Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Road to Minsk AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Road to Minsk AAR Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 4:32:01 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline 		oh man, I lost my last turn snaps !!!

ah man

well, a Armor and Mot Div took Vitebsk

was able to do a rush and take Zhlobin

Mogilev held, 7 attacks by 7 Divs couldn't break it

(and yes, if I would of by passed Minsk and left it for the Inf, I would been in better shape for a stand up fight at Mogilev (to be honest, I was worried about Vitebsk, I thought I could take Mog)

clean out the pockets, formed another one (that one don't matter, but, habit is habit)

so, end the turn with 6 of 7 VH's






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 31
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 4:37:22 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline 		and now it is sit back and see what happens

well, it is all over but the shouting

still a major win, but could of been better !

two minor mistakes gave the Russian more points then they should of gotten !, but at the time, it looked like the right thing to do

(hassle with a small map, short time, in real game, I wouldn't of even bothered with Mog, I would of cut it off, and bypassed it, and left it for my Inf following up)

but, will say, it is a fun little battle, and as a trainer, it gets the idea across

hope it was helpful






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 32
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 6:18:30 PM   
Tiger73

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 7/12/2010
Status: offline 		Sarge,
That was one excellent AAR!

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 33
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 6:22:53 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline 		Thanks for the AAR.

There are a number of errors in the Logistics Phase Event log screen:

"been" should be "has been/have been" or "was/were"

"Fuel refinaries" should be fuel refineries.

"Consumed by vehicles production" should be consumed by vehicle production.

Oil probably isn't consumed by oil production, but by fuel production.

"Aircraft factroties" should be aircraft factories.

"aircarft production" should be aircraft production.

"aicraft factory locations" should be aircraft factory locations.

Whatever "ground types" are, it would make more sense to make it singular instead of plural, so ground type instead of ground types.

"Ground types prodyction" should be ground type (or types) production.

"form *number* manpower centers" should be "from *number* manpower center.

I was under the impression that there was only a motor pool, not a motor pool and a logistics vehicle pool, if so it might make sense to change the "trucks were repaired and returned to the logistics pool" to trucks were repaired and returned to the motor pool.

< Message edited by ComradeP -- 7/17/2010 6:23:34 PM >

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 34
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 6:43:41 PM   
SGHunt


Posts: 873
Joined: 1/20/2010
From: Lancaster, England
Status: offline 		Thanks - really helpful to see all the Air stuff, especially

S

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 35
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/17/2010 10:54:12 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

Thanks for the AAR.

There are a number of errors in the Logistics Phase Event log screen:

"been" should be "has been/have been" or "was/were"

"Fuel refinaries" should be fuel refineries.

"Consumed by vehicles production" should be consumed by vehicle production.

Oil probably isn't consumed by oil production, but by fuel production.

"Aircraft factroties" should be aircraft factories.

"aircarft production" should be aircraft production.

"aicraft factory locations" should be aircraft factory locations.

Whatever "ground types" are, it would make more sense to make it singular instead of plural, so ground type instead of ground types.

"Ground types prodyction" should be ground type (or types) production.

"form *number* manpower centers" should be "from *number* manpower center.

I was under the impression that there was only a motor pool, not a motor pool and a logistics vehicle pool, if so it might make sense to change the "trucks were repaired and returned to the logistics pool" to trucks were repaired and returned to the motor pool.


LOL, makes it look like I was the one writing it, think he was in a hurry so they could let us have it, will ask for some corrections

_____________________________


(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 36
RE: Road to Minsk AAR - 7/18/2010 5:14:56 AM   
Helpless


Posts: 15793
Joined: 8/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

makes it look like I was the one writing it, think he was in a hurry so they could let us have it, will ask for some corrections


Yes these were troubleshooting message for me. Not sure they will be there at all.

_____________________________

Pavel Zagzin
WITE/WITW/WITE-2 Development

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 37
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Road to Minsk AAR Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.625