Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 2:42:25 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did another attrition attack on that stack of 3 Finn divisions. Got another 380 of them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 271
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 2:49:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a listing of the Rifle Divisions sorted on "Guard" status.....as you can see I have quite a few of them already




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 272
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 3:52:41 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's my T33 moves with an overlay to show my attacks. I eleminated two Finn Divisions near Lake Lodoga but other than that it was just a steady push everywhere again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 273
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 4:01:20 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production for T33




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 274
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 8:02:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I did an animation of the changes from turn 16 to turn 33. Quite a sight. Constant pushing to the west for about 17 turns now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 275
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 9:58:35 PM   
olivier34

 

Posts: 1055
Joined: 5/10/2010
From: montpellier
Status: offline 		Great animation Larry !

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 276
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 10:38:02 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		As a rule of thumb, if you are Soviet, and you are threatening Minsk, Kiev, and Odessa in the winter of 41-42, your opponent is losing. Badly. Really Badly.

I don't understand how he could allow Finns to get surrounded.

_____________________________


(in reply to olivier34)
Post #: 277
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/25/2011 10:55:53 PM   
jzardos


Posts: 662
Joined: 3/15/2011
Status: offline 		Larry,

Nice touch with animation!

I'm going to start an AAR, can you please tell me what tools you used to do the animation? I'm somewhat of a graphic tools noob.


(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 278
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/26/2011 2:43:10 AM   
Farfarer61

 

Posts: 713
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

As a rule of thumb, if you are Soviet, and you are threatening Minsk, Kiev, and Odessa in the winter of 41-42, your opponent is losing. Badly. Really Badly.

I don't understand how he could allow Finns to get surrounded.


I know I guy who had a bad breakup from from a Finn as she wasn't willing to, let us say to all the way to Moscow- maybe this is the same thing. :)

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 279
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 - 8/26/2011 4:45:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jzardos
Larry,
Nice touch with animation!
I'm going to start an AAR, can you please tell me what tools you used to do the animation? I'm somewhat of a graphic tools noob.


It's increadibly easy and I think it looks pretty good in an AAR. I use MSPaint to "position" the screenshots so they "overlap" correctly saving the images as files and then I use GIFanimator to string together the two screenshots into a GIF file and then just upload the GIF file to the forum.

You can find the GIFAnimator here:

GIFAnimator

EDIT: Maybe I should post a couple of pictures to show how to use the GIFAnimator. Or at least how I use it:

Or click on this for GIFAnimator instructions


< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/26/2011 4:49:01 AM >

(in reply to jzardos)
Post #: 280
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 4:52:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T34 front lines before any Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 281
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 4:59:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Recon showed me where the rest of the Finns are. I have no idea why he didn't move them into a better position ( to defend the other Finns being attacked). I'll bet he's sitting in level 15 forts and is ready for me.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 282
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:01:28 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I got another 318 of them this turn. Just 100 more turns to go.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 283
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:27:04 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a CR of my Infantry divisions with the biggest in terms of men sorted to the top. I've got a lot of fairly-good-CV divisions now. It's making a difference on the battlefield.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/26/2011 5:28:25 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 284
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:30:49 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I've got 34 Guards Rifle Divisions now. More are needed. Lots are pending.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 285
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:43:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I wish there was some way to find out beforehand what it's going to cost in AP's to send an AA unit attached to a city back to the NR. Clicking on that little X in the box will deduct AP's from your total and you have to figure out yourself from the different AP numbers ( before and after clicking ) what it has cost you. Seldom do I wish to pay an inflated price to do this to an AA unit. I wish I knew before I clilcked on it.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 286
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:48:05 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's what it costs me to build something. I did build 2 Cav Divisions so I would have a stack of three of them to make a Cav Corps. Cost me 40 AP's to do that so far. I'm wondering if they are worth it. Cav Corps. I mean.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 287
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 5:55:33 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a typical attack result........the Axis backs up but it costs me at least twice as many men in losses. Good thing I can afford to do this on a regular basis. I'll win in the long run I know, but it just seems like a gigantic waste is all.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 288
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 7:27:59 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Okie dokie........I moved all the Soviet stuff, did a bunch of Axis air base strikes and lots and lots of land combat attacks. Here's the Soviet moves with an overlay showing my attacks. I'm getting a lot of "held" results lately. Maybe I should think about going on the defensive even though it's only Feb 5, 1941.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 289
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 7:34:11 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units and production. I have bou cou tanks in the pool maybe I should build some more tank units?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 290
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 3:19:11 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		Are Cav Corps worth it?

You lost hardly any Cav Divisions in 1941 (only 10, and of those a few are 100% doomed at the start). So, you should be able to build quite a few Cav Corps without building any new divisions. I didn't in my game vs. Tarhunnas, although I did "Corps Up" every single Cav Division pretty quickly.

Cav Corps are amazingly useful; they are more mobile than infantry, especially in winter, and until you get Rifle Corps are the strongest units you get. As a bonus, they don't hog vehicles. They don't have alot of oomph on their own, but attach 1 Sapper and 2 Tank Units, and they get tougher.

I would probably hoard the APs, though, for creating Tank Corps in April. Make sure you have alot of APs heading into March, because you'll want to immediatly convert all those Tank Bdes into Corps.

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 291
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T34 - 8/26/2011 7:52:17 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Good advice ..........thanks Q-ball dude.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 292
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/26/2011 7:56:22 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T35 front lines before any Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 293
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/26/2011 7:59:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My attacks on those three Finn divisions got another 376 men. Only 99 more turns to go.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 294
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/26/2011 11:54:10 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I'm running into a problem. Those Axis units with low CV I can usually make back up, but the stacks with substantial CV in them I call hard nuggots because I can't do much with them. I end up having to go around them most of the time.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 295
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/27/2011 12:10:00 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		KLilly has used fortifications to build a bunch of strong points. Now I'm stymied and don't yet have the strength to overcome these.
Going to defensive mode is looking better and better.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 296
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/27/2011 12:41:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Okie dokie I moved all the Soviet stuff and did some Axis air base attacks and had lots of land combat. Here's the front lines now with an overlay showing my attacks.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 297
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/27/2011 12:44:34 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Oh yeah, I forgot to mention that I got a lot more Guards Rifle Divisions this turn.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 298
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/27/2011 12:47:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 299
RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T35 - 8/27/2011 6:17:40 AM   
Zebedee


Posts: 535
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline 		The Axis certainly have tried to preserve their mobile forces this winter. Not seen much of them at all the past few turns - the odd hint of them on the flanks of that bulge going west to Minsk and around Kiev but not much else as they build back up towards 3k afvs.

Definitely covered a lot of ground in the winter offensive Larry. Good luck with 42.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.04.39 KLilly vs Fulkerson T33 Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.531