Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

ship withdrawl quandary

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> ship withdrawl quandary Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 8:58:36 PM   
bush

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 10/30/2007
From: san jose, ca
Status: offline
I have a ship overdue for being withdrawn (BB Ramilles). It is pretty heavily damaged (70 FLT.). I have moored her in both Colombo and Bombay, but no "withdraw ship" option was given - I am assuming because of the damage. I thought about just scuttling her, but that option is not available either.

This is eating up 65 PPs per day, so I am thinking about sending her on a one-way mission to visit Tokyo. Anybody have another suggestion?
Post #: 1
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 9:16:26 PM   
beppi

 

Posts: 382
Joined: 3/11/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
Run it with forced full speed a few turns and chances are very good that it will sink in a few turns. Quicker than a trip to Tokio.

(in reply to bush)
Post #: 2
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 9:21:39 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: beppi

Run it with forced full speed a few turns and chances are very good that it will sink in a few turns. Quicker than a trip to Tokio.


I would send her to Tokyo before I would send her to Tokio.

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to beppi)
Post #: 3
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 9:36:10 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bushpsu

I have a ship overdue for being withdrawn (BB Ramilles). It is pretty heavily damaged (70 FLT.). I have moored her in both Colombo and Bombay, but no "withdraw ship" option was given - I am assuming because of the damage. I thought about just scuttling her, but that option is not available either.

This is eating up 65 PPs per day, so I am thinking about sending her on a one-way mission to visit Tokyo. Anybody have another suggestion?


You could send her off-map to Aden and withdraw and save the VPs. I think, don't quote me, that you can withdraw as soon as she gets of map; doesn't have to get to Aden. I don't think damage matters in off-map withdrawls.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to bush)
Post #: 4
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 10:08:02 PM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline
You consider sending your men on a suicide mission? With this leadership style you should rather play the Japanese side, shouldn't you?  

_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 5
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/4/2011 10:44:42 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

You consider sending your men on a suicide mission? With this leadership style you should rather play the Japanese side, shouldn't you?  


A willingness to throw his subordinates under a bus to advance his career is a requirement to make high rank in the modern USN.

_____________________________


(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 6
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/5/2011 12:55:39 AM   
erstad

 

Posts: 1944
Joined: 8/3/2004
From: Midwest USA
Status: offline
I had a similar situation in my game with cuttlefish. I tried to move off map but the TF would auto-disband in columbo during turn execution instead of returning to the off map base. I assume because of the high damage. I ended up riding it out, probably cost something like 2000 PPs.

The one thing I didn't think to try at the time is whether ship/TF commanders with high aggression would have worked better.

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 7
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/5/2011 3:13:30 AM   
Fallschirmjager


Posts: 6793
Joined: 3/18/2002
From: Chattanooga, Tennessee
Status: offline
PP's as the Allies are moot by 1942 anyways. After the first 12 months I never have problems having enough to do whatever I want.

(in reply to erstad)
Post #: 8
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/5/2011 4:29:35 AM   
Pascal_slith


Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline
IIRC the ship must not have damage above a certain level for withdrawl to be acceptable. As some others have said, use it on a high-risk mission and get it sunk.

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(


(in reply to Fallschirmjager)
Post #: 9
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/8/2011 3:57:59 AM   
jdcorley

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 10/30/2004
Status: offline
I discovered by accident that a ship which must withdraw can safely sail thru enemy waters without being attacked! I had a ship on the way back to SF when it went direct instead of safe... right from Australia past TRUK in spring 42... made it all the way to Hawaii unmolested!!!

Tried it again and it worked. Had a withdrawing DD escorting a CVG, no attacks on the DD but the CV and CLs were almost sunk. The glitch only works on the ship needing withdrawl, it isn't a magical shield charm.


Just a glitch, but it might be there to prevent suicide missions designed to save PolPoints.

(in reply to Pascal_slith)
Post #: 10
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/16/2011 8:21:55 PM   
bush

 

Posts: 444
Joined: 10/30/2007
From: san jose, ca
Status: offline
UPDATE:

I went with trying to get off-map first and that proved to be the winner. Once I reached the safe confines of Aden I was able to withdraw.

(in reply to jdcorley)
Post #: 11
RE: ship withdrawl quandary - 5/16/2011 9:07:30 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdcorley

I discovered by accident that a ship which must withdraw can safely sail thru enemy waters without being attacked! I had a ship on the way back to SF when it went direct instead of safe... right from Australia past TRUK in spring 42... made it all the way to Hawaii unmolested!!!

Tried it again and it worked. Had a withdrawing DD escorting a CVG, no attacks on the DD but the CV and CLs were almost sunk. The glitch only works on the ship needing withdrawl, it isn't a magical shield charm.


Just a glitch, but it might be there to prevent suicide missions designed to save PolPoints.


Nothing in the code to support this. I'd vote for "luck".

(in reply to jdcorley)
Post #: 12
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> ship withdrawl quandary Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.172