RHG HQ's.

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RHG HQ's.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Tech Support >> RHG HQ's.

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 5:59:51 PM

Senno

Posts: 489
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline

In reading VonP's AAR, I noticed his discussion of disbanding the RHG HQ's. Since I've always attached any garrison troops to them, I'm wondering if my game is a bit buggy as they typically have several Infantry regiments attached to them. I hadn't read that particular manual section, but I just checked and found:

"Note that only Security type combat units can be attached to an Axis RHG HQ unit."

So I just started a new normal game and attached the 97th Jager Division to the 103rd RHG Command of AGS. 97th Jager isn't labeled as a security type, so I'm a bit confused. Can units actually be attached, just gain no benefits of a higher HQ, or is there a bug of some sort going on?

Post #: 1

RE: RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 6:08:49 PM

Sabre21

Posts: 8231
Joined: 4/27/2001
From: on a mountain in Idaho
Status: offline

Yep..that's a bug. I see what's going on. You can't assign it to an RHG Hq by going off of the unit data page and bringing up the list of available Hq's, but you can assign it by pressing the "G" hotkey providing the RHG Hq is the closest Hq to it.

I'll get it sent up.

Thanks

Andy

PS: BTW, I'll be moving this up to the tech support forum.

< Message edited by Sabre21 -- 1/28/2011 6:09:06 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Senno)

Post #: 2

RE: RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 6:11:04 PM

kevini1000

Posts: 430
Joined: 2/21/2010
Status: offline

I also noticed one of these Corps HQ's getting several support units attached to it.

(in reply to Sabre21)

Post #: 3

RE: RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 6:17:26 PM

Sabre21

Posts: 8231
Joined: 4/27/2001
From: on a mountain in Idaho
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sath

I also noticed one of these Corps HQ's getting several support units attached to it.

I think the intent of the rule was on map units rather then support units. One of the RHG's start with a pioneer bn so I think that is probably ok although maybe not the best use of support units.

_____________________________

(in reply to kevini1000)

Post #: 4

RE: RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 6:18:43 PM

kevini1000

Posts: 430
Joined: 2/21/2010
Status: offline

Yeah this one on turn 2 had like 16 support unit in it.

(in reply to Sabre21)

Post #: 5

RE: RHG HQ's. - 1/28/2011 6:28:06 PM

Senno

Posts: 489
Joined: 12/27/2010
Status: offline

OK, thanks much for the quick response. Sorry I didn't indicate earlier that it was by "G" that I did the assignment, but you sleuthed it out nicely.

Well, there goes my method of alleviating some command concerns, lol.

I've noticed the RHG units being stuffed with Support Units as well, so I have started to set them to zero and lock them. I put my least capable commanders in the RHG units, but somehow they were winning their admin roles, to the frontline Corps detriment. I don't normally set the global lock setting, but as I'm getting more comfortable with the game, I suppose I will now. My security troops have pretty soft duty, they don't need the support units making their soft lives even easier, lol.

(in reply to kevini1000)

Post #: 6