Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: New Art?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: New Art? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Art? - 1/24/2012 6:53:56 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		All files are sent.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 301
RE: New Art? - 1/24/2012 7:33:15 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Just sent to Stanislav:

FatR
Just loaded the files you sent me (Scen 70) and they do not have the changes made to IJN LCUs. The changes made by you and ksfgo didn’t impact the ground stuff—right? Can I use the files sent and KEEP the LCU file? Nevermind that doesn’t work either because I moved planes around some (like the Tinas to Babeldoap) and that wouldn’t show up either.

Only good news here is that I am running the Scenario as Scen 78 and not 70.

Do you know which file is the Ship Classes file? I know the changes for China are included in Scen 78 so if I just move the ship classes file then things should be OK with my ongoing games.

Also means that I need to make the finishing changes to Scen 70 as I did for 78 by deleting the SNLF and replacing them with Assault Brigades, the ADU replacing the Naval Guard, etc... CRAP! Stupidity. Must have missed one of the file updates when we were trying to get this out. Has to be my fault...
John



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 302
RE: New Art? - 1/25/2012 4:45:12 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		OK. Things look pretty good. I uploaded the wpa, wpc, and wps files from 070, renamed them to 078, and dropped them into my on-going game with Lew. Everything looks pretty good. Have asked FatR for a specific example of his work that was excluded from 078 to make sure this has been fixed. IF we are good then we can Post these files separately for anyone who started 4.0 under 078 or 070. Will Post again when I know we're OK.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 303
Updated Scenario - 2/1/2012 6:54:36 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I've sent to Stanislav our corrected files for RA 4.0. Got everything fixed after he found out we had missed a handoff with the rush to finish the Mod.

Additionally, I sent the 3 new Allied Load Screens as well so the Allies might have something to look at other then superior Japanese RA ART!

Enjoy Guys!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 304
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/1/2012 8:47:42 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline 		I've uploaded everything on the site. For those who already started games in the previous version of 4.0 - you probably things should be able to update your existing games, but I still advise to make a reserve save before doing it. Updating wpa.dat and wpc.dat (aircraft and classes of ships) is least likely to cause bugs, wps.dat and wpl.dat (ships and locations) might potentially be problematic.

You also, won't miss the key changes, namely increased China garrizon requirements, and bringing the mod to DaBabes standard, even in case of inability to update. You'll miss more rational upgrades on Japanese DDs and CAs, plus the ability to upgrade the Nick line into nightfighters. The latter is not quite as important anymore, because the latest beta, as far as I can see, had reduced the potency of nightbombing very considerably.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 305
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/18/2012 8:38:42 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		guys, I know you have moved on from RA, but I just have couple of questions regarding my freshly started PBEM and I would very much appreciated answers.

1. 11 Air Fleet - I have it as static in Formosa, is this WAD? This is very important HQ, since it has 5 hex radius.

2. 5th Air division - I'm not sure if this is a mod issue or more general tech support. I had this unit load transports in the first turn for PI. Once unloaded, I got this message (see picture). Half of the unit is in Iba and the other half disappeared and is scheduled to return in 31 days. To make matters worse, parent part of the unit is gone, with all my torpedoes ???




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BigBadWolf -- 2/18/2012 10:48:43 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 306
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/18/2012 9:19:11 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		I went through the tracker and it appears that there are few other HQs that are similarly divided (half on map, half in reinforcements cue)

25th Army
20th Army
1st Air Division

Any advice?


_____________________________


(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 307
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/18/2012 10:21:14 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		I opened RA in editor and 11th Air Fleet doesn't have any static devices, yet in game it is static. Those 88 guns have asterisks.

< Message edited by BigBadWolf -- 2/18/2012 10:48:26 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 308
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/18/2012 10:47:41 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		11th Air Fleet in game





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BigBadWolf -- 2/18/2012 10:48:12 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 309
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/18/2012 10:48:09 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		And in Editor





Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 310
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/22/2012 3:20:53 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Thanks to Mr. Wolfie and Michael, we found a couple of errata within RA 4.0. When I decided to add some AA capability for several types of Japanese units, I did not realize there were two differing types of 88MM gun. Unfortunately I chose the static variant and so NOTHING with those guns could move. Additionally, the radar that several ground units upgrade to was the SHIP-BASED variant. We got those fixed and did a database update. FatR has already replaced the files. Since this is just database work, anyone using the the current files will have no issue downloading these small changes into their existing games. Just click YES when it asks for the update with database question.

Anyone else spot issues, PLEASE let us know. Greatly appreciate the work and help.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 311
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/22/2012 4:50:12 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		Thanks guys.

Any chance of those Chinese hordes being addressed in some future revision?

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 312
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/24/2012 9:42:01 PM   
perkinh


Posts: 181
Joined: 2/7/2010
From: Central, NC
Status: offline 		Does Tracker 1.8 work with this mod ?



_____________________________

One of the serious problems in planning the fight against American doctrine.... is that the Americans do not read their manuals, nor do they feel any obligation to follow their doctrine

(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 313
RE: Updated Scenario - 2/26/2012 5:54:01 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Tracker works with RA.

We found some errata within 4.0 and have updated the files. As mentioned before if anyone has a current game running (4.0) it is no problem to add the changes. It did not impact Lew or Roland's games whatsoever.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to perkinh)
Post #: 314
RE: Updated Scenario - 3/14/2012 10:49:25 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Just did a closer look as an Allied player getting ready to play DivePac88. I find that ALL American BFs, including the static ones, have a full TO&E. In my other games it takes most of early '42 to fill out the units.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 315
RE: Updated Scenario - 3/14/2012 3:19:43 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Please keep on eye on pieces of this. We need to know any issues/errata that either you or DivePac notice.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 316
RE: Updated Scenario - 3/14/2012 3:42:02 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Just went through the Allied OOB and it appears that the opening USA BF all start at 100% strength. Luckily it is ONLY those units. I will correct and send Stanislav the amended file to place on the RA Site. This will impact only starting games. Those who already have a game started (ie Lew and I) will have everything remain the same. Merry X-Mas to American player who are already playing RA 4.0!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 317
RE: Updated Scenario - 3/14/2012 4:09:22 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Pulled this from the Thread I opened.

Michael found that all at start USA BF in Scen 70 were beginning at 100% strength. Specifically slots 5000-5049 so I went back to Scen 1 and checked out what they were supposed to be and then changed them to their historical starting numbers. I don't want to have Stanislav work all 11 files so the wpl file is what I need for the change. THANKS Terminus!

This is now fixed and I shall send the wpl file to Stanislav for replacement.

Once again this only impacts new games.



_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 318
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: New Art? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

7.047