti as rear-area support bases. Emphasis has also been placed on creating and maintaining a secure a line of communication from Auckland and Tahiti to the forward positions at Suva and Samoa.

30 US and Allied naval search planes (PBY’s and some Hudsons) are now based on Suva and flying almost continuous patrols covering the N, NW and W approaches to Suva and Samoa. About 40-50% of the total US submarine fleet (including all S-class boats) are now operating in the South Pacific, mainly in a continuous picket line surrounding Suva and Samoa to the N, NW and W as well as numerous patrols in the Coral Sea and its entry points from the north. US fleet subs operating from Pearl Harbor occupy a continuous north-south axis of patrol zones from the Japanese Home Islands, through the sea areas E of the Marianas and surrounding Truk on all sides, with the southern end of this axis extending to the northern sea approaches to Rabaul, the Solomons and Ndeni/Luganville. Pillager’s most recent sortie of the KB ran into three of the US fleet subs patrolling S of Truk and N of the Solomons, one of these subs having multiple contacts from the KB.

Auckland and Sydney currently provide full support and replenishment for Allied sub operations in the South/SW Pacific with Brisbane and Suva available as forward bases for refueling.

Allied LBA has not been employed in any combat role in the South or SW Pacific up to this time, though a network of bases are in place where US and Allied squadrons with mainly PBY and some Hudsons are flying more or less continuous naval search missions. Suva currently has the largest concentration of naval search planes followed by Australian east coast bases and Auckland.

In a manner of speaking, I’m concentrating most of my “eggs” in the South Pacific in one basket (Suva and Samoa) at the expense of others (Solomons, Efate, Luganville and Noumea), but my view has been that I was not going to adequately guard all the baskets anyway. Give unto Tojo what he is going to get anyway (Rabaul, Port Moresby, Solomons, Efate, Luganville and Noumea) and provide him with a wall (Suva and Samoa) to smack into later.


New Zealand:

Dec 1941 estimate (quote from original post) – Auckland will be developed as quickly as possible into the primary forward operating base for Allied naval forces in the South Pacific.


July 1942 actual – This has largely been accomplished. Auckland is already functioning as the “U-boat pen” of the South Pacific. Auckland has large quantities of supply and fuel brought from the mainland US plus a considerable quantity of resource points picked up from production in Noumea and Suva. As stated earlier, Auckland will also be serving as the primary rear-area support base for forward positions on Suva and Samoa. Plans are to route most LCU’s, LBA, supply and fuel, etc arriving in the South Pacific theatre through Auckland. Auckland also being the primary destination port for the large transport convoys reaching the South Pacific theatre from Hawaii or the mainland US (exceptions of course will be made but Auckland being the general rule).


Rabaul:

Dec 1941 estimate (quote from original post) – As stated above, plans are to evacuate Lark Bn from Rabaul and re-deploy this unit probably in the South Pacific area.


July 1942 actual – Lark Bn had been evacuated from Rabaul to Suva in 12/41. Lark Bn is also a sub-unit of 8th Australian Division and has since transferred from Suva to mainland Australia for building of this division from its existing sub-units (27 Australian Brigade plus three Bns).

Surviving elements of several other LCU including Rabaul Det Base Force and 2/1 Independent Coy were airlifted from open coastal hexes near Rabaul and Kavieng (after Japanese capture of these bases) to Australia by US and Australian PBY and Catalina squadrons. Both LCU have been rebuilt in Australia to full TOE strength.

Force N (ANZAC cruisers) intercepted the Japanese amphibious TF for Rabaul on 12/21/41 after the Jap transports already disembarked the invasion force. In this action 4 Jap PB plus a half-dozen Jap AK of various sizes were destroyed with no loss or damage to the Allies.


New Guinea and Port Moresby:

Dec 1941 estimate (quote from original post) – Defense of Port Moresby proper is receiving a lower priority relative to defensive operations in the South Pacific area. However, locally available Allied surface naval forces will be attempting to disrupt Japanese invasion operations as and where favorable conditions exist.


July 1942 actual – Port Moresby and all of eastern New Guinea fell to the Japanese during Feb-March 42. As in the case of Rabaul (above), US and Australian PBY and Catalina squadrons evacuated elements of or full-strength Allied LCU’s from base and open coastal hexes in eastern New Guinea to Australia. Evacuated LCU from New Guinea include Port Moresby Brigade, 15 RAAF Base Force, C and D Coys/NG Rifles – these LCU also being rebuilt to full TOE strength.

While small infantry LCU’s have limited usefulness in most situations, they could later serve a purpose when loaded aboard submarine transports and dropped off at unoccupied Japanese bases.


The Air War:

Overall plans have been to not employ Allied LBA in combat (unless absolutely necessary) until combat-worthy Allied planes are available and issued to squadrons on a sufficiently large scale and a sufficiently large “mass” of trained Allied combat LBA squadrons reach the forward theaters to begin combat operations with a reasonable degree of success.

Up to this point, with the exception of squadrons being used for naval search from forward bases, practically all Allied air units have been engaged in full-time training. My usual training pattern for individual squadrons has been to focus on specialties (air-to-air combat, naval bombing, land bombing, recon/naval search and ASW to a lesser extent). Squadrons operate continuously at a 100% training level until the squadron reaches a fatigue level of 30 or over, then the squadron is stood down until fatigue resets to zero and the process repeated. A considerable pool of pilots with 65-70 or over skill levels in various specialties is now in place. It should be noted here that pilots in many 2E bomber squadrons are in specialized training for low level naval bombing, this with the intent of extensively using 2E bombers on skip-bombing naval attacks (or whatever in AE passes for them).

Until very recently, nearly all US air squadrons starting the game or entering as reinforcements in the mainland US and Hawaii have remained there in training. This mainly for two reasons: (1) pilot training and (2) assigned priorities of PP expenditures and transport capacity for transfer and movement out of the mainland US and Hawaii to forward theatres.

Movement of US LBA squadrons from the mainland US and Hawaii has begun only within the last month or two (in game time). Air units bound for the SW Pacific and a few for US Tenth AF in Southeast Asia are being transported aboard the convoys leaving the Eastern US to Australia via Capetown – the first air units already reaching Australia. Air units for the South Pacific theatre are leaving in convoys from the US West Coast and Pearl Harbor. Current plans are to concentrate arrival of US LBA air forces in the South Pacific at Auckland and dispatch them to forward bases from there. CVE Long Island and possibly other CVE’s will be used to “shuttle” air units from Auckland and Australian bases into forward airfields when this capacity is needed due to flying range limitations and/or possibility of enemy action if squadrons are transported by sea using other means.

Movement of LBA squadrons into forward areas of the Pacific theatres is also being prioritized by aircraft types – fighters and patrol squadrons having first priority, followed by land-based dive and torpedo bomber squadrons. Transport planes will follow, with 4E and then 2E bombers coming last. This is the approximate order in which I expect to be using planes (by type) in forward theatres on a large scale, however, events may intervene and require unanticipated variations to this “script”.


Deployments from the mainland US:

Compared to our last game in CHS, US deployments from the mainland US to the South and SW Pacific theatres have greatly accelerated in AE, probably as much as 18 months or so ahead of the schedule from our last CHS game in many cases.

A number of US naval auxiliary ships (tenders, oilers, etc) from the mainland US and Hawaii are already operating in the South Pacific and from Australia, these ships being combined with many evacuees from the DEI and Philippines. I currently have no time frame in place for US surface combat and carrier naval forces entering the South Pacific, these forces for the moment remaining in the Eastern Pacific or on the US West Coast until I have a definite plan or operation to employ these forces in the South Pacific.

Four complete US divisions are already deployed in the South or SW Pacific – Americal and 32nd Infantry Divisions in Australia, 41st Division on Suva, 40th Division on Pago Pago. The remaining sub-units of US 3 Marine Division will arrive in Australia aboard the next off-map convoy from the Eastern US, once they arrive the full 3 Marine Division will be formed. Other US infantry LCU’s now in the South or SW Pacific theatres include two regiments of 2 Marine Division and several US RCT’s. US 27th Infantry Division is already transferred to the South Pacific command and remains in the mainland US for now while building to its full TOE strength from the replacement pools (now at about 80%) – this unit scheduled to ship out once it reaches full strength. The third regiment of US 2 Marine Division is also in the mainland US building to full TOE strength from replacements. Many US artillery, tank and combat engineer LCU’s have already reached Australia or the South Pacific.

US headquarter, construction and base force LCU’s are also now in the South and SW Pacific theatres with others in various stages of transit.

Many LBA squadrons have departed the mainland US, a few of these already arrived in forward theatres, most of them currently enroute aboard a transport convoy at some point in its transit.

The largest single route for deployments from the mainland US has been the off-map convoys from the Eastern US to Australia via Capetown (the “EX” convoys). Currently, about 200 large long-range US and other Allied transports are operating along this route at different points and stages of transit. Cargo carried across this route is mainly destined for the SW Pacific theatre with a smaller amount for the South Pacific.

Sea transport of most cargoes to the South Pacific is coming from the US West Coast, most of these convoys going directly to the South Pacific from the US West Coast (rather little of this transport traffic passing through or even near Pearl Harbor).

Sea transport convoys from the mainland US to forward areas have been highly organized, well secured and well concealed.

The general procedure I’ve employed for re-assignment and movement of US forces from the mainland US has developed as a sequence of steps outlined below.

(1) PP expenditure to transfer LCU’s and air units from restricted commands as necessary. This step I do first before any replacement elements or planes are added into the LCU or squadron to build it up to full strength. This accomplishes two things – First, the PP cost to transfer command of an under-strength LCU is lower than it is to transfer it after it’s brought up to full strength. Second, elements in the LCU replacement pools are targeted only at those LCU’s that are being prepared to “ship out”. Note that to do this, the replacement option must be turned off on all LCU’s and air units until you actually intend to start their build-up to full strength.

(2) Drawing elements or planes from replacement pools for all LCU’s and air units that are under full strength is done in the mainland US before the LCU or air units departs. The premise of this is that any supply points, etc used to draw replacements from the pools to get an air unit or LCU to full TOE strength is expended from stocks (at their source) in the mainland US rather than from supply points in theatre or at a forward base that had been shipped in from somewhere else and can be better used for other purposes. In those cases where the LCU or air unit must be transferred from a restricted command, step (1) is always completed before the unit draws any replacement pool elements or planes.

(3) Use of sea transport capacity for LCU and air unit departures from the mainland US is organized along the following priority system. LCU’s have highest priority -combat units (Infantry, Tank, Artillery) coming first, then engineer and HQ LCU’s. Departure of air units have had lower priority for the most part due to several factors including pilot training and availability of planes in the replacement pools. Priority of movement for different types of air units roughly follows the order described at the end of the section on “Air War”.

(4) LCU’s and air units ready for departure from the mainland US are moved to the port at which the transport convoy they will be loaded on is being formed. Unless circumstances require an exception, individual LCU’s being transported by sea will be loaded aboard two or more transport ships, this to prevent loss of the entire LCU if one of the ships is sunk. Vacant cargo space aboard transports carrying elements of an LCU is filled with either supply or fuel. In practice, transport ship(s) carrying LCU’s and air units will be placed in a transport convoy rather than these ship(s) moving at sea independently.

(5) All transport ships and auxliaries leaving the mainland US (regardless of destination) are loaded to their full cargo capacity before departure. No wasted space.



< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/11/2011 1:33:00 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 394
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/18/2011 5:58:59 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/08/42

Pillager had been away on business... thus a brief intermission. Anyways, back to the war (in Pillager's own words).

Game Question (Pilot Training): I have a number of air squadrons where the game is “automatically” transferring pilots into the squadron – these pilots come into the squadron through the squadron’s Group Reserve (pilots are in the reserve pool but are assigned to the squadron). This occurs in both LBA and carrier-based squadrons, and so far occurs exclusively in combat (fighter or bomber) squadrons – I haven’t seen this occur yet in patrol, recon or transport air units. Also note that this situation only occurs in some squadrons.

While I view this as being of little or no problem, the end result is the game keeps these pilots in the squadron’s Group Reserve pool as inactive pilots (probably due to more pilots being in the squadron than the maximum number of active pilots that are allowed in the squadron based on its size). All the squadrons where this situation has happened are currently operating in full (100%) training mode.

What I’ve been doing each game turn is to go through these squadrons and manually activate the pilots from Group Reserve – the AE game later puts them back into Group Reserve status at some point during the game turn’s resolution phase and I re-activate them again during my orders phase.

Question is… Will pilots in a squadron’s Group Reserve train if they are left in Group Reserve while the squadron itself is in training? If so, I’d be quite content to leave the pilots in the squadron’s Group Reserve and let them train there instead of re-activating them each turn.

Comments and/or suggestions from readers appreciated.


Central Pacific: US fleet subs north of Truk report contacts with Japanese planes – these could easily be LBA from the Marianas, though planes from the KB also possible if it is actually moving north from Truk. I do believe some Jap fleet carriers have 7/42 upgrades which makes a northward move (from Truk) to the Japanese Home Islands by part or all of the KB entirely feasible. Entries from 7/07 Operations Report and situation map follow.

SS Sealion observes Japanese Carrier Aircraft at 112,96 near Saipan
SS Sculpin observes Japanese Aircraft at 113,100 near Truk





South Pacific: ASW escort ships heading out to meet an unescorted TK returning to Auckland also meets a Jap submarine in a night action. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Auckland at 119,185 (E of Auckland)

Japanese Ships
SS I-19, hits 2

Allied Ships
AM Kiwi
AM Moa

SS I-19 launches 2 torpedoes at AM Kiwi
AM Moa attacking submerged sub ....
SS I-19 eludes ASW attack from AM Moa
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This entry from the 7/07 Combat Events report appears to be a later sighting of I-19’s float plane in daylight by the same NZ task force in the action shown above.

TF 162 sights Japanese Torpedo Bomber at 123,185 near Auckland

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/07 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: CM Katsuriki reported in port at Koumac (mine laying operation?)
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 102,133 near Normanby Island , Speed 7 , Moving East
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Noumea


Philippines: Jap LCU (probably 5th Infantry Division) now detected in Cagayan base hex.

Entries in the 7/07 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 7 Japanese ships at 79,83 near Roxas, Speed unknown


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port, two small Jap TF’s in harbor (one surface ASW, one possible amphibious), 78 aircraft (24 fighters, 15 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground bombardment attack near Kweiyang continues. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2350 troops, 192 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 885
Defending force 18241 troops, 169 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 499

Allied ground losses:
26 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
21st Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
64th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
16th Group Army
9th Group Army
10th Group Army
4th War Area
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/18/2011 6:04:14 PM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 395
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/18/2011 6:58:27 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wneumann


... Game Question (Pilot Training): I have a number of air squadrons where the game is “automatically” transferring pilots into the squadron – these pilots come into the squadron through the squadron’s Group Reserve (pilots are in the reserve pool but are assigned to the squadron). This occurs in both LBA and carrier-based squadrons, and so far occurs exclusively in combat (fighter or bomber) squadrons – I haven’t seen this occur yet in patrol, recon or transport air units. Also note that this situation only occurs in some squadrons.

While I view this as being of little or no problem, the end result is the game keeps these pilots in the squadron’s Group Reserve pool as inactive pilots (probably due to more pilots being in the squadron than the maximum number of active pilots that are allowed in the squadron based on its size). All the squadrons where this situation has happened are currently operating in full (100%) training mode.

What I’ve been doing each game turn is to go through these squadrons and manually activate the pilots from Group Reserve – the AE game later puts them back into Group Reserve status at some point during the game turn’s resolution phase and I re-activate them again during my orders phase.

Question is… Will pilots in a squadron’s Group Reserve train if they are left in Group Reserve while the squadron itself is in training? If so, I’d be quite content to leave the pilots in the squadron’s Group Reserve and let them train there instead of re-activating them each turn.

Comments and/or suggestions from readers appreciated...




Have a read of this thread.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2873718&mpage=1&key=inactive%2Cpilots�

I fear, with the passage of time, my explanation of a couple of months back might not have been phrased elegantly enough but I think the meaning remains.

What you have experienced is the result of actual historical figures joining their historical units. Hence it is a phenomenon prone to be experienced by those unrestricted (or able to to be reattached) squadrons which were deployed to the frontlines. Those squadrons permanently restricted stateside, and which presumably you have 100% on training duties seem to escape this influx of historical personnel.

As to participating in training, my praxis is that yes, only active pilots train. Thus the "value" of the above thread, which will also assist you in not experiencing recividism back to inactivity amongst your pilots.

Alfred

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 396
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/19/2011 12:29:10 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Alfred,

Thanks for your response. I went out to look at the thread - that and your remarks in here pretty much answers the question.

Actually, I haven't experienced this situation among any squadrons in restricted commands that cannot be transferred out of the restricted command (or the mainland US). It's been almost entirely with squadrons in un-restricted commands or squadrons that can be transferred from a restricted to an un-restricted command.

This phenomena isn't restricted by nationality (I've also seen it in a small number of British and ANZAC squadrons), nor as far as I can tell has anything to do with a squadron's training level (given that I toggle training levels back and forth between 0 and 100 depending on whether the squadron is resting or training "at full speed"). It just does it.

I see a couple options to work around this, at least during the time a squadron with extra pilots is in training...

The first two options involve keeping all the pilots in the squadron, including the extra ones.

(1a) Just keep re-activating the extra pilots in a squadron that are automatically inactivated each game turn, pretty much what I had been doing until now.

(1b) Select a number of pilots in the squadron equal to the number of extra pilots and set these pilots to be inactive - i.e. a squadron with 25 planes and 36 pilots (three over the maximum of 33) would have three pilots selected and set to be kept inactive. As long as the squadron is in full training mode, the three selected pilots for inactivation would likely be those with the highest experience/skill level in the squadron. The inactived pilots would preferably have maximum levels that can be attained in non-combat training - they would derive no benefit from being activated while the remaining pilots in the squadron are training for the current skill. This action would allow me to keep the trained pilots with the squadron (in the squadron's Group Reserve) while at the same time training the less experienced/skilled pilots in the squadron without the manual intervention each game turn required for option (1a).

(2) Send fully trained pilots that are in excess of the number of active pilots allowed in a squadron to the (general) Reserve pilot pool. I have been doing this to a limited extent.

For the short term, I'm intending to look at option (1b).



< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/19/2011 12:31:13 AM >

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 397
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/19/2011 2:50:20 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wneumann

Alfred,

Thanks for your response. I went out to look at the thread - that and your remarks in here pretty much answers the question.

Actually, I haven't experienced this situation among any squadrons in restricted commands that cannot be transferred out of the restricted command (or the mainland US). It's been almost entirely with squadrons in un-restricted commands or squadrons that can be transferred from a restricted to an un-restricted command.

This phenomena isn't restricted by nationality (I've also seen it in a small number of British and ANZAC squadrons), nor as far as I can tell has anything to do with a squadron's training level (given that I toggle training levels back and forth between 0 and 100 depending on whether the squadron is resting or training "at full speed"). It just does it.

I see a couple options to work around this, at least during the time a squadron with extra pilots is in training...

The first two options involve keeping all the pilots in the squadron, including the extra ones.

(1a) Just keep re-activating the extra pilots in a squadron that are automatically inactivated each game turn, pretty much what I had been doing until now.

(1b) Select a number of pilots in the squadron equal to the number of extra pilots and set these pilots to be inactive - i.e. a squadron with 25 planes and 36 pilots (three over the maximum of 33) would have three pilots selected and set to be kept inactive. As long as the squadron is in full training mode, the three selected pilots for inactivation would likely be those with the highest experience/skill level in the squadron. The inactived pilots would preferably have maximum levels that can be attained in non-combat training - they would derive no benefit from being activated while the remaining pilots in the squadron are training for the current skill. This action would allow me to keep the trained pilots with the squadron (in the squadron's Group Reserve) while at the same time training the less experienced/skilled pilots in the squadron without the manual intervention each game turn required for option (1a).

(2) Send fully trained pilots that are in excess of the number of active pilots allowed in a squadron to the (general) Reserve pilot pool. I have been doing this to a limited extent.

For the short term, I'm intending to look at option (1b).




Nice idea about (1b) but it isn't going to work out the way you expect it to.

The problem is that with 36 pilots in the unit, you are 3 over ther extended list. As you know that means you start off with 3 inactive pilots who will not train but what you haven't factored in is that those 3 inactive pilots are like rotten apples in the barrel. Progressively your 33 "active" students will accumulate fatigue and as they reach their fatigue threshold, the program will automatically make them inactive and not replace them with an existing refreshed but inactive pilot. This process will continue until you are down to the TOE of 25 pilots. Hence you will end up with 25 active and 11 inactive pilots. Unless you go in every turn to manually change their status.

Whereas if you keep only 33 pilots in the unit (IOW you send of the 3 surplus pilots off to General Reserve), the program will not deactivate the pilots when they reach the same fatigue threshold as it will were you to have 36 pilots (with 3 inactive).

Summary

1. Unit with 33 pilots, all can be made active and will retain that status.

2. Unit with more than 33 pilots, the inactive pilots act like rotten apples and eventually you will be left with only 25 active pilots.

Alfred

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 398
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/19/2011 4:05:19 AM   
USS Henrico

 

Posts: 152
Joined: 8/2/2009
From: Charlottesville, VA
Status: offline
quote:

Summary

1. Unit with 33 pilots, all can be made active and will retain that status.

2. Unit with more than 33 pilots, the inactive pilots act like rotten apples and eventually you will be left with only 25 active pilots.


Amen. I regularly have to go through my Allied squadrons in my PBEM game and ship the surplus pilots (>33 in this case) back to General Reserve, else you do wind up up with just the 25 pilots active.

Those historical pilots are a feature I could do without. Usually they aren't fully trained in the skills you want anyway, so they're the ones sent back from the front line squadrons to General Reserve, to be manually pulled into a training squadron with slots available to finish up their schooling.


(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 399
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/20/2011 1:56:59 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Alfred, USS Henrico

Thanks for your comments. Looks like what I'll end up doing is transferring fully trained pilots (if any) out of the squadron to the General Reserve pool and keep the rest for training. For squadrons that do not have fully trained pilots I will have to employ some other plan to select which pilots to send to General Reserve.

Note for USS Henrico - in the case of USN fleet carrier squadrons (VF, VB, VS, VT) the historical pilots I'm getting are actually quite good and many of them are fully trained. Not so for the historical pilots coming in for US Army and the other Allied nationalities, these pilots pretty much as you described.

(in reply to USS Henrico)
Post #: 400
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/20/2011 1:58:30 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/09/42

Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/08 reports heavy volume of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Tabiteuea. Detected status of Tabiteuea shows one Jap LCU, no visible Japanese air or naval forces or activity. Four Japanese LCU are known to be on Tabitueua including HQ’s 6th Fleet and 4 Air Division, 65 Naval Gd and 1 Garrison Unit.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/08 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: CM Katsuriki reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: AK Kikukawa Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 4 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: CM Katsuriki reported in port at Koumac (minelaying ops?)
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 115,160 near Noumea, Speed 15 , Moving East
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 107,126 near Rabaul, Speed 11 , Moving Northeast


Philippines: Japanese launch assault to capture Cagayan. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Cagayan (79,89)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13715 troops, 124 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 481
Defending force 10176 troops, 110 guns, 50 vehicles, Assault Value = 430
Japanese adjusted assault: 200
Allied adjusted defense: 119
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
90 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
129 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 33 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
5th Division

Defending units:
3rd PA Constabulary Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd/101st PA Battalion
103rd PA Infantry Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Division
Cagayan USAAF Base Force
III Philippine Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entries in the 7/08 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,83 near Roxas , Speed unknown


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port, no Jap TF’s in harbor (-2 from last turn), 69 aircraft (25 fighters, 22 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground bombardment attack near Kweiyang continues. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2350 troops, 192 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 1348
Defending force 18337 troops, 168 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 503

Allied ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (2 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
32nd Division (moved to the southern front from Sian, arrived this game turn to reinforce attack)
104th Division
38th Division
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
4th War Area
16th Group Army
9th Group Army
10th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 401
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/20/2011 7:48:45 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wneumann

Alfred, USS Henrico

Thanks for your comments. Looks like what I'll end up doing is transferring fully trained pilots (if any) out of the squadron to the General Reserve pool and keep the rest for training. For squadrons that do not have fully trained pilots I will have to employ some other plan to select which pilots to send to General Reserve.

Note for USS Henrico - in the case of USN fleet carrier squadrons (VF, VB, VS, VT) the historical pilots I'm getting are actually quite good and many of them are fully trained. Not so for the historical pilots coming in for US Army and the other Allied nationalities, these pilots pretty much as you described.



These are named pilots. If you have Tracker or use the editor you can see when and where they are due to come in. It represents quite a lot of pilots especially as the game goes on. This is really a big advangage for the Allies as the Japanese player get virtually no named pilots and must train up all pilots from the replacment pool. These named pilots come on with good exp generally in the 55-65 range but some are ace level when they arrive. However their air combat skills are in that same range so it is best to just check your units every month or so and pull them out to the reserve where you can train up the air skills to the 70 level. It is really why, all other things being equal, that the Allied pilots eventually get better than the Japanese pilots

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 402
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/21/2011 2:40:16 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
I've been doing extensive pilot training since the start of the campaign. With the exception of a small number of front-line squadrons mainly employed on naval search or some kind of (short duration) transport mission, almost every Allied air squadron currently in the game is operating basically in a continuous 100% training mode with occasional stand-down periods to rest pilots (once pilot fatigue level of the squadron = or > 30) and/or recover damaged planes. All squadrons in or entering the game are filled to capacity with "green" pilots from the Replacement pool and/or partially trained pilots from General Reserve that were moved there from other squadrons previously withdrawn from the game (due to having a withdrawal date).

What is becoming apparent is that at least most of the named pilots (those that are fully trained and experienced) that enter squadrons that are in training will have to be transferred to General Reserve in order for training of less skilled pilots already in the squadron to proceed. Named pilots can be brought back from General Reserve into these squadrons once a squadron is taken out of a dedicated training mode and prepared for front-line operations.

At this point (7/42) I have a considerable number of pilots in General Reserve. Many of these pilots are trained in one or more specialized skills (60 to low 70's), also a number of partially trained pilots that had been moved into General Reserve from a squadron with a withdrawal date before the squadron was withdrawn from the game. Examples of this include the entire contingent of pilots removed from the three AVG squadrons before the squadrons left the game (this providing a nice boost to the already substantial number of trained USAAF fighter pilots already in General Reserve).

The General Reserve also contains a number of pilots with combat experience that were in front-line squadrons in the game during 12/41 or early 1942 - these pilots were removed from the squadrons and sent into General Reserve once the number of remaining operational planes in the squadron decreased to the point where these pilots no longer had planes or the squadron was deliberately withdrawn from the game rather than it being destroyed by Japanese forces advancing on its airfield. This had been done extensively with USAAF pilots from the Philippines, Dutch pilots in the DEI, and some of the British in Malaya that had remained (almost) to the end. If I ever have squadrons entering the game that use Dutch pilots, there is a significant number of Dutch pilots in General Reserve with some level of experience/skill.

Up to this point in the campaign, I have been moving trained pilots out of squadrons to the General Reserve and replacing them in the squadron with "green" pilots from the Replacement pool and/or partially trained pilots from General Reserve. I see the extent of this practice decreasing as squadrons are taken out of full time training and "ship out" to forward theatres.

To a small extent I'm already doing this, but I can see a number of squadrons (particularly US squadrons, perhaps on a smaller scale for other Allies) that will be kept far to the rear or in their home countries that will operate as permanent training squadrons for new pilots - i.e. a "Training Command". This will (obviously) include squadrons in restricted commands that cannot be transferred to another command and may also include additional squadrons that can be transferred to a front-line command but will be deliberately held back as training squadrons. I'm just starting to look at this, first to identify the non-transferrable restricted command squadrons that are obvious candidates for the "Training Command", then fill in the gaps with additional squadrons (if any) that I can afford to hold back for training use.

In this "Training Command", I am also looking at the possibility of assigning specific training squadrons to perform pilot training for specific skills.

Pilots assigned to fighter squadrons in this command would be training specifically for air-to-air combat skills (escort).

If I'm able to have enough bomber squadrons in this "Training Command", I would be tempted to have each bomber squadron do pilot training in one specific skill (naval or ground attack, high or low altitude). I'd probably place individual bomber pilots at the start of training in either a naval attack or ground attack role. What may work out nice if I have enough bomber training squadrons to do this is something where a pilot would train for higher-altitude naval (or ground) attack in one training squadron, then moved into another squadron where low altitude naval (or ground) attack training is done. Once a bomber pilot is fully trained in either or preferably both high and low altitude skills, the pilot is then ready for front-line ops. Keep in mind this concept is a "pipe dream" that may not prove to be doable in the end.

Currently, I have 7 or 8 USN patrol squadrons (all on the US West Coast) operating OS2U-3 float planes - pilots in these squadrons are training in a combination of naval search and ASW. Where I see these pilots used in the future is getting them into front-line USN squadrons operating long-range PB2Y, PB4Y and PBM planes for naval search and "sub killing" starting in late-1943 and into 1944.

I have no idea at this point whether a "Training Command" is feasible or even the extent to which it can be done. I anticipate it's probably doable for the US, much less likely for other Allied air forces. As I said, this is all being explored.

Following on past experience vs Pillager from CHS - we were both training pilots in that game, the same is expected here.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/21/2011 2:42:19 AM >

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 403
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/25/2011 11:23:07 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/10/42

Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/09 reports intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Tarawa. Detected status of Tarawa shows no visible Jap forces or activity.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/09 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: 22 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: AR Yamahagi Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 115,160 near Noumea , Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville


Philippines: Japanese continue ground assault at Cagayan. Supply situation is certainly not working in Pillager’s favor and likely to prolong the action at Cagayan. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Cagayan (79,89)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13681 troops, 124 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 479
Defending force 9881 troops, 110 guns, 50 vehicles, Assault Value = 402
Japanese adjusted assault: 84
Allied adjusted defense: 215
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
220 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
204 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 34 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 22 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Assaulting units:
5th Division

Defending units:
102nd PA Infantry Regiment
103rd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd PA Constabulary Regiment
3rd/101st PA Battalion
102nd PA Infantry Division
Cagayan USAAF Base Force
III Philippine Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Entries in the 7/09 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 7 Japanese ships at 79,83 near Roxas, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 7 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao, Speed unknown
Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao, Speed unknown


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 5 Japanese ships in port (+2 from last report), one Jap TF in harbor (+1 from last report), 85 aircraft (27 fighters, 30 bombers), 8 Jap LCU’s (+1 from last report).


China: Japanese ground assault near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 39944 troops, 521 guns, 318 vehicles, Assault Value = 1352
Defending force 18407 troops, 166 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 510
Japanese adjusted assault: 1060
Allied adjusted defense: 829
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
880 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 54 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 77 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Vehicles lost 15 (2 destroyed, 13 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
759 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 60 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
2nd RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
9th Group Army
10th Group Army
4th War Area
16th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 404
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/27/2011 1:03:15 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/11/42

Eastern US: Transport convoy EX-14 (35 ships) departing the easterm US for Australia via Capetown. Cargo being carried aboard this convoy includes one US LCU (188 FA Rgt), 123K supply, 47K fuel.


Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/10 reports heavy volume of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Truk. Detected status of Truk shows no unusual Jap forces or activity that is visible.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/10 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: 22 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: AR Yamahagi Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 4 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Belep Islands
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher sighting: 4 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island , Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 115,160 near Noumea , Speed unknown


Australia: Construction of fortifications at potential Jap landing sites in NE Australia (Portland Roads & Normanton) is underway. Plans are to garrison and fortify these two bases to the extent where they can hold off at least a small Japanese amphibious landing attempt – garrisons and fortifications in place that are capable of stopping Japanese attacks up to regimental size or so.


Philippines: Unidentified Japanese LCU detected entering Iloilo base hex (Panay). A ground assault to capture Iloilo can be expected shortly.

Entries in the 7/10 Combat Events report for sightings by planes in the Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu follow.

Stearman 75M sighting report: 6 Japanese ships at 79,91 near Davao , Speed unknown.


Southeast Asia: Dutch sub O-21 operating near the Malacca Straits reports contact with Jap ASW air patrol (Ki-48 Lily) near Phuket.

Dutch submarine patrolling off Rangoon attacked by Jap surface ASW. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Moulmein at 54,56 (SE of Moulmein)

Japanese Ships
DD Hakaze

Allied Ships
SS KVII, hits 1 (minor system damage)

SS KVII is sighted by escort
KVII bottoming out ....
DD Hakaze attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port (-2 from last report), one Jap TF in harbor, 83 aircraft (25 fighters, 25 bombers), 8 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese resume ground bombardment near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2288 troops, 191 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 1303
Defending force 17891 troops, 161 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 477

Allied ground losses:
18 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
93rd Chinese Division
10th Group Army
4th War Area
9th Group Army
16th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 405
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/27/2011 2:51:01 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Starting with the orders phase I did for this game turn, I've been going through through Allied air forces to (1) resolve the situation discussed earlier with the excess number of pilots in some squadrons and (2) possibly look at where and how pilot training activity can be organized and refined beyond the point where I already have it. I really have no set time frame to develop and implement this - it will likely be a process spanning several months in game time.

I'm initially doing this strictly with the US air forces (particularly the USAAF and Naval LBA), the US air forces being by far the largest Allied force and the one where it is most likely changes in the pilot training program will prove to be practical and these changes can be successfully implemented on anything approaching a large scale. It is also realized here it's quite possible any large scale changes in pilot training developed for the US air forces will prove to not be feasible for application in the other Allied air forces (mainly due to their being smaller). Though developing an alternative plan that could work better with the other Allied air forces is not my main focus at the moment, the possibility is by no means being ignored.

The first step I completed this game turn) for the US air forces included an inventory of all land-based US squadrons now located in the mainland US. The inventory noted individual squadrons that are in restricted commands (both transferrable and non-transferrable), also the squadrons with future withdrawal dates. The overall purpose of this inventory was to identify specific air squadrons that could possibly be included in an on-map US air training command. In the process of doing this I was also determining which squadrons were definately going to "ship out" at some future date and what could or would definiately be retained in the mainland US (these squadrons the likely candidates for inclusion in a training command). I will eventually pick through US air squadrons in Alaska and Pearl Harbor for any that are likely candidates for inclusion in the training command. US air squadrons now enroute to or already located in forward theatres are excluded from any consideration for use in the training command, though they will continue their own pilot training until such time as they enter active operations in their assigned theatres.

I also did a breakdown of US air squadrons in the mainland US that definately are or likely to be included in a pilot training command. All these squadrons are now and have been training pilots, this breakdown identifying the skill specialty of pilot training being conducted in each squadron.

Part of my projected plan for a US pilot training command is for individual squadrons to conduct training of pilots in specific skill specialties - these specialties to likely include at least some of the following (1) escort mission for fighter training, (2) ground bombing, (3) naval bombing, (4) naval search, (5) recon, (6) ASW, (7) transport. Skill specialties for ground and naval bombing will be divided further - specialized training for high and low altitude ground or naval bombing will be done by separate air squadrons.

An individual squadron in the training command will be permanently designated for continuous training of pilots in one specific skill, pilots entering a particular training squadron coming in from either the replacement pilot pool ("green" pilots) or General Reserve (pilots already trained in another skill and being brought into the training squadron for training in a new skill specialty). Pilots assigned to a training squadron that become fully trained in the skill (level about 70 or so) will be transferred from the squadron to the General Reserve pilot pool. From the General Reserve, these pilots will eventually transfer to either (1) a front-line squadron, or (2) another training command squadron to undergo training in a different skill specialty.

Some of the specialized pilot training regimens I'm considering in the training command include the following...

(1) Fighter training - This is the most straight-forward and includes all pilots destined to fly F and FB aircraft. After a "hitch" in a fighter training squadron to fully train for escort missions, these pilots will go into General Reserve for transfer into front-line fighter squadrons.

(2) Ground Attack training - This regimen will include all 4E bomber pilots and some pilots going into 2E bombers. All pilots in this training regimen will complete primary training in high-altitude ground bombing, with as many of these pilots as possible undergoing a second course of training in low-altitude ground attack. Likely objectives of the Ground Attack regimen will have 4E bomber pilots fully trained in high-altitude ground bombing (low-altitude optional), with 2E bomber pilots preferably trained in both high and low altitude ground bombing.

(3) Naval Attack training - This regimen will include some 2E bomber pilots (USAAF) and US Marine dive-bomber pilots. Primary training for USAAF 2E bomber pilots in the Naval Attack regimen will be in low-altitude naval bombing (as I intend to employ skip bombing tactics extensively), with as many of these pilots as possible also trained for high-altitude naval bombing. Some USAAF 2E pilots in the Naval Attack regimen could also be "graduates" of part or all the Ground Attack training regimen. US Marine dive bomber pilots are in their own (VMSB) squadrons and will undergo appropriate training for dive-bombing.

(4) Recon training - This regimen will likely be a USAAF "specialty" and include primarily USAAF pilots going into recon squadrons with extra training "spots" possibly going to some USAAF pilots completing the Ground Attack regimen. Training in this regimen is likely to include a single "hitch" with a recon training squadron. I anticipate few if any US Naval pilots going through the Recon regimen.

(5) Naval Search/ASW training - This regiment will likely be a US Navy "specialty" and will probably include USN pilots going into Patrol Squadrons (LBA or seaplane) with a few pilots from this training going to float plane detachments aboard cruisers and BB's. Pilots completing this training regimen will be fully trained in naval search and ASW skills. It could also be possible that some USN carrier pilots (dive bomber and torpedo) might be detoured through naval search training squadrons as circumstances permit.

(6) Transport training - Inclusion of transport pilot training in the overall training command program may or may not end up being feasible.

Much of the pilot training I've done to date has very likely placed many individual US pilots currently in General Reserve as having partially or fully completed at least one of the planned training regimens above. A review of US pilots in the General Reserve pool will be undertaken later on in this process as things come closer to taking shape.


As stated, changes in US pilot training is an ongoing process that will be impleted gradually (if it is implemented). The extent to which I can implement the US pilot training plan will greatly depend on how many US squadrons can be put into a pilot training command and what types of squadrons they are.

For the other Allied air forces, a different training plan will probably have to be developed as the above plan for US pilot training is probably not feasible in the other Allied air forces.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also noted that for some of the US air squadrons where extra "named" pilots appeared (bringing the total number of pilots in the squadron above its maximum) happen to increase in size as of 8/42 - may squadrons going from 8 to 12 planes in size, etc. For these squadrons, I'm retaining the "excess" pilots as these pilots will likely fall within the maximum number of pilots in the squadron once the squadron's increase in size becomes effective in 8/42.

There are squadrons with extra pilots that do not have a scheduled increase in size (number of planes). Extra pilots from these squadrons will still need to be transferred to General Reserve or another squadron.

< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/27/2011 2:57:14 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 406
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/28/2011 2:35:13 AM   
USS Henrico

 

Posts: 152
Joined: 8/2/2009
From: Charlottesville, VA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wneumann

Starting with the orders phase I did for this game turn, I've been going through through Allied air forces to (1) resolve the situation discussed earlier with the excess number of pilots in some squadrons and (2) possibly look at where and how pilot training activity can be organized and refined beyond the point where I already have it. I really have no set time frame to develop and implement this - it will likely be a process spanning several months in game time.

I'm initially doing this strictly with the US air forces (particularly the USAAF and Naval LBA), the US air forces being by far the largest Allied force and the one where it is most likely changes in the pilot training program will prove to be practical and these changes can be successfully implemented on anything approaching a large scale. It is also realized here it's quite possible any large scale changes in pilot training developed for the US air forces will prove to not be feasible for application in the other Allied air forces (mainly due to their being smaller). Though developing an alternative plan that could work better with the other Allied air forces is not my main focus at the moment, the possibility is by no means being ignored.

The first step I completed this game turn) for the US air forces included an inventory of all land-based US squadrons now located in the mainland US. The inventory noted individual squadrons that are in restricted commands (both transferrable and non-transferrable), also the squadrons with future withdrawal dates. The overall purpose of this inventory was to identify specific air squadrons that could possibly be included in an on-map US air training command. In the process of doing this I was also determining which squadrons were definately going to "ship out" at some future date and what could or would definiately be retained in the mainland US (these squadrons the likely candidates for inclusion in a training command). I will eventually pick through US air squadrons in Alaska and Pearl Harbor for any that are likely candidates for inclusion in the training command. US air squadrons now enroute to or already located in forward theatres are excluded from any consideration for use in the training command, though they will continue their own pilot training until such time as they enter active operations in their assigned theatres.

I also did a breakdown of US air squadrons in the mainland US that definately are or likely to be included in a pilot training command. All these squadrons are now and have been training pilots, this breakdown identifying the skill specialty of pilot training being conducted in each squadron.

Part of my projected plan for a US pilot training command is for individual squadrons to conduct training of pilots in specific skill specialties - these specialties to likely include at least some of the following (1) escort mission for fighter training, (2) ground bombing, (3) naval bombing, (4) naval search, (5) recon, (6) ASW, (7) transport. Skill specialties for ground and naval bombing will be divided further - specialized training for high and low altitude ground or naval bombing will be done by separate air squadrons.

An individual squadron in the training command will be permanently designated for continuous training of pilots in one specific skill, pilots entering a particular training squadron coming in from either the replacement pilot pool ("green" pilots) or General Reserve (pilots already trained in another skill and being brought into the training squadron for training in a new skill specialty). Pilots assigned to a training squadron that become fully trained in the skill (level about 70 or so) will be transferred from the squadron to the General Reserve pilot pool. From the General Reserve, these pilots will eventually transfer to either (1) a front-line squadron, or (2) another training command squadron to undergo training in a different skill specialty.

Some of the specialized pilot training regimens I'm considering in the training command include the following...

(1) Fighter training - This is the most straight-forward and includes all pilots destined to fly F and FB aircraft. After a "hitch" in a fighter training squadron to fully train for escort missions, these pilots will go into General Reserve for transfer into front-line fighter squadrons.

(2) Ground Attack training - This regimen will include all 4E bomber pilots and some pilots going into 2E bombers. All pilots in this training regimen will complete primary training in high-altitude ground bombing, with as many of these pilots as possible undergoing a second course of training in low-altitude ground attack. Likely objectives of the Ground Attack regimen will have 4E bomber pilots fully trained in high-altitude ground bombing (low-altitude optional), with 2E bomber pilots preferably trained in both high and low altitude ground bombing.

(3) Naval Attack training - This regimen will include some 2E bomber pilots (USAAF) and US Marine dive-bomber pilots. Primary training for USAAF 2E bomber pilots in the Naval Attack regimen will be in low-altitude naval bombing (as I intend to employ skip bombing tactics extensively), with as many of these pilots as possible also trained for high-altitude naval bombing. Some USAAF 2E pilots in the Naval Attack regimen could also be "graduates" of part or all the Ground Attack training regimen. US Marine dive bomber pilots are in their own (VMSB) squadrons and will undergo appropriate training for dive-bombing.

(4) Recon training - This regimen will likely be a USAAF "specialty" and include primarily USAAF pilots going into recon squadrons with extra training "spots" possibly going to some USAAF pilots completing the Ground Attack regimen. Training in this regimen is likely to include a single "hitch" with a recon training squadron. I anticipate few if any US Naval pilots going through the Recon regimen.

(5) Naval Search/ASW training - This regiment will likely be a US Navy "specialty" and will probably include USN pilots going into Patrol Squadrons (LBA or seaplane) with a few pilots from this training going to float plane detachments aboard cruisers and BB's. Pilots completing this training regimen will be fully trained in naval search and ASW skills. It could also be possible that some USN carrier pilots (dive bomber and torpedo) might be detoured through naval search training squadrons as circumstances permit.

(6) Transport training - Inclusion of transport pilot training in the overall training command program may or may not end up being feasible.

Much of the pilot training I've done to date has very likely placed many individual US pilots currently in General Reserve as having partially or fully completed at least one of the planned training regimens above. A review of US pilots in the General Reserve pool will be undertaken later on in this process as things come closer to taking shape.


As stated, changes in US pilot training is an ongoing process that will be impleted gradually (if it is implemented). The extent to which I can implement the US pilot training plan will greatly depend on how many US squadrons can be put into a pilot training command and what types of squadrons they are.

For the other Allied air forces, a different training plan will probably have to be developed as the above plan for US pilot training is probably not feasible in the other Allied air forces.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I also noted that for some of the US air squadrons where extra "named" pilots appeared (bringing the total number of pilots in the squadron above its maximum) happen to increase in size as of 8/42 - may squadrons going from 8 to 12 planes in size, etc. For these squadrons, I'm retaining the "excess" pilots as these pilots will likely fall within the maximum number of pilots in the squadron once the squadron's increase in size becomes effective in 8/42.

There are squadrons with extra pilots that do not have a scheduled increase in size (number of planes). Extra pilots from these squadrons will still need to be transferred to General Reserve or another squadron.


Sounds more sophisticated than my "seat of the pants" training program in my PBEM just entering 5/43. I don't think there is a perfect way to do training: it's just what suits your style. I haven't used specific squadrons for one type of training as that seems like too much clicking. I switch the squadron training back and forth, for example a medium bomber squadron training in naval attack one month and ground attack the next.

As the war goes along the Brits and the Aussies get more squadrons to use in the rear to train with, although you may not get time to train them up to the skill levels you want before needing the pilots at the front.

1) I also try to train fighter pilots in strafing as I like to use them in this role. Fighter-bombers are best used in this manner and training in a second category helps raise their experience level, I think. The exception is the P-38s, who get the pilots who haven't trained in strafing as they aren't ever going to be used at 100 feet.

4) Once the Naval Recon Liberators arrive in 12/42, you'll need Navy pilots with the recon skill. The Marines and the Navy share these planes. Probably one squadron of Kingfishers to train Navy pilots is sufficient, but start early. Learn from someone else's mistakes.

5) The arrival of the Naval Liberators in 12/42 and Venturas in 2/43 mean that you'll need additional Search/ASW pilots at that time. Also, the Catalina squadrons expand on 1/43, which requires more pilots to fill out each squadron. Another of my boo-boos.

6) You need to allocate a few Army transport squadrons to training to slow down the loss rate on these planes, especially when your opponent harps on your ops losses.


(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 407
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/28/2011 11:07:07 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Henrico,

Thanks for the response.

What prompted this design of training was that I have a number of USN Kingfisher (10 as of 7/42) on the US West Coast, all in training mode - combination of naval search and ASW. My intent with these Kingfisher squadrons is to produce a pool of pilots fully trained in both naval search and ASW. Based on your comments I may want to add recon to the mix.

My initial plan of training in 12/41 for the four Kingfisher squadrons I had in the game at that time was to first train pilots in these squadrons for ASW, then switch training in each squadron to Naval Search once all pilots in the squadron were fully trained in ASW. The end result being all pilots in the Kingfisher squadrons fully trained in both ASW and Naval Search. As of this date (7/12/42), all pilots in the four squadrons are fully trained in ASW and now training in Naval Search. Current estimate has all pilots in these squadrons completely trained in both ASW and Naval Search by fall 1942.

What my initial training scheme does not appear to take into account is that (1) all pilots do not train at the same "speed", and (2) pilots that enter training start with different skill levels. The effect of both these factors in my Kingfisher squadrons was that I could not switch training in a squadron from ASW to Naval Search until all pilots in the squadron were fully trained in ASW. The first pilots in the squadrons reaching maximum skill level (approx 70) in ASW were in effect waiting for the later ones to catch up before anyone moved on to Naval Search.

A thought coming out of this was... If I had another Kingfisher (or other) squadron somewhere set to do full-time Naval Search training along with the squadron I have training for ASW - I could transfer pilots out of the ASW training squadron into General Reserve as their ASW skill level reaches 70, then retrieve the trained ASW pilots from General Reserve into a second training squadron for Naval Search. The trained pilots removed from the ASW training squadron could be immediately replaced with new pilots for training for ASW. And pilots could be trained in either ASW or Naval Search or both, the movement of pilots between training squadrons and General Reserve being used to "regulate" the desired skill or combination of skills in the pilots you are "bringing up".

I found a second example of this general situation in training USAAF bomber pilots - ground vs naval attack, high vs low altitude. Not every USAAF bomber pilot can or needs to be fully trained in all four possible combinations of these skills. A set of bomber training squadrons covering four distinct categories (high-level ground attack, low-level ground attack, high-level naval attack, low-level naval attack) would cover the possible range of desired bombing skills for these pilots. These pilots could be trained in one skill or any combination of multiple skills as needed or desired. Again, the movement of pilots between training squadrons and General Reserve being used to "regulate" the desired skill or combination of skills in the pilots you are "bringing up".

Training for Recon and Naval Search would be handled by other specialized squadrons. These squadrons would not only be used for training for front-line recon and patrol squadrons, but could also be used for training pilots from the "bombing schools" in recon or naval search.

My initial thought on fighter pilot training was rather straight-forward, fully train them in Escort, then ship them out. You did mention of training at least some fighter pilots in both Escort and Strafing skills may be cause to consider expanding the concept of fighter pilot training. Out of all the various pilot training "schools" and squadrons, fighter training would require the largest capacity (in number of trained pilots produced) as air-to-air combat in fighter squadrons is going to generate the largest continuous quantity of pilot turnover and need for trained replacement pilots. Escort skill training is almost certainly mandatory for all fighter pilots, with as many as possible also trained for Strafing as the front-line situation and operational requirements dictate.

< Message edited by wneumann -- 9/28/2011 11:10:20 PM >

(in reply to USS Henrico)
Post #: 408
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 9/29/2011 9:54:48 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/12/42

Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/11 reports heavy volume of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Kwajalein. Detected status of Kwajalein shows no visible Jap forces or activity.


South Pacific: Elements of US 147 Infantry Rgt with supplies are now disembarking to occupy Taveuni Island east of Suva as a forward outpost in the Suva-Samoa position. Main positions at Pago Pago and Fiji are already occupied in strength with ample supply and fuel stocks, activity to occupy and fortify outlying positions around both Suva and Samoa continue as LCU reinforcements continue to arrive.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/11 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Finschhafen
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 100,126 near Finschhafen, Speed 11 , Moving East
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 99,125 near Lae, Speed 8 , Moving Northwest
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: AK Nitisan Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 99,124 near Saidor, Speed 13 , Moving Northwest
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed 12 , Moving Southeast


Philippines: Japanese capture Iloilo (Panay) and Cagayan this game turn. AAR’s follow.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Iloilo (79,84)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 7581 troops, 116 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 224
Defending force 2726 troops, 40 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 101
Japanese adjusted assault: 50
Allied adjusted defense: 10
Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Iloilo !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: op mode(-), leaders(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-)
experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
14 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1047 casualties reported
Squads: 60 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 50 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 11 (11 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
24th Division (came from Sibuyan)

Defending units:
61st PA Infantry Division

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Cagayan (79,89)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13589 troops, 124 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 474
Defending force 9475 troops, 106 guns, 49 vehicles, Assault Value = 368
Japanese adjusted assault: 348
Allied adjusted defense: 139
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Cagayan !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(+)

Japanese ground losses:
106 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1769 casualties reported
Squads: 121 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 171 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 28 (28 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 41 (41 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 7

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
5th Division

Defending units:
102nd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd/101st PA Battalion
103rd PA Infantry Regiment
3rd PA Constabulary Regiment
102nd PA Infantry Division
Cagayan USAAF Base Force
III Philippine Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port, one Jap TF in harbor, 80 aircraft (30 fighters, 25 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s (-1 from last report).


China: Japanese ground assault launched near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 39548 troops, 521 guns, 281 vehicles, Assault Value = 1530
Defending force 17912 troops, 158 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 478
Japanese adjusted assault: 481
Allied adjusted defense: 1192
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1467 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 95 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
997 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 64 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 37 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade (arrived this game turn from Sian to reinforce attack)
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
10th Group Army
16th Group Army
4th War Area
9th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 409
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/4/2011 12:41:20 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/13/42

Aleutians: US landing force (221 USN Base Force) disembarking on Adak Is. Current plans for developing Adak Is are similar to what had been done in our previous CHS match – expand base facilities (particularly port size) with the intent of using Adak as a forward support base for submarine operations near the Japanese home islands. This had been particularly successful in CHS with Adak being used extensively as a refuel/replenishment point for US submarines operating off the Japanese Home Islands and also as an emergency repair base for damaged US subs returning from that sector.


Pilot Training: Two restricted command USAAF fighter squadrons have been assigned as the first squadrons to start the US Pilot Training Command.

One fighter squadron (55FG/54FS) is currently set for air-to-air combat (Air skill) pilot training (Escort mission @ 10000’) and will continue performing full-time in this training role. Fully trained pilots now in this squadron (Air skill level 70+) are being removed to General Reserve for reassignment. New pilots entering this squadron for training will be untrained or partially trained in air-to-air combat (lower Air skill ratings).

Pilots from this training squadron are planned to “graduate” with an Air skill level of 70+. Pilots exiting this squadron will transfer to General Reserve for reassignment either to a front-line fighter squadron or to a different training squadron for additional pilot training in other skills (i.e. Strafing).

The second fighter training squadron (55FG/37FS) has been training pilots for air-to-air combat (Air skill) and will have its training mission reset to begin full-time pilot training for strafing (Escort mission @ 100’). Only pilots fully trained in air-to-air combat (Air skill 70+) are being retained in this squadron, other pilots now in this squadron being transferred to General Reserve for reassignment to other fighter squadrons in training. New pilots that enter this training squadron will likely be from General Reserve, already fully trained in air-to-air combat (Air skill level 70+) and a lower Strafing skill level.

Pilots “graduating” from the second training squadron are planned to leave with a Strafing skill level of 70+. “Graduates” of this training squadron that are also fully trained in air-to-air combat (both Air and Strafing skills 70+) will be considered fully prepared for assignment to front-line fighter squadrons.

The two squadrons are now (at least temporarily) located together in Tacoma for ease of tracking and management. Pilot transfers into and out of these two squadrons is now in progress.

If this all works as intended, my intent is eventually expand the concept and turn a larger part of pilot training into an “assembly line” process.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/12 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 4 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Finschhafen
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: 8 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: CS Nisshin reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher sighting: 3 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 4 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: AK Hokkai Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown


Southeast Asia: Contact reported between Dutch sub O-21 on patrol near Malacca Straits and small Japanese tanker TF. O-21 also spotting a second Jap TF in the same location, plus contact with Jap aircraft.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Phuket at 48,70 (S of Phuket)

Japanese Ships
TK Kyoko Maru
TK Kuremente Maru
DD Hakaze

Allied Ships
SS O21

SS O21 is sighted by escort
O21 diving deep ....
DD Hakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 5 Japanese ships in port (+2 from last report), one Jap TF (2 ships) in harbor, 82 aircraft (25 fighters, 30 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground forces resume bombardment near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2232 troops, 191 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 1458
Defending force 17107 troops, 158 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 425

Allied ground losses:
40 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (3 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
104th Division
13th Tank Regiment
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
38th Division
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
28th Chinese Corps
93rd Chinese Division
4th War Area
10th Group Army
9th Group Army
16th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/4/2011 12:43:06 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 410
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/5/2011 12:51:23 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/14/42

Japanese Home Islands: Contact reported between US fleet sub and small Jap transport TF south of Tokyo. SS Porpoise also reports contact with Jap air patrol (Ki-21 Sally). AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Aogashima at 115,68 (E of Torishima)

Japanese Ships
AK Kinka Maru
AK Sagami Maru
SC Ch 26

Allied Ships
SS Porpoise

SS Porpoise is sighted by escort
SC Ch 26 fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Central Pacific: Sigint entries for 7/13 report intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Gardner Is and Tabiteuea. Detected status of Tabiteuea shows undetermined Jap planes based there plus ships at anchor. No visible Japanese forces shown at Gardner Is. No other visible Japanese activity or forces at either location.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/13 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Ndeni
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Finschhafen
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Finschhafen
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: AK Sakito Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 5 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 113,156 near Koumac , Speed 9 , Moving Southwest

Sigint entries for 7/13 report intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Ndeni and Koumac. Detected status of Koumac shows undetermined Jap ships at anchor. No visible Japanese forces shown at Ndeni. No other visible Japanese activity or forces at either location.


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port (-2 from last report), one Jap TF (2 ships) in harbor, 79 aircraft (28 fighters, 28 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s. Status of this base appears rather static, little or no detected Japanese movement into or out of Burma (at least via Rangoon).


China: Japanese ground forces assault near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 44596 troops, 559 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1478
Defending force 17091 troops, 155 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 423
Japanese adjusted assault: 1062
Allied adjusted defense: 1387
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
609 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 51 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 43 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1070 casualties reported
Squads: 6 destroyed, 69 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 77 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
32nd Division
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
38th Division
2nd Mortar Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
10th Group Army
4th War Area
16th Group Army
9th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 411
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/6/2011 4:25:16 PM   
johnjohn

 

Posts: 186
Joined: 9/18/2010
From: Arvada, CO
Status: offline
Johnjohn update 3/20/43: This is a general recap of the allied position in Mid-March 43. The battle of Midway at Noumea in late February 42, a rousing US success sinking three IJN fleet carriers for the loss of Lexington, turned my first effort in AE into something of a historical replay.

The initial enemy thrusts into the PI and DEI went pretty much as expected with both falling by April. Burma was a cakewalk for the enemy, but a hasty line of defense on the Indian/Burma border ended the thrust. The UK fleet defended the coast well, while additonal reinforcements were rushed in. The enemy has not be able to move from Cox's Bazaar. China is a different story and the enemy took the usual chunk at the beginning, with Wenchow being the only significant holding in the rear. Wenchow turned into a killing field with the enemy losing 5,000 effectives each month attempting to dislodge the Chinese, something they are still trying to do. The middle of China is currently under attack but the Chinese are holding in part due to an airlift into Chungking.

The enemy took PM, Luganville, and Baker Island, but the allies held a line from Canton Is to Noumea, including Efate and Tanna. The enemy thrust came apart with the loss of Zuikaku, Hiryu and Soyru off Noumea. SAGs decimated the support shipping, sinking some thirty transports and other ships, killing approximately 20,000 effectives of all types. As a result, continued attempted assaults resulted in numerous cruisers and battleships being sunk, and more transports et al, as allied air and SAGs defended. By July, the SoPac initiative had turned and in Oct the allies retook the Canal (First USMC Div, Second USMC Div, and 27th USA Div, with support) and Tulagi. Munda soon fell and Shortlands is being reduced. Luganville fell in July, and PM and Milne Bay were retaken in early 43. The SWPAC and SOPAC areas under control include all of Aussie, PM and Milne Bay, to Munda back to Canton Is to PH. The enemy ended raid attempts in January when a relief force and CVLs was jumped off Shortlands, sinking all the CVLs without carrier loss for allies. That carrier group retired to PH and was replaced by another while their airgroups re-equip.

Currently I seem to be in an interlude until I am ready to resume offensive operations. I am presently moving 500K fuel and 500K supply to forward depots. I have over 500K fuel and 2 mill supply at Columbo. PH is about the same. Noumea, Brisbane, Luganville, and Perth are getting what is coming.

Managing aircraft has gone well with the exception of SBD dive bombers. Early losses has reduced the number available and that has become a problem for replacing losses on carriers. All squadrons are not replacing them, but still it takes a month to secure enough to replenish one carrier squadron, much less three. So I have become very judicious at ultilizing the carriers. Training also has gone well, though I am mostly doing general training rather than specialized except for the fighter pilots. They just train to escort. Most of my frontline squadrons have 60-70 level pilots, and the training groups are quickly getting there as well. When they do, I dump the trained guys into the reserve and fill up the training group with new pilots from the replacement pool. Then we start the process all over.

I am finally getting to the logistical pipeline that makes the difference. F6Fs (125 per month) start pouring in next month. SBD5s start arriving soon too. That will alleviate the DB shortage. APAs are being converted and APs are also increasing in number with conversions. In fact, most everything needing updates or conversions is underway. A big round of updates begins next month.

Lexington's air group has arrived, but is having significant difficulty re-equipping. I think that those PPs were not well spent since it will be months before enough a/c of the right types will be available. I probably would not reactivate the air group in future games.

The UK is in its period where most of her BBs and CVs have been withdrawn. Victorious is in Cape Town refitting to handle a larger air group. PoW and Repulse are there too as are some cruisers and tin cans, all designed to become the first UK CV strike force (in three or more months). The Army in India is well positioned and well equipped due to Aussie infusion. The Indian Army has been resting/training for a year. Those levels are now about 50.

The goal of this effort was to learn how to play AE vs. WitP. I have been incredibly lucky. As a result I am not dealing with the enemy having run over the SoPac or Aussie or India. I have, for the most part, been able to duplicate what the Allies did in the actual war. I have not done it as well as real life, but have tried my best to handle the various complexities that we know are part of this game system. This far so good. Johnjohn (noob, rookie, veteran WitP player).


(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 412
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/7/2011 2:56:11 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
john john,

Welcome back.

quote:

The goal of this effort was to learn how to play AE vs. WitP. I have been incredibly lucky. As a result I am not dealing with the enemy having run over the SoPac or Aussie or India. I have, for the most part, been able to duplicate what the Allies did in the actual war.

Duplicating what the Allies did historically is providing you an indication that you're mastering at least as much of the game as the AI can throw at you. The tasks and operations you are executing and how well you're doing them is giving you an idea of your personal strengths and weaknesses in terms of mastering various parts of the AE game mechanics, especially at the operational and tactical level.

The overall strategy you pursued vs the AI is not so much relevant as much of what you did against the AI strategically is not going to be as useful against a human Japanese opponent. At the operational and tactical levels, whatever you succeeded in doing against the AI will be more difficult to do against a human Japanese opponent. When you "step on the field" with a human opponent, your overall game plan (strategy) will likely be considerably different and your activities at the operational and tactical level will come up against a bit more "friction".

quote:

I am finally getting to the logistical pipeline that makes the difference.

Takes a while to build the pipeline. Keep in mind you will have to keep feeding (supply, fuel, etc) the pipeline once you've taken the strategic offensive on a large scale.

Even though (in my game) I'm still on the strategic defensive and expect to be in this mode for some time, I now have enough Allied forces moved up front to where I'm putting as much effort into feeding the pipeline as expanding it. The more stuff you move up front, the more there is for you to feed. Logistics is hell.

So far I've avoided shortages with my air groups, though that could change with events. I had several "bottlenecks" in my last CHS match vs Pillager with planes and pilots due to both combat attrition and the result of mistakes I was making in the game mechanics. Upgrade too many USAAF fighter squadrons in early and mid 1942 (especially leaving fighter squadrons on auto-upgrade) and you have a shortage of P-40's in the replacement pool after a brief spell of air-to-air combat. A few too many dogfights over Calcutta led to a shortage of RAF fighter pilots. Both these mishaps kept more than a few USAAF and RAF fighter squadrons on the ground for months at a time.

Patience. Take your time. Your supply chain initially and later on your front-line troops will thank you for it.


Re: pilot training... My approach has been to specialize nearly all pilot training, this with the intent of having a system where many (though not all) air squadrons will be trained and equipped to handle one or more specific missions.

This will be especially true in the case of my bomber squadrons. The B-17, B-24 and B-29 will likely serve far more as "flying artillery" and exclusively in this role until they get close enough to the Japanese Home Islands to even think about bombing a city. 4E bomber squadrons will do ground bombing, ground bombing and more ground bombing. Recon being a collateral "effect" of ground bombing. 4E bomber pilots (USAAF in particular) need little or no training in naval attack as the planes they're operating are of limited value in attacking ships.

USN Liberators are a slightly different case. The primary roles of patrol squadrons with these planes are naval search and ASW, and training for pilots in these squadrons is being emphasized accordingly. Given that sometimes "a 4E bomber is a 4E bomber", these planes could be used in ground bombing as a secondary role and that possibility has to be considered as time and resources allow, though in the area of longer range ground bombing attack the USAAF 4E squadrons are intended to do most of the heavy lifting.

Their 2E bomber cousins are anticipated to be operating in a wider range of missions, though my plans include specializing at some 2E bomber squadrons for particular mission type(s). What I am especially looking at is having some 2E bomber squadrons composed entirely of pilots trained specifically for a naval attack role (both high and low altitude), skip bombing of Japanese ships figuring high in my plans for these air units. Other 2E bomber squadrons will likely be employed primarily for ground attack in direct support of amphibious landings and ground combat and also strikes against Japanese airfields in the immediate front-line areas. In many 2E bomber squadrons I intend to match aircraft types and skill training specialties of pilots in these squadrons to the most likely mission type(s) a particular squadron will be engaged in.

< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/7/2011 3:01:18 AM >

(in reply to johnjohn)
Post #: 413
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/7/2011 3:07:44 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/15/42

Hawaii: Action between Jap submarine I-1 and “outgoing” US DD’s enroute to merge with and escort an incoming transport ship approaching Pearl Harbor. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Pearl Harbor at 183,101 (NE of Oahu)

Japanese Ships
SS I-1

Allied Ships
DD Phelps

SS I-1 is located by DD Phelps
I-1 diving deep ....
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/14 reports intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Wotje. Detected status of Wotje shows no visible Japanese activity or forces.


South Pacific: US sub intercepts small Japanese transport TF near Kavieng. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub attack near Mussau Island at 105,118 (N of Kavieng)

Japanese Ships
xAP Kashima Maru
APD Shimakaze
APD Tade
APD Hagi

Allied Ships
SS Snapper, hits 1 (minor system damage, remaining on patrol)

SS Snapper launches 4 torpedoes at xAP Kashima Maru
APD Tade fails to find sub, continues to search...
APD Tade attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/14 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: AR Arabia Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: CM Katsuriki reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: AK Naruto Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown


DEI: Japanese amphibious landing operation underway at Lolobato (Moluccas). AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphibious Assault at Lolobato

TF 162 troops unloading over beach at Lolobato, 79,102

Japanese ground losses:
Vehicles lost 13 (0 destroyed, 13 disabled)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Philippines: Philippine AF recon squadron operating from Cebu was withdrawn this game turn – supply points remaining on Cebu are exhausted (planes can no longer fly from Cebu) and no other airfields are left within their flight range that remain in Allied control. This squadron represented the last Allied planes in the Philippines.


Southeast Asia: Dutch sub O-21 reports contract with small Jap TF (possible surface ASW) near Phuket. Jap TF is reported moving on a NW heading, possibly towards Rangoon. No combat occurred.

Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 4 Japanese ships in port (+1 from last report), no Jap TF in harbor, 77 aircraft (28 fighters, 23 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground bombardment near Kweiyang. Note in particular several new Japanese LCU’s arriving to reinforce this attack, these units coming southward from the Central and Northern fronts in China. I intend to add "just enough" Chinese reinforcements to counter this and maintain the lousy Japanese attack odds (at least in my point of view). AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack
Attacking force 2248 troops, 191 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 1700
Defending force 16252 troops, 150 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 364

Allied ground losses:
31 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade (new unit arriving to reinforce attack, from Changsha)
32nd Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
13th Tank Regiment
104th Division
38th Division
58th Infantry Regiment (new unit arriving from Changteh)
21st Mortar Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
23rd Army (new unit arriving from Changsha)
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
9th Group Army
10th Group Army
16th Group Army
4th War Area
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/7/2011 3:09:54 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 414
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/10/2011 12:26:45 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/16/42

South Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/15 reports intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Lunga. Detected status of Lunga indicates Jap airfield and port construction activity is underway – port size 2(1), airfield size 3(5). No visible Japanese forces or activity shown at Lunga.

Three Japanese LCU’s reported at Lunga – 15 JNAF AF Unit, 4 Naval Construction Bn, Yokosuka 2 SNLF.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/15 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: AR Canberra Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 113,156 near Koumac, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Finschhafen
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: AD Ayato Maru reported in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 113,156 near Koumac, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 107,126 near Rabaul, Speed 8, Moving Southeast
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 120,150 near Luganville, Speed 13, Moving Southwest


DEI: Japanese capture Lolobato (Moluccas). AAR follows.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lolobato (79,102)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 235 troops, 0 guns, 69 vehicles, Assault Value = 26
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0
Japanese adjusted assault: 11
Allied adjusted defense: 1
Japanese assault odds: 11 to 1 (fort level 0)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Lolobato !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: leaders(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
7th Tank Rgt /1 (previously reported in Singapore)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port (-1 from last report), one Jap TF in harbor, 86 aircraft (29 fighters, 22 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground bombardment near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2264 troops, 191 guns, 129 vehicles, Assault Value = 1721
Defending force 16343 troops, 148 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 368

Allied ground losses:
70 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)

Assaulting units:
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
104th Division
32nd Division
38th Division
13th Tank Regiment
58th Infantry Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
23rd Army
5th RF Gun Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
64th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
4th War Area
10th Group Army
9th Group Army
16th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/10/2011 12:27:17 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 415
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/12/2011 3:58:42 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/17/42

North Pacific: One or multiple Jap carrier TF(s) spotted SW of Adak Is, reported moving on an E heading. Pillager did not do a great deal in the North Pacific during our previous CHS match.

At this time, I’m suspecting the Japanese action to be a “reconnaissance in force” and taking the appropriate precautions and alerts. My primary question at this point is how far to the east does Pillager intend to bring these carriers. Except for the US transport convoy shown on the situation map leaving the area (this convoy returning to the US West Coast after disembarking 221 USN Base Force and supply on Adak) and ships in port at Dutch Harbor and Anchorage, no other US ships are currently in the area or immediately due to arrive in Alaska or the Aleutians. All ships now in port at both Dutch Harbor and Anchorage are under orders to depart.

US Carrier Main Force is currently located on the US West Coast and can easily be formed and sortied in full strength as the situation requires. Sea areas off the northern US or Canadian coast would be considered favorable terrain for a carrier action, though Pillager could be under a somewhat different opinion. We will see….

Current situation map follows.





Central Pacific: Sigint entries for 7/16 report heavy volumes of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Kwajalein and Tabiteuea. Detected status of both Jap bases show undetermined Jap ship(s) in port, aircraft are also based on both islands. No other visible Japanese forces or activity shown in either location.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/16 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 13 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 3 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Koumac is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 5 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 2 Japanese ships at 104,133 near Woodlark Island, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 120,150 near Luganville, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 6 Japanese ships at 107,126 near Rabaul, Speed 19, Moving Southeast
Coastwatcher sighting: 5 Japanese ships at 108,126 near Feni Islands, Speed 17, Moving East
Coastwatcher sighting: 5 Japanese ships at 106,123 near Kavieng, Speed 16, Moving Northwest


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port, one Jap TF in harbor, 83 aircraft (30 fighters, 21 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground assault near Kweiyang. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52118 troops, 623 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1744
Defending force 16378 troops, 146 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 370
Japanese adjusted assault: 752
Allied adjusted defense: 715
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1156 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 93 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 88 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
849 casualties reported
Squads: 25 destroyed, 60 disabled
Non Combat: 21 destroyed, 94 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 2 (2 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
104th Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
32nd Division
13th Tank Regiment
38th Division
58th Infantry Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
2nd RF Gun Battalion
5th RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
23rd Army
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
64th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
9th Group Army
16th Group Army
10th Group Army
4th War Area
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/12/2011 3:59:57 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 416
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/14/2011 12:21:45 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/18/42

North Pacific: No further sighting or contact reported with Jap carrier TF(s) detected last game turn near Adak. Given prevailing weather conditions (thunderstorms) and limits on the area covered in naval search patrol arcs by planes flying from Dutch Harbor, Anchorage and Canadian coastal bases, it is easily possible the Japanese carrier force could still be operating in the sea areas S of Alaska. All precautions and alerts begun last game turn in the North Pacific theatre remain in effect.


Hawaii: Damaged US AP Barnett reached Pearl Harbor this game turn after numerous days of limping at 7 kts from Tahiti. AP Barnett was torpedoed and severely damaged by a Jap submarine on 6/15 just N of Tahiti (3 hexes out). AP Barnett returned to Tahiti and completed emergency repairs there before leaving for Pearl Harbor. It’s nice when you can save one that took a hit from a Long Lance, especially given the geographic location where it took the hit.


Central Pacific: Sigint entries for 7/17 report heavy volumes of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Kwajalein and Truk. Detected status of both Jap bases show undetermined Jap ship(s) in port, aircraft are also based on both islands. One or more Japanese TF(s) are visible in Truk, none at Kwajalein.


South Pacific: Dutch sub patrol in the northern Coral Sea reports contact with small Jap transport TF. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Rossel Island at 108,136 (SW of Munda)

Japanese Ships
xAK Dainiti Maru
PB Kyo Maru #8

Allied Ships
SS KXV

SS KXV is sighted by escort
PB Kyo Maru #8 fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/17 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher sighting: 5 Japanese ships at 106,123 near Kavieng, Speed 15, Moving Northwest
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: 10 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Noumea
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 113,156 near Koumac, Speed unknown
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 120,147 near Torres Islands, Speed 9, Moving Northeast


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port, no Jap TF in harbor (-1 from last report), 79 aircraft (31 fighters, 21 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground assault continues near Kweiyang. Several Chinese LCU's retreated in the action but the hex remains in Allied hands. The retreated Chinese LCU's were had been depleted in action, the Chinese units holding their ground still maintained some assault strength. Additional Chinese units sufficient to defend the hex (75, 50) are being moved into the hex - my intent is to continue holding it on the chance that Pillager's Japanese army in China might be starting to "run out of gas" at least in the short term. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 51117 troops, 623 guns, 314 vehicles, Assault Value = 1663
Defending force 15264 troops, 144 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 325
Japanese adjusted assault: 1100
Allied adjusted defense: 523
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
652 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 54 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2407 casualties reported
Squads: 62 destroyed, 39 disabled
Non Combat: 128 destroyed, 48 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Units retreated 6

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
38th Division
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
104th Division
32nd Division
13th Tank Regiment
58th Infantry Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
23rd Army
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
93rd Chinese Division
4th War Area
9th Group Army
10th Group Army
16th Group Army
35th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/14/2011 12:23:40 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 417
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/16/2011 12:11:30 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/19/42

Japanese Home Islands: US sub intercepts Japanese transport ship in a night action south of the Home Islands. From information shown in the AAR’s below, the Jap transport appears to have LCU elements on board. AAR’s follow. SS Shark is returning to base having exhausted its torpedoes and ammunition (after firing all its 4" shells plus several salvoes of dud torpedoes in this action) and it is also running low on fuel.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Kanoya at 106,66 (SE of Kyushu)

Japanese Ships
AK Tenyo Maru, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Shark

Japanese ground losses:
5 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

AK Tenyo Maru is sighted by SS Shark
SS Shark launches 2 torpedoes at AK Tenyo Maru

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submarine attack near Kanoya at 106,66 – surface action

Japanese Ships
AK Tenyo Maru, Shell hits 11, heavy fires, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Shark, hits 1 (minor system damage)

Japanese ground losses:
5 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Vehicles lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)

AK Tenyo Maru is sighted by SS Shark
SS Shark attacking on the surface
Shane, L. decides to submerge SS Shark due to damage

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


North Pacific: No reported sighting or contact with Jap carrier TF(s). All precautions and alerts in the North Pacific theatre remain in effect.


South Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/18 reports intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Luganville. Detected status of Luganville shows undetermined aircraft based there, otherwise no visible Jap forces or activity.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/18 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: harbor at Rabaul is reported empty
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher sighting: 1 Japanese ship at 120,147 near Torres Islands, Speed 12, Moving Northeast
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Shortlands
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Madang
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Gasmata
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher sighting: 6 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown


Burma: Dutch sub K-VII on patrol off Rangoon spots small Jap TF (possible surface ASW) southeast of Moulmein, moving on a SW heading. No reported combat occurred.

Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 4 Japanese ships in port (+1 from last report), no Jap TF in harbor, 82 aircraft (29 fighters, 27 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground assault continues near Kweiyang. Several more Jap LCU’s arriving to reinforce this attack. Arrival of Jap 23rd Army HQ in this hex several game turns ago has greatly added to the enemy effort. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 50800 troops, 623 guns, 313 vehicles, Assault Value = 2208
Defending force 11194 troops, 140 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 251
Japanese adjusted assault: 1088
Allied adjusted defense: 313
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
623 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 35 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1404 casualties reported
Squads: 25 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 42 destroyed, 58 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
59th Infantry Brigade (new arrival)
38th Division
13th Tank Regiment
32nd Division
104th Division
39th Division (new arrival, previously reported at Changteh)
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
58th Infantry Regiment
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
5th RF Gun Battalion
23rd Army
21st Mortar Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
28th Chinese Corps
3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps (retreated, zero assault strength remaining)
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 418
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/17/2011 5:34:23 PM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/20/42

North Pacific: No reported sighting or contact with Jap carrier TF(s). Will wait one or two more game turns before declaring the KB has departed. For now, the appropriate alerts remain in effect for Alaska and the Canadian Pacific coast.


Central Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/19 reports heavy volume of intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Kwajalein. Detected status of Kwajalein continues showing undetermined aircraft and LCU(s) based there plus ship(s) in port. One or more visible Jap TF(s) are at Kwajalein.

US sub reports contact with Japanese surface ASW near Truk. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASW attack near Truk at 110,110 (SW of Truk)

Japanese Ships
PB Shotoku Maru

Allied Ships
SS Sturgeon

SS Sturgeon is sighted by escort
PB Shotoku Maru attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


South Pacific: Sigint entries for 7/19 report intercepted Jap radio transmissions from Rabaul and Lunga. Detected status of Lunga shows no visible Jap forces or activity. Detected status of Rabaul is showing undetermined numbers of Jap aircraft based there, also LCU(s) and ship(s) in port, no visible Jap TF.

Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/19 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Salamaua
Coastwatcher Report: CM Katsuriki reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Kavieng
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Manus
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Buna
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Lae
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships in port at Milne Bay
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Port Moresby
Coastwatcher Report: CM Tsugaru reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher sighting: 3 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 3 Japanese ships in port (-1 from last report), 81 aircraft (25 fighters, 24 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Continued Japanese ground assault near Kweiyang. One Chinese infantry division arrived in the hex to reinforce the defense, arrival of a second division is due shortly. Plans are to defend this hex as long as possible to delay Pillager’s Japanese advance into the interior of southern China. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 50515 troops, 623 guns, 313 vehicles, Assault Value = 2187
Defending force 14740 troops, 113 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 453
Japanese adjusted assault: 851
Allied adjusted defense: 433
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
748 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 62 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 43 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1598 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 128 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 68 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Assaulting units:
13th Tank Regiment
59th Infantry Brigade
32nd Division
39th Division
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
104th Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
38th Division
58th Infantry Regiment
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
23rd Army
5th RF Gun Battalion
21st Mortar Battalion
2nd Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
38th New Chinese Division (arrived this game turn as reinforcement)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat reported in mountains W of Lanchow in northwest China. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 81,33 (W of Lanchow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13372 troops, 122 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 459
Defending force 5242 troops, 43 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 232
Japanese adjusted assault: 428
Allied adjusted defense: 439
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), op mode(-), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
100 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
218 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
3rd Division

Defending units:
81st Chinese Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 419
RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly P... - 10/20/2011 1:00:53 AM   
wneumann


Posts: 3768
Joined: 11/1/2005
From: just beyond the outskirts of Margaritaville
Status: offline
Summary of Operations 7/21/42

North Pacific: No reported sighting or contact with Jap carrier TF(s).


Eastern Pacific: Sigint entry for 7/20 reports radio transmissions intercepted from a Jap submarine identified as I-18 (12 hexes) W of San Francisco. No Allied ships located in the vicinity of this contact.


South Pacific: Daily coastwatcher reports from 7/20 Operations report follow.

Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Lunga
Coastwatcher Report: 3 ships reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Koumac
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Tulagi
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Ndeni
Coastwatcher Report: AKE Kureha Maru #3 reported in port at Rabaul
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Efate
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Luganville
Coastwatcher Report: 1 ship in port at Hoorn Islands
Coastwatcher sighting: 6 Japanese ships at 106,125 near Rabaul, Speed unknown


Australia: Transport convoy EX-11 (25 ships) arrived this game turn from the Eastern US via Capetown. Cargo arriving aboard convoy EX-11 includes seven LCU’s (1 & 5 US Marine Rgts, 1 USMC Parachute Bn, 54 Coastal Artillery Rgt. 1 USMC Tank Bn, 33 Aviation Base Force, 197 Coast AA Rgt) plus 50K supply and 56K fuel.

The arrival of 1 and 5 Marine Rgts now has all sub-units of 1st Marine Division located in Australia. Once disembarked, the two regiments will be combined with the third regiment of 1 Marine Division (7 Marine Rgt already in Australia) to form the complete division.

1st Marine Division will be the third US division in Australia, the other two divisions already in Australia include Americal and 32nd Infantry. A total of five US divisions have now reached the South and SW Pacific theatres.


DEI: Dutch sub K-XVI on patrol at the southern exit from the Sunda Straits (between Sumatra and Java) near Oosthaven spots a small Jap TF (3 ships, one xAKL) moving on a W heading. British transport convoy MX-9 enroute from Abadan to Australia is moving through the eastern Indian Ocean and not expected to be in any danger if the K-XVI’s contact turns out to be a Jap carrier or surface combat TF entering the Indian Ocean on a sortie from the DEI to intercept Allied transports – Pillager having done that operation on several occasions in our last CHS match (though he has yet to do it this time in AE).


Burma: Detected status of Jap base in Rangoon from British aerial recon – 4 Japanese ships in port (+1 from last report), 80 aircraft (25 fighters, 22 bombers), 7 Jap LCU’s.


China: Japanese ground assault continues near Kweiyang. It appears that it could become less costly (if not more prudent) for Chinese forces to abandon this hex and defend Kweiyang itself. Hex 75,50 is adjacent to and E of Kweiyang. I had been hoping to hold hex 75,50 as the site of a delaying action, but Pillager has now brought in enough Jap LCU's to pretty much bring the delay in this hex to an end. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 75,50 (E of Kweiyang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 64924 troops, 765 guns, 353 vehicles, Assault Value = 2151
Defending force 17774 troops, 145 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 562
Japanese adjusted assault: 1085
Allied adjusted defense: 451
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
971 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 67 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 66 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 3 (2 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2204 casualties reported
Squads: 192 destroyed, 150 disabled
Non Combat: 65 destroyed, 148 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 2

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
104th Division
2nd Ind.Mixed Brigade
7th Ind.Mixed Brigade
59th Infantry Brigade
38th Division
13th Tank Regiment
32nd Division
39th Division
58th Infantry Regiment
2nd Mortar Battalion
23rd Army
5th RF Gun Battalion
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
21st Mortar Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion

Defending units:
39th New Chinese Division
5th Chinese Cavalry Corps
28th Chinese Corps
38th New Chinese Division

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat reported in mountains W of Lanchow in northwest China. AAR follows.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at 81,33 (W of Lanchow)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 13295 troops, 122 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 454
Defending force 5000 troops, 43 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 213
Japanese adjusted assault: 399
Allied adjusted defense: 166
Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
14 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1161 casualties reported
Squads: 49 destroyed, 32 disabled
Non Combat: 46 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 4 destroyed, 4 disabled
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
3rd Division

Defending units:
81st Chinese Corps

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Message edited by wneumann -- 10/20/2011 1:04:03 AM >

(in reply to wneumann)
Post #: 420
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Sleepless on Samoa, the Sequel (wneumann vs Jolly Pillager) Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.969