Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem >> Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 11/15/2010 8:31:34 PM   
dbz

 

Posts: 37
Joined: 11/2/2010
Status: offline 		For your consideration,

I suggest that the 01-Eindoven to 04-Nederwetten route should be removed.

This would make the bridges in the Eindoven sector more important, and
penalize the reliance on the Nederwetten-Gemart corridor to just bypasses the bridges.
Post #: 1
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 11/16/2010 12:24:25 AM   
xe5

 

Posts: 783
Joined: 5/3/2009
Status: offline 		Or at least reposition it from the lower right, where it is easily accessible to the Allied player entering from Valkenswaard, to the top right.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to dbz)
Post #: 2
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/24/2011 9:24:24 AM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline 		Oddball
is this being considered?? because its a great idea.

were still going to have to have a house rule of some sort tho......a blind man can take that map in one turn as long as he's willing to lose some troops, the way the german Flak... a/t guns perform.

< Message edited by STIENER -- 1/24/2011 9:26:47 AM >

(in reply to xe5)
Post #: 3
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/24/2011 4:19:51 PM   
RD Oddball

 

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline 		Yep we'll look at it Stiener. I guess it slipped past the first time this was posted. Thanks for making sure we saw it.

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 4
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/26/2011 2:58:24 AM   
Andrew Williams


Posts: 6116
Joined: 1/8/2001
From: Australia
Status: offline 		I don't think removing the VL is the answer in fact it does add some interest tot he campaign.

What is really needed is a Nedderwerten   german blocking force to halt or slow down the possible XXX corps use of this route, until 107bde can be brought into action.

The route is a historical one that XXX corps attempted to use but were blocked by strong German defence.


< Message edited by Andrew Williams -- 1/26/2011 2:59:10 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to RD Oddball)
Post #: 5
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/26/2011 4:09:08 AM   
RD Oddball

 

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline 		Steve had a look and agrees with your assessment Andrew, as do I. He's leaning toward possibly moving the VL and adding a static BG on Nederwetten.

(in reply to Andrew Williams)
Post #: 6
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/26/2011 4:27:04 AM   
STIENER

 

Posts: 857
Joined: 1/7/2001
From: Vancouver, Canada
Status: offline 		the book 'it never snows in september" eludes to strong german forces on that flank, but i dont believe the book actually goes into specific's as to what the allies were up against per say in that area. anyone know?

sounds like a reasonable idea Oddball. my suggestion would be a fairly strong static BG...stronger than the one the allies come up against at Valkenswaard on the 1st turn of the GC, perhaps more tanks?

< Message edited by STIENER -- 1/26/2011 4:28:39 AM >

(in reply to RD Oddball)
Post #: 7
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/27/2011 4:32:18 AM   
RD Oddball

 

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline 		Wasn't my idea. It was Steve's after I'd pointed out this thread to him but I do agree it's the best solution. Thanks for the suggestion re: stronger static BG on that route. Will pass it along for consideration.

(in reply to STIENER)
Post #: 8
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/28/2011 1:23:26 PM   
emperor peter

 

Posts: 72
Joined: 11/18/2009
From: Genk, Belgium
Status: offline 		^ It's a step in the right direction, however a normal BG might be better. I already modded a static one in myself and tested it. Those static BGs are vulnerable to attrition. Without replacements for lost soldiers, you can't hold out long with them.

(in reply to RD Oddball)
Post #: 9
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/28/2011 1:29:34 PM   
emperor peter

 

Posts: 72
Joined: 11/18/2009
From: Genk, Belgium
Status: offline 		FYI I based my static BG (21 FJ regt) in Helmond on this: http://www.axishistory.com/index.php?id=512


(in reply to emperor peter)
Post #: 10
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/28/2011 2:38:23 PM   
RD Oddball

 

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline 		Okay thanks Mystic_Snake. Will point it out. Just out of curiosity what was the roster of the static BG you tested?

(in reply to emperor peter)
Post #: 11
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/28/2011 3:57:03 PM   
emperor peter

 

Posts: 72
Joined: 11/18/2009
From: Genk, Belgium
Status: offline 		All FJ troops, but different for every diffuculty level, see the StaticBG file I posted here: http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=2651210


(in reply to RD Oddball)
Post #: 12
RE: Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal - 1/29/2011 3:36:08 PM   
RD Oddball

 

Posts: 4836
Joined: 2/10/2007
Status: offline 		Thanks!

(in reply to emperor peter)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Close Combat Series >> Close Combat: Last Stand Arnhem >> Eindoven-Nederwetten route removal Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.609