rich12545
Posts: 1705
Joined: 10/31/2000 From: Palouse, WA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: macgregor When someone tries to paint Yugoslavia as 'wag the dog', the argument is already poisoned. That conflict was the most successful the US has fought since WW2. Any trouble from that conflict occurred by trying to send ground troops to police the area afterward. By the 'Libyan' standard you set, we've been in Iraq since the first Gulf War. It wasn't costing us trillions of dollars and I'd argue it was highly successful. A hundred thousand less people would be dead there, and Saddam's lack of popularity would be approaching the level of a Ghadaffy-like insurgency, not to mention a US economy benefiting from an extra trillion dollars, 5000 servicemen with triple that not disabled for life, along with cheaper oil. I'm willing to forgive military mistakes. What I won't forgive is the adamant refusal to learn from those mistakes. And some lessons could have been learned in Vietnam. We have 2 conflicts going on at once in southern Asia. One, a highly successful campaign using drones and commandos when targets are available, and one that is such a failure that it all but negates our success by maintaining an occupation force in Afghanistan. We should have been out of there yesterday. But to not see the success of our air/drone/commando campaigns is military ignorance of the highest order, and politically based. You're having difficulty with the concept "national interest." We were in Yugoslavia for the same reason an aspirin factory was bombed. We had zero national interest in Yugoslavia and we have zero national interest in Libya. So why are we there??? To try out our drones and see how they work? If that's the case then let's go someplace where they can make a difference, like Iran. Libya is a tinpot country. Iran is a genuine threat to our national interest. To not see the difference is the height of ignorance. We should pick our wars against countries that are threats, not just because we can show off our military might.
|