Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Panzer Corps >> StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 1:52:25 PM   
Zerstorer


Posts: 19
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline 		Just a minor observation while playing the Gustav Line scenario - the StuG IV is mistakenly displayed (icon) and listed (purchase screen) as an artillery unit instead of an AT. (it was a StuG III superstructure on a Pz IV chassis - cheaper substitue for the JgPz IV).

_____________________________

The Original Panzer General Zerstorer
Post #: 1
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 2:16:32 PM   
Rudankort


Posts: 230
Joined: 12/4/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zerstorer

Just a minor observation while playing the Gustav Line scenario - the StuG IV is mistakenly displayed (icon) and listed (purchase screen) as an artillery unit instead of an AT. (it was a StuG III superstructure on a Pz IV chassis - cheaper substitue for the JgPz IV).


StuG IV is a multipurpose unit which can be switched between arty and AT role. I guess the decision to place it in arty class was made because of upgrade path reasons.

(in reply to Zerstorer)
Post #: 2
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 5:48:59 PM   
homunculus88

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/23/2011
Status: offline 		Well, that´s interesting. The only unit I knew of, that could switch was the 88mm Flak. Could you give a list, which units are "switchable"?

Also, it´s not quite clear why the StuG IV is singled out as a switchable unit. Because, as the OP said, it´s not much different of a StuG IIIG or StuG IIIF/8.

Be that as it may, "switch" is an interesting mechanic.

And, as it can´t be said often enough: GREAT GAME!!!

(in reply to Rudankort)
Post #: 3
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 6:47:51 PM   
Dragoon.


Posts: 175
Joined: 3/2/2003
From: Rio Grande do Sul
Status: offline 		I thought it was a typo. I mean StuGIII variants existed in mass including StuH42 with an 105mm howitzer but except for a prototype I never read about a StugIV equipped with a howitzer. There were some issue with the prototype as well and it would been too time consuming to fix elevation problems. Even the 88 variant was only a prototype. Mass production only saw it equipped with an 75mm gun and using 75mm HE rounds as arty support in 1944? Comes up a bit short on TNT or?


< Message edited by Dragoon -- 7/27/2011 6:48:21 PM >

(in reply to homunculus88)
Post #: 4
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 8:13:24 PM   
Zerstorer


Posts: 19
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rudankort

StuG IV is a multipurpose unit which can be switched between arty and AT role. I guess the decision to place it in arty class was made because of upgrade path reasons.



While the Germans certainly used many types of equipment in multiple roles, the StuG IV was equiped with the 75mm PaK 39 L/48 (or the 75mm StuK 40 L/48 - which were ballistically the same) and was used almost exclusively in the AT role... it was designed to be a less expensive version of the JgPz IV (another AT unit). Both the JgPz IV and StuG IV use the same weapon and AT ammo. The game is depicting it as if it was similar to the StuH 42 - infantry support unit (ART) equiped with 105mm L/28 howitzer with HE rounds.

Hopefully the StuG IV will be re-classified as an AT unit.

By the way, the addition of an equipment upgrade path is another nice edition to the game system.

< Message edited by Zerstorer -- 7/27/2011 8:47:20 PM >

_____________________________

The Original Panzer General Zerstorer

(in reply to Rudankort)
Post #: 5
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 8:56:23 PM   
misesfan

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 3/15/2008
Status: offline 		That would change the campaign a bit since the southern wing in the Low Countries scenario is given a non-core Stug as Artillery support.


< Message edited by pwieland -- 7/27/2011 8:57:00 PM >

(in reply to Dragoon.)
Post #: 6
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 9:13:48 PM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline 		I've notice the Russian SU 76's are also artillery. That doesn't seem right either. I thought they were the Russian tank destroyers.

(in reply to misesfan)
Post #: 7
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/27/2011 10:30:32 PM   
homunculus88

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 7/23/2011
Status: offline 		IIRC the assault gun in the Low Countries is a StuG IIIA with a short 75mm L/24 gun. This type was in reality used as an infantry support weapon and not a tank hunter. So it´s ok to be in the artillery class.

< Message edited by homunculus88 -- 7/27/2011 10:31:18 PM >

(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 8
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 12:09:42 AM   
Dragoon.


Posts: 175
Joined: 3/2/2003
From: Rio Grande do Sul
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

I've notice the Russian SU 76's are also artillery. That doesn't seem right either. I thought they were the Russian tank destroyers.


It's somewhat funny if you think that after Stalingrad they converted captured StuGIII and designated them SU-76i. :) However despite the name similarity had no connection with SU-76 Russian SP-gun. Except maybe to inspire the Russians to build their own series of SP-guns.

(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 9
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 12:35:04 AM   
Zerstorer


Posts: 19
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

I've notice the Russian SU 76's are also artillery. That doesn't seem right either. I thought they were the Russian tank destroyers.


I haven't had time to play out all the campaigns yet, but you are correct the SU-76 was an AT unit -a 76.2mm mounted on a T-70 chassis- (called the "Suka" or "bitch"... it wasn't very popular with its crews).

_____________________________

The Original Panzer General Zerstorer

(in reply to Dragoon.)
Post #: 10
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 3:03:57 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: James Ward

I've notice the Russian SU 76's are also artillery. That doesn't seem right either. I thought they were the Russian tank destroyers.


SU76 is multipupose. It is mainly an infantry support gun. But it can also deal with tanks since it carries APCR rounds. The gun can be elevated very high and do indirect fire unlike real tank destroyers.

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 11
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 5:35:46 AM   
Zerstorer


Posts: 19
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline 		Agree, the SU-76 might be a very good example of a multi-purpose unit. Although its indirect fire capability wasn't particularly effective (small explosive charge), its was a excellent infantry support vehicle. So game wise, it could be designated as either (or both) AT & ART with a limited range of 1 hex - representing it's common close support useage.

_____________________________

The Original Panzer General Zerstorer

(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 12
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 5:51:47 PM   
misesfan

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 3/15/2008
Status: offline 		However ART class units have the unique ability to not be counterattacked when attacking. Should the Stug be given this ability?

(in reply to Zerstorer)
Post #: 13
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 6:18:09 PM   
Zerstorer


Posts: 19
Joined: 7/18/2011
Status: offline 		I would divide the Sturmgeshutz assault guns into two classes according to their primary roles:

StuG III A/B (range 1) + StuH F/G (range 2) Artillery

StuG III F/F8/G + StuG IV = Antitank (no ranged attack)

< Message edited by Zerstorer -- 7/28/2011 6:21:02 PM >

_____________________________

The Original Panzer General Zerstorer

(in reply to misesfan)
Post #: 14
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/28/2011 6:22:20 PM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline 		Perhaps the SU 76 could be avaliable in both catagories with slightly modified stas to reflect the role.

(in reply to Zerstorer)
Post #: 15
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/29/2011 3:13:24 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		SU 76 already has this function.

(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 16
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/29/2011 4:21:07 AM   
James Ward

 

Posts: 1183
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Razz

SU 76 already has this function.


Does the AI use it? Every time I encounter them they are artillery.

(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 17
RE: StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART - 7/30/2011 10:50:54 PM   
KerenskyLI


Posts: 113
Joined: 7/30/2011
Status: offline 		The AI does not know how to switch unit roles.

The AI will use units in both roles if the unit is pre-placed.  Bersaglieri and the Bear map has a SU-122 in AT and two SU-122 in ARTY form.


< Message edited by KerenskyLI -- 7/30/2011 10:51:05 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to James Ward)
Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Panzer Corps >> StuG IV should be AT unit vice ART Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.352