Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'! Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/11/2011 4:07:41 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
Got it. Sounds good. I guess it is better to have as much as possible. And with the DB units that adds a lot of punch.

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 361
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/12/2011 9:07:22 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 29th

Another silent day.


Burma: The Allies are finally moving troops(probably support) and aircraft forward - Chittagong just received its first squadron of bombers, probably Blenheims or Wellingtons. A Ki-43 squadron from Malaya is transfered reserve at Bangkok.

Australia: Aerial reconnaissance shows Wydham almost empty, too. Tomorrow its Darwin's turn.

Pacific: An American submarine sights our oiler convoy from Borneo to Truk, but fails to penetrate the convoy's escort screen twice. Excellent performance by the 2 destroyers...

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 362
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/14/2011 10:18:44 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 30th


Burma: Allies fly multiple reconnaissance sorties over at least Cox's Bazar and Akyab. We should have enough Ki-44s, Ki-45s and A6M3s to equip single squadrons in 2 weeks...

East Indies: Tomorrow, Timor will be 100% Japanese and on Java, Djokjarta will fall.

Home Islands: Some new aircraft enter production! Some A6M2 factories convert to the new A6M3(M3 will begin at 1/day, in a month it'll be 3/day, M2 keeps being produced 1/day for now), some Ki-43 factories convert to Ki-44-IIa(Ki-43 carries on 50/month while Ki-44-II also start 1/day target being 4/day), the Ki-45KAIa enters production 1/day and G3M2 factories upgrade to the über-long range G3M3(production remains 22/month).

Below is a screenshot of the area we'll probably next see some action. I'm going to hit Chittagong if nothing happens for a couple of days...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 363
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/17/2011 12:38:53 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
May 1st


East Indies: Djokjarta on Java and Lautem on Timor fall! Darwin reconnoitered: a couple of thousand troops with only a few bigger guns and vehicles. Looks like it isnt reinforced.

Home Islands: The Allied submarines have finally arrived. A wolfpack of 3 American submarines attack a small convoy carrying resources from Mindanao, sinking one medium size Aden class xAK. Some convoys are re-routed with new waypoints, some ASW squadrons set sail from Nagasaki to sail among the "ASW tunnel" between Kyushu and Formosa, while the search arcs or aerial search and AASW units are double checked and readjusted.

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 364
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/18/2011 4:25:59 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
May 2nd

Another silent day...

No planes lost today, not even in accidents, its the 2nd such day in the war to the Japanese.

Kido Butai location classified.

IJAAF ordered to strike Chittagong tomorrow. 50 bombers escorted by circa 50 fighters, no opposition expected.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 12/18/2011 8:27:51 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 365
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/18/2011 10:29:27 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
This game has ever less action...

It is getting tempting to just start doing something... Because the Allies will not. And I dont think I have attrited them enough or conquered enough land to be able to just sit and wait.

Conquered: historical perimeter minus Wake and Aleutians but plus all Solomons, Ndeni, PM and Horn Island.

Japan naval losses: extremely light at 3 DD(1 old 1 long range), 1 DMS, 1 PC, 4 xAP(2 small), 1 AO.
Allied naval losses: 1 CV, 1 BB, 1 CA, 5 CL but 0, ZERO, ships sunk at Pearl despite attacking multiple days

< Message edited by Erkki -- 12/18/2011 10:32:03 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 366
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/19/2011 10:25:43 AM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

This game has ever less action...

It is getting tempting to just start doing something... Because the Allies will not. And I dont think I have attrited them enough or conquered enough land to be able to just sit and wait.

Conquered: historical perimeter minus Wake and Aleutians but plus all Solomons, Ndeni, PM and Horn Island.

Japan naval losses: extremely light at 3 DD(1 old 1 long range), 1 DMS, 1 PC, 4 xAP(2 small), 1 AO.
Allied naval losses: 1 CV, 1 BB, 1 CA, 5 CL but 0, ZERO, ships sunk at Pearl despite attacking multiple days


Yes Jap losses are extremely low.In my own game a have lost CA, 7DD, 2xCS(sad day when i lost them) and 50 transports and second line ships
But all games are different.

< Message edited by koniu -- 12/19/2011 10:58:15 AM >

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 367
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/19/2011 4:47:41 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

This game has ever less action...

It is getting tempting to just start doing something... Because the Allies will not. And I dont think I have attrited them enough or conquered enough land to be able to just sit and wait.

Conquered: historical perimeter minus Wake and Aleutians but plus all Solomons, Ndeni, PM and Horn Island.


The same situation I faced. I was told often enough that it's the Japanese player's responsibility to dictate the pace of the game for 1942. That being said it still doesn't lead to a fun experience if the Allies won't come out to play.

In hindsight I should have expanded farther into the Aleutians and possibly into the S.E. Pacific. This would have set me up to be able to raid the Allied lines of communication, especially with the poor performance of my submarines and inability to find the convoy routes.

I think it's a catch 22. Expand too much and it's hard to defend everything, while gaining a historical perimeter and digging in leads to boredom and no chance to really upset the Allied buildup timetable. My suggestion would be to determine a strategy on how you want to pursue the remainder of 1942. Do you want to consolidate, or try to extend the perimeter in a few directions to delay the Allies further? If I could do it all again I would extend the perimeter far enough out to be able to track Allied movements and create a few bases that I could stage cruiser and the odd carrier raid into the Allied LOC's. Given the SOP of your opponent, you are going to have to bring the fight to him and it's best to cause him as much grief now rather than later in my opinion. It may be worth looking at Northern Australia as well or at least isolating Darwin. It's almost impossible for Japan to rely on air power alone to neutralize a target, it only takes a few days of bad weather to allow the Allies to recover. So I think delaying any buildup of the Australian coast is a good thing and it will require the Allies to commit naval forces to expand from.

If you decide to consolidate don't do something just for actions sake. Have a plan and stick to it, you have to create the openings in which to strike at the Allies as there is no incentive for them to stick their necks out before they are prepared and Smeulders' is quite prepared to sit back and wait. He wants YOU to stick your neck out so plan accordingly. I had no plan and it's been a long haul. Just some thoughts as I'm still trying to evolve as a Japanese player, but I think you have to give yourself as many options as possible.

Happy hunting!

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/19/2011 4:49:42 PM >


_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 368
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/19/2011 5:10:01 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

This game has ever less action...

It is getting tempting to just start doing something... Because the Allies will not. And I dont think I have attrited them enough or conquered enough land to be able to just sit and wait.

Conquered: historical perimeter minus Wake and Aleutians but plus all Solomons, Ndeni, PM and Horn Island.



Here lies a problem for the Allies in doing a "Midway" ... 5 times in my game I set up a low risk trap to "do something" but my boys did not fly or could not find the target ..stuff was lost without any retort. With that game experience it is just not worth risking everything so I cannot possibly "do anything" for two years. So I pick my battles very very carefully.

If I might make a No limit Hold'em poker analogy .. why play the wrong cards like K-Q suited or A-T unsuited out of position or even worse 7-2 unsuited just because I have been getting lousy cards for the past few hours .. especailly knowing that aces are coming soon in the end game ... So we wait for those aces we know are going to come rather than risk it needlessly just to have some pleasure in doing something risky ...

It does not matter if the IJ expand .. GreyJoy's game shows that with India and China taken .. the Allies still can come back in '44 and beat the IJ senseless ...

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 369
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/19/2011 5:17:00 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

Here lies a problem for the Allies in doing a "Midway" ... 5 times in my game I set up a low risk trap to "do something" but my boys did not fly or could not find the target ..stuff was lost without any retort. With that game experience it is just not worth risking everything so I cannot possibly "do anything" for two years. So I pick my battles very very carefully.

If I might make a No limit Hold'em poker analogy .. why play the wrong cards like K-Q suited or A-T unsuited out of position or even worse 7-2 unsuited just because I have been getting lousy cards for the past few hours .. especailly knowing that aces are coming soon in the end game ... So we wait for those aces we know are going to come rather than risk it needlessly just to have some pleasure in doing something risky ...

It does not matter if the IJ expand .. GreyJoy's game shows that with India and China taken .. the Allies still can come back in '44 and beat the IJ senseless ...


The first of course is very true. The Allies can always run into full KB, a CA squadron in night combat or get bad die rolls. But its the same for the IJ. I dont play poker, but like you said in the end, the Allies can win almost one hand behind back even if they lose their whole fleet in 1942. Why not play in 1942 and try to change the course of the war early? Almost no amount of losses other than all the early CVs will put back the date Japan can be forced to surrender, while theres always the chance of getting some skilled and/or lucky shots in.

SqzMyLemon: I have one more offensive in mind that I hope to get some attention from the Allies, but the preparations wont be done until approx 1½ months from now. In the meanwhile I'll have some fun bombing empty Allied airfields (and training & replacing lost aircrew) in Burma to stop those half a million engineers from expanding those fields.

_____________________________


(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 370
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/19/2011 9:42:25 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
May 3rd


Burma: 40 Japanese Ki-21s bombing at 15,000ft managed to score mighty 2 runway, 1 supply depot and 1 base hit at Chittakong! Allies didnt fly.

DEI: Kuching on Borneo falls, 3/4 of the 1½ battalion garrison dies or surrenders. Survivors flee in the rain forest... There are just 2 bases on whole Borneo still in Allies' control, but one is inland and neither has garrison. We'll go raise the flag some time later. Soekarta on Java falls tomorrow and we should need less than 2 weeks to conquer the rest of the island.

Kido Butai: Looks like CS Chitose has some 1000 tons of fuel as CARGO. No idea how that happened. It'd better not receive any penetrating hits before KB returns to port!

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 371
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/20/2011 10:17:55 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
May 4th


DEI: Soerekaja falls, infantry advances...

Other news:

Allies admit to have lost AP William Ward Burrows on December 12th 1941 some 500nm South of Oahu. Reported cause is said to be a 250kg SAP bomb. That report shouldnt have any FOW in it, but it doesnt make any sense - KB was not there that day(or the day before) and I have no reports of that ship or ships of the same class attacked at all, let alone by Japanese carrier aircraft! And if it was attacked and hit by a naval search plane and I wasn't reported, how come a single 250kg bomb, if it even was that big and not a 60kg one from an E14A or some other float plane, sunk a 4,000 ton ship, presuming it wasnt carrying, if they even can, fuel as cargo?

CV Junyo arrives to Combined Fleet's OOB tomorrow.

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 372
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/21/2011 12:50:34 AM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

May 4th


DEI: Soerekaja falls, infantry advances...

Other news:

Allies admit to have lost AP William Ward Burrows on December 12th 1941 some 500nm South of Oahu. Reported cause is said to be a 250kg SAP bomb. That report shouldnt have any FOW in it, but it doesnt make any sense - KB was not there that day(or the day before) and I have no reports of that ship or ships of the same class attacked at all, let alone by Japanese carrier aircraft! And if it was attacked and hit by a naval search plane and I wasn't reported, how come a single 250kg bomb, if it even was that big and not a 60kg one from an E14A or some other float plane, sunk a 4,000 ton ship, presuming it wasnt carrying, if they even can, fuel as cargo?

CV Junyo arrives to Combined Fleet's OOB tomorrow.


That is where it sank not where it was attacked .. it is quite possible that a Nell ? or Betty? on a scouting mission with a torpedo struck the ship and this is where it made its final resting place ..

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 373
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/21/2011 9:28:52 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

That is where it sank not where it was attacked .. it is quite possible that a Nell ? or Betty? on a scouting mission with a torpedo struck the ship and this is where it made its final resting place ..



Yes, I know, but the date is weird - December 12th. That ship wasn't attacked in PH and KB refused to sortie against the 3 Allied TFs it sighted on its way out. I dont recall any hit reports by search aircraft either, and 90%+ of them are incorrect any way. KB did not sail anywhere near the strike or search plane distance from the place that ship sunk... And I think search planes always use bombs any way.

Weird. Very, very unlikely but still possible it was by an E14Y from a submarine using a 30kg bomb?

edit: I of course typo'ed and meant the E13A and not E14A, and now the E14Y.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 12/21/2011 9:33:22 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 374
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/23/2011 1:30:36 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 5th


Another silent day, only losses to either side are some poor Chinese infantrymen to a Japanese bombers near Nanning.

Home Islands: CV Junyo arrives! Her airgroups come with fully trained pilots, average experiences are randomized pretty high at 77(Zeros), 83(D3As) and 79(B5N). CVE Unyo will meet Junyo tomorrow near Nagasaki and they'll then receive some escorts and head to Singapore.

SigInt: CL Durban is confirmed not sunk but is still in service. I didnt think she was down, not an Allied cruiser after just 3 250kg bomb hits...

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 375
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/24/2011 10:58:49 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
Merry xmas, everyone!


April 6th


Another fairly silent day.

Kido Butai: starts looking for prey tomorrow...

Home Islands: the Allied submarines in the area are staying out of the South China Sea's shallow water hexes and south of all the Japanese traffic, I'm satisfied with the naval search as they sighted multiple Allied submarines today. No attacks on them though. All air search and AASW units in the area have received well trained ASW aircrew by yesterday, and I'd like to have some results. Not expecting to kill more than a handful or less submarines with air attacks over the course of the game, but I hope they can make the Allies afraid of losses and move their submarines away.

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 376
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/25/2011 1:05:31 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 7th

Once again, another silent day.


Burma: The forward-deployed bombers at Chittacong are Westland Lysanders... Lol.

DEI: Madioen falls on Java and another base tomorrow. Allies are evacuating the last of their aircraft... Dunno where, they have few to no bases in range and they are not flying via at least Ambon, Denpasar or Mataram. Maybe the units are being disbanded?

Kido Butai: KB is still unsighted by the enemy and now looking for fresh prey. I dont expect contacts tomorrow but the day after anything is possible and enemy contact is almost guaranteed in 4 days. CV Junyo and CVE Unyo will leave Nagasaki in 2 days.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 12/25/2011 1:06:42 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 377
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/27/2011 2:49:34 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 8th

Japanese troops advance on Java. Japanese submarine RO-66 sights a force of 4 destroyers near Brisbane and is damaged by depth charge attack.


April 9th


Kido Butai: American Catalina flying boat violates the airspace over the fleet and is shot down by PO2. Shiga V. from CV Hiryu, making it his 3rd victory. Kido Butai's position unfortunately is now revealed, right between Hawaii and Palmyra, 440 nautical miles from the closest island. I hate how good the Allied air search is compared to Japanese... KB will now keep sailing East in hopes of catching some slower convoys on route from San Francisco/LA/Hawaii to Palmyra, Baker, Fiji/Pago Pago and Australia/NZ, but I'm not holding my breath. Quite a lot of fuel burned to kill a Catalina.

Other than that, nothing...

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 378
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/27/2011 4:34:06 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

... Kido Butai's position unfortunately is now revealed, right between Hawaii and Palmyra, 440 nautical miles from the closest island. ..

Truthfully, I have never been able to navigate that stretch without getting seen either. I always have to loop north of Midway to get in between WC and PH. Controlling Adak is what is crtiical to the northern searches ... If I have it, I'm ok. If the allies have it, unlikely that I can make the passage.


_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 379
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/27/2011 4:40:46 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
quote:

Burma: The forward-deployed bombers at Chittacong are Westland Lysanders... Lol.


Probably doing recon. That's all I use em for.

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 380
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/28/2011 1:24:55 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 10th


Kido Butai: sights nothing as does CS Chitose some 120nm ahead... Zeros fail to down any of the today's Catalinas. KB keeps sailing East...

Burma: 84th Independent Fighter Chutai is the first unit to receive the brand new fighter Ki-44-IIa. Some of the rookie pilots are kicked out of this 12-plane squad and more experienced pilots get assigned in.

Home Islands: BB Yamato arrives! However I have nothing for her to do so she'll just sit at anchor near Hiroshima's Kure Yards.

Submarines: Second submarine in 2 days, its now I-26's turn to get hammered in a depth charge attack by a duo of mine layers near Los Angeles(deep water hex though) - damage is only moderate but its heading back to Yokohama. Being a Japanese vessel, it might not make it.


Other than that, still very quiet. Morale is getting low in the HQ as nothing happens and the Allies are playing time and not the game they are assured to win regardless of lost battles and units...

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 381
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/28/2011 9:08:09 PM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Home Islands: BB Yamato arrives! However I have nothing for her to do so she'll just sit at anchor near Hiroshima's Kure Yards.

[ ... ]

Other than that, still very quiet. Morale is getting low in the HQ as nothing happens and the Allies are playing time and not the game they are assured to win regardless of lost battles and units...


A shore bombardment of Seattle might provoke a response.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 382
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/28/2011 10:25:53 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

KB will now keep sailing East in hopes of catching some slower convoys on route from San Francisco/LA/Hawaii to Palmyra, Baker, Fiji/Pago Pago and Australia/NZ, but I'm not holding my breath. Quite a lot of fuel burned to kill a Catalina.

Other than that, nothing...


I think you have to go even farther southeast than that to get a whiff of any TF's. We're talking Tahiti here. It won't be until Bart is positive you won't be interdicting the most direct routes from Hawaii to the Southeast Pacific that he'll use those routes. I think he also relies on large TF's, so that means there is less chance of interdicting them.

I still think the key (against Bart) is establishing bases deep enough into his LOC that you can spot and interdict his movements. That is the only way to force his hand. If you stick to a historical perimeter you simply are too far away to make an impact. We both know he's patient, extremely patient to the point he's more than willing to spend a few extra weeks sailing to get to his destination. He simply will not put forces at risk unnecessarily, and right now there is absolutely nothing he HAS to do that requires him to stick his neck out. He'll just redirect his forces to move away from KB, wait for you to retire then resume his movements once again. Time is on his side and he will use it to the fullest.

I strongly urge you to either accept this and dig in like crazy and prepare to have zero action until Oct/Nov when you can oppose his moves against you, or take the initiative yourself and force him to play the game. I empathize with you completely, but a different pace to the game sadly rests with you. If you sit back and let him go about his business unmolested, as I did, then 1942 will crawl along like an ice age for you.

Respectfully.



_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 383
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/28/2011 11:40:46 PM   
Richard III


Posts: 710
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Erkki my friend, you are a victim of your own success.

However your in distinguished company since the Combined Fleet Planning Staff had the same problem by early `42. It was becoming clear the Allies " defensive plans" were a house of cards, propped up by strategic and operational planning that could best be described as fantasy, non working weapon systems ( US Torps ), antiquated air power ( Brit & Dutch AC ) and generally poor troop leadership and performance.

It was also clear that the US Pacific Fleet, specifically the CV`s, had no intention of coming out to fight and be sunk.

So.... knowing the window of opportunity would close by mid `43 ( if not much sooner ), the bright lads at CFPS, came up with four operational plans that had some real virtues.( if the Army, which distrusted the Navy intensely, had supported those, that is)

IMO, faced with very limited Army support, Isoroku Yamamoto picked the best of them, irregardless of the historic outcome, however I doubt that one will work in your game.
So... not faced with that Army problem, I think you need to give a keen look at the other three, right now, and... get ...it...moving...and stop cruising around the Central Pacific hoping he will come out to be sunk.

As The Very Wise Lemon suggested, you need to force him to respond to your initiatives where you are strong at best, and upset his planning at worst, and soon.

With great Respect....
R. III


_____________________________

“History would be a wonderful thing – if it were only true.”

¯ Leo Tolstoy

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 384
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/29/2011 10:53:17 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
Hello everyone, good to have some replies here...

Harlock:
quote:

A shore bombardment of Seattle might provoke a response.


Yeah or KB air attack at Sydney...

SqzMyLemon:
quote:

I think you have to go even farther southeast than that to get a whiff of any TF's. We're talking Tahiti here. It won't be until Bart is positive you won't be interdicting the most direct routes from Hawaii to the Southeast Pacific that he'll use those routes. I think he also relies on large TF's, so that means there is less chance of interdicting them.

I still think the key (against Bart) is establishing bases deep enough into his LOC that you can spot and interdict his movements. That is the only way to force his hand. If you stick to a historical perimeter you simply are too far away to make an impact. We both know he's patient, extremely patient to the point he's more than willing to spend a few extra weeks sailing to get to his destination. He simply will not put forces at risk unnecessarily, and right now there is absolutely nothing he HAS to do that requires him to stick his neck out. He'll just redirect his forces to move away from KB, wait for you to retire then resume his movements once again. Time is on his side and he will use it to the fullest.

I strongly urge you to either accept this and dig in like crazy and prepare to have zero action until Oct/Nov when you can oppose his moves against you, or take the initiative yourself and force him to play the game. I empathize with you completely, but a different pace to the game sadly rests with you. If you sit back and let him go about his business unmolested, as I did, then 1942 will crawl along like an ice age for you.


Yes, I fully agree. Bart is a very thorough player. This... "raid" however is only half about killing Allied shipping(which, as it looks, its not going to do). The other part is about showing him once again, I think its the 6th time, that I'm ready to commit KB far into harms way split up - if hes done his homework he should be aware that at least CV Kaga simply cannot be part of the fleet hes looking at. In the end it might not worth it and I'm burning a lot of fuel for nothing here, but it just might pay off. He knows I have not combined the KB yet, even once, and have operated it down to CV/CVL pairs even as direct invasion support well within the range of Allied LBA and night surface raids(he even tried to intercept the half-KB near Makassar, but that cruiser force ran into mine and got annihilated).

Richard:
quote:

Erkki my friend, you are a victim of your own success.

However your in distinguished company since the Combined Fleet Planning Staff had the same problem by early `42. It was becoming clear the Allies " defensive plans" were a house of cards, propped up by strategic and operational planning that could best be described as fantasy, non working weapon systems ( US Torps ), antiquated air power ( Brit & Dutch AC ) and generally poor troop leadership and performance.

It was also clear that the US Pacific Fleet, specifically the CV`s, had no intention of coming out to fight and be sunk.

So.... knowing the window of opportunity would close by mid `43 ( if not much sooner ), the bright lads at CFPS, came up with four operational plans that had some real virtues.( if the Army, which distrusted the Navy intensely, had supported those, that is)

IMO, faced with very limited Army support, Isoroku Yamamoto picked the best of them, irregardless of the historic outcome, however I doubt that one will work in your game.
So... not faced with that Army problem, I think you need to give a keen look at the other three, right now, and... get ...it...moving...and stop cruising around the Central Pacific hoping he will come out to be sunk.

As The Very Wise Lemon suggested, you need to force him to respond to your initiatives where you are strong at best, and upset his planning at worst, and soon.


To answer both you and SqzMyLemon... I'd like to not sit down and wait. That leaves too many places to defend, and I'd like to do something about it.

Going through the map counter-clockwise:

Burma - he already has at least twice the unrestricted AV I have available. I have no idea why he retreated when he could have kept me at Rangoon. Next turn I'll have PPs to buy out a Manchu division which will get moved to Rangoon or Magwe - prepping for Magwe already. Next 3 or 4 divs will also go there... I dont see a way I could get Ceylon or attack into India - simply not enough units and too much open ground to get troops bombed.

DEI: still some mopping up to be done, including Kendari(not garrisoned) and Ambon(not reinforced).

Fiji/Baker/Line Islands etc.: I dont think I can get any further here. I could snatch an island or 2 for recce/nav search bases but what are they worth? He doesnt have to invade them and for nav search they'd be very leaky. He doesnt need to advance through South Pacific, so why would he?

Wake: is probably already mined, reinforced and fortified. I dont think I can get it, and while its threatening the Tokyo-Truk LOC the convoy traffic is now slowly moving from HI to Truk/Solomons to DEI-Truk/Solomons... And having Wake hopefully makes him consider about attacking via CENPAC - and I'd love to have a carrier battle when the Allies have already lost Yorktown and KB is intact. If he comes only once he has first Essexes, I'll have had time to fortify Marcus, Marshalls and Marianas for over a year. Marcus already has 150 AV and forts 3.

NOPAC: fortifying Kuriles(but nothing excessive!) - no plans to invade Aleutians. Again, I'd love to see an early try to get Paramushiro and Onnekotan - I have lots of "useless" assets such as BBs and training air units here that have cost me 0 PPs... Paramushiro alone has 250 AV behind forts 3, with the CD fortress unit, some aircraft, mines and a BBTF. I have netties within torpedo range. Let 'em come.

Theres one place missing in the above list. I'm planning to go there just to deny Bart of the most obvious and easiest attack route to Japan's vitals. And hopefully to provoke some resistance too...

_____________________________


(in reply to Richard III)
Post #: 385
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/29/2011 10:59:23 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
Also, now that Yamato was freed I have quite a lot of shipyard points. Now, I have

Taiho accelerated
All Unruys accelerated(none building yet though)
2 CLs and a DD accelerated
All CVEs except Chuyo accelerated(Churyo and CV Hiyo have same arrival date)
One KD7 and all RO submarines halted

And I'm gaining some 100 points/turn extra now

Once first 2 Unruys start building and need 3x points I'll stop accelerating the CLs - not enough for 240 points but Hiyo is completed shortly after and will provide the extra capacity. Naval production wise, ts now looking very good...

_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 386
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/29/2011 4:06:38 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
April 11th


Kido Butai: I expected Bart to move everything away from Kido Butai's path.... But KB finds 3 flush-decker Clemson or Wickes AVDs and the 6 D3As assigned to the job hit 2 of them, one bomb each. Neither probably went down but they're heavily damaged, on fire, and far from land. Some shipping is fleeing Pearl to NE but submarines failed to make contact, only I-6 got close enough to be attacked by a destroyer... KB will now turn to SE to sweep behind Line Islands - its very possible we'll catch something bigger tomorrow.

DEI: Japanese troops advance and will reach Soerebaja tomorrow.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 12/29/2011 4:07:53 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 387
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/29/2011 7:09:40 PM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

April 11th


Are you not in May?

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 388
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 12/29/2011 7:21:37 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
Ooooo-oops!

_____________________________


(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 389
RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 1/2/2012 8:51:13 AM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
May 12th

A... Weird day.


Kido Butai: Sights nothing but the allied air patrols miss it completely. There are some Allied submarines in the area, but if they keep their courses they will miss the KB, which keeps heading SE. No sign of the yesterday's AVDs, some might have sunk.

Almost everywhere else: Nothing!

Submarines: I-165 attacks an Allied surface combat squadron near Perth twice. It sights 3 different destroyers and scores a hit on a ship that is identified as Clemson class DD Barker. Barker seems to have been repaired since CAs Chokai and Ashigara put some holes on it 2 months back, but she surely sunk now! Somehow in this game the IJN subs have been able to do some real damage to Allied combat ships while at the same time I can only keep guessing where their merchantmen sail...

SigInt: Allies admit to have lost... The CL Durban! The same ship that was confirmed to be still operational just less than a week ago. Even more surprisingly, the sinking hex is MELBOURNE and date today! Repair accident? Succumbed to bomb hit damage after all(hit by G3M2s at Soerebaja, Java, during the operation to sink BB Royal Sovereign) before it was put to dry dock? Why wasnt Perth's naval yard used - not safe enough? Now I'm suddenly not sure at all that there isnt FOW in the loss admittance/confirming system... I'll consider the Durban to be afloat until I either see her in action again or my opponent confirms her to be down.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 1/2/2012 9:00:36 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 390
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'! Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.094