Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata Page: <<   < prev  12 13 14 15 [16]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/22/2011 11:05:05 PM   
bjfagan

 

Posts: 50
Joined: 7/8/2004
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline 		I'm a Navy Reservist and went to Fort Huachuca for several weeks of training in June 2009. I was expecting the hot and arid wasteland, but was surprised that it was usually in the 90's during the day and it rained every few days. Still wouldn't want to live there though.

(in reply to Buck Beach)
Post #: 451
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/23/2011 12:05:49 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Buck Beach

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Yeah, that's the deck. Nice view of a valley and mountains on the other side across it.


What part of the SoWest are you from?

Buck


I'm from New England, but we're in Arizona.

(in reply to Buck Beach)
Post #: 452
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/23/2011 12:07:05 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bjfagan

I'm a Navy Reservist and went to Fort Huachuca for several weeks of training in June 2009. I was expecting the hot and arid wasteland, but was surprised that it was usually in the 90's during the day and it rained every few days. Still wouldn't want to live there though.


Haven't been there, but I think it's the elevation that saved you from the real heat. Down in "The Valley of the Sun" where Phoenix is you would have fried.

(in reply to bjfagan)
Post #: 453
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/29/2011 6:50:41 AM   
Buck Beach

 

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline 		In DBB scenarios the 45th Base Group (ID#5674) is set to load on TF 8407 at Canton. Is this intended?

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 454
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/29/2011 2:45:34 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Buck Beach

In DBB scenarios the 45th Base Group (ID#5674) is set to load on TF 8407 at Canton. Is this intended?


Yes. There were ground support troops on the Pensacola Convoy and I expect the 45th Base Group stands in for them.

(in reply to Buck Beach)
Post #: 455
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 4/29/2011 3:26:38 PM   
Buck Beach

 

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Buck Beach

In DBB scenarios the 45th Base Group (ID#5674) is set to load on TF 8407 at Canton. Is this intended?


Yes. There were ground support troops on the Pensacola Convoy and I expect the 45th Base Group stands in for them.


Thank you. I was confused because they have the Hawaiian USAFF as there Htqrs. I'll just change them when they find a place to settle.

Buck

< Message edited by Buck Beach -- 4/29/2011 3:57:45 PM >

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 456
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 5/20/2011 5:14:07 PM   
Herrbear


Posts: 883
Joined: 7/26/2004
From: Glendora, CA
Status: offline 		It has been reported that for Device 1684 12cm AA Rocket has a "0" effect it will not work. Even though this is a carryover from the original scenarios, do you have a suggestion on what value the Effect should be. Thank you.

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 457
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 5/20/2011 6:31:57 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline 		Yeah, forgot to include it in the public Babes fixes. Sorry 'bout that. This is what we've been using for ages. It'll get into the next updates, promise .




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Herrbear)
Post #: 458
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 6/26/2011 1:57:27 AM   
Buck Beach

 

Posts: 1973
Joined: 6/25/2000
From: Upland,CA,USA
Status: offline 		FYI, for those using this data base for their mods/game (who are detail nuts like yours truly), most of the ships underway in TFs, at the game start, still have 100% of their fuel capacity reflecting.

Not a big deal I know but I plan on adjusting them to reflect the usage to get to their present location.

Buck




(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 459
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 7/10/2011 2:23:04 AM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline 		bump...

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 460
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 7/11/2011 12:32:35 AM   
Halsey

 

Posts: 5069
Joined: 2/7/2004
Status: offline 		bump...

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 461
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 7/11/2011 7:57:45 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline 		Halsey now has 1 real post and 4459 "bumps"

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Halsey)
Post #: 462
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 14 15 [16]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata Page: <<   < prev  12 13 14 15 [16]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.031