Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie (R) Rnd 2

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie (R) Rnd 2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 12:50:15 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
Turn 4 Dispatches:

Here is a brief overview of Turn 4

Overall, I can tell that this game is evolving differently than my first one against Von Beanie, mostly because his defense is much more effective. He is Checkerboarding where he needs to fight, and surrendering ground elsewhere. It is going to be very difficult to get a high KIA count on the Russians, as VB is sacrificing ground to save the Red Army.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to PeeDeeAitch)
Post #: 31
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 12:57:31 AM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
hes gonna suffer when ''trading land for time''

the new double rail costs for evacuating industry is gonna sting him

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 32
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 2:54:54 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
Turn 5 Dispatches:

OLEG: Destroying units is actually the priority, the problem is that Von Beanie isn't going to let that happen right now (see map).

I'm not driving on Kiev, just towards it; I find it's easier to get across further south, like around Cherkassy

COOKIE: I hope you are right, this game will test how much the Reds need to defend forward. So far he isn't feeling the need.

OVERALL:
I am certainly behind my last AAR in terms of unit destruction and Dead Reds, which is a problem. I caused 3 mil Soviet losses last time before Winter, which I think is about the minimum; Von Beanie kept losses down by trading space for time.

This time, his defenses are better, so I will likely have even less success destroying units. If he is able to still withdraw just as much, I might only get 2.5 mil by Winter, which is a problem!

Current Soviet Losses (Beginning Turn 5):

1.02 Mil Men
712,000 POWs
14,600 Guns
8,600 Tanks

In my last game, I topped 1 mil POWs by turn 7. I don't think I'm getting there this time! I'll be lucky to clear 900K.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 33
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 3:30:37 AM   
Klydon


Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline
TBH, Q-Ball, I would load up the Russians and look at where his factories are and start looking to put some heat on them to make him feel the pinch on moving stuff or at least it will give you an idea of where he may have issues moving stuff and may make a better stand. The other thing with your fast drive towards the Leningrad area is that if he is busy moving stuff out, he won't be busy railing that many troops in.

It looks like you sent that PG2 panzer corps back up north of the swamp for the most part. I just don't know if 1 panzer army in the south is enough to both put heat on the river line and also to help speed things up for 11th army in the far south.

I am sure that while you are worried about your rate of advance that Von Beanie is also concerned at how fast you have advanced in places.

Going to be interested to see how this all plays out.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 34
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 10:00:02 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
Turn 5: The AFTER shots

KLYDON: I actually didn't send the Pz Corps back up north. Start of turn 2, I sent the Viking SS division north of the swamp, but that's it. You don't see any BLUE because I re-HQed the Panzer Corps. Panzer Group 1 now has 4 Panzer Corps.

AFTER SHOTS:
Here is the after shots; pretty self-explanatory

Von Beanie is clearly looking to conserve the Red Army, which isn't a bad strategy. I hope to press him shortly. I forgot to check if Kiev is cleared, but if it isn't, he'll have to shortly, as I have crossed the Dnepr only 2 hexes from there. I actually didn't intend to cross at that spot, but the opportunity presented itself.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Klydon)
Post #: 35
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 10:42:40 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
One thing I'll be interested in, is the effect the HQ build-ups you're using will have on supply and the motor pool. According to the manual, the effect should be fairly substantial if used more than once.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 36
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/6/2011 10:46:47 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

One thing I'll be interested in, is the effect the HQ build-ups you're using will have on supply and the motor pool. According to the manual, the effect should be fairly substantial if used more than once.


I don't think it's a big deal.

It does cost APs, no doubt. But in terms of TRUCK losses, it's not that big a deal; a few hundred each time, which is an acceptable trade-off I think. It probably was not meant to be used for 3 Panzer Corps at once, but there it is.

Those units DID sit tight all last turn, so that's the other "price" you pay; that aspect I think does a good job of simulating a period of rest/refit before a big push. Having Panzers not move for an entire turn is probably the biggest price you pay, IMO.

I will post supply/truck stats next turn

< Message edited by Q-Ball -- 3/6/2011 10:50:05 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 37
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/7/2011 6:31:33 PM   
Tarhunnas


Posts: 3152
Joined: 1/27/2011
From: Hex X37, Y15
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CharonJr

Damaging a port will lower its ZOC and 1% damage is enough to allow the Axis to get to Riga. In addition to getting units there it will even work as a supply source if you can prevent the port from being fully repaired during the logistics phase. It seems like 7% damage is repaired each turn, so you need to cause 8%+ damage if you want Riga as a supply source, too, which is very helpful IMO.


I sure learnt something useful here! Nice trick! I can't say I have a problem with it.

(in reply to CharonJr)
Post #: 38
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/7/2011 7:01:18 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
I was correct that there's a problem with the port repair rate, leading to a rate of about 22% in some cases. It has been fixed in a tester hotfix and should be fixed in the next official patch.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Tarhunnas)
Post #: 39
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/7/2011 7:17:17 PM   
EntropyAvatar

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 2/14/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
Having Panzers not move for an entire turn is probably the biggest price you pay, IMO.


Technically you can still move the panzers, you just can't move them very far. If I'm contemplating an HQ buildup, I often place my HQ as far forward as I can the previous turn. Then move the panzers, smash and surround locally if possible, then do the buildup. However, it's more wear-and-tear on the panzers.

One other thing you can do is transfer units between corps. In one game, one of my panzer corps was behind, so I limited the advance of the lead corps and transfered three divisions from the trailing corps in at the end of the turn, hit HQ buildup and then transferred them back next turn. Certainly expensive in terms of APs though...

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 40
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 5:26:01 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
Turn 6 OKH Dispatches:

COMRADE: I have lost 5,200 vehicles to supply movement so far, including 1250 last turn. I don't think that's alot.

OVERALL: Der Fuhrer is not happy with the progress. We are bogging down already, and having to use Panzers to smash holes in the line. I attribute this to a couple things.

First, Von Beanie's defense is effective. He is checkerboarding, putting a unit on every Panzer unit, and counterattacking. Last game he created 50+ RR Bdes, and I think he did it again, because Reds are digging everywhere. I am running into entrenched Rifle units all over the place.

As a result, my pockets are paltry. Unit destruction is a priority, but with VBs pullbacks and tough defense, pickings are slim. Only 4 Divisions this turn, which isn't cutting it. I figure on 900,000 POWs next turn, which is 10% behind my last game.

Anyway, example of how a good Soviet defense to can frustrate the Germans.

PS: So far, no factories have fallen, he is keeping ahead of me

AGN: See below; I used this turn to rest Panzers and move Infantry up. Next turn the big push.

In the last game, I was in the suburbs of Leningrad by now.....

AGC: Smolensk is surrounded, and will fall next turn. Otherwise, I need to recover fuel from the big push last turn.

AGS: Real disaster!
At the DNEPR line, we cleared 3 more hexes and put more units across. We should be able to push him off the river next turn or the following, which is OK.

Bad News: See the last turn, and that Panzer Finger. It was bitten off!

First, 2 Rifle Units retreated the 2nd to last unit. Then, piles of units ROUTED my Panzer divisons. His losses were high, but having that happen is bad. Progress toward the SOUTHEAST pretty much ground to a halt with that one.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to EntropyAvatar)
Post #: 41
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 3:58:21 PM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

Might be time to setup for an HQ Buildup, especially down south. If you can bust out down there, he'll likely have to pull stuff from the other fronts. That'll thin out his defense there.

I don't like crossing the Dnepr north of those hills. Too easy to get bogged down and they slow your infantry followup.

_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 42
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 7:27:26 PM   
Altaris

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 8/14/2009
Status: offline
You're running into, IMHO, *THE* #1 issue with this game right now: forts. The more I research this thing, the more scary it becomes. With some good leader and engineer management, the Soviets can go from lvl 0 to lvl 2 forts in a hex in 2 turns with just 1 rifle division, and usually get to lvl 3 within 4 turns. Those lvl 2 forts are no joke, particularly for the panzers. Lvl 3 forts mean you're *stuck* waiting for infantry to arrive and deliberate attack, which pretty much ends any concept of mobile warfare. As the game stands right now, with a good plan on the Soviet side, he can have a wall of these lvl 3 forts within 4 turns or so pretty easy. That's doable by employing a good checkerboard and defending far enough back.

As Soviet players get better, these problems are going to be glaring. Every AAR I've seen so far has the Soviets making mistakes they won't make the second time around, and this means they'll be better entrenched by the time you get past their early checkerboards. I have few doubts that the Soviets can get a solid enough defense line going within the first 5-6 turns to make life pretty miserable for even a seasoned Axis player. Just going to take a little time for those Soviet players to figure out that strategy.

You're also seeing what I saw where sticking panzers out against heavily concentrated areas is just asking to have them completely beat to Sh1t.

Honestly, I don't know a feasible strategy around it, apart from hoping the Soviet player is newb enough to make errors. Only feasible way I can see is to focus your forces into several heavy hitting strike forces that just push forward eastward at all costs and keep the Soviets from having time to dig in. Unfortunately, this can't continue forever, and once it comes to a stop, you're screwed against a well-prepared opponent. I'd say by Turn 8-9 you simply have to pause long enough to recoup, that's when the front devolves into a slug-fest.

Personally, I'm taking a look at reducing fort levels. Playing a HtH test game vs myself with fort settings at 35%. This seems to keep forts about 1 level lower than what I've seen in my PBEM, and feels much more natural so far (but only into Turn 3, so hard to say). There's still little trouble getting up to lvl 1 forts in 1 turn, but those lvl 2's take more time, effort, and commitment to build, which seems more spot on.

< Message edited by Altaris -- 3/8/2011 7:28:09 PM >

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 43
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 7:40:13 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Altaris

You're running into, IMHO, *THE* #1 issue with this game right now: forts.


Interesting, everyone seems to have his favorite THE issue with the game. To me that's supermen on both sides.

With current supermen setup, Soviets are almost totally incapable of mounting a coherent 2-3 unit counterattack in the summer, and same goes for Germans in the winter (as previous Q-Ball's game shows). Games are almost totally 100% one sided in summer/winter (with period of mud castrating both sides in between, and snow which functions like mini summer for Germans which is just bizarre).

With counterattacking out of the equation, the only thing untermencsh side (Sovs in summer, Germans in winter) can do is DEFEND.

Reducing the fort capability would further undermine even the already ridicolously low defensive capability of the defending side (Sovs/summer, Gers/winter). That would skew the already skewed game in the wrong direction.

I agree fort building should probably be reduced, but only after we reduce supermen abilities on both sides, and introduce small operational level counterattacking capability for summer Sovs and winter Gers.

(in reply to Altaris)
Post #: 44
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 7:55:29 PM   
Altaris

 

Posts: 216
Joined: 8/14/2009
Status: offline
It's quite possible to counter-attack panzers that stick out too far. Just surround them on 4-5 sides with 3 units each, and WHAM!, that's a dead panzer stack for 2-3 turns.

I do tend to agree that the Soviets should be a little better in 1941, though. At least by the time September comes around. I've wondered if a small boost in morale (maybe 5%) might be what's needed to even that out.

What I don't agree with is the uber-insane build speed in which they can erect forts. I watched forts go from lvl 0 to lvl 2, then 40% or so to lvl 3, in 3 turns of mud! There were 3 rifle divisions, but with the 0.33 mud multiplier, this basically simulates what 1 rifle div would be capable of in clear weather. Considering how many turns there are between December and the spring of 1942, there's absolutely no reason why the Soviets can't have a gigantic wave of lvl 3 and lvl 4 forts come spring, which makes for a rather uninteresting game once December 1941 comes around. No 1942 offensives will make much headway against that kind of resistance.

< Message edited by Altaris -- 3/8/2011 8:03:30 PM >

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 45
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/8/2011 10:08:18 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Altaris
What I don't agree with is the uber-insane build speed in which they can erect forts.


I guess that depends on the number of construction and sapper units. As Soviet, I tend to build lots of those. With shakey C&C and bad commanders having SUs commited to defence is dicey, but construction units are always "commited" (to digging LOL).

Anyway, I would MUCH rather have some counterattacking ability vs German supermen, then superfast fort building. It would also make for a more interesting game. If you just reduce the fort building ability without taking some of the superhuman characteristics from the Germans, you will get only more skewed game engine, and IMO it is pretty skewed as it is.

(in reply to Altaris)
Post #: 46
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 11:40:02 AM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
I'm not sure if the people complaining about Soviet fort construction speed have looked at German construction values, but they tend to be quite a bit higher than Soviet ones initially. With construction brigades, the Soviets can get good forts up soon too, but it's not like it's a one sided advantage. Many Panzer divisions end up in a level 1 fort after the Soviet logistics phase, for example.

For me the strategic problem in summer for the Soviets comes down to simply having insufficient forces, not to the Germans being much better.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 47
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 11:49:40 AM   
Rafo35

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 2/22/2011
Status: offline
You're running into, IMHO, *THE* #1 issue with this game right now: forts.
 
Really ? Except the at start fort in the Leningrad area, most of the fort are fort level 1 it seems.

Also, the Germans seems to be more on less on the historical lines in the north and center (maybe a little west to the historical lines) and outperformed enormously its historical counterpart in the south (due to the "weird" Lvov pocket). Losses are of the right magnitude, too (rememenber turn 6 is before the really huges historical pocket).

So I don't see how the current AAR support your point of view so far, although it could happen later, of course.

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 48
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 12:01:39 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
Forts, at this stage, do more to increase Axis losses than to truly slow them down. Soviet units are still not really good enough to man forts. A 2 CV Rifle division in a level 3 fort still has a CV of only 8, not something the Germans should be scared of.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Rafo35)
Post #: 49
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 12:27:14 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP
A 2 CV Rifle division in a level 3 fort still has


You mean Soviets do have a 2 CV division anywhere on the map? I am not sure I have any in my games.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citro%C3%ABn_2CV <= Europeans will understand the joke (I hope)

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 50
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 12:34:23 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP
For me the strategic problem in summer for the Soviets comes down to simply having insufficient forces, not to the Germans being much better.


Whether Soviets are too weak or Germans too strong is rhetoric. The point is: counterattacking is a forlorn hope, and it practically does not exist as viable option. Yes, a Kiev MD tank unit can surprise unlucky Rumanians or some regiment caught in the open but that's more of a gimmick than a real operational level option.

By the turn 15, we usually have grand total of, say, 100 German attacks per turn, for maybe 1 Soviet, so that's something to the tune of 1500:15 (probably less for Sovs in most games). Realistic? I don't know, my gut feeling tells me it isn't.

So what else can the hapless Soviet do but dig? Even digging usually does not help, as even Pieter admits. In my opinion, we need to reduce "supermanism" before we start reducing anything else.

I apologize for hijacking another Q-Ball's thread with my supermen diatribe, I'll do my best to restrain from doing it again

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 51
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 1:05:21 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

You mean Soviets do have a 2 CV division anywhere on the map? I am not sure I have any in my games.


A near full strength Rifle division has a CV of around 2 (or 3 if it's near 50 experience/morale). 1 CV on the counter can also indicate 19 CV during combat, it isn't literally 10. My point is that even in the best of cases, with a number of 2 CV Rifle divisions, Soviet defensive CV's are generally not scary in clear terrain or terrain with low intrinsic fort modifiers.

quote:

Whether Soviets are too weak or Germans too strong is rhetoric. The point is: counterattacking is a forlorn hope, and it practically does not exist as viable option. Yes, a Kiev MD tank unit can surprise unlucky Rumanians or some regiment caught in the open but that's more of a gimmick than a real operational level option.

By the turn 15, we usually have grand total of, say, 100 German attacks per turn, for maybe 1 Soviet, so that's something to the tune of 1500:15 (probably less for Sovs in most games). Realistic? I don't know, my gut feeling tells me it isn't.

So what else can the hapless Soviet do but dig? Even digging usually does not help, as even Pieter admits. In my opinion, we need to reduce "supermanism" before we start reducing anything else.

I apologize for hijacking another Q-Ball's thread with my supermen diatribe, I'll do my best to restrain from doing it again


I still disagree with you about the Soviet counterattacking possibilities, at least with the current CV variability and odds modifier. Like I said, the main problem is the lack of sufficient available forces, not the Soviet unit quality per se. A mob of 1-2 CV Rifle divisions can still fairly easily push back German units with good support and good leaders.

It takes until early/mid August to cure the problems caused by the German opening moves (you can iron out most C&C problems on turn 4, though, due to the AP's you get when Reserve Front activates), at which point the Soviets should have fairly large numbers of ready units. You're not going to be able to launch hundreds of counterattacks, but 10 counterattacks/turn is far from impossible as long as you preserve and concentrate forces. I average 2-4 counterattacks/turn in the first 3 turns, about 6 after that and slowly moving towards 10 after that.

I don't really see the point of attacking German infantry early on: they'll always kill lots of my men with heavy weapons and damaging them doesn't do much on the long term, so I attack mobile units instead. The Germans are not really going to feel it if one or two of their infantry divisions takes 1000 extra losses during a turn, but they will most certainly feel it if a couple of their mobile units take 1000 extra losses each turn, and they lose ~200 extra tanks each turn on top of their irrecoverable tank losses during the logistics phase. THAT slows the Germans down. Panzer divisions are in many ways fragile like Tank corps/divisions, they just have a slightly thicker glass jaw.

< Message edited by ComradeP -- 3/9/2011 1:06:42 PM >


_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 52
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 1:27:21 PM   
Rafo35

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 2/22/2011
Status: offline
I agree with ComradeP. Depending of the daring of the Germans, the Soviet can make several counter-attack each turns. I know I do !

Also, although I'll try to make mainly succesfull attacks, I don't mind losing some of them. Lot's of Russians are going to die anyway, but I'm sure that on average the ratio vs the Germans is a lot better during my turn than during his !

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 53
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 1:41:02 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
I also attack with isolated units, if my opponent tries to contain them with some security regiment. Losses don't really matter, as the guys are going to surrender next turn anyway. You can in many case still force security regiments to retreat as they have an in-battle CV of 5 or so most of the time, something even your isolated units should be able to deal with.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Rafo35)
Post #: 54
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 2:07:41 PM   
Klydon


Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline
Not to say this is totally the case about Russian counter attacks, but one has to wonder if player Russians are more wise as far as counter attacking while Uncle Joe as a player may go through a learning curve with something like "Comrade, if we counter attack, its 1-3 odds!" to which the response may be "Yes, but we may roll a 1 on a 20 sided die and cause the Facists casualties so do it or lose your head!". I like the point of primarily attacking the mobile forces because historically that was what had a tendency to happen and it certainly had an effect both on their combat effectiveness and also on German tactics as the campaign went along. 

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 55
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 3:03:26 PM   
Texas D


Posts: 121
Joined: 10/21/2006
From: Republic of Texas
Status: offline
It would be easier to follow Q-balls AAR if you gents would have these debates on another thread.

(in reply to Klydon)
Post #: 56
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 3:33:18 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Texas_D

It would be easier to follow Q-balls AAR if you gents would have these debates on another thread.


But then wouldn't be half as fun

It's not like Q-Ball is posting updates every two hours, we are there to bump his thread to stay on top of the list...

(in reply to Texas D)
Post #: 57
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 4:37:44 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
If Q-Ball minds, we'll take it elsewhere. We're not trying to derail his thread, we're just having a lively debate about what's happening and what could happen.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 58
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 4:47:25 PM   
Reconvet

 

Posts: 355
Joined: 1/17/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

You mean Soviets do have a 2 CV division anywhere on the map? I am not sure I have any in my games.



If you don't throw newly arrived shell units to the front before they have 80% supply and ammo then you WILL get 2 CV infantry divisions quite quick. Attach these new formations to non-STAVKA armies with a 5-admin general, and 2 to 3 dig turns can work wonders CV-wise. I never send units into combat without ammo except in really bad situations.

I hope Q-Ball won't mind 1 screenshot to give evidence of quite a few 2 CV sovjet units (turn 10, pbem):







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

The biggest threat for mankind is ignorance.


(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 59
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 3/9/2011 4:52:33 PM   
Oleg Mastruko


Posts: 4921
Joined: 10/21/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Reconvet

Attach these new formations to non-STAVKA armies with a 5-admin general


I was being somewhat ironic.... but now that you mentioned it, why do you think units gain strength faster if attached to non Stavka armies (ie, front armies?).

My own strategy, when forming a shock armies who I need to perform better than others, is to leave them in white counters, ie attached directly to Stavka. Regular run of the mill, stop-the-Germans-at-all-costs armies get attached to Fronts. Is this wrong and if so why?

(in reply to Reconvet)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie (R) Rnd 2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.170