RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 9:46:35 AM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

I think I promised screenshots for today.... Okay.

Next turn is 110th's so its time to do an analysis. Lets go first through the map, clockwise.

Kuriles:

I decided to not invade Aleutians. In 7 days we'll have some units at Paramushiro together with battlewagons and search planes. I'll later also move units to Onnekottan-Jima and at least a 3rd battalion of infantry to Paramushiro and an engineer unit to build up the forts quicker.

I havent seen Allied submarines here for a while. There were 2 or 3 a month ago but Skipjack got shot up by an xAK south of Hokkaido and havent seen them since.

Central Pacific:

I decided to not invade Wake, using that force to at New Britain instead. I have moved away most shipping to minimize losses against a possible raid, but reinforced Marcus and Tarawa. Once Solomons have enough units we'll start reinforcing some key islands and atolls here.

South Pacific:

We have captured everything we've wanted with minimal Allied interference. Port Moresby was invaded simultaneously with KB raid to Brisbane that sunk CA Canberra and CL Achilles with her escort DD and at least heavily damaged 3 other CLs. From now on we will be on the defensive here.

East Indies:

Still a lot to take here... The Dutch are delaying us at Bandoeng where they have 950 AV vs. 2800 Japanese behind 2 forts in mountain terrain. When forts were 3, 2100 Japanese AV still achieved 2:1 so I'm carefully optimistic that we might retreat them in 3 or 4 attacks. Invasion fleet with a fresh division and lots of support units will set sail from Kove to Timor in 8 days - once Koepang is ours the Japanese carriers are free to do some raiding!

Andaman Sea:

We're building up some airbases to monitor Allied traffic in the Bay of Bengal... I dont want them to invade Sumatra either. Fortifying this area will rise in my priorities by late 1942 but I dont think the Allies can attack here before early 43.

Burma:

Allies retreated after little fighting and Burma is ours. I'm expecting the Allies to start bombing Magwe's oil wells any day now, and we're building airfields... Lots of Ki-43s here. I really, really need more troops in Burma but there arent really any available before the East Indies is secured - will take several months more.

China: front stabilized and semi-ceasefire in effect. The road from Indochina to Shanghai is clear and looking at Tracker all the fuel from Burma and Sumatra-->Singapore seems to flowing all the way to Korea as or almost as quickly as it gets produced... Nice! I might be able to shorten my sea lanes from Sumatra/Singapore to Kyushu to Shanghai/Port Arthur/Pusan-Kyushu!

Naval losses so far: (not counting PH raid where I know I got something, but nothing is confirmed)

Japan:

3 x DD (1 old)
1 x TB
1 x DMS

Half a dozen small ships, 3 xAP, some 7 xAK - losses are very light

Allies:

CV Yorktown
BB Royal Sovereign
CA Canberra
CL Achilles
CL Mauritius
CL Danae
CL Enterprise
CL Marblehead
7 x DD

Probables:
CL Java
CL Dragon
1 x DD

Damaged, some might even be sunk:
CL De Ryuter
CL Perth
CL Adelaine
CL Durban
1 x DD

Also AV Langley, 3 big xAPs, dozen-ish xAKs, 2 submarines, 4 big TKs, some dozen tenders and loads of small ships(xAK, xAKL, xAP etc.) from various classes

Air forces of both sides are practically intact. KB's air units got a bit roughed up at Pearl, but so did AVG over China and Burma. Dutch air units have been attrited a little but they should still have lots of planes left.

Industry: I recently managed to finally stop the Home Islands' resource levels from dropping. Resource and fuel levels have been growing for a few days, although the fuel isnt growing fast enough for the time when I run out of oil. HI points are increasing at a nice 3500/day and I'm accelerating all but 2 CVs(Shinano canceled and Aso still in queue). I'm expecting the HI increase to lower to around 2000/day once the Ki-44 and Ki-49 mass-production programs start together with other aircraft. I rather defend my oil fields harder than reserve HI for the time I dont have those fields any more. That means with my skills its game over by 1944.

_____________________________

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 211

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 10:21:01 AM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

I like pictures.
Can you show air production rate. I want to compare with my plans.
And you have very small naval losses. I am in middle January and i have 2 x bigger losses.

koniu

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 212

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 10:31:39 AM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

Heres the air production at the moment. In 5 turns we will have H6K2-L (5 planes/month), Ki-49-Ia(10 planes) and A6M2-N(10 planes) entering production. 5/43 also A6M3(one R&D switches to production and one size 30 M2 factory stays in M2), Ki-45(initially 45 a month for 2 size-45 anti-4E units but later I will reduce it) and Ki-44-IIa(some Ki-43 factories switch to Ki-44, planning for 120/month initially).

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 213

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 12:36:34 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

China: front stabilized and semi-ceasefire in effect. The road from Indochina to Shanghai is clear and looking at Tracker all the fuel from Burma and Sumatra-->Singapore seems to flowing all the way to Korea as or almost as quickly as it gets produced... Nice! I might be able to shorten my sea lanes from Sumatra/Singapore to Kyushu to Shanghai/Port Arthur/Pusan-Kyush

It doesn't look like oil should go without the railroad being open, unless it's moving along the yellow roads from Hanoi to Canton. I guess it could do this, but would this mean there would be losses similar to supply moving down yellow road systems?

quote:

I decided to not invade Wake, using that force to at New Britain instead.

Do you have plans to get Wake at some point? It could be a real thorn to not have Wake in the near future. Especially if he adds another Marine Defense unit there. If your opponent has Wake and can recon the Marshalls and notices there are no air forces around, there might be some nasty surprises coming there.

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 214

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 12:53:29 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

quote:

China: front stabilized and semi-ceasefire in effect. The road from Indochina to Shanghai is clear and looking at Tracker all the fuel from Burma and Sumatra-->Singapore seems to flowing all the way to Korea as or almost as quickly as it gets produced... Nice! I might be able to shorten my sea lanes from Sumatra/Singapore to Kyushu to Shanghai/Port Arthur/Pusan-Kyush

It doesn't look like oil should go without the railroad being open, unless it's moving along the yellow roads from Hanoi to Canton. I guess it could do this, but would this mean there would be losses similar to supply moving down yellow road systems?

quote:

I decided to not invade Wake, using that force to at New Britain instead.

Do you have plans to get Wake at some point? It could be a real thorn to not have Wake in the near future. Especially if he adds another Marine Defense unit there. If your opponent has Wake and can recon the Marshalls and notices there are no air forces around, there might be some nasty surprises coming there.

He moved those Wildcats out early and hasn't moved in any aircraft or ships since... I had a picket xAKL 2 hex away from Wake for 3 days and it wasn't sighted.

I'm not worried about Marshalls or Wake yet, later in 1942 perhaps... Theres plenty of time to move more troops and air units. Also as he has lost Yorktown I dont think he'll adventure central pacific with just 4 USN CVs or later in 1942 with the Wasp. And if he does, I'd more than welcome a central pacific campaign so close to Truk and my fuel sources. I know the Marshalls in Allied hands are a threat to Japanese flank but until I choose to garrison them better I'll take the (hopefully minor) risk and rely on being able to conquer back all lost islands while having good odds to further attrit Allied navies and CV fleet.

Or what do you think?

EDIT: if I'll take Wake I'll do that during the amphibious bonus - ie. within 1 month and 5 days. 3-4 SNLFs should be sufficient with a BB in the amphibious TF, backed up by CVs. I'll think about it but it'll have to happen only after Timor invasion which will be April 13-16th or so...

< Message edited by Erkki -- 10/27/2011 12:55:24 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 215

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 2:02:38 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

Or what do you think?

EDIT: if I'll take Wake I'll do that during the amphibious bonus - ie. within 1 month and 5 days. 3-4 SNLFs should be sufficient with a BB in the amphibious TF, backed up by CVs. I'll think about it but it'll have to happen only after Timor invasion which will be April 13-16th or so...

With the defensive units the Allies have even early in the war, like the Marine Defense Battalions, and the number of good engineers they get, this could be a hard spot to hit if he just makes one small landing of a few new units up to the size limits. If I were the Alied player and I knew where the KB was in mid-42 I would be landing all over any undefended spots in the Marshalls and Gilberts that could support air. It would just be an auto-campaign they wouldn't even have to struggle to support as the hardest part about this area is taking defended atolls. If nothing is on them it's a free pass and the US could roll the whole place back to Kwajalein using LBA by early 43. He can easily run in and out with the CVs once he has a foothold due to the superior search of the Cats.

Your opponent doesn't sound very aggressive or willing to take advantage of early opportunities, but any anomaly like Wake not being taken would be heavily used by a strong and aggressive Allied player. I think even leaving Canton Island to flourish as a mid-Pacific outpost is suspect for the Japanese player as this base controls the approaches to supply lines in the south and provides a great search post and transfer area for ships and planes moving through to the South Pacific. With the invasion bonus and without an Allied build-up these places are relatively easy to take. Two SNLFs for each did it in my game in the first two weeks. Without revealling anything my opponent won't find out when he recons the bases, they will be strong enough by the time he comes for them that it will take a determined effort to take them back. Any roadblocks toward Allied advance that are easy for a Japanese player should be used I feel.

If you need units just take some of the garrisons from second level islands in the Solomons that won't be attacked for a year or so.

PS- I got the behind of the IJN handed to me in the first few weeks of the war, (and did a limited version of that to my opponent in Hawaii), so I've been duly trained to expect best play from my opponent and try to be ready for it, so that if he does act less aggressively it's a pleasant surprise and I can take advantage.

< Message edited by obvert -- 10/27/2011 2:06:45 PM >

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 216

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 2:27:55 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

quote:

Or what do you think?

EDIT: if I'll take Wake I'll do that during the amphibious bonus - ie. within 1 month and 5 days. 3-4 SNLFs should be sufficient with a BB in the amphibious TF, backed up by CVs. I'll think about it but it'll have to happen only after Timor invasion which will be April 13-16th or so...

With the defensive units the Allies have even early in the war, like the Marine Defense Battalions, and the number of good engineers they get, this could be a hard spot to hit if he just makes one small landing of a few new units up to the size limits. If I were the Alied player and I knew where the KB was in mid-42 I would be landing all over any undefended spots in the Marshalls and Gilberts that could support air. It would just be an auto-campaign they wouldn't even have to struggle to support as the hardest part about this area is taking defended atolls. If nothing is on them it's a free pass and the US could roll the whole place back to Kwajalein using LBA by early 43. He can easily run in and out with the CVs once he has a foothold due to the superior search of the Cats.

Your opponent doesn't sound very aggressive or willing to take advantage of early opportunities, but any anomaly like Wake not being taken would be heavily used by a strong and aggressive Allied player. I think even leaving Canton Island to flourish as a mid-Pacific outpost is suspect for the Japanese player as this base controls the approaches to supply lines in the south and provides a great search post and transfer area for ships and planes moving through to the South Pacific. With the invasion bonus and without an Allied build-up these places are relatively easy to take. Two SNLFs for each did it in my game in the first two weeks. Without revealling anything my opponent won't find out when he recons the bases, they will be strong enough by the time he comes for them that it will take a determined effort to take them back. Any roadblocks toward Allied advance that are easy for a Japanese player should be used I feel.

If you need units just take some of the garrisons from second level islands in the Solomons that won't be attacked for a year or so.

PS- I got the behind of the IJN handed to me in the first few weeks of the war, (and did a limited version of that to my opponent in Hawaii), so I've been duly trained to expect best play from my opponent and try to be ready for it, so that if he does act less aggressively it's a pleasant surprise and I can take advantage.

I am painfully aware of those possibilities. That is why I already moved more troops including naval construction unit to Marcus and Paramushiro. Marcus especially in Allied hands is imho much worse threat than Wake. The time to reinforce other places will come but first I wanted to, and want to, avoid a "meeting engagement" style battle in the Solomons where Allies can also get an easy early foothold - Port Moresby, Milne Bay or Tulagi area. I showed CVL Shoho near Baker Island half a month ago so if the Allies take action they will presumably first need to prepare to meet the Shoho TF and any LBA in the area - and they havent flown any recon yet. I have some Netties and Ki-43s at Truk that I can fly to Solomons or Marshalls when required.

Decisions decisions... I chose Solomons and New Guinea over Wake and for at least the next month I'll have to stick stick to that plan. 3 SNLFs are waiting at Tokyo to be moved to Gilberts and Solomons - might re-earmark them to Wake. Shoho is at Truk and 100% ready. The USN CVs are probably at Sydney but I'm of course not sure - they could be almost anywhere.

_____________________________

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 217

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 3:01:50 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

I am painfully aware of those possibilities. That is why I already moved more troops including naval construction unit to Marcus and Paramushiro. Marcus especially in Allied hands is imho much worse threat than Wake. The time to reinforce other places will come but first I wanted to, and want to, avoid a "meeting engagement" style battle in the Solomons where Allies can also get an easy early foothold - Port Moresby, Milne Bay or Tulagi area. I showed CVL Shoho near Baker Island half a month ago so if the Allies take action they will presumably first need to prepare to meet the Shoho TF and any LBA in the area - and they havent flown any recon yet. I have some Netties and Ki-43s at Truk that I can fly to Solomons or Marshalls when required.

Decisions decisions... I chose Solomons and New Guinea over Wake and for at least the next month I'll have to stick stick to that plan. 3 SNLFs are waiting at Tokyo to be moved to Gilberts and Solomons - might re-earmark them to Wake. Shoho is at Truk and 100% ready. The USN CVs are probably at Sydney but I'm of course not sure - they could be almost anywhere.

I know. Decisions decisions! That's why this game is so interesting. And one's opponent can arrive with new thoughts and tactics and strategy at any moment and upset many of the best plans. I'll be posting some long term strategic questions soon I'll definitely be wanting some help with!

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 218

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/27/2011 7:57:22 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Heres the air production at the moment. In 5 turns we will have H6K2-L (5 planes/month), Ki-49-Ia(10 planes) and A6M2-N(10 planes) entering production. 5/43 also A6M3(one R&D switches to production and one size 30 M2 factory stays in M2), Ki-45(initially 45 a month for 2 size-45 anti-4E units but later I will reduce it) and Ki-44-IIa(some Ki-43 factories switch to Ki-44, planning for 120/month initially).

A few suggestions/comments on your air production if you don't mind.

I'd watch all non-bomber production a bit more closely. Non-bombers are not very effective kami's, so once they are outdated, you don't have much use for them. They just become wasted HI that you will wish you had back in '45. EX: you have 155 A6M2 in your pool. Unless you are imminently expecting a major confrontation, I would taper off production. Ideally, you want a zero pool in Dec when the A6M3A comes online, correct?

G3M2 Nell. You're about to get an upgrade that is a GOOD upgrade. You won't have much use for these older ones. They are effective kami's, but are double the cost of a Kate.

Just some thoughts ...

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 219

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/28/2011 12:38:57 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

A few suggestions/comments on your air production if you don't mind.

I'd watch all non-bomber production a bit more closely. Non-bombers are not very effective kami's, so once they are outdated, you don't have much use for them. They just become wasted HI that you will wish you had back in '45. EX: you have 155 A6M2 in your pool. Unless you are imminently expecting a major confrontation, I would taper off production. Ideally, you want a zero pool in Dec when the A6M3A comes online, correct?

G3M2 Nell. You're about to get an upgrade that is a GOOD upgrade. You won't have much use for these older ones. They are effective kami's, but are double the cost of a Kate.

Just some thoughts ...

Hey. Once the M3 comes online I'll lose 33% of the factories when they convert in 5/42 - that is planned. An size 30 extra factory from R&D will bring production back from 30/month to 117/month in (130*(2/3))/3= 29 days. The CV air groups become resizable in June so I'll need over a hundred M2s for those... But you're right in that in the long run I probably wont be needing that many fighters, especially these early types. Ki-43 factories will convert to Ki-44 so I wont be producing more than a couple of hundred more. I'll probably leave the Harbin factory which is size 20 though, the later Ki-43s carry 2 bombs so they're probably nice kamis with the armor and everything.

G3M2 factory is off about half the time as I dont want to expand Ha-33 factories too much. I cant escort them to max range(nor do they even usually sortie naval attack at hose ranges too often) so they're IMHO only marginally if in practice at all worse than G4M1 as the better defensive armament in G4M doesnt have any practical effect and the 800kg port attack bomb is rarely used. I'm pretty much building them only because I happen to have the factory, lol.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 10/28/2011 1:26:50 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 220

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/28/2011 1:10:47 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

Ki-43 factories will convert to Ki-44 so I wont be producing more than a couple of hundred more

I will stay with few Ki-43 factories to use them as long range escort for bombers but i think they are not good kami

< Message edited by koniu -- 10/28/2011 1:11:48 PM >

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 221

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/28/2011 1:30:13 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Hey. Once the M3 comes online I'll lose 33% of the factories when they convert in 5/42 - that is planned. An size 30 extra factory from R&D will bring production back from 30/month to 117/month in (130*(2/3))/3= 29 days. The CV air groups become resizable in June so I'll need over a hundred M2s for those... But you're right in that in the long run I probably wont be needing that many fighters, especially these early types. Ki-43 factories will convert to Ki-44 so I wont be producing more than a couple of hundred more. I'll probably leave the Harbin factory which is size 20 though, the later Ki-43s carry 2 bombs so they're probably nice kamis with the armor and everything.

I forgot about the CV group resize coming, so good planning on that. Oscars are nice for escort, Tojo's have very short range. You may end up producing Oscars longer just to provide Sally/Helen escort in which they do ok.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki
G3M2 factory is off about half the time as I dont want to expand Ha-33 factories too much. I cant escort them to max range(nor do they even usually sortie naval attack at hose ranges too often) so they're IMHO only marginally if in practice at all worse than G4M1 as the better defensive armament in G4M doesnt have any practical effect and the 800kg port attack bomb is rarely used. I'm pretty much building them only because I happen to have the factory, lol.

Nells make GREAT long range Patrol. The next upgrade gets you range almost that of Mavis/Emily at half the cost. Plus you don't get that many Patrol air groups. I always have to "convert" several Nell groups into what are effectively Patrol airgroups to keep sufficient patrol going on.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 222

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/28/2011 1:43:42 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

quote:

Ki-43 factories will convert to Ki-44 so I wont be producing more than a couple of hundred more

I will stay with few Ki-43 factories to use them as long range escort for bombers but i think they are not good kami

Looks like we have different philosophies then!

To me Zero is better long-range sacrificial escort fighter and once I'll using Army bombers for naval attack they will be flying 11 hex. Looking at many AARs it looks like operating bombers from front fields will not be possible for long because they get nuked all the time, and Ki-43s in front fields will use space and aviation support from better planes. My reasoning has con sides of its own and probably many I havent thought out yet but if I change my plans again it will cost another hundred thousand supplies and lots of HI

so we will have to see and find how this will work!

With 2x250kg bombs, armor and service rating 1 the Ki-43 IIb should be cost-efficiently better kamikaze than the Japanese 2E bombers... However my main kamikazes will probably be Netties, leftover Army bombers and Navy strike aircraft and the D4Y - its cheap, single engine, arrives early, its faster than all Wildcats and carries a 500kg/1100lbs SAP bomb and later models 800kg SAP!!! Plus I'll be building lots of them any way for the KB.

Probably going to keep building the B5N and later B6N for kami role too.

March 26th 1942

East Indies: Japanese forces advance on Celebes. Deliberate attack ordered at Bandoeng tomorrow: 2780 Japanese AV(21 more joining in 7 days) faces 920-1,000 Allied, forts 2(should be), mountain hex, Allies cut off from supply and bombarded for soon 3 weeks. Last attack with forts 3 and still with supply the casualties were 1:2 and forts dropped - high hopes!

South Pacific: Japanese forces land at Woodlark Island, Tulagi's airfield is expanded to size 2 and Rabaul's port is now size 4 and building.

Home Islands: Timor invasion fleet ready, now waiting for the political points... 3 A6M3 R&D factories are fully ready so if my understanding of R&D mechanics is right we should be able to accelerate the plane by 1 month to 5/42. 4th factory is 5 points away from ready at 25(5).

Submarines: Dutch submarines try their luck at Christmas Island and Port Moresby - they get attacked by Japanese escorts but managed to get away. I-29 and I-27 recon Perth: no units at port and very little troops. Lets see if we get better info tomorrow.

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 223

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/28/2011 2:09:18 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

To me Zero is better long-range sacrificial escort fighter and once I'll using Army bombers for naval attack they will be flying 11 hex.

I agree, it clearly is. So you can use them this way, but be aware of the inter-service penalty on strike coordination. My experience is that the penalty is pretty high. There are work arounds of course ...

< Message edited by PaxMondo -- 10/28/2011 2:10:09 PM >

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 224

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/29/2011 2:13:21 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

March 27th

Indian Ocean: for 2nd day I-29 and I-17 recce sorties to Perth and canceled due to bad weather.

East Indies: Bandoeng deliberate attack raw AVs are 2860 vs. 930 against forts 2 and terrain - defenders dont have disruption, fatigue or supply issues yet. Forts lowered to 1, casualties 1:2 however all but 8 Japanese squad losses are just disabled vs. 150+ Allied destroyed and fatigue raises so little that we can attack again in 3 days - just need to get the regiment that took almost all the losses away first and a reinforcement coy in.

Philippines: Pegu invaded and captured, defending well-supplied PA units surrender!

South Pacific: first recon sorties flown over Australia, a Japanese transport carrying elements of a naval construction regiment gets torpedoed by a submarine and sunk. 135 men or about 1/2 of the men are rescued and it looks like most of the lost squads were just support...

_____________________________

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 225

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/30/2011 5:10:45 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

March 28th

Nothing happened.

Some British or Indian units seem to be moving from Calcutta - JAAF recon units keep monitoring all Allied bases between Burmese border and Calcutta so we should be able to keep track of them. Probably just support units but who knows... At Singapore, KB is again 100% ready for action. Timor invasion fleet ready, 3 days and we start loading troops aboard the ships. BB Hyuga TF arrives at Ominato where it'll refuel and do minor repairs before relocating to Paramushiro-Jima where it'll merge with BB Yamashiro TF.

_____________________________

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 226

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 10:11:43 AM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

March 29th

Another silent day, nothing worth mentioning on any front, however:

Intel/SigInt:

Intel reports CL Dragon not sunk but being still in service, so the Type 95 torp didnt do its job.

Ki-49-IIa advanced by 1 month to 42/8, we should be able to get it into production by 42/7!

Japanese spies at Los Angeles let us peek the port, apparently there are no capital warships or tankers:

Tomorrow: Another deliberate attack ordered at Bandoeng. We have only 80 AV less than last try(which achieved 1:1 odds) and now with the lower forts I hope for another 1:1 and equal losses and forts reduction. Reinforcements arrive to Samarinda, I hope to keep the Dutch bombers at Balikpapan for another day attacking Japanese xAKLs so that those 20+ bombers can be captured by our troops.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 10/31/2011 10:44:30 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 227

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 1:53:49 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

To me Zero is better long-range sacrificial escort fighter and once I'll using Army bombers for naval attack they will be flying 11 hex.

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
I agree, it clearly is. So you can use them this way, but be aware of the inter-service penalty on strike coordination. My experience is that the penalty is pretty high. There are work arounds of course ...

I play only 50 turns in my game and i see that it is much easier to coordinate Army/army or navy/navy planes than army/navy planes.
I have few actions when army planes do not even start from ground to fly as escort to navy bombers and vice versa.
Like in real life there is internal conflict between army and navy. And like in real life this simulate doctrine differences of navy and army training.

< Message edited by koniu -- 10/31/2011 1:56:36 PM >

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 228

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 2:01:45 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Ki-49-IIa advanced by 1 month to 42/8, we should be able to get it into production by 42/7!

I think that you should keep some Ki-49-Ia in pool. Later(06/44) they will get MAD device so you can use them as very good long range ASW plane.

< Message edited by koniu -- 10/31/2011 2:03:51 PM >

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 229

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 2:12:09 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Ki-49-IIa advanced by 1 month to 42/8, we should be able to get it into production by 42/7!

I think that you should keep some Ki-49-Ia in pool. Later(06/44) they will get MAD device so you can use them as very good long range ASW plane.

B5N2 also gets MAD the same date, and I'll have LOTS of extra B5Ns in the pool by then.

I'm still going to build some Ki-49-Ias until the IIa is available, 10/month so should get some 30 of them.

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 230

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 2:28:40 PM

PaxMondo

Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

MAD only add 5% to detection ... it is nothing that I would build for specifically. Helen 1's are 1 hex shorter range than Helen II's or Sally. I find that to be most significant.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 231

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 4:34:20 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

By the way, Japan's last sub kill is Yorktown, over a month ago.

We see an Allied sub attack Japanese ships every 2-3 days or so and for the last month they have sunk I think 5 ships, but for the last month, only things the Jap subs have achieved have been reconing of Perth and San Francisco and a failed attack on those 2 DDs near Sydney, remains of the CL Mauritius TF.

Any ideas, suggestions?

_____________________________

(in reply to PaxMondo)

Post #: 232

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 4:50:17 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

Where are Your subs are hunting. Maybe you doing everything good only place is wrong.
I my game i am sending subs to places where they can find targets. Also having good sub commanders will help.

To detailed help give us more info. (where, how many, patrol zones etc.)

< Message edited by koniu -- 10/31/2011 4:52:27 PM >

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 233

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 5:28:47 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

Map clockwise:

1 sub off West Coast (with E14Y, just reconin). Quite a lot of subs near PH. Allies use patrol PCs and DDs and fly Cats, so I moved the sub screen so far that they havent seen any Cats or those patrol vessels for a month. Any ship approaching Hawaii from directly North to East will have to sail through the sub screen. I checked the most direct routes from all Hawaiian islands to SF and LA and that arc (NNE-NEE) is 2 subs thick. No contacts for a month now.

Near Fiji and New Caledonia, 5 subs. These have got 2 contacts during the last month but no attacks. One near Suva another near Pago Pago.

10 subs Australian eastern coast - 3 are blocking the straight between Tasmania and Australia, others are camping Sydney south and to west 4-5 hex away. Last contact was those 2 DDs and before that Yorktown.

5 subs near Perth: one E14Y sighted convoy 2 weeks ago with lots of xAKs sailed past the screen but didnt attack. Perth has no planes or ships in port except 2 HDMLs or something. All ships heading north along the coast or west to Cape Town or Mombasa will have to sail past the subs.

DEI: 7-8 submarines, these are used as as a very, very leaky mobile picket screen.

India: 7 subs near Colombo, all ships arriving from any direction will have to sail past the sub screen. The most direct routes from Africa and Karachi have 2 subs. Only contact so far are the 4 torpedo boats at Colombo's port that get sighted by E14Ys every couple of days.

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 234

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 5:43:33 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

Ie. as far as I can tell, good part of the Allied fleet is sitting on their thumbs at Sydney and Melbourne, doing nothing. Perth is definitely empty, Pearl only has 2 CLs, SF and LA have no combat ships.

_____________________________

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 235

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 5:52:22 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

For me that are good hunting areas. Maybe they are to good.
Maybe your opponent after you sunk Yorktown choose alternative convoy routs. Tray to send few subs more south. Maybe you will be lucky there.

Also sending sub or two little north of Pago Pago, Christmas island will be good idea. Maybe he decide to skip those bases for while.
What method are you using to make patrol zones. In my game i am using small 3-4 hexes patrol zones. I have reaction set to 1 and subs are ordered to stay in hex for 1-2 to safe fuel.

Or maybe you use all your luck on Yorktown

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 236

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 5:56:39 PM

koniu

Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Ie. as far as I can tell, good part of the Allied fleet is sitting on their thumbs at Sydney and Melbourne, doing nothing. Perth is definitely empty, Pearl only has 2 CLs, SF and LA have no combat ships.

Tray to use midget subs on them

< Message edited by koniu -- 10/31/2011 5:57:28 PM >

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 237

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 6:02:17 PM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

For me that are good hunting areas. Maybe they are to good.
Maybe your opponent after you sunk Yorktown choose alternative convoy routs. Tray to send few subs more south. Maybe you will be lucky there.

Also sending sub or two little north of Pago Pago, Christmas island will be good idea. Maybe he decide to skip those bases for while.
What method are you using to make patrol zones. In my game i am using small 3-4 hexes patrol zones. I have reaction set to 1 and subs are ordered to stay in hex for 1-2 to safe fuel.

Or maybe you use all your luck on Yorktown

Yeah thats what I thought.

Not that I can really complain, I rather have Yorktown down than 100 xAKs or 2 dozen TKs/AOs.

I have been thinking about moving the Hawaii screen from N-E to NNE-SWW. This turn I moved the Australian east coast subs a little, they will no longer patrol the route across the Pacific but the traffic along the coast from Brisbane to Melbourne except shallow water.

I use 2-3 adjacent patrol hexes with 1-2 linger days.

Also I dont think I'm going to move them to India's western coast yet, probably more traffic there especially near Karachi but also lots of shallow water and too many alternative routes the convoys could use.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 10/31/2011 6:03:51 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to koniu)

Post #: 238

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 10/31/2011 6:03:44 PM

Puhis

Posts: 1737
Joined: 11/30/2008
From: Finland
Status: offline

I've noticed that it's more or less useless to keep subs around Pearl or West coast of US.

In mid 1942 best places seems to be near Karachi and Colombo, and Perth. Also my subs have had some success in Calcutta-Akyab-Cox'sBazar triangle, but that's only because allies are fighting for Akyab.

If allies are doing nothing, there's not much to sink.

(in reply to Erkki)

Post #: 239

RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) -... - 11/1/2011 11:12:24 AM

Erkki

Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

March 30th

Great Nicobar and some base in the Philippines captured.

East Indies:

Ground combat at Bandoeng (50,100)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 87585 troops, 931 guns, 305 vehicles, Assault Value = 2686

Defending force 35878 troops, 364 guns, 204 vehicles, Assault Value = 819

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 1686

Allied adjusted defense: 1132

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
4730 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 239 disabled
Non Combat: 52 destroyed, 127 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 24 (1 destroyed, 23 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2970 casualties reported
Squads: 40 destroyed, 180 disabled
Non Combat: 49 destroyed, 249 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Vehicles lost 95 (34 destroyed, 61 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Assaulting units:
21st Infantry Regiment
15th Ind Engineer Regiment
113th Infantry Regiment
41st Guard Battalion
5th Recon Regiment
Yokosuka 2nd SNLF
5th Engineer Regiment
24th Infantry Regiment
55th Infantry Regiment
56th Infantry Regiment
33rd Division
114th Infantry Regiment
12th Engineer Regiment
11th Infantry Regiment
23rd Ind Engineer Regiment
148th Infantry Regiment
1st Tank Regiment
41st Infantry Regiment
46th Division
53rd Division
42nd Infantry Regiment
I/81st Naval Guard Unit
56th Field Artillery Regiment
18th Mountain Gun Regiment
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
5th Field Artillery Regiment
3rd Medium Field Artillery Regiment
25th Army
1st RF Gun Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
3rd Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
5th Mortar Battalion
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
1st KNIL Regiment
2nd KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Lijfwacht Cav Sqn
Mobiele Eenheid Battalion
4th KNIL Regiment
6th KNIL Regiment
Tjilatjap KNIL Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
Marinier Battalion
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Barisan KNIL Regiment
3rd KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Roodenburg Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
1/4th Avn Sup Afd
ML-KNIL
ABDA
KNI Zeemacht
KNI Leger
NI-MLD
6th Avn Sup Afd
2/4th Avn Sup Afd
3rd KNIL AA Battalion
Andir ML Base Force
7th Avn Sup Afd

As you can see the Allies have massed quite a lot of troops around the DEI to Bandoeng, originally 1200+ AV but even that included some units already hit at Batavia and Kalidjati. Some troops still left elsewhere on Java but they were on their way to Bandoeng when a Japanese armor unit cut cut off the railroad connection. We have now destroyed 2 units from this stack - must have been small support units or something. Forts now 0 and the Dutchmen lost another 100+ AV and they are probably soon out of supplies! One infantry regiment got hit pretty badly but great majority of losses were just disabled squads. I'm still moving it to rest at Batavia. Japanese AV fell from 2686 to ~2460 but fatigue and disruption are fairly low, so we can attack again in 2 or 3 days with 2550+ AV. Shock or deliberate? Allied AV remaining after 2 days rest will be 730 tops and terrain is mountains, no forts any more.

Soerebaja's airfield attacked by Ki-21s with Ki-43 escort - the Dutchment still arent flying! 2 B-339s are destroyed. Soerebaja now reported to have 15 fighters and 40 auxiliary, and airfield damage clearly isnt repairing. All Dutch aviation support is stuck at Bandoeng and theres no way to fly out those Brewsters?

South Pacific: Tassafaronga hits airfield size 1. An Allied submarine (again) gets a shot at an xAK near Guadalcanal but this time its a miss.

Home Islands: Troops for Timor invasion start boarding ships. TF target is set to Kendari. Theres so many ships that I can afford to lose 2-3 to submarines... 1 DD escorting now but more will be joining near Mindanao and more distant cover will be given by KB and surface units. Koepang reported to have some bombers at the airfield and some 5000 troops.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 11/1/2011 11:13:32 AM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Puhis)

Post #: 240

Page: << < prev 6 7 [8] 9 10 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Aboard the Red Castle - Erkki(J) vs. Smeulders(A) - no lookin'!