Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 3:42:57 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And I should mention the army from the Western Front next.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 481
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 3:48:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the three Armies inside the pocket.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 482
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 3:51:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And on the north end of the pocket we have another Army. The units on the east side of the pocket are just singleton divisions from
various Fronts.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 483
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 4:00:19 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Next we have four Armies from the Voronez Front




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 484
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 4:05:59 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And on the southeast side of the pocket we have a mixed bag of three Armies from various Fronts:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 485
RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 4:27:26 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		And here's a depiction of the various Armies from various fronts inside the Crimea "pocket"




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 486
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 - 10/1/2011 4:39:36 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 487
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 2:28:47 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T65 front lines before any Soviet recon or Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 488
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 2:35:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a close up of the pocket. I'm afraid the guys inside the pocket are goners.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 489
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 5:25:58 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Did I happen to mention that I managed to move an Axis unit and relieve the pocket for supply purposes? This is probably the last time
they are going to see any supply.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 490
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 5:29:03 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 491
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 7:45:13 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		His line and his logistics chain are far, far, far too long

He has a huge stretch of his line North of Stalino held by Minor Allies.

If they don't move, then Cavalry Corps and Armor Bdes will be able to really threaten his communications with the units that are in the Kuban and over the Don (I'm assuming that they will withdraw, but you never know)



_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 492
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T65 - 10/2/2011 10:26:07 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Thanks, Encircled dude, for that observation.  Maybe this winter offensive ought to start with my units near those Axis allies and push to the sea. Or better yet, maybe a two-pronged approach, one prong going north from the Crimea. Or maybe just pushing those lines further together will convince him he needs to pull out.  

EDIT: Thought I'd insert a picture of the area in question from T66. I just opened the turn from the server and saw this.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/2/2011 10:40:02 PM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 493
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/2/2011 10:51:37 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T66 front lines after Soviet recon but before Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 494
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/2/2011 11:00:33 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I pieced together some old screenshots from T65 and T66 and made this animation showing how KLilly is pushing to the NW and
the pocket is slowly being digested from the north down.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 495
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/2/2011 11:07:05 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		That spot where I relieved the pocket last turn is now sealed off again. And there's another smaller pocket forming ( blue circle ) that I
need to back out of pretty quickly or I'll lose another three or four units there.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 496
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/2/2011 11:20:48 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I spent 30 AP's on 6 rifle brigades in V-town ( blue circle ) and I'm thinking of buying some more in Kursk. KLilly is going to continue
his attacking up until at least the start of the mud turns I'm guessing, so I'm thinking I'll be needing some more manpower on the front
lines real soon now.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/2/2011 11:21:43 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 497
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/2/2011 11:59:40 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I just discovered a disaster. The rail isn't working from Sevastopol. All my guys in the Crimea are starving for supplies. Look at them.....
they're all cherry red from lack of supplies and fuel etc. I'm thinking I have to pull these guys back to the entrances to the Crimea and
set up shop there. Most of these guys can be used somewhere else that way. What do you guys think I should do with this situation?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 498
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/4/2011 7:13:13 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		The previous post was a result of the 1.05.28 supply bug.  I've now upgraded to the 1.05.30 and they are in supply now.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 499
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/4/2011 7:15:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		KLilly has broken through in T68 ( again ). This is the T68 front lines before any recon or movement.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 500
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T66 - 10/5/2011 5:39:08 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the T69 front lines after Soviet recon but before Soviet movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 501
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/5/2011 6:12:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		In one of the major surprizes for me so far in this game, THIS is one of them. KLilly, it appears, has pulled his units back to re-form in a
different place, probably closer to his supply lines. I guess I'll just have to advance to fill the vacuum left there. That mega-pocket he
formed in the last three turns is almost gone now. Just a couple of remnants have managed to hold on this long for one reason or
another.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 502
RE: 1.05.28beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/5/2011 7:01:48 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		So um..........hey you guys. I've created one of those Combined Arms HQ units and now I don't quite know what to do with it. Is it just
for air bases alone or can I assign ground units to it as well? The tag with the leader says restrictions: "Air Only" so I'm guessing it's
just for air bases. Right?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 503
1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/5/2011 7:23:10 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Okie dokie.......here's my moves such as they are:








Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/5/2011 7:37:07 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 504
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/5/2011 7:43:04 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the OOB, losses, destroyed units, and production:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 505
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/6/2011 6:36:54 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Turn 70:

Um........I just got the T70 moves from KLilly off the server and was taking a look around ( I'll post the front lines shortly, don't worry ) and
I found this little statistic. None of the captured equipment is being used except for a 37MM AT gun in one of my units. All that stuff is
still in the pool. Just thought you'd like to know that.

EDIT: I just looked at the picture again........maybe it's two 37mm AT guns in one of my units.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 10/6/2011 6:38:01 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 506
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T70 - 10/6/2011 6:42:15 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		T70: Here's the front lines before any recon or movement:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 507
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/6/2011 6:48:57 AM   
Flapdrol

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 8/18/2011
Status: offline 		Perhaps a stupid question, but why are you attacking in Finland? What is your strategic goal?

You need about 6 divisions up north digging in deep and the fortified zones outside Leningrad, and that's it for the rest of the war. You have killed a few Finnish divisions, so Finland has no offensive power left.

Those corps would do much more good either defending in the south or attacking near Riga or in the center.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 508
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T70 - 10/6/2011 7:02:21 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		This is another one of those MUD turns when nothing important happens.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 509
RE: 1.05.30beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T68 - 10/6/2011 7:06:37 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Flapdrol
Perhaps a stupid question, but why are you attacking in Finland? What is your strategic goal?

Um.......so I thought maybe I could drive the Finns out of the war entirely. Maybe I won't make it anytime soon but I'm thinking that my
attacking the Finns is helping the war effort by siphening off some replacements and equipment etc. and that maybe sometime in the
future I might be able to get so far into Finland that they would just drop out of the war effort. It happened in one of my AI test games
and I was able to rail an entire front worth of troops down to the NorthWest Front to continue the effort. Of course, this all happened in
late '42 and early '43 but it DID happen. So I thought maybe I'd just do it again.

(in reply to Flapdrol)
Post #: 510
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: 1.05.23 beta KLilly vs Fulkerson T63 Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.172