What is in the future for the game?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

What is in the future for the game?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> What is in the future for the game?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

What is in the future for the game? - 6/10/2010 7:58:06 PM

mbrien

Posts: 32
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

Hi all,
I hae been looking at this game for some time and I finaly made the plunge last night! I like how the game has come along and I do like some of the Map Mods that have been created by users. I am wondering if there are plans to expand to other air war scenarios, Poland 39, France 40, Russian Front? Maybe move over to the Pacific?

Thanks
and great work on the game, Now I have to learn how to play and start bombing!

Post #: 1

RE: What is in the future for the game? - 6/11/2010 9:31:20 PM

mbrien

Posts: 32
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

Hi all,
Here is anothe option that I was thinking of. How about a scenario that works along with a what it Sealion invasion of England?
Any thoughts?

Thanks

Mark

(in reply to mbrien)

Post #: 2

RE: What is in the future for the game? - 6/12/2010 5:51:40 PM

K.Pooley

Posts: 709
Joined: 4/15/2008
From: Crystal Palace, London.
Status: offline

I think you'll find that Operation Sealion was to have been the invasion of the whole of Britain, not just England

Really BoB as a game only makes sense as what is was historically. The LW have the job of preparing the way for Sealion, while the British attempt to thwart the LW's aims. I don't think that extending it in that way would work very well, as Sealion would be a very marginal proposition at best (even after 'defeating' the RAF). It would not be the 'formality' of a D-Day type invasion with powerful allied forces being able to gradually build and sustain momentum, in the face of an enemy who (let's face it) is just playing for time. As to the other ideas, I'd be interested to hear what others have to say.

_____________________________

Kev

Y Ddraig Goch am Byth

(in reply to mbrien)

Post #: 3

RE: What is in the future for the game? - 6/12/2010 6:23:07 PM

Rebel Yell

Posts: 470
Joined: 6/21/2003
From: The Woodlands, TX USA
Status: offline

I would really like to see this type of game for other years and theaters also, but it needs to be an entirely new engine. They did a fantastic job of beating the old code in this game into submission to make all the improvements in the current version, but the future needs to be revolutionary, not evolutionary.

My .02.

_____________________________

I used to enjoy these forums. So many people that need the green dot now.

(in reply to K.Pooley)

Post #: 4

RE: What is in the future for the game? - 6/14/2010 1:09:50 AM

mbrien

Posts: 32
Joined: 12/11/2005
Status: offline

Thanks K. Pooley and Rebel Yell,
I would be interested in the revolutionary change that Rebel Yell mentioned and there are some other theaters of operations to keep our hands full. I am working through the BoB one week scenario as the Germans and I am not doing to well. I will play it again with some different objectives to see how I do.

Lets keep thinking about what would be next for this game.

Thanks

Mark

(in reply to Rebel Yell)

Post #: 5

RE: What is in the future for the game? - 6/16/2010 5:05:38 PM

fochinell

Posts: 287
Joined: 11/19/2005
Status: offline

I think HS & Co have done a good job to upgrade something that is pretty long in the tooth with some difficult legacy issues. But there's plenty I'd like to see in a new game with some of those issues eliminated - maybe even including the Eastern Front. I'd certainly like a really long game starting on 17 August 1942, although it would be hard to avoid sudden death and I think the scoring would have to be re-jigged.

(in reply to mbrien)

Post #: 6