RE: How feasible is team play?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: How feasible is team play?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Opponents Wanted >> RE: How feasible is team play?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: How feasible is team play? - 2/19/2011 6:36:05 PM

timmyab

Posts: 2044
Joined: 12/14/2010
From: Bristol, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: redmarkus4
Having the OKH/STAVKA player also controlling one front probably makes real sense. It reduces the team size to 3 and gives the commander a bit more enjoyment...

With regard to this, If ComradeP wants to take over command of the western front, I'll be happy to stand aside.I think it makes good sense, especially to have the CinC controlling the centre.As you say too many people is going to make for a very slow game and I sometimes have to work long shifts when I'll not be able to post a turn for a day or two.Maybe three a side would be a sensible maximum for pbem play.Even then players will need to be fairly committed.

(in reply to Redmarkus5)

Post #: 31

RE: How feasible is team play? - 2/20/2011 8:43:17 AM

Jay Doubleyou

Posts: 245
Joined: 8/12/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mehring

Hey, Jay, long time. I'm surprised you're still up for a multi.

I have NEVER spent so long on turns as when I took on STAVKA role.

I agree with you on the hours. My wife still complains about it