Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Checking the fleet....

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Checking the fleet.... Page: <<   < prev  22 23 24 25 [26]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 4/12/2013 1:52:33 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		I, for one, I am happy that this is slowly moving forward. It will be an interesting mod, that is for sure :)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 751
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 4/12/2013 4:00:34 PM   
MateDow


Posts: 218
Joined: 8/6/2002
Status: offline 		Is it safe to assume that this mod will be based on the Babes as well?

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 752
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 4/12/2013 8:30:03 PM   
FatR

 

Posts: 2522
Joined: 10/23/2009
From: St.Petersburg, Russia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MateDow

Is it safe to assume that this mod will be based on the Babes as well?


Yes, it does. Its naval side is based on Scen 28C. The ground side uses the stock unit structure (base forces instead of many small units), though. As far as I can see - didn't have much interest in ground OOB.

_____________________________

The Reluctant Admiral mod team.

Take a look at the latest released version of the Reluctant Admiral mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to MateDow)
Post #: 753
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 5/4/2013 11:40:32 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Instead of this being permanently restricted to the West Coast of USA until being withdrawn in early '45, can just 'one' American armoured division be able to be bought out (PP)??




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to FatR)
Post #: 754
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 5/6/2013 3:23:58 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		Having played RA into March '45, have you considered increasing allied air production slightly? In this mod, with all the streamlining of Japanese air production, you can get airframes almost a year ahead of RL production( the M8 Zero comes to mind, sitting here at work). As Allies, you have so many LSI's and LST's you can walk across the pacific if you put them bow to stern. But virtually every air campaign will come to a halt due to a lack of airframes. Fighter pools are very tight, so are heavy bomber pools, and light bomber pools will dry up. Reducing Landing Ship inventories and increasing airframe production would seem an intelligent trade off. Real Life production was drawn down due to the fact that the Japanese economy, and by association it's war machine, was noticeably being impacted by early '44. Air superiority had been achieved. That is not the case here, where the Japanese war machine can sustain itself with "banked" industry far beyond historical norms.

Just an opinion.


<edit>

Dang, I thought I was in the RA post. Having IT issues at work, took 3 tries to even upload this

< Message edited by Lecivius -- 5/6/2013 9:01:15 PM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 755
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 5/6/2013 4:27:09 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Those are EXCELLENT observations. Can you Post more specific recommendations over on the RA Thread? I think you have gone farther into the Mod then just about anyone. WELL DONE!

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 756
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/7/2013 7:31:25 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Day dreaming here, but how about switching the FM-1 (30/month)& 2 (128/month) Wildcats over to Corsairs?? Those two models are too slow and pretty much useless for Allied players.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 757
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/7/2013 8:04:59 PM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline 		One problem in Real History - they wouldn't fit on CVE's.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 758
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/7/2013 8:15:30 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

One problem in Real History - they wouldn't fit on CVE's.


I can make a HR that doesn't put them on. I'll keep Corsairs on my CV & CVLs and Hellcats on CVEs.

This is a simulation, so lots of things are not historical.

_____________________________


(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 759
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/10/2013 10:54:03 PM   
VManteuffel

 

Posts: 22
Joined: 8/10/2013
Status: offline 		Nice work, and addictive theories

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 760
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/10/2013 11:03:58 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RevRick

One problem in Real History - they wouldn't fit on CVE's.


This is not 100% correct. The biggest US CVE's could, and did, carry them.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 761
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/11/2013 7:34:53 PM   
RevRick


Posts: 2617
Joined: 9/16/2000
From: Thomasville, GA
Status: offline 		I don't think it was a whole lot of them, though. By and large, most F4U's went to the fleet carriers and CVLs, didn't they? The only CVE's that I know of that could hand F4U's were the Commencement Bay class and they were commissioned in late 44 and on.

_____________________________

"Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 762
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 8/12/2013 3:41:49 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline 		Thing about the Commencement Bays was they were designed and fitted with catapults. Otherwise they were very similar to, and of a size with, the Sangamon class. Their flight deck lengths were within 1 foot of one another, only the designed-in catapults allowed F4U operations.

I too would limit the availability of F4Us on CVEs to the Commencement Bays and perhaps the Sangamons, but would make the Sangamons get an “upgrade” that includes a virtual catapult before allowing F4U ops from them.

just mho. JWE

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to RevRick)
Post #: 763
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 3/3/2014 3:33:28 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		BUMP

Bringing this forward to read with discussion on the new Treaty Mod.

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 764
RE: Checking the fleet.... - 3/7/2014 6:57:55 PM   
Jellicoe


Posts: 157
Joined: 9/26/2012
From: Kent, UK
Status: offline 		As a marginal aside could I put in a suggestion that as a reaction to the much increased Japanese naval strength posited in RA that the USN would put rather more effort into their negotiations with the Chileans to purchase/lease Almirante Latorre and the 6 Serrano class destroyers (equivalent to RN A class - HMS Arrow in the game. Discussions certainly took place but the Chileans were reluctant due to issues with Argentina. A more pressured situation may have pushed the US to up their price. I am a real sucker for those classic 5 turret RN dreadnoughts and it would be great to see one in the game. Shouldn't make too much balance difference either as she is about the equivalent of a Fuso at best.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 765
Page:   <<   < prev  22 23 24 25 [26]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Checking the fleet.... Page: <<   < prev  22 23 24 25 [26]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.531