Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

TOAW 3.4 Interface changes

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> TOAW 3.4 Interface changes Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 2:33:13 AM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
There are a lot of changes to TOAW in the 3.4 patch, I'm going to talk about the ones that you'll notice right away.

The most obvious ones is the optional face-lift which tones down the graphics, and gives TOAW a new look. The new graphics system allows you to not just have a picture on a picture, but also allow you to have transparent pictures. Things like clouds that you can see through for the weather. I don't think we've seen the last of what can be done with the new system.

There are a lot of changes to the way that it can be played too.

The first time you start TOAW, it will ask you whether you want to play with 'Classic' defaults or 'Updated' defaults. Classic is the way that you're playing now.

Updated is just that, updated. It's intended for the player that is learning or isn't playing PBEM and wants a more casual experience. When you right click, it will move, attack, or bombard as appropriate instead of pulling up the menu. If you right click and hold, it will pop up the normal right-click menu. If you double-click on an enemy unit, it will open the combat planner dialog, which now allows you to assign artillery to direct attacks.

Both modes support dragging the mouse, either while on a unit to move the unit, or on the map to move the map (or the mini-map.)

I've found I use the Updated defaults, but I'm the only one on the Beta team that does, and play mostly against Elmer.

I've found that I've been playing a lot using the iPad and software called iTap RDP. It allows me to log in to my computer from the iPad. I can easily move units around, zoom in and out (using the iPad) and plan attacks. There are some things like setting the loss level, or putting units into reserve status which need to be done from menus, but a good 80% of what I do doesn't need the menu popped up each time, and I can always right-click on the unit to do those things. It's got some issue, but I'm not sure how many are due to the iPad, my learning how to use it, or the other things.

I believe that the updated interface is perfect for teaching anyone that has any interest very quickly what the fun is about.

The other major experiment is that there is a new play mode called 'Elmer Assist' (or whatever you want to call it ) You can let Elmer take control of certain formations, and set their formation tracks, aggressiveness, etc. You can then move the formations you want to control, and let Elmer move the rest according to your broad directions. You could (playing both sides) play a game of FitE within your lifetime. Elmer has shortcoming at the strategic level, but you can adjust for that. I'm still not sure if that idea is going to take off or not. I'm having fun playing Red Thunder, letting Elmer do most of the grunt work while I do the fine tuning like placing engineers correctly, ensuring we don't get encircled, handle attacks that are critical, etc. I made some mistakes, so I'm about to start over.

I hope you enjoy it,
Ralph


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.
Post #: 1
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 2:58:31 AM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline
Sounds like some awesome changes/additions! Can't wait to play this patch, especially since I'm a new player and some of these changes sound very helpful. 

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 2
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 5:55:15 AM   
rhinobones

 

Posts: 1540
Joined: 2/17/2002
Status: offline
quote:

The first time you start TOAW, it will ask you whether you want to play with 'Classic' defaults or 'Updated' defaults. Classic is the way that you're playing now.


There is always the option to switch between "Classic" and "Updated" . . . right?

Otherwise, as always, Ralph gives us another reason to rejoice.

Regards, RhinoBones

_____________________________

Colin Wright:
Comprehensive Wishlist Forum #467 . . . The Norm (blessed be His name, genuflect three times and accept all values in the program as revealed truth)

Pre Combat Air Strikes # 64 . . . I need have no concern about keeping it civil

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 3
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 10:54:48 AM   
jmlima

 

Posts: 782
Joined: 3/1/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ralphtrick
...
The other major experiment is that there is a new play mode called 'Elmer Assist' (or whatever you want to call it ) You can let Elmer take control of certain formations, and set their formation tracks, aggressiveness, etc. You can then move the formations you want to control, and let Elmer move the rest according to your broad directions. ...


Now that is something useful.

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 4
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 2:20:49 PM   
Panama


Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline
Some other nice interface things would be:

Dragging a selection box with the cursor and then clicking to magnify only that area of the map that is selected to the next highest magnification level. Then you can do the normal game things there and click again and it closes. Make it so it covers only a section of the current map, not the entire screen. That window would be the focus and the rest of the map would be like a background window. Would really be nice on large maps. Or maybe even make it so the selected area could be magnified to whatever level you want.

Something to replace or compliment the text at the bottom of the screen. I don't think mouse over popups would be a good idea. But something. Maybe a player adjustable/movable window. Can resize it and move it where it's out of the way but more visible than what we now have.

< Message edited by Panama -- 5/16/2010 2:24:06 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to jmlima)
Post #: 5
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 4:19:44 PM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Panama
Some other nice interface things would be:

Dragging a selection box with the cursor and then clicking to magnify only that area of the map that is selected to the next highest magnification level. Then you can do the normal game things there and click again and it closes. Make it so it covers only a section of the current map, not the entire screen. That window would be the focus and the rest of the map would be like a background window. Would really be nice on large maps. Or maybe even make it so the selected area could be magnified to whatever level you want.

Something to replace or compliment the text at the bottom of the screen. I don't think mouse over popups would be a good idea. But something. Maybe a player adjustable/movable window. Can resize it and move it where it's out of the way but more visible than what we now have.

The scroll wheel centers on the mouse cursor so you can easily zoom out to get the big picture and zoom in on the area of interest. On some controllers (the logitech trackball I have) the 4th and 5th buttons do the same thing.

Mouse over popups are what can be done, they now include terrain info. Making the windows movable and adding better scrolling/resizing require a rewrite, so those can't happen until the next full game.

Ralph


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to Panama)
Post #: 6
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 5:18:53 PM   
Panama


Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ralphtrick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panama
Some other nice interface things would be:

Dragging a selection box with the cursor and then clicking to magnify only that area of the map that is selected to the next highest magnification level. Then you can do the normal game things there and click again and it closes. Make it so it covers only a section of the current map, not the entire screen. That window would be the focus and the rest of the map would be like a background window. Would really be nice on large maps. Or maybe even make it so the selected area could be magnified to whatever level you want.

Something to replace or compliment the text at the bottom of the screen. I don't think mouse over popups would be a good idea. But something. Maybe a player adjustable/movable window. Can resize it and move it where it's out of the way but more visible than what we now have.

The scroll wheel centers on the mouse cursor so you can easily zoom out to get the big picture and zoom in on the area of interest. On some controllers (the logitech trackball I have) the 4th and 5th buttons do the same thing.

Mouse over popups are what can be done, they now include terrain info. Making the windows movable and adding better scrolling/resizing require a rewrite, so those can't happen until the next full game.

Ralph



Oh, you made me think of something else that might be cool. You could have multiple movable map windows. If you have a big map you could use these smaller windows to focus on areas of importance. As you got done with each area you could close the window and move on to the next one or switch between them. That way you wouldn't be so likely to forget something.

To be honest, there's really several things that could be done given infinite time or multiple Ralphs.

What you've got so far is very very nice.

_____________________________


(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 7
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 5:37:24 PM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Panama
Oh, you made me think of something else that might be cool. You could have multiple movable map windows. If you have a big map you could use these smaller windows to focus on areas of importance. As you got done with each area you could close the window and move on to the next one or switch between them. That way you wouldn't be so likely to forget something.

To be honest, there's really several things that could be done given infinite time or multiple Ralphs.

What you've got so far is very very nice.

I think Total Annihilation did that years ago, although I may be thinking of another RTS.

Once I do the rewrite, it's something to play with. The technology I'm looking at would allow for multiple windows that can be moved onto multiple monitors, so you could leave the 'Group' window up, along with a couple of different sized map windows, and possibly the Unit and Formation windows (assuming you've got a couple of monitors.) As long as I set things up so that the default looks something like what we have now since it's reasonable.

That's a ways off, though.

Ralph


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to Panama)
Post #: 8
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 6:07:30 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
Hey Ralph,

will you fix the window for the weather report? It doesn't fit correct for larger scale scenarios!

greetings pionier




Attachment (1)

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 9
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/16/2010 6:08:36 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
This is what it should look like!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 10
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 2:42:21 AM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
You can zoom out all the way on the main display instead. It's great for planning on the larger maps.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by ralphtrick -- 5/18/2010 5:23:02 AM >


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 11
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 3:28:36 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
you got a lot of application open there Ralph

Hey Ralph:

Um.....a while back we spoke about a CSV file that TOAW could output that would contain the losses for the turn for each attack that I could use as the input file for an application that I would write to output a losses chart. like the one in the picture below. If you would supply me with such a file I'll get busy writing an application.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/18/2010 3:36:22 AM >

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 12
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 5:25:22 AM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
Those are a windows 7 thing. You can paste commonly used applications on that bar. I editied the message to trim it from the picture to avoid confusion.

I'm attaching the logs for a game of Arracourt. Let me know how it goes.

Ralph


Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 13
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 6:34:23 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Hey Ralph:

I'm just guessing what the columns C -> H represent. How did I do?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 14
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 4:39:50 PM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson
Hey Ralph:

I'm just guessing what the columns C -> H represent. How did I do?

Don't quit your day job. You're one for 5. OK, one you couldn't have known, so make that 1 for 4, which isn't too bad.

X,Y location of the combat.
Equipment Lost/Equipment Assigned.
Image number (I wouldn't have expected you to know this one) You can use it to look up the image in the equipment256.bmp file, or in the ixxxxx file.

Ralph


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 15
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 4:43:30 PM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ralphtrick

Don't quit your day job. You're one for 5. OK, one you couldn't have known, so make that 1 for 4, which isn't too bad.

X,Y location of the combat.
Equipment Lost/Equipment Assigned.
Image number (I wouldn't have expected you to know this one) You can use it to look up the image in the equipment256.bmp file, or in the ixxxxx file.

Ralph



That seems a lot more complicated and less helpful than if it were structured like Larry's interpretation

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 16
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/18/2010 5:01:17 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
Yeah it would be quite cool for our AARs if we could simply generate a log with for example strg + shift+ F7 with the actual total losses? /assigend etcpp that would be nice too

best regards

pio!

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 17
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/19/2010 1:09:35 AM   
ralphtricky


Posts: 6685
Joined: 7/27/2003
From: Colorado Springs
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pionier

Yeah it would be quite cool for our AARs if we could simply generate a log with for example strg + shift+ F7 with the actual total losses? /assigend etcpp that would be nice too

best regards

pio!


If you turn on the sitreplog, it will generate a txt file with the news from the combat results dialog, and a csv file that you can open in Excel with the losses for that turn.


_____________________________

Ralph Trickey
TOAW IV Programmer
Blog: http://operationalwarfare.com
---
My comments are my own, and do not represent the views of any other person or entity. Nothing that I say should be construed in any way as a promise of anything.

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 18
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 1:43:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Okie dokie.....I wrote an application in Java that will parse the sitrep_log files that version 3.4 will output and ran it and got some acceptable output. It's console application, which means it runs in the background while you're doing something else and doesn't have a "window" to watch or anything like that. I'm attaching the executable, with a batch file to start it up and an input file so anybody who wants to can play with it. Right now it has produced an html file that doesn't have any pictures of the equipment and I'm still looking at making a different version that will indeed have some pictures of the different kinds of equipment. But that might mean that I'll have to break out the separate pictures into files and there's 15 X 9 of them which is about 135 different files to produce. I guess I'll do that in my spare time.

Just download the attachment, clip off the ".txt" from the end of the filename so that it's a zip file....unzip it and if you have the java runtime installed all you have to do it double click on the ListCharter.bat file and the test.html file will be produced ( hopefully ). I've included a test.html file that I produced just now and you can look at that and compare it to the CSV input file if you want to. I have already glanced over the product and it looks good to me.

Maybe Ralph can incorporate this code into the 3.5 version or the 4.0 version or something so we might have this facility within the TOAW program instead of a stand-alone application to do this.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to ralphtricky)
Post #: 19
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 1:49:43 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I thought it prudent to post a picture of the html output file that LossesCharter produces so far. Notice that it doesn't have any pictures of the various equipment types. That's for a future version. Plus I want to make it a multi-threading program with at least two threads ( one for force 1 and one for force 2 ) because it takes at least 1/10th of a second to run at the present time and that's about 20 nanoseconds too long. Also, I want to modify the program so you can input more than one file at a time and have them all preocessed at the same time. And to top off the cake, I want to produce an applet with a loader application so that users can just browse to my web site and click on a link, have a simple bootstrap program download to the users web browser so that the user can upload an input file to my program, where the program will run automatically using the user's file, and have the users browser display the resulting file. Or we could just distribute the executable as a jar file that anybody can use to process their own file(s) at their leisure.

Just a thought.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/21/2010 6:10:50 PM >


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 20
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 4:31:29 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
great larry

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 21
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 7:48:42 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Okie Dokie.....I've fixed it so it's putting out pictures too. Anybody have any suggestions to make it better? Maybe some different colors?






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/21/2010 7:54:25 PM >


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 22
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 7:54:56 PM   
Silvanski


Posts: 2506
Joined: 1/23/2005
From: Belgium, residing in TX-USA
Status: offline
OK nice, but the SdKfz's have the silhouette of the Mark I tank

_____________________________

The TOAW Redux Dude

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 23
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 8:53:17 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Silvanski
OK nice, but the SdKfz's have the silhouette of the Mark I tank

That was an early version which used a lot of "default" pictures....I have since fixed the Sdkfz's pictures. I'm attaching the output as it looks now. Just drop the ".txt" off the filename and unzip it and double click on MyOutput.html to see the output.Here's a list of the equipment types we have so far:
		
case 0:	return "Rifle AT squad -.bmp";
case 3:	return "engineer.bmp";
case 5:	return "Medium MG.bmp";
case 7:	return "SMG AT squad -.bmp";
case 9:	return "Motorcycle Squad.bmp";
case 11:return "truck.bmp";
case 12:return "Halftrack.bmp";
case 18:return "50mm AT Gun.bmp";
case 19:return "75mm AT Gun.bmp";
case 20:return "88mm Dual Purpose Gun.bmp";
case 25:return "150mm Light Gun.bmp";
case 31:return "81mm Mortar.bmp";
case 45:return "PzKpfw V Panther.bmp";
case 59:return "Sturmgeschütz IV.bmp";
case 67:return "Sdkfz 10-4 SPAAG.bmp";
case 68:return "Sdkfz 251-1.bmp";
case 69:return "Sdkfz 251-9.bmp";

case 70:return "Sdkfz 251-10.bmp";
case 71:return "SdKfz 7-1 SPAAG.bmp";
case 74:return "Sdkfz 234-2.bmp";
case 158:return "M5 Stuart.bmp";
case 161:return "M4-76 Sherman.bmp";
case 162:return "M4-105 Sherman.bmp";
case 166:return "Halftrack 75mm SPAT.bmp";
case 171:return "M18 GMC Hellcat.bmp";
case 174:return "Halftrack 75mm Howitzer.bmp";
case 176:return "M8 Greyhound.bmp";
case 241:return "Halftrack 81mm Mortar.bmp";
case 254:return "Medium Scout Car.bmp";
default:return "Motorcycle Squad.bmp";


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/21/2010 9:08:21 PM >

(in reply to Silvanski)
Post #: 24
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 9:10:46 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
What do you think about gruops? Inf, Art, SdKfz, Tanks, Planes, Helikopters etcpp?

greetings

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 25
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/21/2010 11:57:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pionier
What do you think about gruops? Inf, Art, SdKfz, Tanks, Planes, Helikopters etcpp?
greetings

I've been outputting the results in the order they are found in the input file but putting the results into group sets is an idea that merits looking into. That's possible but it would involve saving or holding the intermediate results from previous records while parsing the rest of the input file and that could get messy. The same problem occurs when trying to process more than one file at a time. So I'll probably have to do something like that. Good thought. Thanks.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 26
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/22/2010 2:19:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
White on Green looks better than black on white.

I'm thinking of grouping the combat results sets according to where they occured since the input file provides us with the location where those losses occured. That would allow the grouping of US and German losses in each specific combat and maybe put a totals group at the end of the output file for each side.

I'm open to ideas, suggestions and demands. Lemme know what you'd like to see in the output and I'll see what I can do.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 27
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/23/2010 3:55:29 AM   
Abnormalmind


Posts: 200
Joined: 11/24/2009
Status: offline
Hey Larry, very nice job! You've asked for suggestions, so here is one. Sort the equipment alphabetically.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 28
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/23/2010 7:03:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's the problem:  Sometime soon now my program will be able to read more than one input file at a time.  Ralph supplied me with 8 of them.  So each file can have a different combat date and each file can contain the equipment for both sides of the combat ( force1 and force2, in this case the US Army and the Germans ) and the different combats can occur at different places on the map.  So there are a myriad of ways to sort this stuff each of which might make sense to someone depending on who you ask.  But we can dispense with most of that if I just publish the totals.  Rather than get bogged down in what were the losses in what particular battle on what day where I can just list the total losses for both sides and let it go at that.  I'm just talking to myself here probably.

So sorting the equipment alphabetically....yeah I can do that.  Probably.  I did say probably.  I'll see what I can do and get back to you.


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Abnormalmind)
Post #: 29
RE: TOAW 3.4 Interface changes - 5/23/2010 1:39:26 PM   
Panama


Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

White on Green looks better than black on white.

I'm thinking of grouping the combat results sets according to where they occured since the input file provides us with the location where those losses occured. That would allow the grouping of US and German losses in each specific combat and maybe put a totals group at the end of the output file for each side.

I'm open to ideas, suggestions and demands. Lemme know what you'd like to see in the output and I'll see what I can do.




Depending on what this can do, why not leave it up to the user as to what information is shown? If you can do a check box list have the user check off what they want to see then spit out the results. You could make this very flexible.

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> TOAW 3.4 Interface changes Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.811