Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/25/2011 8:24:02 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Turn 21: First Turn of Snow

Our SNOW offensive got off to a fair start, causing 80,000 Soviet losses for 15,000 in return, and creating several smaller pockets.

Von Beanie's layered defenses prevent big pockets and breakthroughs, and I also need to keep the Panzers close at hand.

Next turn, if all these pockets hold (I think they will), I will liquidate the 14 units I have surrounded, and probably push just a little more for positioning. I don't want to leave Panzers in the open the last turn of Snow, because they'll suffer attrition losses, so I really need to wrap-up my attacks next turn.

If I can destroy 16-20 units and cause 250K Soviet losses, that will be a successful Snow campaign, and take the edge off Winter. I hope.....




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Schmauser)
Post #: 121
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/25/2011 8:25:52 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		schmauser: I don't know that SUs take the same attrition as regular units. I started to wonder about this last winter. The units that attached directly to Mountain Divisions DEFINITELY did not suffer attrition, and checking a few more, they didn't appear to either.

I will investigate this again, not sure if it's WAD, or maybe my SUs were just taking replacements quickly so I didn't notice.

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 122
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/26/2011 2:47:26 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline
I'm thinking maybe snow is the time to use the panzers to eliminate the pockets. They will be moving back to cities and rebuilding where the infantry will be out in the cold suffering.


_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 123
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/28/2011 3:07:11 PM   
Schmauser

 

Posts: 36
Joined: 1/24/2011
Status: offline 		I don't either and can't check since I am WITEless until I get a new computer.

I do know that attached SU's are counted for troop levels, guns and afv's on the unit counters including HQ's.

You might want to look at the FBD units too. They have very high manpower levels due to all the attached construction units.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 124
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 3:49:15 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Turn 24: Winter Cometh

Snow Offensive Wrap-Up: The results were somewhat disappointing; we inflicted about 150K Soviet losses in return for 25K casualties. We destroyed a total of 10 Units; would have been more, but Von Beanie did a good job breaking pockets, so that in the end, I had to rout 6 units rather than pocket them. C'est la guerre!

We did inflict over 30 routs, so hopefully that disrupted him somewhat. I did that last game though where I got slaughtered, so I don't think it really does much.

Pre-Winter Sitrep:
See graphics below; pretty self-explainatory.

Here is my BLIZZARD strategy:

Turn 1: Withdraw one hex to new trenches, and present only every other hex to attack. We are going to pull back a hex a turn, except at the entrances to the CRIMEA; here, we are using the Romanian Mountain units to hopefully hold the line.

Here is my winter checklist, let me know if I missed anything:

1. LEADERS: I replaced my worst German leaders
2. PANZERS: Are all tucked away in cities
3. RESERVES: 17 German Infantry Divisions are sprinkled around the map in Blizzard-Safe Cities. Initially, I am using depleted ones; they are going to REFIT while they recover. I also have 10 Romanian Divisions in reserve. Both German Mountain Divisions are in reserve.
4. CHECKERBOARD: Limited front, pulled back a hex per turn
5. FORTS: I have constructed a line of forts 10 hexes to the rear of the front, and tried to construct some close to the front, but I can't fill 10 hexes with forts. I created FORTIFIED zones to help; 100% of them are picked-up now. None will be in the open.
6. EXCESS UNITS: 10 airbase units and extra Corps HQ (mostly Romanian) are back in the no-Blizzard Zone
7. TOWNS: All units, if possible, seek shelter in towns and cities. All close to the front occupied.
8. OREL BULGE: That Orel Bulge, where I almost made it to Voronezh? That's definitely being pulled back, probably a little faster than the flanks.

I'm probably screwed despite all this, but it's not for lack of understanding of how this works




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Q-Ball -- 3/29/2011 3:50:00 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Schmauser)
Post #: 125
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 4:00:17 AM   
PeeDeeAitch


Posts: 1276
Joined: 1/1/2007
From: Laramie, Wyoming
Status: offline 		Keep in mind that the Finns can attack over the "no move" line. Small help I know, but that slow down things a wee bit...in my game I have a nice row of empty hexes south of the that line where the Soviets dare not move.  Thos units east of Orel might lose as much as some of my guys did that were on the edge of supply.  By January they are unready.

_____________________________

"The torment of precautions often exceeds the dangers to be avoided. It is sometimes better to abandon one's self to destiny."

- Call me PDH

- WitE noob tester

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 126
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 4:05:08 AM   
randallw

 

Posts: 2057
Joined: 9/2/2010
Status: offline 		Your worst German general would be taken by the Soviet player with no grumbling. 

(in reply to PeeDeeAitch)
Post #: 127
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 4:18:01 AM   
Klydon


Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline 		What are your plans with the Luftwaffe over the winter?


(in reply to randallw)
Post #: 128
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 3:09:37 PM   
Ketza


Posts: 2227
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Columbia, Maryland
Status: offline 		I am no expert but keeping the Luftwaffe active seems to have helped me in the Blizzard.

(in reply to Klydon)
Post #: 129
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 3/29/2011 4:20:35 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeeDeeAitch

Keep in mind that the Finns can attack over the "no move" line. Small help I know, but that slow down things a wee bit...in my game I have a nice row of empty hexes south of the that line where the Soviets dare not move.  Thos units east of Orel might lose as much as some of my guys did that were on the edge of supply.  By January they are unready.


I, and Von Beanie, are well aware of this. There are only 3 hexes between Lake Ilmen and the No-Move line; Von Beanie attacked in this corridor, and angry Finns constantly routed units on his flank. For this reason, he gave up on that approach.

I have 2 Finnish Divisions up there poised for this purpose.

LUFTWAFFE: Most of the airbases I have moved are ARMY airbases, which only have Recon Planes. I don't really need tons of recon IMO, the Russians are attacking, not much I can do about it. I anticipate disbanding most of theses for replacements in the spring.

I also sent back 3 LW Airbases, by sending planes to RESERVE. I plan to keep the Ju-52s in reserve for now (I can't see needing them), and use alot of fighters.

The Romanian Airforce, I sent alot of units to RESERVE, ones that were very short-handed. Alot of Romanian Bomber units don't get replacements, and end up very depleted, because they use Polish or French A/C. I am down to only 2 Romanian Airbases at the front, they are both piled-high with the best RUM units. I will bring some Airbases back in spring, but I can see disbanding 3 or 4 to get more Romanian Rifles in the line.

The Slovaks, Hungarians, and Italians, I just sent them all back. Their air units are all pretty weak. No reason to sit out in the Blizzard when they barely contribute.

I am open to suggestions though, I am really NOT the expert of Luftwaffe management!!!!

_____________________________


(in reply to PeeDeeAitch)
Post #: 130
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 4/6/2011 12:23:03 AM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		Hey  Q-Ball, no update?  I've come over here from WITP, always liked learning from your AAR's.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 131
1.04 Commences! - 4/26/2011 2:48:20 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Turn 25: Blizzard!

After a hiatus, Von Beanie and I are continuing the game with the latest patch installed.

The House Rules limiting attacks are OUT. Von Beanie can unload all he wants.

This might be the first AAR going through the new Beta Blizzard, so if everyone wants, I post some details.

First turn we suffered 29,000 attrition losses, which is less than I expected. Most of my units left in the open were not hurt that badly, so I am not as concerned with making sure everyone gets to a city or town. Because I set this up, though, before the beta, all my Panzers with a couple exceptions are in cities.

Orel/Kharkov Salients: My heavy snow attacks near Orel and Kharkov created salients; we are abandoning gains, though I am holding on to forts in many areas rather than fall back onto open ground. At least this turn, Rivers help a ton, so I am holding any river lines (Ice Level is 7, which provides alot of defense benefits).

We will see how this develops, but letting everyone know this is back ON!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 132
RE: 1.04 Commences! - 4/26/2011 3:45:18 AM   
Sabre21


Posts: 8231
Joined: 4/27/2001
From: on a mountain in Idaho
Status: offline 		Can you post the OOB screen. I would like to compare where you guys are at with the game I did while testing this. In my test game I made it to turn 38 but that was before the armaments were increased by 50%. A new game will no doubt play much different than your current one due to this increase. You will be facing much stronger Soviet units throughout the summer and into the mud season.

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 133
RE: 1.04 Commences! - 4/26/2011 4:00:29 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sabre21

Can you post the OOB screen. I would like to compare where you guys are at with the game I did while testing this. In my test game I made it to turn 38 but that was before the armaments were increased by 50%. A new game will no doubt play much different than your current one due to this increase. You will be facing much stronger Soviet units throughout the summer and into the mud season.


A few posts up, #125, has the OOB the turn before. Is that good enough? It didn't change much to turn 25.

The Soviets enter Blizzard with 4.9 mil men, and 4100 tanks. Higher than I would like. V-B did a good job not getting guys cut-off, after the first few turns.

_____________________________


(in reply to Sabre21)
Post #: 134
RE: 1.04 Commences! - 4/26/2011 9:13:30 PM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline 		I think the attrition loses you seeing on the t25 loses view are from the last snow turn and not the first blizzard turn? But I could be very wrong on that?

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 135
RE: More Dispatches from OKH: Q-ball (A) v Von Beanie ... - 4/26/2011 9:40:50 PM   
Aussiematto

 

Posts: 344
Joined: 2/13/2011
From: Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

In my opinion your Panzers in the AGS are not placed well. Ideally, Panzer movements in the south should depict the letter W, cutting up and down each turn, encircling Sovs with every "cut", also ignoring Kiev (it's not important at all, it will fall eventually anyway).


Oleg -- you are right about the cutting up and down, this is definitely working for me. However, the positioning of the panzers driving to Kiev might also be necessary, so as to lure the Soviets into defending it? In almost all cases I

_____________________________

I still remember cardboard!

(in reply to Oleg Mastruko)
Post #: 136
RE: 1.04 Commences! - 4/27/2011 3:50:18 AM   
kswanson1

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 3/25/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: abulbulian

I think the attrition loses you seeing on the t25 loses view are from the last snow turn and not the first blizzard turn? But I could be very wrong on that?


I think you are right. I ran an AI vs AI game over the weekend to record various game stats. One of the stats I was interested in was Axis attrition rates during the first winter with the v1.04.11 patch. The Axis were suffering about 100,000 casualties per turn strictly from attrition during December. This rate looks to drop to about 50 or 60k per turn in January. It seems to drop again to about 30 to 40k in February.

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 137
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 4/28/2011 3:41:41 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Turn 27: 12/18/41

Attacks up and down the line; I have a serious problem in the sector around Orel, and also along 17th Army front in the south.

In AGN's sector, not much of a push at all.

In the Center and South, I figure to get pushed back to Smolensk, and probably right to D-Town and Z-Town before the winter is over

Here is some data so far on winter results:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Q-Ball -- 4/28/2011 3:43:00 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 138
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 4/30/2011 7:27:30 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Turn 29: 1/1/42

Not too bad so far; I am losing alot of ground in AGC and AGS, but I expected that. I hope to hold Z-Town/D-Town through the winter, but that's doubtful. Kharkov, Orel, and Bryansk are not gone yet, but I expect them to be shortly. C'est la guerre.

The Wehrmacht is doing OK, though, the new rules certainly make a big difference. By this time in my last game vs. Von Beanie, I had at least 3 dozen infantry units that were already UNREADY. Now, I might have one or two.

Here are the current numbers for posterity:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 139
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 4/30/2011 10:08:47 PM   
marty_01

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 2/10/2011
Status: offline 		From your description, it sounds like blizzard attrition is toned down some. It also sounds like your getting pressed in an across the map gigantor winter offensive. Is that about the size of it? It still sounds like the Soviet attack capability during winter isn't in tune with their historical capability.

Soviet Documents on the Use of War Experience, Vol II, The Winter Campaign 1941 - 1942, Translated by H.Orenstein. Sort of a quick synopsis. The study indicates that the Soviet Army felt German defensive positions were extremely difficult to attack and push back during the winter of 41-42. Much of this was apparently related to the Red Army’s inability to coordinate multi-divisional attacks – these are the Red Army’s own words not mine. Lessons learned by the Red Army were along the lines of German strong points should be bypassed and isolated rather than attacked directly. It sounds like the more successful ground gains during the winter offensive were the result of Red Army units shoe horning Isolated German stong point out of position via flanking moves rather than by direct frontal assault. I think they took these lessons to heart in terms of how they went about executing Operation Uranus -- double envelopment of Stalingrad by pincers pushing through Axis Allies rather than attempting to crash through German units.

Granted the Red Army was able to Push Army Group Center back from the gates of Moscow during the winter of 1941-42. But that is a much more focused winter offensive relative to the across the map winter offensives we are still seeing in WiTE.


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 140
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 5/2/2011 3:03:13 PM   
marty_01

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 2/10/2011
Status: offline 		I'm not meaning to distract from your AAR report. But as your in the middle of the blizzard, it seemed appropriate to talk about the games combat model in terms of blizzard effects. Historical vs Game...

QUESTION: Do you think something like the Demyansk Pocket could actually survive within the context of the current Blizzard Rules?

In game terms the dimensions of the Demyansk Pocket would have been about 3 hexes long (north-south) by about 2 hexes deep (east-west). There were six German Divisions trapped in the pocket from about 8th of February 1942 to about May of 1942. This included five infantry divisions and the Totenkopf motorized Infantry Division. In game terms, it conveniently works out, based upon review of the situation maps of the battle, to be about one German division defending each of the six hexes of the pocket.

The pocket was supplied almost exclusively from the air. That is until a corridor was finally opened to the pocket in the spring. – the “Ramushevo Corridor”. The German eventually withdrew from the pocket via the thin Ramushevo Corridor in May of 1942.

The Russian order of battle apparently included at least 18 Infantry Divisions and 3 Brigades.

In game terms, the pocket had to survive at least three turns of the February 1942 Blizzard – while also in an isolated state. In additional the pocket would have had to survive an additional several turns of March snow while still in an isolated state. The units within the pocket suffered approximately 13,500 casulties (KIA and WIA).

I’m in the middle of several PBEM games two as Axis and Two as Soviets. One of the PBEM is actually in the heart of the blizzard. I’m Axis in this one. I’ve already suffered the complete elimination of a three division\two hex pocket. One hex was a level three fort, the other was a level 2 fort. These were contiguous rough terrain hexes which were actually not far from the historical Demyansk Pocket. I used the entire Luftwaffe from AGC and AGN to air drop supplies on the two hexes. All three divisions were in reasonably decent state in terms of strength prior to the blizzard hitting. Moreover two were at CV of 8 and one was at a CV of 9 prior to the commencement of the blizzard. My game pocket held out for one turn after being isolated.


< Message edited by marty_01 -- 5/2/2011 3:13:37 PM >

(in reply to marty_01)
Post #: 141
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 5/9/2011 3:28:02 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Last turn numbers for posterity




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 142
RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg - 5/21/2011 3:51:47 AM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Feb 19, 1942

Winter is winding down, but it's been a grind. Attrition isn't a problem, it's the incessant Soviet attacks.

I have formed hedgehogs and given ground, but even that is not that helpful; you have to give up a hex a turn basically with that strategy (see below), which means eventually you are in open terrain.

It could be I'm not that good, and that Von Beanie IS very good at building reserves. Or both.

But this game is completely lost for me I am sure. Probably going to end it in 1942, once I confirm that an offensive is impossible.

I'll probably try Soviets, maybe I can win that side.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 143
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Leningrad was Petrograd was St. Petersburg Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.172