Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 5/31/2011 5:53:45 PM   
promethean

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 5/31/2011
Status: offline
I'm looking for a (relatively) casual game. Perhaps "game" is the operative word, where "simulations" is what I am not looking for.

Which would be better for this, JTCS or AT? (Or is neither appropriate? Or do you have a 3rd recommendation?)

Thanks!
Post #: 1
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 5/31/2011 9:56:12 PM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline
Oh that's a tough one, I have both and they are both in my opinion must haves. JTCS has every gun/weapon/tank/you-name-it, ever made in the database, a huge scenario base and countless hours of playing. But no production. AT, or to be more precise AT Gold is different in that it has no "divisions" or "brigades" but units/counters, in those counters you can place every piece of equipment you want... specifically tailored for a certain terrain of operations. So Inf for woods and cities, tanks for open terrain, planes for bombing and interdiction. The huge bonus ATG has is the production factor, you decide what to produce and what to do with it. ATG lacks the huge weapon database JTCS has, or Gary Grigsby War in the East, for that matter. There are no Shermans, Valentines, T-34's, only light-medium-heavy-superheavy tanks level 1 to 4. Though that is not a bad thing in my book, it sometimes feels as if you're missing a bit gameflavour, no PzKpfw III when you're playing the German side feels a bit... dunno, on the other hand, medium tank II is equal to PzKpfw III if you know what I mean.

Also ATG feels more like Civ wargaming, small or very large maps (shrouded or not) with cities everywhere and you can conquer it all! More strategic, whereas JTCS is more on conquering certain objectives, say a hill, or a town.
I enjoyed both tremendously, countless hours of gaming.
Oh, one reason I don't buy Battlefront Strategic Command series anymore is; no stacking allowed. Also it's almost impossible to do encirclements in the SC series, whereas ATG shines in things like that, sweeping fast manoeuvres; a left blow and a right hook, that's ATG in my opinion.
Oh well, both are great. But ATG is newer and Vic provides updates very very frequently.

(in reply to promethean)
Post #: 2
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 5/31/2011 10:38:51 PM   
Jason Petho


Posts: 15009
Joined: 6/22/2004
From: Terrace, BC, Canada
Status: offline
JTCS truly shines when playing against a Human Opponent.

You can find many active players at "The Blitz"  ... http://www.theblitz.org

Jason Petho


_____________________________


(in reply to Josh)
Post #: 3
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 5/31/2011 11:26:14 PM   
Wolfe1759


Posts: 798
Joined: 1/20/2008
From: Shropshire, UK
Status: offline
The most basic difference between the two is the scale of the game, JTCS is tactical/operational whereas AT is grand operational/strategic.

Of the two my choice would be JTCS as although it has a lot of detail it feels a lot less "fiddly" than AT and for me was easier to get into.

You may also want to consider Combat Command (the newly released Matrix edition) which is a very nice game towards the lighter end of the complexity scale.

_____________________________

"In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Jason Petho)
Post #: 4
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 5/31/2011 11:54:09 PM   
promethean

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 5/31/2011
Status: offline
Hello All, thanks for the replies

From the sound of it, I'll have to check out both at some point, though I'm not sure that my decision on which to try first has been made any easier Here's where the lack of a demo makes it difficult for a consumer, though I understand the problems developers & publishers face on this front too.

I've found a few tutorial videos on JTCS, which give some insight, but none for AT or ATG. Can anyone point out a link to some?

Josh-- I know what you mean on the SC series. Bottlenecks there are ridiculous. Their newest WWI game has a unit-swap feature, and the potential of much larger maps, that may mitigate this a little, but I haven't taken the plunge on even the demo yet to say for sure.





< Message edited by promethean -- 5/31/2011 11:55:38 PM >

(in reply to promethean)
Post #: 5
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 6/1/2011 1:28:54 AM   
htuna


Posts: 591
Joined: 1/19/2009
From: Boston, MA
Status: offline
Battlefield Academy is very casual.. and very easy to get into.. yet can be pretty addictive...

(in reply to promethean)
Post #: 6
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 6/1/2011 2:34:44 AM   
sabre1


Posts: 1928
Joined: 8/15/2001
From: CA
Status: offline
BA or JTCS, with ATG a distant third in terms of casual. (so don't jump on my guys)

(in reply to htuna)
Post #: 7
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 6/1/2011 6:32:31 AM   
Lützow


Posts: 1517
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline
Gameplay in JTCS is remotely comparable to Steel Panthers.

For AT there is a demo of the predecessor game, but I forgot the name. Peoples tactics or so.

_____________________________


(in reply to sabre1)
Post #: 8
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 6/1/2011 4:02:17 PM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline
Yes the predecessor of AT is called Peoples Tactics, it's for free (I think)... but there's no comparison between P-Tactics and ATGold, the latter is much better.
I forgot to mention that Jason Petho is working hard on a Modern Wars for the JTCS series, I posted my response just before hitting the bunk and then when I almost fell asleep it suddenly hit me; " oh my, I forgot to mention Jason is putting much work on his add on "Modern Wars". Sorry for that mr. Petho. Anyways, with that addon included JTCS covers a vast timeperiod, and has a huge scenario base.
Me, I wouldn't know which one too chose...  Both I'd say.

(in reply to Lützow)
Post #: 9
RE: John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics - 6/1/2011 7:42:03 PM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cmurphy625

Battlefield Academy is very casual.. and very easy to get into.. yet can be pretty addictive...


Agreed. BA is a much better choice than either given your stated requirements.

(in reply to htuna)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> John Tiller Campaign Series vs. Adavanced Tactics Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.781